Corrosion Control at VMT Dr. Rust, Inc. Corrosion Control at VMT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

corrosion control
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Corrosion Control at VMT Dr. Rust, Inc. Corrosion Control at VMT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Corrosion Control at VMT Dr. Rust, Inc. Corrosion Control at VMT R. Heidersbach Dr. Rust, Inc. R. Heidersbach K. Prakash R. Guise January 17, 2013 Emphasis of Project Objective not to second guess Objective is an assessment of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Corrosion Control at VMT

  • Dr. Rust, Inc.
  • R. Heidersbach
  • K. Prakash
  • R. Guise

Corrosion Control at VMT

  • Dr. Rust, Inc.
  • R. Heidersbach

January 17, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Emphasis of Project

  • Objective not to second

guess

  • Objective is an

assessment of what was seen and obvious reliability issues that need to be addressed

  • Goal for both Alyeska

and RCAC

– Prevent corrosion-related environmental damage

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Objectives

  • Evaluate corrosion control at Valdez

Marine Terminal

– Only for systems that can cause oil pollution

  • Emphasis on procedures
  • Review condition of

– Corrosion control efforts – Tanks, piping, berths and related equipment

  • Recommend changes, if any, that should

be considered

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Dr. Rust Inc
  • Bob Heidersbach

– Direct contractor to PWSRCAC – Pipes and corrosion inhibitors

  • Kash Prakash

– Tanks – Coatings – Berth facilities

  • Bob Guise

– Cathodic protection

9/20/2012 Board Meeting PWSRCAC

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Thanks

Alyeska PSC

  • Barry Roberts
  • Steve Lacatena
  • Clay Forsyth
  • Doug Fleming
  • Tawna Beer-Burns,

Coffman

  • Cecilia Sanchez,

Baker Hughes PWSRCAC

  • Tom Kuckertz
  • Linda Swiss
  • Anna Carey
  • Donna Schantz
  • Mark Swanson
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Priorities--crude oil marine terminals

Corrosive Environments

  • Oil

– Largest volume of potential pollutants largest pollution risk

  • Fire fighting equipment

– Safety – Perhaps equal in operational priority, but less likely to produce pollution

  • Vapor recovery
  • Oily water

– Most corrosive liquid environment

Equipment

  • Piping

– Most likely to leak – Pitting corrosion most likely corrosion-related leak initiator

  • Berthing/dock facilities

– At waters edge

  • Pipelines

– Buried – Hard to inspect – ECDA coming standard/requirement

  • Tanks

– Large volume of oil – Easy to inspect – Expensive internal inspections

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Scheduling and Timeline

  • Pre-visit Activities – Prior to July 31, 2012

– Requests for and analysis of documentation

  • Anchorage Activities – July 31-August 3, 2012

– Documents review -- Alyeska’s Anchorage office

  • Valdez Field Work – August 6 – 9, 2012

– Monday – Admin, safety, security, document requests, facilities access requests – Tuesday – Look at Berth 4, tanks, CP, piping, fire foam systems – Wednesday – Look at Berth 5 and other VMT locations, – Thursday – Exit briefing

  • Draft report – September 2012
  • Final Report – Revise and review – October thru December 2012
  • Final report – Proposed for acceptance -- January 2013
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Changes in Oilfield Corrosion Problems

  • As oilfields age, corrosivity increases
  • Inspection and corrosion control efforts

need to be increased in ageing fields/terminals

  • Decreased production decreased

funding for maintenance and inspection at the same time that needs for these efforts increase

slide-9
SLIDE 9

OK/Almost OK Areas

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Internal corrosion of pipes

  • Control is by corrosion inhibitor

– Injected batches on 2-week intervals

  • Effectiveness of corrosion inhibitors and

biocides is monitored by coupons

– Inserted/removed twice per year – Standard weight loss and pit depth report

  • State of the art in the 1970s
  • Still most common method of monitoring corrosivity

and effectiveness of corrosion inhibitors

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Structural Integrity

  • Covered by Alyeska MP-166.3.21, VMT

Facility Underwater Inspections

  • Covered by Alyeska MP-166.3.21, VMT

Facility Underwater Inspections

Structural Integrity

slide-12
SLIDE 12

AFFF—Fluoroprotein Foam

  • Concern before this week’s efforts
  • No longer a corrosion concern
  • “Spiders” in tanks have experienced some

corrosion

– External in “deadleg” locations – Now part of Alyeska T-500 tank inspection protocol (2012 paragraph additions)

  • Concern before August

efforts

  • No longer a corrosion

concern

  • “Spiders” in tanks have

experienced some corrosion

– External in “deadleg” locations – Now part of Alyeska T-500 tank inspection protocol (2012 paragraph additions)

Fire-suppression Foam

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Tanks

  • Tank inspection is OK

– Possible exceptions are roof and vapor recovery systems which were not considered in this project’s efforts – Need to review summer 2012 inspection results

  • Corroded foam spiders

now included in Alyeska procedure

slide-14
SLIDE 14

API 653 Scope

  • Includes foam fire suppression systems
  • Alyeska T-500

– New section 3.4 on Fire Foam System added early 2012

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Cathodic Protection—Buried Piping

  • Good

– Follow strictest industrial/regulatory practice

  • NACE SP0169
  • Coming

– ECDA

  • NACE SP0502-2008, Pipeline External Corrosion

Direct Assessment Methodology

  • Coming from US DOT
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Cathodic protection Industrial waste water line

  • Ductile cast iron
  • Bell and spigot connections
  • No jumpers

– Questionable continuity

  • Jumpers
  • Lead or jute packing poor or no electrical

continuity at joints

–  stray current – Questionable cathodic protection beyond the first joint

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ECDA—External corrosion direct assessment

  • External corrosion direct assessment
  • NACE SP0502—Pipeline External Corrosion

Direct Assessment Methodology

  • Will be required by US DOT at some time in the

future

  • Requires digs and inspection in selected

locations

  • Controversial,

– Evolving methodology – RBI-related

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Cathodic Protection—Berth Platform Legs

  • OK

Cathodic Protection Berth Platform Legs--OK

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Cathodic Protection--Tanks

  • Tank bottoms

–Pay attention to readings

  • Rectifiers turned off  almost instant

depolarization based on measurements in August 2012

  • Stray current from nearby systems?

– Soil side only?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Corrosion Coupons in Piping

  • Used for monitoring changes in

the environment

  • Cannot

– Identify/measure worst corrosion in the system

  • Only the corrosion of the

coupon—not the system

– Deadlegs – Crevices – MIC – Identify when corrosion occurred

  • Comparison with previous

exposure data  indication of effectiveness

  • Misses upsets, etc.
  • Needs comparisons with previous

exposures to ID trends in corrosion rates

  • Too much data to usefully

interpret

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Problem Areas

  • Corrosion under insulation
  • Inspectability
  • Communications

– Contractor/Alyeska personnel – Problemsresolution of problems

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Corrosion Under Insulation (CUI) —Berth 5 Crude Oil Line

  • Good news—

corrosion found/repaired with no leaks into the environment

  • Concern
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Previous Observations of Corrosion

  • n Unpainted Welded Joints

Corrosion near unpainted welds on insulated piping.

Photograph by T. Kuckertz, PWSRCAC staff member, May 29, 2008 at the VMT Ballast Water Treatment Facility

slide-24
SLIDE 24

CUI Identified during Fieldwork in Anchorage by Alyeska

Corrosion on Berth 4 riser piping caused 70% wall loss in places

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Slide from Tom Kuckertz presentation September 2012

Repairs in accordance with standard industrial practice

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Summer 2012 CUI Corrosion Inspections

Alyeska inspection

  • 3rd year of program to

inspect selected locations

  • 2012 results

– Crude oil piping – Maximum pitting 70%+ wall loss – Sleeve repairs

Alyeska survey

  • Project Z683 – VMT

Crude Header External Condition Survey (2012)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Summer 2012 CUI Corrosion Inspections

Good news

  • VMT found the

corrosion

– Before leaks

Concerns

  • Over water location

Questions

  • When did the

corrosion occur?

  • Why not discovered

sooner?

– 3rd year of inspection program – Previous years did not emphasize over-water locations

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Snow-removal damage 2012

Note sharp, angular features on openings

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Openings prior to 2012

Piping Leading to Berth 5

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Numerous patches at VMT

This is good news—inspection/maintenance has occurred

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Additional CUI-related Observations

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Corrosion coupon box—

full of water on August 7 and again on August 8

Corrosion coupon box—

full of water on August 7 and again on August 8

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Wet pipe above coupon holder Wet pipe above coupon holder

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Water droplets Unavoidable “void” space

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Note UT grid pattern

  • Did anyone report the

water on the pipe?

  • Contractors see these

locations several times each year

  • No requirement to

report moisture to Alyeska decision makers

  • Did anyone report the

water on the pipe?

  • Contractors see these

locations several times each year

  • No requirement to

report moisture to Alyeska decision makers

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Question/problem?

  • The previous slides show pipes wetted in

locations where a contractor pulling corrosion coupons gains access to the pipe twice a year.

  • Does Alyeska & their contractor have a method
  • f communicating the water accumulation at

these “dry” locations?

  • Possibly install drain holes on bottom of jackets

– May lead to melt water intrusion due to high snow loads in some locations at VMT

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Corrosion Under Insulation

  • NACE SP0198
  • Not industry-recognized problem in 1970’s
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Problem locations for insulated above-ground pipelines

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Slide from 2006 RCAC presentation Illustrates problems associated with localized corrosion inspections Best practice—100% inspection

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Key Recommendations

  • Install smart pigging, or other equivalent internal

inspection options ASAP (as soon as possible)

  • Until this smart-pigging capability is installed, the

VMT should

– Emphasize inspection of above-water piping systems – Repair damaged external jacketing (weather proofing)

  • Improve communications and instructions to

corrosion contractors

  • Improve reporting and information feedback

procedures

  • Evaluate summer 2012 reports on Tanks 13 & 14
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Smart Pigging

  • Capital improvement

– Time to schedule/fund/install

  • Not possible in 1970s
  • Allows simultaneous inspection for internal and

external corrosion

  • Will eventually allow
  • More frequent inspections
  • Simultaneous internal and external corrosion inspections
  • Complete inspections of entire VMT large-diameter piping

lines

  • Eliminate the need for

– Digging – Estimates as to where most corrosion has occurred.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Recommended Emphasis on Over-Water Locations

  • Smart pigging installations
  • Inspections in absence of smart-pig

capability

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Concluding remarks

  • DRI was on-site for only 4 days
  • Alyeska and VMT personnel are there

continuously

  • Contractors do corrosion-related work on a

monthly and/or semi-annual basis

  • Communications between contractors and

Alyeska decision makers need improvement