Crondall Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2017 2032 October 17 1 NP Site - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Crondall Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2017 2032 October 17 1 NP Site Exhibition October 2017 Update on progress to date Review the Vision and Objectives for the Plan Opportunity to see details of the sites proposed by the public
October 17 1
October 17
2
Formal approval to create a plan given in July 2016 Working group established in October 2016 Parish wide survey and exhibitions in January 2017 Reponses presented at Annual Parish meeting in April and published on the CPC website Monthly working group meetings with feedback to the CPC and minutes published on the website Call for Sites opened and followed up by meetings with site owners and developers to understand land availability and possible site layouts Grant for £4,950 secured in April 2017 External consultant appointed in April 2017 Drafting of policies in progress
October 17 3
88% want to encourage wildlife 95% want to protect and maintain the conservation area 86% believe the views in and out of the conservation area are important Wide support to protect green spaces to retain the rural feel and limit local development. Creation of a Local Gap to the north of Crondall widely supported
October 17 4
“Crondall will continue to be a thriving and sustainable community, with its inherent historic and social character as a rural village and parish nurtured, enhanced and protected for the benefit of residents and future generations”
➢To have maintained and improved a sense of community as evidenced by commitment and involvement in village activities ➢To have achieved a stable and flourishing rural Parish with excellent access to the countryside and prosperous village and farming communities ➢To have retained the active Churches, School, Village Hall, two pubs and the village shop in a supportive society ➢To have achieved a reasonable balance between the supply and the demand for the types of housing required in the Parish ➢To have improved the infrastructure to all the properties in the Parish in terms of roads, electricity, gas, water and drainage ➢To have preserved or enhanced the Conservation Area with its historic assets ➢To have maintained the rural character of the parish and the significant views in and out of the village ➢To have influenced a reduction in the volume and speeding of through traffic in the village and the narrow lanes in the Parish ➢To have supported existing and encouraged additional small businesses and home working, especially through the provision of high-speed broadband
October 17 5
October 17 6
October 17
Site Ref Location Site Ref Location
SHL 73 Land West of Crondall (behind Greensprings & Pankridge St) CRON 10 Hurst House, Bowling Alley SHL 74 Land behind the Scout Hut CRON 11 Bowling Alley, behind Hurst House SHL 76 Old Parsonage Meadow CRON 19 The Horns (Bowling Alley) SHL 159 Land at Dippenhall Street CRON 20 Windamoor Farm SHL 178 Broden Stables Redlands Lane CRON 21 The Bungalow, Pankridge Street SHL 179 Mill Lane East of Bowenhurst CRON 22 Marsh Farm Business Park (Bowling Alley) CRON 02 Well Road Field CRON 23 Land at Erlands House (Bowling Alley) CRON 03 Clare Park Development CRON 24 Land at Itchel Manor CRON 04 Clifton Barn (Croft Lane) CRON 25 Upper Clare Park Farm CRON 08 Phantom Motors Site CRON 26 Lower Clare Park Farm CRON 09 Bowling Alley (Phantom Motors) CRON 27 17-19 St Cross Road
7
October 17
Ref Name Description Reason for Inclusion Policy Reference 1 Access & Safety The access to the new properties is good with clear sight lines and low impact on the existing roadway and/or junction. Traffic in and out of the site will not cause any safety concerns to local residents. Traffic and safety was the biggest concern for residents, particularly the volume of traffic passing through the centre of the village NPPF Policy 4 Promoting sustainable transport Para 32. Safe and suitable access to the site can be maintained for all people 2 Infrastructure Will it be easy to get Water, Electricity, Sewerage etc. into and out of the site? In particular, consider the impact on existing sewer /waste system which is a key concern. Essential for the site to be developed without major dependency on infrastructure providers (Utility companies) NPPF Para 162 Consider the sufficiency and capacity of wastewater infrastructure 3 Sustainable Location The site is located in a position that will enable access to key services and facilities. New houses should be able to access local amenities without significantly increasing the traffic flow. NPPF Policy 3 Supporting a prosperous rural economy 4 PDL The site is on Previously Developed Land
non-agricultural building on the site previously? Development on brown field sites is encouraged by Hart and was also flagged by respondents as an important consideration in identifying sites. NPPF Para 17.8 and 111 Annex 2 excludes: land that is or has been occupied by agricultural or forestry buildings 5 Rural Impact Will the site impact on the rural landscape? Will it contribute towards urbanisation of the countryside? This was an important factor for the refusal on Broden Stables that was recently decided by Hart with specific reference to policies GEN1 and RUR2. NPPF Policy 11 Conserving and enhancing the natural / valued environment Para 109 – 113
8
October 17 Ref Name Description Reason for Inclusion Policy Reference 6 Flood Risk Is the site well clear of regions of high flood risk and not included in flood zones 2 and 3? Is it likely that the site will contribute to unacceptable levels of surface water run off? Flooding was the 4th most important concern for respondents Hart have already discounted sites within flood zones 2 and 3. NPPF policy 10 Meeting the challenge
flooding and coastal change. 7 Settlement Area Is the site within or adjacent to the Village Boundary but not impacting the settlement pattern and shape? CON22 does not allow development that adversely affects the character or setting
important areas of open countryside. NPPF Policy 6 Para 55. Avoid new isolated homes in the countryside 8 Conservation Will the development preserve or enhance the Conservation Area, particularly the views in and out of the village? Would development of the site impact any heritage assets or listed buildings and their curtilage? CON13 does not allow development that will cause demonstrable harm to the character of the Conservation Area. 95% of respondents said the Conservation Area should be maintained NPPF Policy 12 Conserving and enhancing the historic environment NPPF Policy 7 Requiring good design 9 Local Gaps Will the site reduce the size and appearance of an important Local Gap? 86% of respondents wanted to maintain Local Gaps to avoid convergence of settlements Hart LDP para 158 10 Local Green Spaces Will the site detract from a Local Green Space that has been suggested in the Neighbourhood Plan? Half of the respondents nominated specific locations as green spaces with 265 suggestions made. 88% of respondents supported more being done to encourage wildlife through the use of green spaces. NPPF Policy 8 Promoting healthy communities. 9
October 17 10
A Local Gap between Crondall and the A287 to prevent coalescence with Church Crookham is being proposed.
October 17 11
NB The NP gap is
the A287, not as proposed to Hart by CPC which transcended the parish boundary
Areas to be considered – as identified by the Questionnaire responses and through the NPPF.
October 17
Meadow (SHLA 76)
Recreation Ground (Football Field)
(CRON 02)
Burial Ground
Pankridge Street
Fields
12
Section 77 of the NPPF defines a Local Green Space as follows:
significance, for example because of its beauty, historic significance, recreational value (including as a playing field), tranquillity or richness of its wildlife; and
A Local Green Space can be privately owned space, even if it is not accessible by the public.
October 17 13
October 17 CLGS 1 Hook Meadow
CLGS 5 School Playing Fields
CLGS 2 Farnham Road Recreation Ground (Football Field)
CLGS 6 Four Acre Field
the village
Conservation Area CLGS 3 Old Parsonage Meadow
North and backdrop to numerous listed buildings
CLGS 7 Well Road
landmark CLGS 4 Churchyard and Burial Ground
CLGS 8 Land East of Pankridge Street
14
October 17
Crondall Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2017 – 2032 Draft Submission Plan
Published by the Crondall Parish Council for consultation under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 and the Environment Assessment of Pans & Programmes Regulations 2004.
“Working on behalf of the entire community, to enhance and protect the inherent historic and social rural character of Crondall as a thriving and sustainable rural village and parish, for the benefit
Spatial Plan Housing Site Allocation Housing Mix and Design Local Gaps Local Green Spaces Natural Environment Conservation Community Facilities Open Space and Recreation
15
October 17
Crondall Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2017 – 2032 Draft Submission Plan
Published by the Crondall Parish Council for consultation under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 and the Environment Assessment of Pans & Programmes Regulations 2004.
“Working on behalf of the entire community, to enhance and protect the inherent historic and social rural character of Crondall as a thriving and sustainable rural village and parish, for the benefit
Traffic, Parking and Safety Infrastructure Local Businesses Education These are things we also want to comment on and make suggestions but they are not land based policies
16
land based policies and ‘aims and proposals’.
green spaces, the Objective Assessment of Housing Need
the parish as well as the formal processes that are required
met
October 17 17
Publication of referendum decision and making of the NP Preparation of the NP (pre-submission + supporting material) “Pre-submission NP” CPC agreement Review comments, agree actions & update NP to “submission” “Submission NP” to HDC (with supporting documents)
Examination (Inspector) HDC consideration of the Examiner's recommendations Publication of Examiner's Report and Decision Statement Publication of pre-referendum information statement etc Referendum
CPC NP WG HDC Planning Inspectorate GANTT chart reference
Screening “Pre-submission NP” (& evidence) public consultation SEA/ HBA “Submission NP” CPC agreement
CPC CPC
Public & parishioners Public & parishioners Public & parishioners Questionnaire and evidence gathering Public & parishioners
12 75 71 90 91 107 110 116
“Site assessment Process Check” CPC agreement “Site assessment Process Check” public feedback
CPC
Public & parishioners
56
October 17 18
Review feedback from these sessions Finalise draft of plan Pre Submission Consultation (6 week process)
Review Feedback & Update Plan
Submission to Hart by Parish Council
Legal Check by HDC for statutory documents
Submission Consultation (6 week process)
Comments sent to Examiner
Formal Examination
Review feedback and update plan
Referendum
October 17 19