County of Santa Clara Parks and Recreation Los Gatos Creek Trail - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

county of santa clara parks and recreation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

County of Santa Clara Parks and Recreation Los Gatos Creek Trail - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

County of Santa Clara Parks and Recreation Los Gatos Creek Trail November 7, 2012 Los Gatos Creek Trail November 7, 2012 Presentation Outline 1. Introduction 2. T rail Study Selection 3. Challenges and Constraints 3. Challenges and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

County of Santa Clara Parks and Recreation

Los Gatos Creek Trail – November 7, 2012 Los Gatos Creek Trail November 7, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Outline

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. T

rail Study Selection

  • 3. Challenges and Constraints
  • 3. Challenges and Constraints
  • 4. T

rail Segments - Alternatives 5 Public Survey Results

  • 5. Public Survey Results
  • 6. T

rail Study Selections 7 D i St di /P it

  • 7. Design Studies/Permits
  • 8. Budget/Conceptual Costs

9 N S

  • 9. Next Steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Trail Alternatives

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Challenges and Constraints

Outboard Shoulder Issues Outboa d S ou de ssues

  • Insufficient pavement edge

support

  • Vegetation along shoreline
  • Storm water runoff
  • Erosion and creep
  • Pavement condition
  • Existing trees
  • Fill placement options limited
  • Sl

di t

  • Slope gradient
  • Shoreline notch
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Challenges and Constraints

I b d Sh ld I Inboard Shoulder Issues:

  • Over steepened slopes (2:1 & steeper)
  • Existing utilities in and along the path

Existing utilities in and along the path

  • Landslides/sloughing
  • Improvements at top-of-slope

p p p

  • Non-engineered fill on slope
  • Slope sloughing & erosion
  • K-rail at base of eroding slope
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Challenges and Constraints

Pi i

Existing Conditions

  • Trees in proximity to path

Pictures to insert:

p y p

  • Storm water runoff
  • Park furniture
  • Utilities & manholes
  • Water & irrigation facilities

C fli f l i d l il

  • Conflict of multi-modal trail users
  • i.e. Walkers, bicyclists, runners, baby

strollers, etc. ,

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Trail Segments

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Trail Segments – Alternatives 1 & 2

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Trail Segments – Alternatives 1 & 2

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Trail Segments – Alternatives 1 & 2

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Trail Segments – Alternatives 1 & 2

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Trail Segments – Alternatives 1 & 2

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Trail Segments – Alternatives 1 & 2

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Trail Segments – Alternatives 1 & 2

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Public Survey Results

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Public Meeting Results

Eliminate/restrict bicyclists y

  • Send bikes along Garden Hill
  • Enforce bicycle speed limit
  • Make bikes walk in tight areas

B ll d b i d k bik

  • Bollards or barricades to keep bikes out

Keep cost down

  • Patch and repair existing trail without widening trail

p g g

  • Raise trail with fill rather than walls or deck
  • Use funds to build a new trail to the new soccer park
  • Staff meet with Susan Anawalt to discuss the option of

Staff meet with Susan Anawalt to discuss the option of detouring bicycles onto Garden Hill Drive and restricting their use on the trail.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Trail Selection

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Trail Selection

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Trail Selection

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Trail Selection

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Trail Selection

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Trail Selection

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Trail Selection

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Design Studies Engineering Engineering Engineering Engineering

Design Surveys Design Surveys

  • Ex. Utility Boxes
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Design Studies Geotechnical Engineering Geotechnical Engineering Geotechnical Engineering Geotechnical Engineering

Site Investigations and Borings Site Investigations and Borings

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Design Studies Environmental Surveys

Field Survey for Federal and State Listed Species

(Surveys dependant on various protocols and timing)

  • Complete surveys during the preliminary design
  • Early determination of possible avoidance areas
  • E l d t

i ti f ti l h bit t t

  • Early determination of particular habitat types
  • Early design accommodation if necessary
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Structural Options: Segment G

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Structural Options: Segment E

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Structural – Example of Cantilevered Pathway

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Methodology & Strategy Natural Resource Permits

Section 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement

(California Department of Fish and Game) ( p )

Section 404 Nationwide Permit

(Army Corps of Engineers)

Section 401 Water Quality Certification

(Regional Water Quality Control Board) Incidental Take Authorization impacts to federal Incidental Take Authorization impacts to federal and state listed species

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Methodology & Strategy

Natural Resources - California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CEQA)

CEQA process includes consideration of:

  • Some species listed by the

California Endangered Species Act

  • Species identified in the

State Fish and Game Code C pli ith CEQA i d f Compliance with CEQA required for:

  • Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDF&G

W Q li C ifi i f RWQCB

  • Water Quality Certification from RWQCB
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Budget / Conceptual Cost

  • Selected alignment with walls

$1,723,000

  • Selected alignment with concrete deck

$2,045,000 Selected alignment with concrete deck $2,045,000

  • Project Budget

$1,694,000

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Next Steps