Counterterrorism/ Counterinsurgency Class 8 - August 27 How can - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

counterterrorism counterinsurgency
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Counterterrorism/ Counterinsurgency Class 8 - August 27 How can - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Counterterrorism/ Counterinsurgency Class 8 - August 27 How can governments stop insurgents or terrorists? How can governments stop insurgents or terrorists? Use force Punitive military tactics Repression Police measures


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Counterterrorism/ Counterinsurgency

Class 8 - August 27

slide-2
SLIDE 2

How can governments stop insurgents or terrorists?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

How can governments stop insurgents or terrorists?

  • Use force

○ Punitive military tactics ○ Repression ○ Police measures

  • Negotiate with some, use force on others.

○ Work with moderates to punish extremists ○ Resolve financial grievances.

Each tactic has benefits and drawbacks.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Military tactics

  • Military action against

insurgents/ terrorist sanctuaries.

  • Drone strikes and special

forces assassinations against suspected terrorists.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Repression

  • Prevent organization by

restricting social rights.

  • Suspension of habeas

corpus, censorship, detention without cause or prosecution, guilt by association, torture.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Police measures

  • Preventive, especially for

terrorist attacks.

  • Wiretapping, body

scanners, urban surveillance, sting

  • perations, NSA, etc.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Drawbacks?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Drawbacks?

  • May be effective in short term, but creates

more support for violence in long-term.

  • May play into terrorists’ hands.
  • Creates backlash, especially in

democracies.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Some Concessions: Kydd and Walter

  • What case do they look at?
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Some Concessions: Kydd and Walter

  • What case do they look at?

○ Israel and Palestine: ○ Negotiations between Israel and PLO with Hamas as spoiler. ○ Extremists will disrupt negotiations to obtain their ideal point. ○ Only effective if moderates seen as strong and trustworthy a priori.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Terrorism upends trust in strong moderates

  • Weak moderates are not expected to do

much, as it is (PLO 1994)

  • Strong moderates that fail to stop attacks will

lead to a loss of faith in negotiation (1996, 2001).

○ Moderates are seen as exploiting good will of population (Israel) through negotiations and simultaneously backing terrorism.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Policy Implication?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Policy Implication?

Governments must negotiate with credible

  • moderates. Moderates should be responsible

for reeling in extremists to maintain trust...or just pay the extremists off.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Another example: Sons of Iraq

  • US pays Sunni tribesmen in

Iraq to oppose Al-Qaeda in Iraq insurgents.

  • Problem: Group falls apart

after US withdrawal.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Concession 2: Resolve Grievances

  • Berman et al. 2011
  • Financial transfers can make people less

likely to support violence.

  • How is this measured?
  • Any issues with findings?
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Concession Drawbacks

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Concession Drawbacks

  • Moderates can lose to

extremists.

○ Ex. ISIS destroys Sons

  • f Iraq
  • Insurgents might not

want financial transfers.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Discussion: What sounds like the best approach to dealing with insurgency? Terrorism?

Is any one approach best? Should a combination be used? Can military occupations successfully reduce violence?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Afghanistan and Chechnya

Cases

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Afghanistan: Background

  • Multi-ethnic,

traditionally decentralized.

  • War, foreign
  • ccupation since 1979.
  • Taliban rule 1996-2001
  • US invades in 2001.
slide-21
SLIDE 21

US empowers Northern Alliance

  • Mostly Uzbek, Tajik and Northern Pashtun-

supported.

  • Taliban return in 2004 as fighting force.
  • Obama introduces ‘Afghan Surge’ in 2009.
slide-22
SLIDE 22

U.S. Tactics used to subdue Taliban

slide-23
SLIDE 23

U.S. Tactics used to subdue Taliban

  • Training local security forces.
  • Attempting to convince locals to support

Afghan government and not Taliban.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Problems U.S. encountered...

slide-25
SLIDE 25

What, if anything, can the US do to end Taliban insurgency?

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Chechnya...you know the story, right?

slide-27
SLIDE 27

What were Russian tactics during first Chechen War?

slide-28
SLIDE 28

What were Russian tactics during first Chechen War?

  • Conventional, designed as show of force.
  • Chechens designed for war of attrition,

create low morale among Russian troops.

  • What was the effect?
slide-29
SLIDE 29

What were Russian tactics during the Second Chechen war?

slide-30
SLIDE 30

What were Russian tactics during the Second Chechen war?

  • Morale training for troops before conflict.
  • Radical Chechen fighters mobilized support.
  • Increased radicalization through targeting of

civilians.

  • Swayed secular moderates to join

government and fight insurgents.

  • Insurgents dispersed to neighboring regions.
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Could Russia have done better in prosecuting Chechen War(s)?

Should war have been fought in the first place?