Corporate Presentation
January 2017
Corporate Presentation January 2017 Cautionary statements ALL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Corporate Presentation January 2017 Cautionary statements ALL AMOUNTS IN U.S. DOLLARS UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information contained in this presentation, including any information
Corporate Presentation
January 2017
Cautionary statements
2
ALL AMOUNTS IN U.S. DOLLARS UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information contained in this presentation, including any information relating to New Gold’s future financial or operating performance are “forward looking”. All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical fact, which address events, results, outcomes or developments that New Gold expects to occur are “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “targeted”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “potential”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation of such terms. Forward-looking statements in this presentation include, among others, statements with respect to: guidance for production; mineral reserve and resource estimates; planned design for the Rainy River project; construction activities at the Rainy River project and their expected progress and timelines, including the timing for, and duration of, underground development and its impact and timing for power energization; expected capital costs and contingency amounts and timing for incurring costs in the future; planned preparations for operations, including the mining rate, removal of overburden and waste and storage of water prior to commissioning and availability of ore; the expected production, costs, economics, grade, mining and milling rate, strip ratio, milling and mill feed schedule, recovery rates and mine life and other operating parameters of the Rainy River project; planned staffing levels; future exploration activities and exploration potential; the capacity of the starter dam; targeted timing for permits; targeted timing for commissioning, start-up, production and ramp-up; statements with respect to the company’s future compliance with its leverage ratio covenants; statements regarding future free cash flow and after-tax cash flow; and statements with respect to the payment of the remaining $75 million from Royal Gold and the percentage of future revenue represented by the total payments from Royal Gold. All forward-looking statements in this presentation are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and are subject to important risk factors and uncertainties, many of which are beyond New Gold’s ability to control or predict. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this presentation, New Gold’s annual and quarterly management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”), its Annual Information Form and its Technical Reports filed at www.sedar.com. In addition to, and subject to, such assumptions discussed in more detail elsewhere, the forward-looking statements in this presentation are also subject to the following assumptions: (1) there being no significant disruptions affecting New Gold’s operations; (2) political and legal developments in jurisdictions where New Gold operates being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (3) the accuracy of New Gold’s current mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates; (4) the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and U.S. dollar being approximately consistent with current levels; (5) prices for diesel, natural gas, fuel oil, electricity and other key supplies being approximately consistent with current levels; (6) equipment, labour and materials costs increasing on a basis consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (7) arrangements with Indigenous groups in respect of the Rainy River project being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (8) all required permits, licenses and authorizations being obtained from the relevant governments and other relevant stakeholders within the expected timelines; (9) the results of the feasibility study for the Rainy River project being realized; (10) conditions to the payment of the remaining $75 million from Royal Gold being satisfied later in 2016; and (11) with respect to guidance for 2016 AISC, refer to “2016 Guidance” in New Gold’s news release dated February 17, 2016 for the key assumptions. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, without limitation: significant capital requirements and the availability and management of capital resources; additional funding requirements; price volatility in the spot and forward markets for metals and other commodities; fluctuations in the international currency markets and in the rates of exchange of the currencies of Canada and the United States; discrepancies between actual and estimated production, between actual and estimated mineral reserves and mineral resources and between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries; changes in national and local government legislation; taxation; controls, regulations and political or economic developments in the countries in which New Gold does or may carry on business; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining and maintaining the validity and enforceability of the necessary licenses and permits and complying with the permitting requirements of each jurisdiction in which New Gold operates, including, but not limited to: in Canada, obtaining the necessary permits for the Rainy River project; the uncertainties inherent to current and future legal challenges New Gold is or may become a party to; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves and resources; competition; loss of key employees; rising costs of labour, supplies, fuel and equipment; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activities; uncertainties inherent to mining economic studies including the feasibility study for the Rainy River project; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; accidents; labour disputes; defective title to mineral claims or property or contests over claims to mineral properties; unexpected delays and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of Indigenous groups; risks, uncertainties and unanticipated delays associated with obtaining and maintaining necessary licenses, permits and authorizations and complying with permitting requirements. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental events and hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover these risks) as well as “Risk Factors” included in New Gold’s disclosure documents filed on and available at www.sedar.com. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results and future events could materially differ from those anticipated in such statements. All of the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are qualified by these cautionary
except in accordance with applicable securities laws. The footnotes, endnotes and appendix to this presentation contain important information. The endnotes and appendix are found at the end of the presentation.
Portfolio
in top-rated jurisdictions Invested and experienced team Among lowest-cost producers with established track record Peer-leading growth pipeline A history
creation
New Gold investment thesis
15.0 Moz gold reserves(1), >85% located in Canada C$45 million investment by Board & Management Q3’2016 all-in sustaining costs(2)
Lowered 2016 cost guidance by $75/oz in Q2 ~800 Koz annual production potential from growth projects(3) Share price
S&P/TSX Global Gold Index by >200% since beginning
Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.
3
Portfolio of assets in top-rated jurisdictions
4
Blackwater New Afton Rainy River Mesquite Cerro San Pedro Peak Mines Mine Life: 17 years Mine Life: 12+ years Mine Life: 14 years Mine Life: 7 years + residual leach Mine Life: Final year + residual leach Mine Life: 6+ years
#1
CANADA
#3
UNITED STATES
#5
MEXICO
#2
AUSTRALIA
OPERATING DEVELOPMENT
All Assets Ranked in Top 5 Global Mining Jurisdictions(1)
Mineral Reserves(2)
5
Experienced and invested team
David Emerson Former Canadian Cabinet Minister James Estey Chairman, PrairieSky Royalty Robert Gallagher Former President & Chief Executive Officer, New Gold Vahan Kololian Founder, TerraNova Partners Martyn Konig Chief Investment Officer, T Wealth Management Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Ian Pearce Partner, X2 Resources Kay Priestly Former Chief Executive Officer, Turquoise Hill Resources Raymond Threlkeld Chairman, Newmarket Gold Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Hannes Portmann President Brian Penny Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Raymond Threlkeld Interim Chief Operating Officer
Executive Management Team Board of Directors
Significantly invested in company, directly aligned with shareholders
6
GOLD PRODUCTION (Koz) COPPER PRODUCTION (Mlbs) TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz) ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz) SILVER PRODUCTION (Moz)
2016 consolidated guidance – First nine months 2016
On track to meet full-year gold production guidance and lowered cost guidance
YTD 2016 2016 GUIDANCE
YTD 2016 2016 GUIDANCE
YTD 2016 2016 GUIDANCE
YTD 2016 2016 GUIDANCE YTD 2016 2016 GUIDANCE
$105 $136
7
First nine months 2016 free cash flow generation
New Afton ($ million) Peak Mines ($ million) Mesquite ($ million) Cerro San Pedro ($ million)
All operations generating free cash flow
$15 $49
Operating margin(1) Free cash flow(2)
$34
$54 $62
Operating margin(1) Free cash flow(2) Capex(3)
$15 $16
Operating margin(1) Free cash flow(2) Capex(3)
$809 $718 $340 $551
FY 2015 First Nine Months 2016
$1,149 $1,269
+62%
First Nine Months 2016 Free Cash Flow Generation Margin Expansion ($/oz)
All-in Sustaining Costs(4) Margin(5) Realized Gold Price
$8 $1
Capex(3) Operating margin(1) Free cash flow(2) Capex(3)
$31
8
Liquidity position
Remaining proceeds Rainy River stream(3) Remaining Rainy River capital(4)
Liquidity Position
$502million
Cash and cash equivalents(1)
$151 million $276 million
Undrawn credit facility(2)
$415 million
$75 million Ongoing Sustaining Free Cash Flow
Generating free cash flow with gold price certainty through option contracts through June 2017 Payment received November 2016 Approximately $50 million spent in October
Reinvesting free cash flow generation
9
First Nine Months 2016 All-in Sustaining Cost Margin(1)
+75% of expected 2016 company production at lower all-in sustaining costs(2)
Rainy River
Opportunity to extend mine life of New Gold’s most significant cash flow generator
New Afton C-zone
+120% of expected 2016 company production at lower all-in sustaining costs(2)
Blackwater
Investing in longer-lived, larger-scale, lower-cost assets
10
Rainy River project summary
Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources” and “Technical Information”. Mineral resources are exclusive of reserves.
>30% from Indigenous communities
line construction complete
Ontario, Canada
Gold Reserves
3.1Moz at 1.0g/t
Open Pit Underground
0.7Moz at 5.0g/t
#1
Gold M&I Resources
2.0Moz at 0.8g/t
Open Pit Underground
0.6Moz at 3.7g/t
Jurisdiction Resource Scale(2)
Secured low power rates through 2024
Rainy River overview
11
Start-up planned for mid-2017
Overall Construction
Through October 2016
Capital Spent Project to Date
$680 million
Through October 2016
Total Remaining Capital
$365 million
Process building Mill building SAG and ball mill Open pit From November 2016 through targeted mid-2017 start-up
12
Rainy River project metrics
Pebble crusher Primary crusher CIP tanks Process building
$550 /oz $710 /oz
Gold Production Total Cash Costs(1) All-in Sustaining Costs(2)
~80% of costs denominated in Canadian dollars
13
Significant cash flow contributor
$770 $710 $480 $540
FY 2016E Rainy River
$1,250 $1,250
Rainy River doubles New Gold’s cash margin
~$180million ~$175million
Cash Margin(3)
RAINY RIVER
4 operating mines 1 operating mine
Increases Margins Significantly Increases Cash Flow All-in Sustaining Costs(1) ($/oz) Margin(2) ($/oz) Gold Price ($/oz)
14
Rainy River value creation through development
Development of Rainy River presents opportunity for ~$1.0 billion
UPSIDE
$300million
Acquisition cost
50% /
Cash
50%
Shares
$1.0billion
Development capital estimate(1)
$1.3billion
Total investment Average annual after-tax cash flow(2) Potential cash flow multiple range Implied value potential
~$225million
Investment Value Potential
$100 change in gold price
+/- ~$30million +/- ~$300million
~10x
15
New Afton C-zone opportunity
Based on the feasibility study, average annual pre-tax cash flow
mine/process 25 million tonnes (over five years) of material from C-zone
and 430 million pounds of copper to reserves
higher, copper grade 8% lower
year
further expand C-zone
to the west Feasibility Study Highlights
1,180m
C-zone Block Cave Volume Open to West Open at depth Main Zone Extraction Level
C-zone
Measured Indicated Inferred
Blackwater highlights
16
flow”. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources” and “Technical Information”.
Development Capital(1)
Reserves(2)
Annual Production(3) Life-of-Mine Revenue ($B)(4) Sustaining Cost Margin(5) Regional Upside 2016 Plan: Complete Environmental Assessment process in first half 2017
Land Package
Flagship asset already in portfolio
Strong Canadian presence
17
Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.
OPERATING DEVELOPMENT
1.2 Moz Gold Reserve(2) 1.1 Blb Copper Reserve(2) 2015 operating margin: $187 million
New Afton (production)
3.8 Moz Gold Reserve(2) 9.4 Moz Silver Reserve(2) >190km2 land package
Rainy River (construction)
8.2 Moz Gold Reserve(2) 60.8 Moz Silver Reserve(2) >1,100km2 land package
Blackwater (permitting)
Top global mining jurisdiction(1) >85% gold reserves(2) in Canada Significant Canadian dollar exposure ~70% of cash flow generated from Canadian
~25% gold production from Canadian assets
in full production Our Footprint in Canada
New Gold has multiple organic growth options in its portfolio
18
New Gold looking forward
Organic Growth Projects(2) Current Portfolio
~$640 /oz
Average Annual Gold Production Per Asset All-in Sustaining Costs(3) Weighted Average
~7 years ~100 Koz ~$770 /oz
Average Mine Life
Investing in longer-lived, larger-scale, lower-cost assets ~400 Koz
(1)
>2x 4x
($130)/oz
19
A history of value creation
New Gold (NYSE MKT)
171%
Gold Price
35%
S&P/TSX Global Gold Index(2)
(39%)
13.3% 3.9% (5.9%)
Compound Annual Growth Rate
Performance since beginning of 2009(1)
New Gold investment thesis
20
Establishing the leading intermediate gold company
Invested and experienced team Portfolio
in top-rated jurisdictions Peer-leading growth pipeline A history
creation
Among lowest-cost producers with established track record
Appendices
21
Appendices Page 1. Corporate 22 2. New Afton 35 3. Other Operations – Mesquite, Peak Mines, Cerro San Pedro 42 4. Rainy River 45 5. Blackwater 57 6. Exploration and Reserves and Resources 58
Summary of debt
22
Undrawn Credit Facility Senior Unsecured Notes (April 2012) Senior Unsecured Notes (November 2012) Face Value $400 million(1) $300 million $500 million Maturity 3 years with annual extensions permitted April 15, 2020 November 15, 2022 Interest Rate See ‘Key features’ 7.00% 6.25% Payable Revolving credit Semi-annually Semi-annually Conversion price n/a n/a n/a Current trading value n/a ~103 ~101 Key features
between 2.00%-3.25% based on leverage ratio
2016 at 103.5% down to 100%
ratio below 2:1
15, 2017 at par plus half coupon, declining ratably to par
ratio below 2:1
Appendix 1
23
Credit facility overview
Appendix 1
credit for closure obligations at the company’s producing mines and development projects
Revolving credit facility (expires August 14, 2019) $400 Letters of credit issued $124 Undrawn credit facility $276
Current Revolving Credit Facility ($mm)
Prior Terms Current Terms Maximum Net Debt/EBITDA Q4’16-Q2’17 4.5x Thereafter 3.5x Q4’16-Q2’17 4.5x Q3’17-Q4’17 4.0x Thereafter 3.5x
Credit Facility Financial Covenants
Gold production (Koz)
398 436
Silver production (Koz)
1.6 1.9
Copper production (Mlbs)
85 100
Gold reserves(1) (Moz)
15.9 15.0
Copper reserves(1) (Blbs)
1.0 1.2
Operating expenses ($mm)
$436 $420
Corporate administration ($mm)
$27 $20
Exploration and business development ($mm)
$34 $7 $497 $447
24
Producing more and spending less 2015 2013
+10%
+19% +18% (6%) +20% (4%) (26%) (79%) (10%)
improvement in production of all metals at lower costs:
Appendix 1
25
2016 third quarter highlights
$350 per oz
Total cash costs(1)
$682 per oz
All-in sustaining costs(2)
Production Costs Margin Financial Balance Sheet Rainy River
Overall construction currently 60% complete $131 million in capital expenditures during third quarter
in October
$151million
Cash balance at Sept. 30, 2016 Further enhanced financial flexibility by increasing size of credit facility to $400 million and
additional gold option contracts for first six months of 2017
$90million
Cash generated from operations
$0.17
Cash flow per share
$978 per oz
Total cash cost margin(3)
$646 per oz
All-in sustaining cost margin(3)
Appendix 1
24 19 15
26
Mine-by-mine operating results
Total cash costs(1) ($/oz) All-in sustaining costs(2) ($/oz)
2016 Third Quarter
Gold production (Koz)
($633) $633 $522 $897 ($211) $1,202 $632 $912
GOLD PRODUCTION (oz)
TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz)
ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz)
38
Well positioned to meet full-year production guidance
Appendix 1
74 72 89 51
27
Mine-by-mine operating results
Total cash costs(1) ($/oz) All-in sustaining costs(2) ($/oz)
First Nine Months 2016
Gold production (Koz)
($605) $622 $575 $911 ($202) $1,085 $736 $936
GOLD PRODUCTION (oz)
TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz)
ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz)
Well positioned to meet full-year production guidance
Appendix 1
Consolidated financial summary
28 Three months ended September 30 Nine months ended September 30
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)
2016 2015 2016 2015 Revenues $179 $177 $514 $514 Operating margin(2) 94 72 262 211 Adjusted net earnings/(loss)(3) 13 (9) 27 (14) Adjusted net earnings/(loss) per share(3) 0.03 (0.02) 0.05 (0.03) Net earnings/(loss) 5 (158) 23 (192) Net earnings/(loss) per share 0.01 (0.31) 0.04 (0.38) Cash generated from operations before changes in non-cash operating working capital(4) 89 58 233 189 Cash generated from operations 90 51 231 178
Financial Summary
GOLD ($/oz):
19%
COPPER ($/lb):
(3%)
SILVER ($/oz):
37% Average Realized Prices(1)
$1,117 $1,328 $2.23 $2.17 $14.72 $20.15
Appendix 1
Detailed operating results and assumptions
29
Appendix 1
2015A 2015A 2015A Tonnes processed
(000 tonnes)
5,097 5,400
19,987 13,900
723 580
Total tonnes mined
(000 tonnes)
5,255 6,900
58,778 56,500
693 600
Strip ratio
3.1
(g/t)
0.78 0.66
0.34 0.43
4.19 4.80
Silver grade
(g/t)
(%)
0.90% 0.80%
0.60%
Gold recovery(1)
(%)
82.5% 79.0%
61.7% 93.0% 91.0%
Silver recovery
(%)
(%)
84.9% 81.0%
87.0%
Production Gold production
(Koz)
105.5 90.0
134.9 130.0
89.9 80.0
Silver production
(Koz)
(Mlbs)
86.0 75.0
6.0
Reserve Grade at December 31, 2015 Gold grade
(g/t)
Silver grade
(g/t)
Copper grade
(%)
1.29% 2.89 6.9 Mesquite 2016E 2016E New Afton Peak Mines 2016E ~65% 0.82%
0.55 2.1
2016 all-in sustaining costs sensitivities
30
Appendix 1
Category Copper Price Silver Price CDN/USD AUD/USD MXN/USD
Base Assumption $2.00 $14.00 $1.40 $1.40 $18.00 Sensitivity +/-$0.25 +/-$1.00 +/-$0.05 +/-$0.05 +/-$1.00 COST PER OUNCE IMPACT New Afton +/-$210
+/-$20
New Gold Total +/-$55 +/-$5 +/-$20 +/-$10 +/-$5
NEW GOLD 2016 ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(1) - KEY SENSITIVITIES
guidance presented in February 2016
31
2016 guidance
All-in Sustaining Costs(1)
$750-$790 /oz
Total cash costs(2) Sustaining capital(3) General and administrative and other(4) Sustaining exploration expense
$360-$400 ~$280 ~$80
~$30
Gold Production (Koz)
400 360 Appendix 1
32
2016 capital expenditures by category
Sustaining Capital: ~$105 million Growth Capital: ~$510 million
Mesquite $55 million New Afton $38 million Peak Mines $12 million Rainy River $500 million Blackwater $5 million New Afton $5 million
Total Capital Expenditures
Appendix 1
YTD’16A: $72 million YTD’16A: $330 million
33
2016 capital expenditures by category (cont’d)
Rainy River Mesquite New Afton
infrastructure and process facilities
costs, indirects and
capitalized stripping
equipment
leach pad expansion
development, plant and equipment
studies, C-zone capitalized exploration
Sustaining capital
Peak Mines Blackwater
equipment and capitalized exploration
environmental studies and site support
$500 million $55 million $43 million $12 million $5 million
Appendix 1
Stream comparison
34
silver spot price.
production leading to strong cash flow”. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.
Initial gold stream percentage 4% 6.5% Average annual stream ounces (Koz) >16 ~16 Total gold reserves(2) (Moz) 8.9 3.8 Reserves subject to stream (Koz) 357 247 Transfer price pre-threshold ($ per ounce) $400 25% of spot gold price Ounce threshold (Koz) 217 230 Gold stream percentage post-threshold 4% 3.25% M&I gold resources subject to stream (exclusive) (Koz) 49 85 Inferred resources subject to stream (Koz) 258 24 Transfer price post-threshold ($ per ounce) $400 + 1% inflation factor 25% of spot gold price
El Morro Stream Retained Rainy River Stream Sold (gold portion)(1)
Appendix 1
New Afton – 2016 guidance
35
decreases due to lower gold and copper grades
revenues
price equals ~$210 per ounce change in New Afton all-in sustaining costs(2)
exchange rate equals ~$55 per
sustaining costs(2)
Gold Production (Koz) Copper Production (Mlbs) Total Cash Costs(1) ($/oz) All-in Sustaining Costs(2) ($/oz)
Overview Key Sensitivities
Appendix 2
Full-year costs expected to be below guidance ranges
$219 $246 $305 $432 $596 $793
$90 $396 $441 $557 $466 $530
$336 $701 $873 $1,153 $1,259 Early 2010 Mid-2010 Early 2011 Mid-2011 Early 2012 Mid 2012 Sept 2016
New Afton value creation
36
VALUE CREATION ($mm)
Development Capital Spend ($mm)
Value Creation(2)
$904 million
Current NAV Net Investment(1)
$641 million/ $263 million $1.25 per sh.
Significant value creation realized 12-18 months prior to start-up
calculated as revenue less operating expenses.
Achieved commercial production Copper Price ($/lb) Gold Price ($/oz) Foreign Exchange (CDN/USD) ~$1,100 ~$3.25 $1.05 $1,300 $2.20 $1.30 NAV ($mm) $1,434
$530 million(1)
flow since mid-2012 start-up
$793 $904
Appendix 2
New Afton C-zone update
37 1,180m
C-zone Block Cave Volume Open to West Open at depth Main Zone Extraction Level C-zone Measured Indicated Inferred
Appendix 2
38
leading to strong cash flow”. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources” and “Technical Information”.
New Afton C-zone reserves and resources
Resource remains open at depth and to the west
gold and 430 million pounds of copper
limited deep holes drilled from surface prior to 2007
138 holes totaling 85,585 metres and continually updated resource
to further expand C-zone
Tonnes (000s) Gold (g/t) Copper (%) Gold (Koz) Copper (Mlbs) Proven
25,040 0.72 0.78 583 430 Total P&P 25,040 0.72 0.78 583 430 Measured 2,230 1.05 1.21 75 59 Indicated 15,462 0.79 0.96 392 326 Total M&I 17,693 0.82 0.99 467 385 Inferred 6,856 0.48 0.54 106 87
2015 Year-End C-zone Reserves and Resources(1)
Appendix 2
New Afton C-zone – Scoping study versus feasibility study
39 2015 Scoping Study 2016 Feasibility Study Total tonnes mined/processed
(Mt)
21.5 25.0 Average gold grade
(g/t)
0.76 0.72 Average copper grade
(%)
0.80 0.78 Contained metal – Gold
(Koz)
522 583 Contained metal – Copper
(Mlbs)
377 430 Mine life
(years)
5 5.5 Average full-year gold production
(Koz)
107 108 Average full-year copper production
(Mlbs)
77 81 Development capital
($mm)
349 402 Sustaining capital
($mm)
110 107 Average operating cost
($/t)
19.24 19.35
C-zone: Scoping Study versus Feasibility Study(1)
16% increase in ore tonnes Increase primarily driven by the inclusion of a $41 million provision for capital escalation given six year development timeline
12% increase in contained gold 14% increase in contained copper
Appendix 2
New Afton C-zone indicative timeline
40
Significant capital spending to begin well after Rainy River start-up
Rainy River start-up + 1 year + 2 years + 3 years + 4 years + 5 years + 6 years
Targeted milestones
FIRST PRODUCTION DEVELOP BLOCK CAVE PRODUCTION LEVELS COMPLETE MAIN ACCESS RAMP
Over 70% of $402 million development capital expected to be spent in the final 3.5 years
after the start-up of Rainy River
Appendix 2
New Afton C-zone – Feasibility study economics
41
2015 Scoping Study 2016 Feasibility Study After-tax 5% NPV
($mm)
68 84 After-tax IRR
(%)
9.7 10.3 After-tax Payback
(years)
3.4 3.4 Gold price
($/oz)
$1,200 Copper price
($/lb)
$2.75 CDN/USD
($)
$1.25
C-zone: Project Economics
(Long-term consensus commodity prices and foreign exchange rates)
C-zone: Key Sensitivities
Based on the feasibility study, during the years of full production, average annual pre-tax cash flow of ~$200 million
$0.25 per pound change in copper price ~$34 million in after-tax NPV and 1.9% change in IRR $100 per ounce change in gold price ~$18 million in after-tax NPV and 1.0% change in IRR $0.05 change in exchange rate ~$24 million in after-tax NPV and 1.5% change in IRR
Appendix 2
Mesquite – 2016 guidance
42
in line with 2015
continued operational efficiencies and lower diesel prices
Gold Production (Koz) Total Cash Costs(1) ($/oz) All-in Sustaining Costs(2) ($/oz)
Overview
Appendix 3
Peak Mines – 2016 guidance
43
in line with 2015
decrease as 2016 mine plan intentionally focuses on mining more gold-rich ore bodies
price equals ~$20 per ounce change in Peak Mines all-in sustaining costs(2)
exchange rate equals ~$35 per
sustaining costs(2)
Gold Production (Koz) Copper Production (Mlbs) Total Cash Costs(1) ($/oz) All-in Sustaining Costs(2) ($/oz)
Overview Key Sensitivities
Appendix 3
Full-year costs expected to be below guidance ranges
Cerro San Pedro – 2016 guidance
44
transitions to residual leaching
equals ~$20 per ounce change in Cerro San Pedro all-in sustaining costs(2)
exchange rate equals ~$30 per
all-in sustaining costs(2)
Gold Production (Koz) Silver Production (Moz) Total Cash Costs(1) ($/oz) All-in Sustaining Costs(2) ($/oz)
Overview Key Sensitivities
Appendix 3
Rainy River site layout
45
Appendix 4
Rainy River plant site construction photos
46
August 2015 April 2015
Appendix 4
November 2015 October 2015
Rainy River plant site construction photos (cont’d)
47
February 2016 December 2015
Appendix 4
July 2016 June 2016
48
Rainy River plant site construction photos (cont’d)
Primary crusher Coarse ore reclaim Pebble crusher Elevated section from coarse ore to transfer tower
September 2016
Appendix 4
49
Rainy River plant site construction photos (cont’d)
SAG mill and ball mill Installation Leach tanks and thickener CIP tank installation Pinewood pumpstation
September 2016
Appendix 4
50
Rainy River plant site construction photos (cont’d)
Main substation Main substation and powerline Temporary truck shop and truck wash Assay lab
September 2016
Appendix 4
51
Rainy River plant site construction photos (cont’d)
Piping installation Gold room Mechanical and piping installation Process plant
October 2016
Appendix 4
52
Rainy River update
60% complete
cladding all substantially complete
instrumentation in processing facilities over 30% complete
water management facility
waste stripping completed to date
approximately 85,000 tonnes per day
Rainy River (as at end of October 2016)
Process plant and leach thickener Aerial view of plant site
Appendix 4
53
Remaining capital breakdown
Description Total Remaining Capital ($mm) % complete at end
Target % complete at year-end 2016 Process Plant $90 60% 75%
installation
Mining $85 40% 75%
purchase of additional mobile equipment WMP/TMA $85 40% 55%
structures
Other(1) $105 70% 80%
EPCM, camp costs, commissioning and owners costs Total $365 60% 70%
Power infrastructure to be completed in November 2016
Appendix 4
Key areas of focus
54
2016 2017 Q4 Q1 Q2 Targeted milestones
First production on target for mid-2017
PRE-STRIP & PIT DEVELOPMENT TAILINGS & WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION PROCESS PLANT CONSTRUCTION
Water management pond
(dams 3,4 and 5)
60%
% complete
40% 40%
Tailings management area
quarter 2017
by year-end 2017
Appendix 4
55
Water management facility
management facility after receiving approval in August 2016
addition of rock toe buttresses
million cubic metres of water at commissioning
Redesign in alignment with emerging industry best practices
Water management pond
Appendix 4
56
Tailings management facility
November 2016
discrete shear zones/slickensides within foundations
during construction
carried out site-wide, including inspection of large open excavations during construction (open pit, crusher) which showed pre-shear zones/ slickensides in some areas
slickensides/pre-shear zones
recommendation); original design factor of safety was 1.3
Appendix 4
57
Blackwater – Project economics
~$100 million change in after-tax NAV and 1.2% change in IRR
equals ~$240 million change in after-tax NAV and 2.3% change in IRR
Gold Price ($/oz) Silver Price ($/oz) CDN/USD ($) $1,250 $18.00 $1.30 After-tax 5% NPV ($mm) $940 IRR (%) 14.4 Payback (years) 4.8
Appendix 5
17-year base case mine life
2016 exploration program overview
58
Rainy River
$4 million
Expensed - $2 million New Afton
Sustaining exploration Growth exploration
$12 million
Capitalized - $2 million Peak Mines Capitalized - $2 million Expensed - $6 million New Afton Expensed - $4 million
Appendix 6
2016 exploration program overview
59 1,180m
C-zone Block Cave Volume Open to West Open at depth Main Zone Extraction Level
C-zone
Measured Indicated Inferred
2016 Program New Afton
C-zone block cave resource to west
reconnaissance drilling to test newly identified satellite targets
Appendix 6
2016 exploration program overview (cont’d)
60
2016 Program
Rainy River
Peak Mines
Dapville, Gladstone, Mt. Pleasant, Young Australian
Appendix 6
Positive results from initial reconnaissance drilling Proteus 2016: 10,000 metres of drilling 2016: 10,000 metres of drilling
61
Reserves and resources summary
Appendix 6
Gold Koz Silver Moz Copper Mlbs Gold Koz Silver Moz Copper Mlbs Proven and Probable reserves 14,985 76 1,193 17,646 82 2,821 New Afton 1,228 4 1,112 760 3 781 Mesquite 1,492
267 1 82 375 1 89 Cerro San Pedro 13
8
3,814 9
9
8,170 61
61
Measured and Indicated resources (exclusive of reserves) 6,659 34 1,065 8,094 34 1,728 Inferred resources 1,844 24 194 3,488 21 1,746
MINERAL RESERVES AND RESOURCES SUMMARY TABLE
As at December 31, 2015 As at December 31, 2014
62
Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)
Appendix 6
Mineral Reserves estimate as at December 31, 2015
Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs NEW AFTON A&B Zones Proven
36,510 0.55 2.4 0.85 646 2,765 681 C Zone Proven
25,040 0.72 1.8 0.78 583 1,447 430 Total New Afton P&P 61,550 0.62 2.1 0.82 1,228 4,212 1,112 MESQUITE Proven 8,473 0.51
75,807 0.56
84,280 0.55
Proven 1,520 3.31 7.2 1.30 162 349 44 Probable 1,360 2.42 6.7 1.29 105 291 38 Total Peak Mines P&P 2,870 2.89 6.9 1.29 267 640 82 CERRO SAN PEDRO Proven 289 0.35 9.7
90
748 0.41 13.7
329
1,038 0.40 12.6
419
Contained metal
63
Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)
Appendix 6
Mineral Reserves estimate as at December 31, 2015
Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs RAINY RIVER Direct processing material Open Pit Proven 17,001 1.40 2.0
1,075
52,950 1.18 2.8
4,690
69,952 1.23 2.6
5,765
Proven
4,499 5.00 11.8
1,709
4,499 5.00 11.8
1,709
Open Pit Proven 5,496 0.37 1.5
259
23,302 0.35 2.3
1,701
28,798 0.35 2.1
1,959
Proven 22,498 1.14 1.8
1,333
80,752 1.15 3.1
8,100
103,250 1.15 2.8
9,433
Direct processing material Proven 124,500 0.95 5.5
22,100
169,700 0.68 4.1
22,300
294,200 0.79 4.7
44,400
Proven 20,100 0.50 3.6
2,300
30,100 0.34 14.6
14,100
50,200 0.40 10.2
16,400
344,400 0.74 5.5
60,800
14,985 75,504 1,193
Metal grade Contained metal
64
Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)
Appendix 6
Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource estimate (exclusive of Reserves) as at December 31, 2015
Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs NEW AFTON A&B zones Measured 16,940 0.69 2.1 0.87 377 1,134 325 Indicated 10,512 0.46 2.2 0.68 156 749 157 A&B Zone M&I 27,451 0.60 2.1 0.80 534 1,878 482 C-zone Measured 2,230 1.05 2.2 1.21 75 161 59 Indicated 15,462 0.79 2.2 0.96 392 1,075 326 C-zone M&I 17,693 0.82 2.2 0.99 467 1,226 386 HW Lens Measured
10,560 0.51 2.1 0.44 174 703 102 HW Lens M&I 10,560 0.51 2.1 0.44 174 703 102 Total New Afton M&I 55,704 0.66 2.1 0.79 1,175 3,809 971 MESQUITE Measured 4,595 0.40
50,524 0.47
55,119 0.47
Measured 2,000 3.56 5.9 0.94 220 370 41 Indicated 2,100 3.20 8.9 1.14 220 610 53 Total Peak Mines M&I 4,100 3.37 7.5 1.04 440 980 94 CERRO SAN PEDRO Measured
Contained metal
65
Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)
Appendix 6
Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource estimate (exclusive of Reserves) as at December 31, 2015
Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs RAINY RIVER Direct processing material Open Pit Measured 3,294 1.19 1.8
185
37,530 1.15 3.5
4,189
40,824 1.15 3.3
4,374
Measured
4,834 3.74 12.6
1,952
4,834 3.74 12.6
1,952
Open Pit Measured 1,244 0.35 1.3
51
36,360 0.43 2.5
2,942
37,604 0.43 2.5
2,993
Measured 4,538 0.97 1.6
236
78,724 0.98 3.6
9,083
83,262 0.98 3.5
9,319
Direct processing material Measured 289 1.39 6.6
61
41,128 0.86 4.5
5,950
41,417 0.86 4.5
6,012
Measured
14,070 0.32 4.0
1,809
14,070 0.32 4.0
1,809
55,487 0.72 4.4
7,821
Indicated 17,671 0.54 22.1
12,562
6,659 34,491 1,065
Metal grade Contained metal
66
Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)
Appendix 6
Inferred Resource estimate as at December 31, 2015
Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs NEW AFTON A&B-zones 6,875 0.35 1.3 0.36 77 296 55 C-zone 6,856 0.48 1.5 0.54 106 328 87 HW Lens 969 0.69 1.5 0.46 21 45 10 Total New Afton Inferred 14,702 0.43 1.4 0.45 205 672 145 MESQUITE 4,858 0.37
2,000 3.14 10.9 1.13 200 690 49 CERRO SAN PEDRO
Direct processing Open Pit 10,699 0.84 1.8
621
2,591 4.21 7.8
646
13,290 1.50 3.0
1,267
Open Pit 9,876 0.36 1.1
339
23,166 1.01 2.2
1,606
Direct processing 10,378 0.80 3.7
1,235
2,493 0.33 3.1
248
12,871 0.71 3.6
1,483
23,591 0.44 26.3
19,948
1,844 24,399 194
Metal grade Contained metal
67
Reserves and resources summary (cont’d)
Appendix 6
New Gold Interest (4%)
Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Copper % Gold Koz Copper Mlbs Gold Koz Mineral Reserves Proven 321,814 0.56 0.55 5,820 3,877 233 Probable 277,240 0.35 0.43 3,097 2,626 124 Total P&P 599,054 0.46 0.49 8,917 6,503 357 Mineral Resources Measured 19,790 0.53 0.51 340 223 14 Indicated 72,563 0.38 0.39 880 630 35 Total M&I 92,353 0.41 0.42 1,220 853 49 Inferred 678,066 0.30 0.35 6,453 5,190 258
Metal grade Contained metal
El Morro Property Mineral Reserves & Resources as at December 31, 2015 (Goldcorp 50% - Teck 50% Joint Venture)
The table below sets out the Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates, on a 100% basis, for the El Morro project, as well as New Gold’s 4% stream interest. The El Morro project, together with the Relincho project in Chile, is now held by a 50/50 joint venture between Goldcorp and Teck Resources Limited. The following information is based on information available to the Company as of February 17, 2016.
68
in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”).
criteria: Lower cut-offs for the company’s Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources are outlined in the following table:
Reserves and resources notes
Appendix 6
Gold ($/oz) Silver ($/oz) Copper ($/lb) CAD/USD AUD/USD MXN/USD
Mineral Reserves $1,200 $15.00 $2.75 $1.25 $1.35 $17.00 Mineral Resources $1,300 $17.00 $3.00 $1.25 $1.35 $17.00
Reserves Resources Lower Cut-Off Lower Cut-Off
New Afton Main Zone – B1 Block: C$ 21.00/t Main Zone – B2 Block: C$ 33.00/t B3 Block & C-Zone: C$ 24.00/t Mesquite Oxide & Transitional: 0.21 g/t Au (0.006 oz/t Au) 0.12 g/t Au (0.0035 oz/t Au) Sulphide: 0.41 g/t Au (0.012 oz/t Au) 0.24 g/t Au (0.007 oz/t Au) Peak Mines All ore types: A$ 110/t to A$ 156/t A$ 113/t to A$ 150/t Cerro San Pedro All ore types: US$ 6.00/t NA Rainy River O/P direct processing: 0.30 – 0.60 g/t AuEq 0.30 – 0.45 g/t AuEq O/P stockpile: 0.30 g/t AuEq 0.30 g/t AuEq U/G direct processing: 3.50 g/t AuEg 2.50 g/t AuEq Blackwater O/P direct processing: 0.26 – 0.38 g/t AuEq All Resources: 0.40% AuEq
Mineral Property
All Resources: 0.40% CuEq
69
Chilean Pesos to one United States dollar, and a lower cut-off of 0.20% CuEq.
that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred Mineral Resources have a greater amount of uncertainty as to their existence, economic and legal feasibility, do not have demonstrated economic viability, and are likewise exclusive of Mineral Reserves. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
and economic parameters consistent with the methods most suitable for their potential commercial exploitation. Where different mining and/or processing methods might be applied to different portions of a Mineral Resource, the designators ‘open pit’ and ‘underground’ have been applied to indicate envisioned mining method. Likewise the designators ‘oxide’, ‘non-oxide’ and ‘sulphide’ have been applied to indicate the type of mineralization as it relates to the appropriate mineral processing method and expected payable metal recoveries, and the designators ‘direct processing’ and stockpile’ have been applied to differentiate between material envisioned to be mined and processed directly and material to be mined and stored in a stockpile for future processing. Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing and other risks and relevant issues. Additional details regarding Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimation, classification, reporting parameters, key assumptions and associated risks for each of New Gold’s material properties are provided in the respective NI 43-101 Technical Reports which are available at www.sedar.com.
reported according to the following additional criteria: Underground mineral reserves are reported peripheral to and/or below the open pit mineral reserve pit shell which has been designed and optimized based on an $800/oz gold price. Underground Mineral Resources are reported below a larger mineral resource pit shell which has been defined based on a $1300/oz gold price. Approximately 44% of the gold metal content defined as underground mineral reserves derives from material located between the mineral reserve pit shell and the mineral resource pit shell; the remaining 56% of mineral reserves derives from material located below the mineral resource pit shell. Open pit mineral resources exclude material reported as underground mineral reserves.
defined under NI 43-101, under the oversight and review of Mr. Mark A. Petersen, a Qualified Person under NI 43-101.
Reserves and resources notes (cont’d)
Appendix 6
70
2016 guidance assumptions Spot:
2016 Silver price ($/oz) 14.00 Copper price ($/lb) 2.00 AUD/USD 1.40 CDN/USD 1.40 MXN/USD 18.00 Spot Gold price ($/oz) 1,180 Silver price ($/oz) 16.75 Copper price ($/lb) 2.59 AUD/USD 1.36 CDN/USD 1.32 MXN/USD 21.50
Commodity price/foreign exchange assumptions
Appendix 6
Endnotes
71
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. READERS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Information concerning the properties and operations of New Gold has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to similar information for United States companies. The terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” used in this presentation are Canadian mining terms as defined in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by CIM Council on May 10, 2014 and incorporated by reference in National Instrument 43-101. While the terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations, they are not defined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. As such, certain information contained in this presentation concerning descriptions of mineralization and mineral resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. An “Inferred Mineral Resource” has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal feasibility. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher confidence category. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “Reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve estimation is made. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves. In addition, the definitions of “Proven Mineral Reserves” and “Probable Mineral Reserves” under CIM standards differ in certain respects from the standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. TECHNICAL INFORMATION The scientific and technical information in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Mark A. Petersen, Vice President, Exploration of New Gold. Mr. Petersen is an AIPG Certified Professional Geologist and a “Qualified Person” as defined under National Instrument 43-101. For additional technical information on New Gold’s material properties, including a detailed breakdown of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources by category, as well as key assumptions, parameters and risks, refer to New Gold’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Endnotes (cont’d)
72
NON-GAAP MEASURES (1) ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce is a non-GAAP financial measure. Consistent with guidance announced in 2013 by the World Gold Council, an association of various gold mining companies from around the world of which New Gold is a member, New Gold defines “all-in sustaining costs” per ounce as the sum of total cash costs, capital expenditures that are sustaining in nature, corporate general and administrative costs, capitalized and expensed exploration that is sustaining in nature and environmental reclamation costs, all divided by the ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. New Gold believes this non-GAAP financial measure provides further transparency into costs associated with producing gold and assists analysts, investors and
to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP financial measure. All-in sustaining costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS and is not necessarily indicative of cash flow from operations under IFRS or operating costs presented under IFRS. Further details regarding historical all-in sustaining costs and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measures are provided below and in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. (2) TOTAL CASH COSTS “Total cash costs” per ounce is a non-GAAP financial measure which is calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The Gold Institute, a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold products that ceased operations in 2002. Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other
generate liquidity through operating cash flow to fund future capital expenditures and working capital needs. This measure, along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of the company’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash flow from its mining operations. Total cash costs include mine site operating costs such as mining, processing and administration costs, royalties, production taxes, and realized gains and losses on fuel contracts, but are exclusive of amortization, reclamation, capital and exploration costs and net of by-product sales. Total cash costs are then divided by ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. Co-product cash costs remove the impact of other metal sales that are produced as a by-product of gold production and apportion the cash costs to each metal produced on a percentage of revenue basis, and subsequently divides the amount by the total ounces of gold or silver or pounds of copper sold, as the case may be, to arrive at per ounce or per pound figures. Unless otherwise indicated, all total cash cost information in this presentation is net of by-product sales. This data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP financial measure. Total cash costs and co-product cash costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS and is not necessarily indicative of cash flow from operations under IFRS or operating costs presented under GAAP. Further details regarding historical total cash costs and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measures are provided below and in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. (3) AVERAGE REALIZED PRICE “Average realized price per ounce or pound sold” is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standard meaning under IFRS. Management uses this measure to better understand the price realized in each reporting period for gold, silver, and copper sales. Average realized price is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS; it should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate this measure differently and this measure is unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.
Endnotes (cont’d)
73
(4) ADJUSTED NET (LOSS)/EARNINGS “Adjusted net (loss)/earnings” and “adjusted net (loss)/earnings per share” are non-GAAP financial measures. Net (loss)/earnings have been adjusted and tax affected for the group of costs in “Other gains and losses” on the condensed consolidated income statement. The adjusted entries are also impacted for tax to the extent that the underlying entries are impacted for tax in the unadjusted net (loss)/earnings from continuing operations. The company uses this measure for its own internal purposes. Management’s internal budgets and forecasts and public guidance do not reflect fair value changes on senior notes and non-hedged derivatives, foreign currency translation and fair value through profit or loss and financial asset gains/losses. Consequently, the presentation of adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share enables investors and analysts to better understand the underlying operating performance of our core mining business through the eyes of management. Management periodically evaluates the components of adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share based on an internal assessment of performance measures that are useful for evaluating the operating performance of our business and a review of the non-GAAP measures used by mining industry analysts and
under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flows from operations as determined under IFRS. (5) OPERATING MARGIN “Operating margin” is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standard meaning under IFRS, which management uses to evaluate the Company’s aggregated and mine-by-mine contribution to net earnings before non-cash depreciation and depletion charges. (6) CASH GENERATED FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE CHANGES IN NON-CASH OPERATING WORKING CAPITAL “Cash generated from operations before changes in working capital” and “cash generated from operations before changes in working capital per share” are non-GAAP financial measures with no standard meaning under IFRS, which exclude changes in non-cash operating working capital. Management uses this measure to evaluate the Company’s ability to generate cash from its
Contact information
74
Investor Relations Julie Taylor 416-324-6015 julie.taylor@newgold.com