Cozamin Mine Tour April 2014 1 Cautionary Note Forward Looking - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cozamin mine tour
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Cozamin Mine Tour April 2014 1 Cautionary Note Forward Looking - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cozamin Mine Tour April 2014 1 Cautionary Note Forward Looking Information This presentation, and the documents incorporated by reference herein, may contain forward - looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Cozamin Mine Tour

April 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 2

This presentation, and the documents incorporated by reference herein, may contain “forward-looking information” within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this document and Capstone does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements, except as required under applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance and reflect our expectations or beliefs regarding future events. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, the realization of Mineral Reserve Estimates, the timing and amount of estimated future production, costs of production and capital expenditures, the success of our mining operations, environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses and title disputes. In certain cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases, or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative of these terms or comparable

  • terminology. By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements

to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to: inherent hazards associated with mining operations; future prices of copper and other metals; counterparty risks associated with sales of our metals; our ability to raise capital; foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; accuracy of Mineral resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates; changes in general economic conditions; increased operating and capital costs; challenges to title to our mineral properties; operating in foreign jurisdictions with risk of changes to governmental regulation; compliance with governmental regulations; dependence on key management personnel; compliance with environmental laws and regulations; reliance on approvals, licenses and permits from governmental authorities; impact of climatic conditions on our Cozamin operation; potential conflicts of interest involving our directors and officers; aboriginal title claims and rights to consultation and accommodation; limitations inherent in our insurance coverage; land reclamation and mine closure obligations; labour relations; increasing energy prices; competition in the mining industry; risks associated with joint venture partners; and our ability to integrate new acquisitions into our operations. Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those described in our forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause our results, performance or achievements not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that our forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.

Alternative Performance Measures

“C1 Cash Cost”, “Cash Cost” and “Adjusted Net Earnings” are Alternative Performance Measures. Alternative performance measures are furnished to provide additional information. These performance measures are used by management to monitor performance, to plan and to assess the overall effectiveness and efficiency of mining operations. These performance measures may not be comparable to similar data presented by other mining companies. These performance measures should not be considered in isolation as a substitute for measures of performance included in the Company’s unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.

Currency

All amounts are in US$ unless otherwise specified.

Cautionary Note Forward Looking Information

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Location & History

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Historical Mining District

Au-Ag Mine Districts and Projects along the Sierra Madre

  • 1. Dolores
  • 2. Mulatos
  • 3. Morís
  • 4. El Sauzal
  • 5. Topia
  • 6. La Cienega
  • 7. Guadalupe de Los Reyes
  • 8. Bacis
  • 9. Tayoltita

10.Bolaños 11.Guanajuato 12.Pachuca 13.San Sebastián

4 El Paso 1

4

8 Mazatlán 2 3 5 6 7 9 10 11 12

Zacatecas

Fresnillo Concepción Del Oro Sombrerete Río Grande Juan ALdama

Cos

N

Chihuahua Durango

México City

Guadalajara

13

Hermosillo

Zacatecas City Cozamin Mine

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 5

Location

Source: Defiance Silver Corp. and Wikipedia

Cozamin

Goldcorp

Capstone

San Acacio Defiance Silver Corp.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Close Proximity to Zacatecas City

Source: Google Earth maps.

Cozamin Downtown Zacatecas

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7 7

History of Cozamin Mine

January 2004 Capstone options Cozamin Mine May 2004 Confirms high grade copper and silver values October 2004 Phase 1 drill results increase grade and tonnage and underground development begins December 2005 Capstone acquires 90% interest in Cozamin March 2006 Results of feasibility study reported August 2006 Updated Mineral Resource Estimate September 2006 Cozamin mine achieves commercial production on time and under budget October 2007 Increased Mineral Resources and mill expanded from 1,000tpd to 2,200tpd September 2008 Cozamin expansion completed from 2,200tpd to 3,000tpd February 2009 Updated Mineral Resource Estimate June 2009 New life-of-mine plan and Mineral Reserves September 2009 Additional mineral claims March 2010 Increased Mineral Resource Estimate April 2010 Exploration drilling commences September 2010 Announcement of discovery of Mala Noche Footwall Zone (MNFWZ) February 2012 Updated Mineral Resource for MNFWZ March 2013 Updated Mineral Resource for MNFWZ December 2013 Updated Mineral Resource for MNFWZ

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Geology and Exploration

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Regional Geology

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Structures, Mineral Concession, Exploration Areas

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11 11

Cozamin Mining Areas

San Roberto Shaft

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 12

Cozamin Mine Exploration Potential

Current Mineral Resource/Reserve over length of 1.5 km

  • Mala Noche Vein (MNV) extends for 5.5 km - still open

to West

  • Mala Noche Footwall Zone (MNFWZ) 0.7 km - slightly
  • pen to East, West, and down dip

2014 Exploration Budget $3 million (10,000 m)

  • Surface drilling testing of splays that have not

previously been tested, targeting new mineralized zones

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

2012-2013 Drilling Level 10, Different Elevation

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Crosscut 10E-MNFWZ Section B-B

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15 15

San Roberto Mine Resource Classification

San Roberto Shaft San Rafael Shaft Virginias Shaft

Section 747 920 E Section 746 826 E

San Ernesto Ramp Guadalupana Ramp Mining Blocks San Tiburcio Shaft

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16 16

MNFWZ Resource Classification

San Roberto Shaft

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17 17

Cozamin Mineral Resources1

MINERAL RESOURCES – Inclusive of Mineral Reserves CONTAINED METAL Category 000’s Tonnes Cu % Zn % Pb % Ag g/t Cu Mlbs Zn Mlbs Pb Mlbs Ag kozs

San Roberto & MNFWZ

(Mala Noche Footwall Zone)

Measured 3,290 1.57 1.44 0.53 65 114 104 38 6,869 Indicated 8,530 1.43 0.98 0.16 43 269 184 30 11,720 M&I 11,970 1.45 1.16 0.27 49 383 307 72 18,772 Inferred 3,340 1.39 0.91 0.10 36 103 67 7 3,853 San Rafael Zinc Deposit Measured Indicated 1,150 0.33 3.64 0.49 49.28 8.4 92.4 12.5 1,822 M&I 1,150 0.33 3.64 0.49 49.28 8.4 92.4 12.5 1,822 Inferred 750 0.13 3.62 0.77 37.83 2.1 59.9 12.7 912 Cozamin Total Measured 3,290 1.57 1.44 0.53 65 114 104 38 6,875 Indicated 9,680 1.30 1.30 0.20 44 277 277 43 13,615 M&I 13,120 1.35 1.38 0.29 49 391 398 84 20,679 Inferred 4,090 1.16 1.41 0.22 36 105 127 20 4,778

(1) As of December 31, 2013. Totals may not add due to rounding. Metal price assumption (in USD) used to calculate the $35 NSR COG for all deposits are Cu=$2.50/lb, Zn=$0.80/lb, Pb=$0.85/lb, and Ag=$20.00/oz. Processing recoveries used to calculate the NSR COG for the MNFWZ Resource are based historical site operating experience reflecting recoveries of: Cu=92%; Zn=69%; Ag=72%; Pb=64%. Processing recoveries used to calculate the NSR COG for the San Rafael Resource are based historical site operating experience reflecting recoveries of: Cu=57%; Zn=79%; Ag=61%; Pb=56%. All Mineral Reserve Estimates are inclusive of dilution and mining recovery factors. Mineral Reserves are presented inclusive of Mineral Resources. See Technical Reports filed under Capstone’s profile on SEDAR for further information.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18 18

NSR Parameters – San Roberto & MNFWZ

Metal Prices NSR Parameters

Units Value US$ Units Value US$

Cu $/lb $2.50 Cu 0.10 % 4.26 Zn $/lb $0.80 Zn 0.10 % 0.62 Pb $/lb $0.85 Pb 0.10% 0.91 Ag $/oz $20 Ag g/t 0.42

Grades % Recovery %

Pb Cu Zn Ag Pb Cu Zn

Pb con. 64 10 65 Cu con. 26 62 93 Zn con. 49 69

San Roberto MNFWZ

* When applicable

Metal Prices NSR Parameters

Units Value US$ Units Value US$

Cu $/lb $2.50 Cu 0.10 % 4.49 Zn $/lb $0.80 Zn 0.10 % 0.61 Pb $/lb $0.85 Pb 0.10% 0.90 Ag $/oz $20 Ag g/t 0.41

Grades % Recovery %

Pb Cu Zn Ag Pb Cu Zn

Pb con. 63 10 64 Cu con. 27 62 93 Zn con. 49 69

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19 19

NSR Parameters – San Rafael1

San Rafael Zinc Deposit (Cu > 50%)

Metal Prices NSR Parameters

Units Value US$ Units Value US$

Cu $/lb $2.50 Cu* 0.10 % 2.53 Zn $/lb $0.80 Zn 0.10 % 0.70 Pb $/lb $0.85 Pb 0.10% 0.55 Ag $/oz $20 Ag g/t 0.37 Au $/oz $950 Au g/t 4.95

Grades % Recovery %

Au g/t Ag g/t Pb % Cu % Zn % Au Ag Pb Cu Zn

Pb con. 10 1,514 33 19 24 54 Cu con. 20 37 57 Zn con. 54 79

1 . For Mineral Reserve estimation purposes. Copper circuit not run when Cu grade is less than 0.5% Cu.* When applicable.

San Rafael Zinc Deposit (Cu < 50%)

Metal Prices NSR Parameters

Units Value US$ Units Value US$

Cu $/lb $2.50 Cu* 0.10 % Zn $/lb $0.80 Zn 0.10 % 0.72 Pb $/lb $0.85 Pb 0.10% 0.69 Ag $/oz $20 Ag g/t 0.14 Au $/oz $950 Au g/t 7.26

Grades % Recovery %

Au g/t Ag g/t Pb % Zn % Au Ag Pb Zn

Pb con. 21 1,514 42 26 23 58 Zn con. 54 75

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20 20

Cozamin Mineral Reserves1

MINERAL RESERVES CONTAINED METAL* Category 000’s

Tonnes

Cu % Zn % Pb % Ag g/t Cu Mlbs Zn Mlbs Pb Mlbs Ag kozs

MNV/San Roberto

(Mala Noche Vein)

Proven 2,124 1.44 1.41 0.61 62.2 67 66 29 4,248 Probable 2,589 1.25 1.59 0.30 53.8 71 91 17 4,479 Sub-total 4,713 1.34 1.51 0.44 57.6 139 157 46 8,729 MNFWZ

(Mala Noche Footwall Zone)

Proven 248 1.86 0.35 0.03 40.7 10 2 325 Probable 4,216 1.67 0.23 0.01 31.8 155 21 1 4311 Sub-total 4,464 1.68 0.24 0.01 32.4 Copper Zones Sub-total Proven 2,372 1.48 1.30 0.55 60.0 77 68 29 4,576 Probable 6,805 1.51 0.75 0.12 40.2 226 113 18 8,796 Total 9,177 1.51 0.89 0.23 45.3 305 180 47 13,367 San Rafael Zinc Deposit Probable 721 0.34 3.49 0.46 49.17 5 55 7 1140 TOTAL COZAMIN DILUTED RESERVE 9,898 1.42 1.08 0.25 45.58 310 236 55 14,506

(1) As of December 31, 2013. Totals may not add due to rounding. Metal price assumption (in USD) used to calculate the $40 NSR COG for all deposits are Cu=$2.50/lb, Zn=$0.80/lb, Pb=$0.85/lb, and Ag=$20.00/oz. Processing recoveries used to calculate the NSR COG for the MNFWZ Resource are based historical site operating experience reflecting recoveries of: Cu=92%; Zn=69%; Ag=72%; Pb=64%. Processing recoveries used to calculate the NSR COG for the San Rafael Resource are based historical site operating experience reflecting recoveries of: Cu=57%; Zn=79%; Ag=61%; Pb=56%. All Mineral Reserves Estimates are inclusive of dilution and mining recovery factors. Mineral Reserves are presented inclusive of Mineral Resources. See Technical Reports filed under Capstone’s profile on SEDAR for further information.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

HSEC and Permitting

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22 22

Short term

Safety Performance

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 5 10 15 20 25 30 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 YTD

LTA Frequency Number of Injuries

LTA Medical Aid LTA Freq

  • DNV – Modern Safety Management: 4/20 modules to be implemented in 2014; three

modules/year continuing on 2015

  • Safety Management Program that promotes supervisor due diligence and employee

accountability

  • Accelerate Stop & Correct Program
  • Continue to enhance the 5 Point Safety System
  • Re-induction and re-certification of all Capstone’s employees and contractors
  • Verify that contractors are following their Safety Management Program
slide-23
SLIDE 23

23 23

Key Environmental Documents

  • Clean Industry

Certification (Official Profepa)

Principal Documents

All in place

  • Voluntary audit

(Official Profepa)

  • Environmental Unique

License

  • Environmental

monitoring program

(Air, solid waste control, closure plan, etc.)

Other Documents

Current

  • MIA (Environmental

Impact Declaration)

1, 2 & 3 modifications

  • Soil use change
  • ETJ (Technical Study

Justification)

1st, 2nd & 3rd

  • Risk Study

Certification

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Operations

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25 25

Cozamin Operations

Mining Fleet

  • 4 haul trucks, 8 loaders, 2 jumbos drill, 2 jumbo bolter,

2 long hole jumbos, 1 stope mate, 1 long hole cubex, 2 high way trucks 14 m3, 1 anfo-loader, 1 scissors lift, 2 telehandler, 1 passenger bus, 2 utility trucks for diesel Ore Processing

  • Underground long hole stoping and cut/fill
  • Sulphide chalcopyrite/ sphalerite/ galena selective

flotation

  • Conventional crushing and grinding

Production Facilities

  • Crushing circuit: primary, secondary & tertiary

crushers, two screens

  • Grinding circuit: 2 primary ball mills, 1 regrind ball mill
  • Flotation /thickening/ filtration circuits: for copper, zinc

and lead concentrates

  • Fully equipped assay and met labs

Tailings Storage

  • Tailings storage capacity in place through mid 2016
  • Engineering for two more stages through 2020 in

progress

  • Option of underground backfill will significantly

increase capacity, studies in progress

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26 26

2013 Production & 2014 Production Guidance

Mine life remaining (years) 8+ 2013 Production Production – 2013 (k tonnes) 20.6 C1 cash cost1 – 2013 ($/payable lb Cu) $1.18 Cozamin 2014 Production Guidance Tonnes milled (millions) 1.2 Copper grade (%) 1.85 Copper recovery (%) 93.4 Cu Production (k tonnes ±5%) 20.0 Zn Production (k tonnes) 9.0 Pb Producion (k tonnes) 1.7 C1 cash cost1 – 2014 guidance ($/payable lb Cu) $1.30 - $1.40

  • 1. C1 Cash Cost is an Alternative Performance Measure, which is net of by-product credits as well as treatment and selling costs. See Forward-

Looking Statements slide for 43-101 information. C1 cash cost per pound is per pound of payable copper produced. All amounts in US$ unless

  • therwise specified.

Underground Mine in Zacatecas State, Mexico

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27 27

Infrastructure

Mine concessions (3,388 ha) Current 115kv power line & 10 MVA substation – C.F.E. up to 5,000 tpd Emergency power back up and peak hour generation 3.3 MVA installed capacity Hoisting system 2,200 tpd capacity Two ramps for production & services (San Ernesto & Guadalupana) 1,200-3,200 tpd capacity Tailings pond Current phase 2.5Mt (to 2016) , future phases 5.5 Mt Water rights available/year (from various sources) All current, Total 1.25M m3 Ejidos relations (La Pimienta & Hacienda Nueva) Cordial Auxiliary services (banks, schools, manpower, airport, government, hospitals) Excellent Surface ownership Capstone Gold S.A. de C.V (mill, admin, tailings, shops) 100% Right of way for power line, water wells Current

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Mine Operations

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29 29

Long Hole

Stopes: Mining Tonnes/Month 10E 82,000 12W 202,278 13W 72,000 15E 137,137 16E 159,175 14FWZ-C 30,458 14FWZ-E 67,000 14FWZ-W 58,000 Total 808,048

2014 Mine Plan

Cut and Fill

Stopes: Mining Tonnes/Month 11T 80,500 12T 11,500 Total 92,000

Development in Ore: 270,000 tonnes

Development/year: 9,940 m (2014) 270,000 tonnes Development/5 year: 38,466 m (2014-2018)

Ore Production

Production/year: (2014) 1.2 M tonnes Production/5 year: 6.0 M tonnes (2014-2018)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30 30

West-East Long Section

Showing historic mining

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

San Roberto Mine (MNV) – Mining Method

San Roberto Shaft San Rafael Shaft Virginias Shaft San Tiburcio Shaft

Long Hole

San Ernesto Ramp Guadalupana Ramp

Cut and fill Avoca

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

San Roberto Mine (MNFWZ) – Mining Method

San Roberto Shaft San Rafael Shaft Virginias Shaft San Tiburcio Shaft

Long Hole

San Ernesto Ramp Guadalupana Ramp

Cut and fill

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33 33

Schematic Cut & Fill Production Cycle

1.- DRILLING

3.2 ml 75 JUMBO

MALA NOCHE VEIN

BACK FILL

2.- WASTE BACKFILL

75

MALA NOCHE VEIN

BACK FILL

BACKFILL

SCOOP TRAM

3.- BLASTING

75

BACK FILL

ORE BROKEN

DRILL HOLES

4.- MUCKING

BACK FILL New Fill

ORE BROKEN SCOOP TRAM

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34 34

Schematic Long Hole Sublevel Stoping

Ore drifting and ground support Ore mucking Long hole drilling Mined area Natural rib pillars Crown Pillar Rock support

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35 35

Long Hole Drill

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36 36

Schematic Avoca Mining

Ore Pillar Sub Level Back Fill Broken Ore

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37 37

Schematic Crusher & Loading Pocket Station

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Dilution Factors

Dilution and Reserve Loss is estimated using the following:

  • -3%

Loss (mineral not recovered)

  • 13% In Cut and Fill stopes
  • 15% In Long Hole stopes
  • 15% In Avoca stope

Wall Dilution Grade:

  • Au & Ag grade is 20% of average block grade
  • Cu, Pb and Zn is 33% of average block grade
slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Mill Operations

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40 40

Crushing Circuit

Ore bins (2) 1200 Tonnes each

Alimentador 1 Banda 36”

Ore bin

20’x36’ CONE CRUSHER SYMONS 4’

Belt No 1 30”

Belt No 5 Magnet

Belt No 2 30” BELT No. 3, 30” Belt No. 4, 30”

CRUSHER HP 4 FEEDER BELT 2 TYLER SCREEN 6’ x 16’ Belt No 7 screen 5’X12’

Jaw Crusher Belt feeder

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41 41

Milling Circuit

To Flotation Flash Cell Pb/Cu Mill #2 12’x14’ Mill #1 12’x14’ Mill #3 8’x6’ Bin #1 1200 Tonnes Capacity Bin #2 1200 Tonnes Capacity Bin #3 300 Tonnes Capacity Cyclone D26 Cyclone D26 Cyclone D15 Trash Screen

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42 42

Process Plant Flow Sheet: Pb-Cu Circuit

OK-16

Rougher Pb-Cu

OK-16 1800 ft3

Rougher Pb-Cu Flash Cell

1800 ft3

  • Cond. Zn

Cu Regrinding Fe Conc. to

Final tail

Cell column 10´x 25´ 2dn Cleaner Pb/Cu From Mill

Wemco 1200 ft3 Wemco

Magnetic Drum

Pb Conc. Cu Conc. 2nd Pb Cleaner Rougher.Pb

Tank cells 6´x 8´

Cond. Pb/Cu 8 x 12 1st Pb Cleaner DR 200 1800 ft3

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43 43

Process Plant Flow Sheet: Zn Circuit

OK-16 OK-16

Zn 2nd Cleaner Rougher Zn Rougher Zn Zn Conc.

ZINC CIRCUIT

  • Cond. Zn

Column Cell 8x25 ft

OK-5

Zn 1st Cleaner

OK-5

Final Tail

From Cu/Pb Circuit

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Production Statistics

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45 45

Copper Production and Costs

$0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Contained Copper Produced (Millions lbs) Contained Cu (M lbs) Cash Costs (US$ lb) C1 Cash Costs (C$/lb)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46 46

Milled Tonnes and Grade

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

  • 50

100 150 200 250 300 350 Mill Throughput (Thousands of tonnes) Mill Throughput (tonnes) Cu Grade Processed (%) Copper Grade Processed (%Cu)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47 47

Mill Grade and Recoveries

0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Copper Grade Processed Copper Recoverie s Cu Recovery (%) Cu Grade Processed (%)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48 48

Development (metres)

Meters

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49 49

Total Operating Cost/t (US$)

  • $10

$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 Q1/09 Q2/09 Q3/09 Q4/09 Q1/10 Q2/10 Q3/10 Q4/10 Q1/11 Q2/11 Q3/11 Q4/11 Q1/12 Q2/12 Q3/12 Q4/12 Q1/13 Q2/13 Q3/13 Q4/13

Mine Mill General Managment Administration

Cash Costs/t (US$)

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

Capital Projects

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

2014 Capex and Exploration Budget

2014 Capital Expenditures

($US millions)

Underground Development $10.8 Infrastructure and Communications 6.4 Other 0.8 Total Cozamin Mine $18.0 Exploration 3.0 Total Capital $21.0

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52 52

5 Year Strategic Objectives

Opportunities

  • Capital review and trade-off study of hoisting, shaft and trucking capacities
  • Capital review of the potential for a hoisting plant, the existing shaft with a larger hoist and a new

head frame can accommodate a 16 T skip at 2,500 ft/min to a depth of 4,000 ft (currently a 4.5 T skip at 1,200 ft/min to a depth of 1,200 ft) versus a new truck fleet or a new shaft

  • Access resources at depth while avoiding high CAPEX for a new shaft
  • Reduce Contractor Haulage costs by maximizing hoisting
  • Improved ventilation due to reduction in diesel equipment
  • Improve water use in the process - thickener to be constructed by Q3 2014
  • Maintenance Overhaul
  • New surface and underground maintenance shops (mechanical and electrical) for optimal use of

equipment

  • Asset Reliability Program - maximize service level, ensure adherence to safety principals, and
  • ptimize maintenance
  • Mine to transition from a “people dependent” to a “process dependent” culture, through the

application of reliability and maintenance best practices

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53 53

Changes to Mexico’s Mining Tax Code

Cozamin Mine’s applicable taxes include the following - effective January 1, 2014

  • The Mexican corporate income tax is at a 30% rate applied on net revenue (profit) after
  • depreciation. The 2013 Mexican Tax Reform repealed the 17.5% IETU Tax (Impuesto

Empresarial Tasa Unica) effective for Cozamin’s 2014 taxation year

  • A value added tax is payable to the Mexican government. The amount paid in any given year

is 100% refundable, and may be used to offset income tax

  • The 2013 Mexican Tax Reform introduced a 7.5% mining royalty calculated on an operating

mine’s taxable income before the deduction of interest and taxes as well as a 10% withholding tax on dividends paid to individuals or non-resident shareholders (in Canada 5% withholding due to a tax treaty)

  • Environmental erosion fee for precious metals only 0.5%
slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

People

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

Organizational Chart

Current non union labor agreements (local & federal)

460 Employees 316 Contractors

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

Awards and Accreditations

Distinction

  • Family Responsible Company (Federal

Labor Secretary)

  • Socially Responsible Company

Distinctive (Mexican Philanthropy Center CEMEFI)

  • Inclusive Organization (Federal Labor

Secretary)

  • ESR - Corporate Social Responsibility

Silver Award (State Government)

  • Lab Accreditation (Mexican

Accreditation Entity EMA)

  • Reasons and Challenges Award (State

Government)

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

  • Expo Business Zacatecas
  • “A” Organization (INFONAVIT)
  • 1st Place. Best Sustainable Practices

(State Government)

  • “Conocer” Certification
  • A Mining Friendly Company
  • National Labor Award Participation

(Federal Labor Secretary)

Distinction

Awards and Accreditations

slide-58
SLIDE 58

58

2014 and Beyond

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59 59

2014 and Beyond

Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate Ongoing exploration program

2014 2015

Silver stream sale expires April 2017 (currently ~1.5M

  • z/yr) to significantly improve

economics

2017 +

Increase production from MNFWZ: 23% in 2014 to an average of 40% through 2018

slide-60
SLIDE 60

60 60

Unless otherwise indicated, Capstone has prepared the technical information in this presentation (“Technical Information”) based on information contained in the technical reports and news releases (collectively the “Disclosure Documents”) available under Capstone Mining Corp.’s company profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Each Disclosure Document was prepared by or under the supervision of a qualified person (a “Qualified Person”) as defined in National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators (“NI 43-101”). For readers to fully understand the information in this presentation, they should read the Technical Reports (available on www.sedar.com) in their entirety, including all qualifications, assumptions and exclusions that relate to the information set out in this presentation which qualifies the Technical Information. Readers are advised that Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The Disclosure Documents are each intended to be read as a whole, and sections should not be read or relied upon out of context. The Technical Information is subject to the assumptions and qualifications contained in the Disclosure Documents. The technical information in this presentation has been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in NI 43-101 and reviewed by Brad Skeeles, P.Eng. VP of North American Operations (Technical Information related to mining and production) and Brad Mercer, P. Geol., Vice President, Exploration (Technical Information related to mineral exploration activities), and reviewed and approved by Gregg Bush, P. Eng., Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for Capstone Mining, all "Qualified Persons" under NI 43-101. This presentation summarizes some of the information contained in the SRK Consulting (Canada) “Technical Report, Cozamin Mine, Zacatecas State, Mexico” dated March 31, 2009. Qualified Persons under National Instrument 43-101 for the Cozamin Technical Report include: Robert Sim, P.Geo., Jenna Hardy, P.Geo., Jeff Woods, CP, Gord Doerksen, P.Eng. The Cozamin Mineral Resource Estimate for the MNFWZ were completed Ali Shahkar P.Eng., Principal Consultant with Lions Gate Geological Consulting

  • Inc. who is the Qualified Person under NI43-101 responsible for this estimate.

The Mineral Resource Estimates for the end of 2013 tabulated in this presentation exclude all mined out areas. The Mineral Resource Estimate for the MNFWZ deposit was prepared by independent consultant Ali Shahkar, P.Eng., Principal Consultant of LGGC, in February 2013, using accepted industry standard methods conforming to NI 43- 101 requirements. This model was depleted for all mining activity to the end of 2013 to produce the remaining Mineral Resource Estimates stated in this presentation. In each case, estimated Mineral Resources exclude all historical (pre-Capstone) and Capstone underground production conducted through December 31, 2013. Mineral Resources are constrained by the Capstone property boundary. The Cozamin Mineral Resource Estimates for Cozamin mine as at December 31, 2013 in this presentation are reported above a $35 per tonne cut-off. The Cozamin Mineral Resource Estimates for the San Rafael area is reported in this presentation is above a $35 per tonne cut-

  • ff, which remain unchanged since 2012. There has been no mining activity or changes to the San Rafael model in 2013. The estimated Mineral Reserves for Cozamin Mine

as at December 31, 2013, for a US$40 NSR COG.

Compliance with NI 43-101

slide-61
SLIDE 61

61

For additional information, please visit capstonemining.com

  • r contact us at:

Phone: +1-604-684-8894 Toll Free: 1-866-684-8894 Email: info@capstonemining.com

Last updated March 27, 2014