COSMIC RAYS
P PASQU ASQUALE ALE BL BLASI ASI
INAF/ Arc rcet etri Ast Astro rophysical O l Observato atory y
COSMIC RAYS P PASQU ASQUALE ALE BL BLASI ASI INAF/ Arc rcet - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
COSMIC RAYS P PASQU ASQUALE ALE BL BLASI ASI INAF/ Arc rcet etri Ast Astro rophysical O l Observato atory y THE ALL -PARTICLE SPECTRUM Knee 2 nd knee? Dip/Ankle GZK? OUTLINE 1. The supernova paradigm for
P PASQU ASQUALE ALE BL BLASI ASI
INAF/ Arc rcet etri Ast Astro rophysical O l Observato atory y
Knee 2nd knee? Dip/Ankle GZK?
THE ALL
THE SUPERN THE SUPERNOVA P A PARADIGM ARADIGM
P PAR ARTICLE A TICLE ACCELERA CCELERATION TION
= R + 2 R 1 4
Emax~1-100 GeV<<Knee
BEYOND TEST PARTICLES: Non linear DSA
Berezhko & Voelk, PB, Amato & PB, Ellison et al…
NON LI NON LINEAR R THEORY EORY DYNAMICAL REACTION OF ACCELERATED PARTICLES CR INDUCED B-FIELD AMPLIFICATION DYNAMICAL REACTION OF AMPLIFIED B-FIELDS
Cosmic r Cosmic ray acceler y acceleration ation up t up to The knee
!"#$%"&'"( %)*+,-./01*(21*+.3(
&4567(8/5)-( v
,.0,4567(((((((!/16./,5/(
&%9&:'$;! "#$%&'()!*+%,'$#!
CR TRANSPORT EQUATION
MASS, MOMENTUM, ENERGY CONSERVATION EQUATIONS
!9<(=>0+6+(?(@>))5)+(ABBC(
SHOCK MODIFICATION
REDUCED REDUCED HEA HEATIN TING G
SMALL PERTURBATIONS IN THE LOCAL B-FIELD CAN BE AMPLIFIED BY THE SUPER-ALFVENIC STREAMING OF THE ACCELERATED PARTICLES
METHOD: Write a Vlasov eq for each particle type Write Maxwell eqs for the fields Perturb them all Check if there are fourier modes that Develop a negative im(w) UNSTABLE MODES
Amato & PB 2009, Bell 2004
Amato & PB 2009
NON-RESONANT MODES grow faster only in the early phases of a SN
1000 years
ALL RESULTS ARE OBTAINED IN PERTURBATIVE THEORY BUT THEY LEAD TO NON-PERTURBATIVE CONCLUSIONS (dB/B>>1). HARD TO PREDICT THE REAL SATURATION LEVEL (EVEN PIC SIMULATIONS DISAGREE ON CONCLUSIONS…)
BUT IT IS SUGGES BUT IT IS SUGGESTIVE THA TIVE THAT THE V T THE VAL ALUES INFERRED FR UES INFERRED FROM OM PER PERTURB TURBATIVE TIVE THEOR THEORY HINT T Y HINT TO O
DBE( DBF( DBC( DBG( !23!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!433 !!!!!!!!!!423!!!!!!!!!!!!!!533! !63! PR PROTON ON KNEE KNEE
PB, Amato & Caprioli, 2007 Amato & PB, 2006
9543(H+II(J+-45.-( 9K>3LM+I+6>-+5)(
TYPICAL THICKNESS OF FILAMENTS: 10-2 -10-3 pc The synchrotron limited thickness is:
x = 4D(E) syn(E) 4 pc Bµ
CONCAVE SPECTRA (Rtot~10) [Caprioli et al. 2008]
NARROW X-RAY RIMS MAGNETIC FIELD AMPLIFICATION MAGNETIC FIELD DAMPING
LARGE PMAX EFFICIENT ACCELERATION NO RIMS IN THE RADIO BAND SOME B AMPLIFICATION STILL NEEDED RIMS ALSO IN THE RADIO EMISSION NO ACCELERATION UP TO THE KNEE UNLESS… …ACCELERATION IN THE PERPENDICULAR REGIME CR INDUCED
(UPSTREAM)
PLASMA INDUCED
(DOWNSTREA M)
ONLY IF @ PERPENDIC. SHOCK
789:;<=>!!
?@*A;<=>!
6%+$'B%C!8./(%!D!*E!533F!
RXJ1713
THE MISSING LINK BETWEEN CRs AND ACCELERATED PARTICLES
WHAT IS THE SPECTRUM OF CR AT EARTH?
EXPANDING SHELL + ADIABATIC LOSSES DURING THE SEDOV-TAYLOR PHASE
N(E)E2 E
IN IN THE THE ABSENCE OF ABSENCE OF THIS ESC THIS ESCAPE PE FL FLUX UX ADIAB ADIABATIC L TIC LOSSES OSSES WOULD ULD MAKE REA MAKE REACHING CHING THE KNEE IMPOSSIBLE THE KNEE IMPOSSIBLE
$>L/+5M+<(!9(?(N3>-5(ABBO( P+/>7>,4Q+M+(?(!-.,7+)(ABBC(
Q(E)dE Fesc(t) 1 2 Vs
3 4Rsh 2 dE max
dt dE E t1/2 dE E E -2 dE
E-2 WI
WITH NO CONNE TH NO CONNECTION CTION WI WITH TH THE INTRINSIC SPE THE INTRINSIC SPECTR CTRUM UM
$>L/+5M+<(!9(?(N3>-5(ABBO( P+/>7>,4Q+M+(?(!-.,7+)(ABBC(
PROTON SPECTRUM AT EARTH
EVIDENCE FOR A CUTOFF!
9/(/!,+%.!E#+(/'B/!#(!/$G!533H!
ALL PARTICLE PROTONS ONLY Caprioli, PB & Amato 2009
ON THE MAX ENERGY OF EACH SPECIE
galactic cr spectrum ending at ~a few 1017 eV
same trend
100 Mpc
GZK DIP P
MODIFICATION FACTOR
Aloisio, Berezinsky, PB & Ostapchenko 2008
HOW DOES THE SPECTRUM LOOK LIKE? THE DIP
Berezinsky et al. 2005 Aloisio et al. 2007
ACCIDENT OR PHYSICS?
Berezinsky et al. 2005 Aloisio et al. 2007
ENERGY SHIFTS WITHIN SYSTEMATICS FOR ALL EXPS BUT Auger
HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE TRANSITION: THE ANKLE
ALTERNATIVE INTERPRETATION OF THE TRANSITION: MIXED COMPOSITION
Allard et al. 2005-2008
UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCE:
DIP VS MIXED
From Kampert 2008 From Sokolsky, SoCoR Workshop
UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCE:
DIP VS ANKLE
Aloisio, Berezinsky, PB & Ostapchenko 2008
DIP ANKLE LE
XMAX and RMS OF XMAX
Auger HiRes
HiR iRes Auger r
From Roth (SoCOR Workshop)
NUCLEI (THEREFORE NO CORRELATION) THEN THE FLUX SUPPRESSION IS NOT THE GZK FEATURE
X-ray observations have probably provided us with the first evidence of b amplification This makes possible to reach the knee for protons Heavier nuclei follow with z The transition region would be naturally around 1017 eV The competing models of the transition can be Discriminated through composition studies UHECRs remain confusing…