Crenshaw Corridor Strategic Plan (Draft) Economic Findings November - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Crenshaw Corridor Strategic Plan (Draft) Economic Findings November - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Crenshaw Corridor Strategic Plan (Draft) Economic Findings November 15, 2007 Presented to The Crenshaw Corridor Stakeholder Task Force Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Understanding of the Assignment III. Socio-Demographic Overview
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 2
Table of Contents
I. Introduction II. Understanding of the Assignment III. Socio-Demographic Overview IV. Real Estate Market Overview V. Supportable Development Estimates VI. Strategic Issues
- VII. Discussion
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 3
Introduction - ERA Team
David A. Wilcox, FAICP
Senior Vice President
10990 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1500 Los Angeles, California 90024 310.477.9585 FAX: 310.478.1950 e-mail: David.Wilcox@econres.com www.econres.com
Amitabh Barthakur, AICP
Principal
10990 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1500 Los Angeles, California 90024 310.477.9585 FAX: 310.478.1950 e-mail: Amitabh.Barthakur@econres.com www.econres.com
Judith Taylor
Associate
10990 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1500 Los Angeles, California 90024 310.477.9585 FAX: 310.478.1950 e-mail: Judy.Taylor@econres.com www.econres.com
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 4
Understanding of the Assignment
Creation of a Development Vision and Strategic Plan for the Crenshaw Corridor Study area from I-10 to King Blvd. – About 1.65 Miles Project partners Include
- CRA/LA;
- MTA;
- Council Dist. 10;
- Community Stakeholders
Two RDA Projects
- Mid City
- Crenshaw Corridor
Obvious ‘Anchors’ Include
- West Angeles Church of God in Christ
Cathedral and Campus
- Crenshaw Plaza Shopping Center
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 5
Understanding of the Assignment
Project Goals
- 1. Create a regional destination – a
pedestrian friendly district
- 2. Leverages the new light rail
extension for transit oriented development
- 3. Generates employment and
supports the local economy
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 6
Understanding of the Assignment
Project Opportunities
- Exposition Light Rail Transit Station,
(operating in 2010)
- Participation/Interest of community
institutions holding a number of parcels along the corridor, including
- The West Angeles Church of God in
Christ and
- Ward EDC
- New light rail station with TOD
- pportunities
- Participation/Interest of private land
- wners
- Proven success of redevelopment
projects
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 7
Analysis Zone
Upper Crenshaw District
- The Crenshaw Corridor will Capture
Demand for Various Land Uses from a Larger Local and Regional Market
- However, the Corridor Itself is a
Fairly Narrow Analysis Area in the Context of Regional Market Demand Analysis
- For Analysis purposes ERA Defined
the Analysis Area as Census Tracts Within a 1-Mile ring of the Corridor Center
- This Area Also Represents Primary
Resident Market Base
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 8
Demographic Profile (2005)
3.08 2.93 2.65 Persons/HH 3,247,077 1,322,153 25,769 Households 9,998,371 3,879,964 68,333 Population Los Angeles County City of Los Angeles Upper Crenshaw District
Source: ESRI 2005, ERA
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 9
Demographic Profile (2005) – Age Cohorts
Source: ESRI 2005, ERA
80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 130% 140% Under 5 years 5 to 9 years 10 to 14 years 15 to 19 years 20 to 24 years 25 to 29 years 30 to 34 years 35 to 39 years 40 to 44 years 45 to 49 years 50 to 54 years 55 to 59 years 60 to 64 years 65 to 69 years 70 to 74 years 75 to 80 years 80 to 85 years 85 years and over Crenshaw as % of City of LA Crenshaw as % of LA County
The analysis area contains a higher proportion population aged under 14 years and over 60 years compared to regional averages
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 10
Demographic Profile (2005) – Racial Distribution
11.7% 56.0% 0.6% 3.9% 0.1% 22.8% 4.9% 44.6% 10.4% 0.7% 10.4% 0.2% 27.9% 5.8% 46.1% 9.2% 0.8% 12.4% 0.3% 25.7% 5.6% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% White African American American Indian/Alaska Native Asian Asian/Pacific Islander Some other race alone Two or more races Crenshaw District City of Los Angeles Los Angeles County
Source: ESRI 2005, ERA
The African Americans comprise 56 percent of total population the analysis area compared to 10.4 percent in the City of L.A. and 9.2 percent in L.A. County
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 11
Demographic Profile (2005) – Hispanic Population
36.9% 50.6% 48.7% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% Crenshaw District City of Los Angeles Los Angeles County Source: ESRI 2005, ERA
The analysis area contains a lower share of Hispanic population compared to the City of L.A. and L.A. County
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 12
Demographic Profile (2005) – Household Income
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 180% 200% Less than $20,000 $20,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $99,000 $100,000 or more Crenshaw as % of City of LA Crenshaw as % of LA County
Source: ESRI 2005, ERA
The analysis area contains a significantly higher share of lower households earning under $35,000 annually compared to the City of L.A. and L.A. County
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 13
Demographic Profile (2005) – Housing Tenure
29% 38% 48% 64% 57% 48% 7% 5% 4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Crenshaw District City of Los Angeles Los Angeles County Vacant Renter-occupied Owner-occupied
Source: ESRI 2005, ERA
64 percent of the housing units in the analysis area are renter-occupied compared to only 48 percent renter occupied units countywide. 7 percent of total units are vacant
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 14
Demographic Profile – Project Annual Growth 2005-2030
0.78% 0.80% 0.82% 0.84% 0.86% 0.88% 0.90% 0.92% 0.94% 0.96% 0.98% 1.00% Population Households Employment Crenshaw District City of Los Angeles Los Angeles County
Source: ESRI 2005, ERA
SCAG’s long term projections for the analysis area show higher growth rates for population, dwelling units and employment compared to the City of L.A.
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 15
Corridor and District Business Volumes
Crenshaw Corridor Study Area Vicinity Tax Year
- No. of
Establishments
- Approx. Revenue
(Mill) 2004 356 $148 2005 362 $153 2006 346 $135 Source: City of Los Angeles, Office of Finance, Division Division Estab Establishments ishments Emp Employees
- yees
Revenue ($ M evenue ($ Mill ll.) .) Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing 21 102 4 Construction 120 553 108
- Fin. Services, Real Estate, Insurance
193 1,304 264 Manufacturing 84 773 73 Mining Retail Trade 576 4,937 506 Services 903 7,402 640 Transportation, Comm., & Utilities 65 809 64 Wholesale Trade 66 591 106 Tot Total 2,028 28 16, 16,471 471 1,765 65 Source: Claritas 2007, Economics Research Associates
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 16
Largest Employer Groups (2007)
Source: Claritas, ERA
Largest Employer Groups
- 500
1,000 1,500 2,000
Educational Services Eating & Drinking Places Business Services Social Services Health Services Personal Services General Merchandise Stores Miscellaneous Retail Food Stores Real Estate Apparel & Accessory Stores Special Trade Contractors
Jobs
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 17
Office Market Profile
Total RBA in the 3 Zip Area (90016, 90018 and 90008) is 990k s.f. while the 1-mile ring contains 370k s.f. No new space added during the last decade Most of the office inventory is Class B and Class C space with lower vacancies in Class C buildings West Angeles EDC is adding 45k s.f. of new space
Period Buildings Total RBA
- Avg. Annual
Vacancy Rate Delivered RBA
- Avg. FS Rent/s.f./Yr.
2007 YTD 66 992,905 9.4% $2.56 2006 66 992,905 2.0% $1.73 2005 66 992,905 3.6% $1.52 2004 66 992,905 7.1% $1.27 2003 66 992,905 8.2% $1.38 2002 66 992,905 10.3% $1.43 2001 66 992,905 11.1% $1.59 2000 66 992,905 17.3% $1.57 1999 66 992,905 10.8% $1.30 1998 66 992,905 10.1% $1.19 1997 66 992,905 7.7% $1.26
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 18
Retail Market Profile
Period # Bldgs Total RBA Total Vacant SF Total Vacant % Total Net Absorption Direct Average Rate NNN
2007 YTD 148 2,683,611 65,566 2.4% (32,695) $2.69 2006 146 2,677,974 71,406 2.7% 94,918 $3.28 2005 144 2,611,811 73,130 2.8% 18,516 $2.15 2004 143 2,601,810 61,934 2.4% (10,105) 2003 141 2,588,763 55,700 2.2% 19,912 2002 141 2,584,485 30,279 1.2% (58,100) 2001 140 2,571,295 1,500 0.1% 25,409 2000 136 2,480,908 3,125 0.1% 174,553 1999 131 2,375,036 4,875 0.2% 4,724 1998 129 2,369,432 1,500 0.1% 55,106 1997 126 2,315,227 1,625 0.1% Source: CoStar, Economics Research Associates
Total RBA in the 3 Zip Area (90016, 90018 and 90008) is 2.7 million s.f. Total RBA in the 1-mile ring is 1.9 million s.f. (1.2 million s.f. excluding the mall) Only 368k s.f. of retail space has been added in the 3 zip code area since 1997. The $18 Million Coliseum Center is one of the newest developments Several other retail/mixed use projects are planned including a major refurbishment of the Mall
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 19
Housing Market Profile – For Sale Housing
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 20
Housing Market Profile – Rental Housing
Sub Submar arket Inventor Inventory (Bld (Bldgs) Inventor Inventory (uni units) Asking Rent ng Rent $ Vac % Vac % Fr Free R ee Rent nt (mos (mos) Exp Expenses nses %
Inglewood/Crenshaw
412 20,058 926 $ 1.9% 0.200 43%
Mid-City/W Adams
387 15,393 998 $ 2.9% 0.400 42%
South/Central LA
496 14,065 888 $ 3.0% 0.200 42%
Hawthorne
431 16,786 951 $ 2.2% 0.200 42%
Carson/San Pedro
334 15,712 1,121 $ 2.7% 0.400 41%
Mar Vista/Palms
710 27,729 1,429 $ 2.9% 0.300 41%
Hollywood
1,089 50,900 1,361 $ 3.2% 0.400 41%
West LA/Westwood
743 34,750 2,018 $ 1.6% 0.300 41%
Los Angeles Metro Area Totals/Averages
14,275 745,236 1,370 $ 3.4% 0.353 41%
Source: REIS, Economics Research Assoicates
Upper Crenshaw area rents have grown in line with City of L.A. rent control
- policies. New market rate apartments will not be rent controlled
Crenshaw area apartment rents are lower than regional averages but it also exhibits some of the lowest vacancies Average asking rents are in the $1.00 to $1.08/s.f./month range for 1 to 3 bedroom units. Studio units can command significantly higher rents on a per/s.f. basis
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 21
Demand Estimates – Job Space (Crenshaw District)
20,000 22,000 14,000
- Low
64,000 60,000 49,000 17,000
- Mid
80,000 77,000 65,000 47,000
- High
2025-2030 2020-2025 2015-2020 2010-2015 2007-2010
Source: ERA
5-Year Absorption Estimates (s.f.)
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 22
Demand Estimates – Residential Units (Crenshaw District)
658 727 803 855 491 Low 1,480 1,453 1,405 1,283 622 Mid 1,644 1,635 1,606 1,497 753 High 2025-2030 2020-2025 2015-2020 2010-2015 2007-2010 Rental Units 5-Year Absorption Estimates
Source: ERA
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 23
Demand Estimates – Residential Units (Crenshaw District)
658 595 535 123
- Low
1,480 1,189 937 409
- Mid
1,644 1,338 1,070 580
- High
2025-2030 2020-2025 2015-2020 2010-2015 2007-2010 For Sale Units 5-Year Absorption Estimates
Source: ERA
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 24
Demand Estimates – Retail (Crenshaw District)
Estimated Retail Demand (2007-2020) Additional Capture from Current Residents 65,200 s.f. New Households (Assuming 5,000 new units) 129,200 s.f. Additional Capture from Current Area Draw 50,000 s.f. Total Estimates New Supportable Retail Space (2020) 244,400 s.f.
Source: ERA
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 25
Strategic Issues
Apartment Market evolving into ownership
- Affordability
- Market support
- Retain / Attract younger workforce
Capture an increased share of community serving office space
- We are a net exporter of jobs
- Seniors and emerging businesses demand unique services
- Attract limited medical services
- Business services
Live work units to enhance residual on-site activity and catalyze entrepreneurial activities Already a cluster of regional serving retail – attract a cluster of destination retail and services capitalizing on existing patronage to the area, new employees, and residents Selective up-front investments in key public improvements – streetscape, landscaping etc., are critical for success
November 15, 2007 Crenshaw Corridor Strategy Slide 26