cost competitive reduction of carbon emissions of up to
play

Costcompetitive Reduction of Carbon Emissions of up to 80% from the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Costcompetitive Reduction of Carbon Emissions of up to 80% from the US Electric Sector by 2030 Alexander E. MacDonald Christopher Clack* Anneliese Alexander* Adam Dunbar Yuanfu Xie James Wilczak NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory


  1. Cost–competitive Reduction of Carbon Emissions of up to 80% from the US Electric Sector by 2030 Alexander E. MacDonald Christopher Clack* Anneliese Alexander* Adam Dunbar Yuanfu Xie James Wilczak NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory *Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences 1

  2. Wind capacity factor: Power costs 3 to 4 cents in red areas.

  3. US 48 states Balancing Area Spectrum of atmospheric kinetic energy density. Weather energy is concentrated at large scales.

  4. Though wind power may be missing in a small area, it is likely to be available in a larger area.

  5. Solar PV Capacity Factor Map % % % %

  6. US Study: National Energy System Designer Step 1. We collected an extraordinarily detailed and accurate weather data set. Step 2. We collected electric load data concurrent in time with the weather data. Step 3. We developed a power system simulator that used all power sources and associated infrastructure (transmission and storage). Step 4. The simulator finds the least expensive configuration of the entire power system using hourly wind, solar and load concurrently. Step 5. The weather and economic simulator was used to study the geographic domain size effects of wind and solar energy generation systems.

  7. Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) Hourly Assimilation Cycle hydrometeor, soil Hourly obs temp/moisture/snow plus atmosphere Data Type ~ Number state variables Rawinsonde (12h) 150 NOAA profilers 35 1-hr 1-hr 1-hr VAD winds 120-140 fcst fcst fcst PBL – prof/ RASS ~ 25 Aircraft (V,temp) 3500-10000 Background Analysis TAMDAR (V,T,RH) * 200-3000 Fields Fields Surface/ METAR 2000-2500 Buoy/ ship 200-400 3dvar 3dvar GOES cloud winds 4000-8000 GOES cloud-top pres 10 km res GPS precip water ~ 300 Obs Obs Mesonet (temp, dpt) ~ 8000 Mesonet (wind) ~ 4000 METAR-cloud-vis-wx ~ 1800 AMSU-A/ B/ GOES radiances – RR RR only Ti Tim e 11 12 13 Radar reflectivity/ lightning (UTC TC) 1km

  8. Wind Speed Video (m/s)

  9. Solar Irradiance Video (W/m 2 )

  10. US Study: National Energy System Designer Step 1. We collected an extraordinarily detailed and accurate weather data set. Step 2. We collected electric load data concurrent in time with the weather data. Step 3. We developed a power system simulator that used all power sources and associated infrastructure (transmission and storage). Step 4. The simulator finds the least expensive configuration of the entire power system using hourly wind, solar and load concurrently. Step 5. The weather and economic simulator was used to study the geographic domain size effects of wind and solar energy generation systems.

  11. Electric Demand/Load 800 700 600 Electrical Demand (GW) 500 400 300 700 700 600 600 200 500 500 100 400 400 300 300 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

  12. US Study: National Energy System Designer Step 1. We collected an extraordinarily detailed and accurate weather data set. Step 2. We collected electric load data concurrent in time with the weather data. Step 3. We developed a power system simulator that used all power sources and associated infrastructure (transmission and storage). Step 4. The simulator finds the least expensive configuration of the entire power system using hourly wind, solar and load concurrently. Step 5. The weather and economic simulator was used to study the geographic domain size effects of wind and solar energy generation systems.

  13. Land Use Constraints • The type and amount of electricity generation installed in each RUC cell is constrained by: – Spacing between facilities – Topography of the land – Land Use (residential, commercial, protected lands, etc…)

  14. Cost Data/Values 2030 Estimates Natural gas has a heat rate of 6,430 Btu / kWh. Variable O&M is $3.11 / MWh

  15. HVDC Transmission Parameterization

  16. Mathematical Optimization Minimize: + = + + + Subject to: ≥ + - ALL OTHER EQUATIONS CONSTRAIN THE MAGNITUDE OF ANY OF THE TERMS For details of the NEWS optimization see Clack et al. , IJEPES 2015.

  17. Present Paper Optimization Procedure Natural gas generation (MWh) Yearly cost of transmission stations ($/MW) Yearly cost of variable Yearly cost of conventional Installed capacity generation ($/MW) generation ($/MW) of transmission (MW) Installed capacity of Installed capacity of variable generation (MW) Yearly cost of transmission conventional generation (MW) lines ($/MW-mile) Cost of conventional fuels ($/MWh) Length of transmission lines (mile)

  18. Present Paper Optimization Procedure Load constraint VARIABLE CONVENTIONAL NET ELECTRIC GENERATION DEMAND GENERATION Subject to: Variable generator Filter Conventional generator Excess filter Installed capacity generation (MWh) of variable Hydroelectric generation (MW) generation (MWh) Transmission Weather Component power flux (MWh) Nuclear generation (h) (MWh) Electric demand (MWh) Natural gas generation (MWh)

  19. Present Paper Optimization Procedure Transmission power flux (MWh) VERY IMPORTANT CONSTRAINT AND EXTREMELY COMPUTATIONALLY EXPENSIVE Transmission power flow (MWh) HVDC transmission flux constraint Transmission power flow (MWh) Length of transmission lines (mile) Electric loss factor (%/mile)

  20. Peer reviewed description of the linear programming optimization techniques used.

  21. Present Paper Optimization Procedure • Optimization has O(10 6 ) equations, O(10 7 ) variables and O(10 8- 9 ) non zeroes • Solves in O(10 6 ) iterations or O(10 5 ) seconds. • We solve on a dedicated Server with 1 TB of RAM and 32 processors

  22. US Study: National Energy System Designer Step 1. We collected an extraordinarily detailed and accurate weather data set. Step 2. We collected electric load data concurrent in time with the weather data. Step 3. We developed a power system simulator that used all power sources and associated infrastructure (transmission and storage). Step 4. The simulator finds the least expensive configuration of the entire power system using hourly wind, solar and load concurrently. Step 5. The weather and economic simulator was used to study the geographic domain size effects of wind and solar energy generation systems.

  23. Cost optimized US Electric Power System for 2030

  24. Dispatch of wind and solar PV within the simulation

  25. Cost and Carbon Emission Analysis 2030

  26. Conclusions • Since weather is variable over large geographic scales, wind and solar generation and use must also encompass large geographic areas to be reliable and cost effective. • HVDC transmission grids would enable a large domains big enough to make wind and solar work. • The US could reduce CO2 emissions up to 80% with comparable electric costs to recent decades. 27

  27. Questions . . . . 28

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend