COSMIC RAYS P PASQU ASQUALE ALE BL BLASI ASI INAF/ Arc rcet - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cosmic rays
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

COSMIC RAYS P PASQU ASQUALE ALE BL BLASI ASI INAF/ Arc rcet - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

COSMIC RAYS P PASQU ASQUALE ALE BL BLASI ASI INAF/ Arc rcet etri Ast Astro rophysical O l Observato atory y THE ALL -PARTICLE SPECTRUM Knee 2 nd knee? Dip/Ankle GZK? OUTLINE 1. The supernova paradigm for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

COSMIC RAYS

P PASQU ASQUALE ALE BL BLASI ASI

INAF/ Arc rcet etri Ast Astro rophysical O l Observato atory y

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Knee 2nd knee? Dip/Ankle GZK?

THE ALL

  • PARTICLE SPECTRUM
slide-3
SLIDE 3

OUTLINE

  • 1. The supernova paradigm for acceleration
  • 2. The knee and the knees (chemistry)
  • 3. The end of Galactic CRs
  • 4. UHECRs
  • a. Spectrum
  • b. Anisotropy
  • c. Chemical Composition
slide-4
SLIDE 4

THE SUPERN THE SUPERNOVA P A PARADIGM ARADIGM

P PAR ARTICLE A TICLE ACCELERA CCELERATION TION

slide-5
SLIDE 5

TEST P EST PART RTICLE T LE THEORY OF EORY OF DIFFU FUSIVE S E SHOCK AC K ACCELE LERATION ON

  • 1. POWER LAW SPECTRUM WITH SLOPE
  • 2. LOW ACCELERATION EFFICIENCY REQUIRED
  • 3. MAXIMUM ENERGY

= R + 2 R 1 4

Emax~1-100 GeV<<Knee

slide-6
SLIDE 6

BEYOND TEST PARTICLES: Non linear DSA

Berezhko & Voelk, PB, Amato & PB, Ellison et al…

NON LI NON LINEAR R THEORY EORY DYNAMICAL REACTION OF ACCELERATED PARTICLES CR INDUCED B-FIELD AMPLIFICATION DYNAMICAL REACTION OF AMPLIFIED B-FIELDS

Cosmic r Cosmic ray acceler y acceleration ation up t up to The knee

  • The knee
slide-7
SLIDE 7

DYNAMICAL REACTION

!"#$%"&'"( %)*+,-./01*(21*+.3(

&4567(8/5)-( v

,.0,4567(((((((!/16./,5/(

&%9&:'$;! "#$%&'()!*+%,'$#!

CR TRANSPORT EQUATION

  • +

MASS, MOMENTUM, ENERGY CONSERVATION EQUATIONS

  • 1. CONCAVE SPECTRA
  • 2. HIGH ACCEL. EFFICIENCY
  • 3. REDUCED HEATING
  • 4. ESCAPE FLUX
slide-8
SLIDE 8

!9<(=>0+6+(?(@>))5)+(ABBC(

SHOCK MODIFICATION

REDUCED REDUCED HEA HEATIN TING G

slide-9
SLIDE 9

MAGNETIC FIELD AMPLIFICATION

SMALL PERTURBATIONS IN THE LOCAL B-FIELD CAN BE AMPLIFIED BY THE SUPER-ALFVENIC STREAMING OF THE ACCELERATED PARTICLES

METHOD: Write a Vlasov eq for each particle type Write Maxwell eqs for the fields Perturb them all Check if there are fourier modes that Develop a negative im(w) UNSTABLE MODES

slide-10
SLIDE 10

GROWING MODES

Amato & PB 2009, Bell 2004

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Amato & PB 2009

NON-RESONANT MODES grow faster only in the early phases of a SN

1000 years

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SATURATION OF GROWTH

ALL RESULTS ARE OBTAINED IN PERTURBATIVE THEORY BUT THEY LEAD TO NON-PERTURBATIVE CONCLUSIONS (dB/B>>1). HARD TO PREDICT THE REAL SATURATION LEVEL (EVEN PIC SIMULATIONS DISAGREE ON CONCLUSIONS…)

BUT IT IS SUGGES BUT IT IS SUGGESTIVE THA TIVE THAT THE V T THE VAL ALUES INFERRED FR UES INFERRED FROM OM PER PERTURB TURBATIVE TIVE THEOR THEORY HINT T Y HINT TO O

B 100 µG

slide-13
SLIDE 13

WHY IS IT INTERESTING:

  • I. Reaching the knee?
  • ./01.&!

DBE( DBF( DBC( DBG( !23!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!433 !!!!!!!!!!423!!!!!!!!!!!!!!533! !63! PR PROTON ON KNEE KNEE

PB, Amato & Caprioli, 2007 Amato & PB, 2006

9543(H+II(J+-45.-( 9K>3LM+I+6>-+5)(

slide-14
SLIDE 14

WHY I HY IS I S IT I T INT NTEREST ESTING ( G (2)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

WHY IS IT INTERESTING:

  • II. Large B observed?

TYPICAL THICKNESS OF FILAMENTS: 10-2 -10-3 pc The synchrotron limited thickness is:

x = 4D(E) syn(E) 4 pc Bµ

  • 3/2

B 100 µGauss

slide-16
SLIDE 16

DYNAMICAL ROLE OF THE AMPLIFIED B-FIELD

  • 1. LARGE B HIGHER MAX MOMENTUM PMAX
  • 2. HIGHER PMAX LARGER SHOCK MODIFICATION
  • 3. SHOCK MODIFICATION CONCAVE SPECTRA
  • 4. LARGE B REDUCE MODIFICATION LESS

CONCAVE SPECTRA (Rtot~10) [Caprioli et al. 2008]

slide-17
SLIDE 17

NARROW X-RAY RIMS MAGNETIC FIELD AMPLIFICATION MAGNETIC FIELD DAMPING

LARGE PMAX EFFICIENT ACCELERATION NO RIMS IN THE RADIO BAND SOME B AMPLIFICATION STILL NEEDED RIMS ALSO IN THE RADIO EMISSION NO ACCELERATION UP TO THE KNEE UNLESS… …ACCELERATION IN THE PERPENDICULAR REGIME CR INDUCED

(UPSTREAM)

PLASMA INDUCED

(DOWNSTREA M)

ONLY IF @ PERPENDIC. SHOCK

slide-18
SLIDE 18

789:;<=>!!

?@*A;<=>!

6%+$'B%C!8./(%!D!*E!533F!

RXJ1713

slide-19
SLIDE 19

THE MISSING LINK BETWEEN CRs AND ACCELERATED PARTICLES

WHAT IS THE SPECTRUM OF CR AT EARTH?

EXPANDING SHELL + ADIABATIC LOSSES DURING THE SEDOV-TAYLOR PHASE

N(E)E2 E

IN IN THE THE ABSENCE OF ABSENCE OF THIS ESC THIS ESCAPE PE FL FLUX UX ADIAB ADIABATIC L TIC LOSSES OSSES WOULD ULD MAKE REA MAKE REACHING CHING THE KNEE IMPOSSIBLE THE KNEE IMPOSSIBLE

$>L/+5M+<(!9(?(N3>-5(ABBO( P+/>7>,4Q+M+(?(!-.,7+)(ABBC(

slide-20
SLIDE 20

ESCAPE FLUX WITH TIME

Q(E)dE Fesc(t) 1 2 Vs

3 4Rsh 2 dE max

dt dE E t1/2 dE E E -2 dE

E-2 WI

WITH NO CONNE TH NO CONNECTION CTION WI WITH TH THE INTRINSIC SPE THE INTRINSIC SPECTR CTRUM UM

$>L/+5M+<(!9(?(N3>-5(ABBO( P+/>7>,4Q+M+(?(!-.,7+)(ABBC(

slide-21
SLIDE 21

PROTON SPECTRUM AT EARTH

EVIDENCE FOR A CUTOFF!

9/(/!,+%.!E#+(/'B/!#(!/$G!533H!

slide-22
SLIDE 22

SPECTRA

slide-23
SLIDE 23

PREDICTED SPECTRUM

ALL PARTICLE PROTONS ONLY Caprioli, PB & Amato 2009

slide-24
SLIDE 24

SOME IMPLICATIONS

  • 1. PROTONS ARE EXPECTED TO BE ACCELERATED T0 ~106 GeV
  • 2. ACCELERATION IS Z DEPENDENT EMAX(Z)=Z EMAX
  • 3. THE KNEE IS LIKELY TO BE THE RESULT OF OVERLAP

ON THE MAX ENERGY OF EACH SPECIE

  • 4. GALACTIC CRs SHOULD END WITH IRON @ ~1017 eV

?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

THE TRANSITION

  • 1. The SNR paradigm hints to a

galactic cr spectrum ending at ~a few 1017 eV

  • 2. Observations also suggest the

same trend

DIP MIXED ANKLE

slide-26
SLIDE 26

PROPAGATION OF PROTONS

100 Mpc

GZK DIP P

slide-27
SLIDE 27

MODIFICATION FACTOR

Aloisio, Berezinsky, PB & Ostapchenko 2008

slide-28
SLIDE 28

HOW DOES THE SPECTRUM LOOK LIKE? THE DIP

Berezinsky et al. 2005 Aloisio et al. 2007

slide-29
SLIDE 29

ACCIDENT OR PHYSICS?

Berezinsky et al. 2005 Aloisio et al. 2007

ENERGY SHIFTS WITHIN SYSTEMATICS FOR ALL EXPS BUT Auger

slide-30
SLIDE 30

HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE TRANSITION: THE ANKLE

slide-31
SLIDE 31

ALTERNATIVE INTERPRETATION OF THE TRANSITION: MIXED COMPOSITION

Allard et al. 2005-2008

slide-32
SLIDE 32

UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCE:

DIP VS MIXED

From Kampert 2008 From Sokolsky, SoCoR Workshop

slide-33
SLIDE 33

UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCE:

DIP VS ANKLE

Aloisio, Berezinsky, PB & Ostapchenko 2008

DIP ANKLE LE

slide-34
SLIDE 34

XMAX and RMS OF XMAX

Auger HiRes

slide-35
SLIDE 35

THE E GZK F FEATURE E

HiR iRes Auger r

From Roth (SoCOR Workshop)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

CR Astronomy with PAO

slide-37
SLIDE 37

SOME INCONSISTENCIES

  • 1. PAO hints to a gradually heavier composition @ high E
  • 2. …BUT THE GALACTIC B-FIELD LARGE DEFLECTIONS
  • 3. WOULD THIS KEEP THE LARGE SCALE ANISOTROPY?
  • 4. EVEN MOST MIXED COMPOSITION MODELS DO PREDICT
  • 5. EVEN ASSUMING THAT WE ARE IN FACT SEEING HEAVY

NUCLEI (THEREFORE NO CORRELATION) THEN THE FLUX SUPPRESSION IS NOT THE GZK FEATURE

slide-38
SLIDE 38

SOM SOME CON E CONCLUSION ONS

X-ray observations have probably provided us with the first evidence of b amplification This makes possible to reach the knee for protons Heavier nuclei follow with z The transition region would be naturally around 1017 eV The competing models of the transition can be Discriminated through composition studies UHECRs remain confusing…