Crondall Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2017 – 2032 October 17 1
NP Site Exhibition – October 2017 Update on progress to date Review the Vision and Objectives for the Plan Opportunity to see details of the sites proposed by the public Understand the process for site assessment Comment on the available sites Comment on a proposed Local Gap Comment on the possible Local Green Spaces Understand the next stages October 17 2
Progress to date Formal approval to create a plan given in July 2016 Working group established in October 2016 Parish wide survey and exhibitions in January 2017 Reponses presented at Annual Parish meeting in April and published on the CPC website Monthly working group meetings with feedback to the CPC and minutes published on the website Call for Sites opened and followed up by meetings with site owners and developers to understand land availability and possible site layouts Grant for £4,950 secured in April 2017 External consultant appointed in April 2017 Drafting of policies in progress October 17 3
In Information derived fr from the Questionnaire results Most liked Least liked • Sense of community • Traffic • Rural environment • Parking • Threat of development • Countryside • Flooding • Village amenities 88% want to encourage wildlife 95% want to protect and maintain the conservation area 86% believe the views in and out of the conservation area are important Wide support to protect green spaces to retain the rural feel and limit local development. Creation of a Local Gap to the north of Crondall widely supported October 17 4
Vision and Objectives “Crondall will continue to be a thriving and sustainable community, with its inherent historic and social character as a rural village and parish nurtured, enhanced and protected for the benefit of residents and future generations” ➢ To have maintained and improved a sense of community as evidenced by commitment and involvement in village activities ➢ To have achieved a stable and flourishing rural Parish with excellent access to the countryside and prosperous village and farming communities ➢ To have retained the active Churches, School, Village Hall, two pubs and the village shop in a supportive society ➢ To have achieved a reasonable balance between the supply and the demand for the types of housing required in the Parish ➢ To have improved the infrastructure to all the properties in the Parish in terms of roads, electricity, gas, water and drainage ➢ To have preserved or enhanced the Conservation Area with its historic assets ➢ To have maintained the rural character of the parish and the significant views in and out of the village ➢ To have influenced a reduction in the volume and speeding of through traffic in the village and the narrow lanes in the Parish ➢ To have supported existing and encouraged additional small businesses and home working, especially through the provision of high-speed broadband October 17 5
Map showing possible sites October 17 6
Parish Site List Site Ref Location Site Ref Location SHL 73 Land West of Crondall (behind CRON 10 Hurst House, Bowling Alley Greensprings & Pankridge St) SHL 74 Land behind the Scout Hut CRON 11 Bowling Alley, behind Hurst House SHL 76 Old Parsonage Meadow CRON 19 The Horns (Bowling Alley) SHL 159 Land at Dippenhall Street CRON 20 Windamoor Farm SHL 178 Broden Stables Redlands Lane CRON 21 The Bungalow, Pankridge Street SHL 179 Mill Lane East of Bowenhurst CRON 22 Marsh Farm Business Park (Bowling Alley) CRON 02 Well Road Field CRON 23 Land at Erlands House (Bowling Alley) CRON 03 Clare Park Development CRON 24 Land at Itchel Manor CRON 04 Clifton Barn (Croft Lane) CRON 25 Upper Clare Park Farm CRON 08 Phantom Motors Site CRON 26 Lower Clare Park Farm CRON 09 Bowling Alley (Phantom Motors) CRON 27 17-19 St Cross Road October 17 7
Site Criteria (1 (1) Ref Name Description Reason for Inclusion Policy Reference 1 Access & Safety The access to the new properties is good Traffic and safety was the biggest NPPF Policy 4 with clear sight lines and low impact on concern for residents, particularly Promoting sustainable the existing roadway and/or junction. the volume of traffic passing transport Traffic in and out of the site will not cause through the centre of the village Para 32. Safe and suitable any safety concerns to local residents. access to the site can be maintained for all people 2 Infrastructure Will it be easy to get Water, Electricity, Essential for the site to be NPPF Para 162 Sewerage etc. into and out of the site? developed without major Consider the sufficiency and In particular, consider the impact on dependency on infrastructure capacity of wastewater existing sewer /waste system which is a providers (Utility companies) infrastructure key concern. 3 Sustainable The site is located in a position that will New houses should be able to NPPF Policy 3 Location enable access to key services and access local amenities without Supporting a prosperous facilities. significantly increasing the traffic rural economy flow. 4 PDL The site is on Previously Developed Land Development on brown field sites is NPPF Para 17.8 and 111 or “Brown Field”. Has there been some encouraged by Hart and was also Annex 2 excludes: land that non-agricultural building on the site flagged by respondents as an is or has been occupied by previously? important consideration in agricultural or forestry identifying sites. buildings 5 Rural Impact Will the site impact on the rural This was an important factor for the NPPF Policy 11 landscape? Will it contribute towards refusal on Broden Stables that was Conserving and enhancing urbanisation of the countryside? recently decided by Hart with the natural / valued specific reference to policies GEN1 environment and RUR2. Para 109 – 113 October 17 8
Site Criteria (2 (2) Ref Name Description Reason for Inclusion Policy Reference Flooding was the 4 th most important 6 Flood Risk Is the site well clear of regions of high flood risk NPPF policy 10 and not included in flood zones 2 and 3? concern for respondents Meeting the challenge Is it likely that the site will contribute to Hart have already discounted sites within of climate change, unacceptable levels of surface water run off? flood zones 2 and 3. flooding and coastal change. 7 Settlement Area Is the site within or adjacent to the Village CON22 does not allow development that NPPF Policy 6 Boundary but not impacting the settlement adversely affects the character or setting Para 55. Avoid new pattern and shape? of a settlement or leads to the loss of isolated homes in the important areas of open countryside. countryside 8 Conservation Will the development preserve or enhance the CON13 does not allow development that NPPF Policy 12 Conservation Area, particularly the views in will cause demonstrable harm to the Conserving and and out of the village? character of the Conservation Area. enhancing the historic Would development of the site impact any 95% of respondents said the environment heritage assets or listed buildings and their Conservation Area should be maintained NPPF Policy 7 Requiring curtilage? good design 9 Local Gaps Will the site reduce the size and appearance of 86% of respondents wanted to maintain Hart LDP para 158 an important Local Gap? Local Gaps to avoid convergence of settlements 10 Local Green Will the site detract from a Local Green Space Half of the respondents nominated NPPF Policy 8 Spaces that has been suggested in the Neighbourhood specific locations as green spaces with Promoting healthy Plan? 265 suggestions made. communities. 88% of respondents supported more being done to encourage wildlife through the use of green spaces. October 17 9
Conservation Area Map October 17 10
Local Gap A Local Gap between Crondall and the A287 to prevent coalescence with Church Crookham is being proposed. NB The NP gap is only south of the A287, not as proposed to Hart by CPC which transcended the parish boundary October 17 11
Possible Local Green Spaces Areas to be considered – as identified by the Questionnaire responses and through the NPPF. 2. Farnham Road 3. Old Parsonage 4. Churchyard and Recreation Ground Meadow 1. Hook Meadow Burial Ground (SHLA 76) (Football Field ) 5. School Playing 8. Land east of 7. Well Road Field 6. Four Acre Field Fields Pankridge Street (CRON 02) Section 77 of the NPPF defines a Local Green Space as follows: • Where the green space is in reasonably close proximity to the community it serves: • Where the green area is demonstrably special to a local community and holds a particular significance, for example because of its beauty, historic significance, recreational value (including as a playing field), tranquillity or richness of its wildlife; and • Where the green area concerned is local in character and is not an extensive tract of land. A Local Green Space can be privately owned space, even if it is not accessible by the public. October 17 12
Possible Local Green Space Locations October 17 13
Recommend
More recommend
