Hugo Chudyson Elaine Ferreira
Coordinated Audit on Latin American Protected Areas
SecexAmbiental Department of Agriculture and Environmental Audit Curitiba, 29 September 2015
Coordinated Audit on Latin American Protected Areas SecexAmbiental - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Coordinated Audit on Latin American Protected Areas SecexAmbiental Department of Agriculture and Environmental Audit Hugo Chudyson Elaine Ferreira Curitiba, 29 September 2015 Summary Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) Federal Court of
Hugo Chudyson Elaine Ferreira
Coordinated Audit on Latin American Protected Areas
SecexAmbiental Department of Agriculture and Environmental Audit Curitiba, 29 September 2015
– Federal Court of Accounts of Brazil (TCU)
– Brazilian Amazon Protected Areas – 2012/13 – Latin American Protected Areas – 2014/15
sound use of public funds
government accounts and extends to the evaluation of public policies
recognizes the role SAIs can play and encourages relevant UN institutions to intensify their cooperation, including in capacity-building, with the INTOSAI in order to promote good governance at all levels by ensuring efficiency, accountability, effectiveness and transparency.
– SAI of Brazil, created in 1890 – Supports National Congress (Legislative) – Carry out compliance and performance audits – Specific Department to environmental auditing
–Universal topic – No boundaries Protected Areas ↔ Public heritage – SAIs can evaluate PAs management
247 Protected Areas (Federal and state level)
1120 Protected Areas (12 countries)
– Performance audit – 247 PAs – territory > France and Spain together
– Normative, institutional, operational aspects
Tree of problems Diagram of regulations
– Implementation and Management – Georeferenced maps – Indimapas
Protected Areas Implementation and Management Index
G – Management plan H – Human resources $ – Financial resources E – Physical structures T – Territorial consolidation F – Environmental inspection P – Research B – Biodiversity monitoring C – Managing council M – Community management U – Public use N – Concessions L – Articulation in the PA
13 Indicators
Index of PAs Implementation and Management
= average of 13 indicators
High (2 ≤ i ≤ 3) Medium(1 ≤ i < 2) Low (0 ≤ i < 1)
247 PAs evaluated
– Federal Court of Accounts of Brazil (TCU) – General Comptroller of the Republic of Paraguay (CGR)
– Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and Venezuela
12 Countries 1120 Protected Areas evaluated
COMTEMA
– Aichi Biodiversity Target 11
– Quantitative - by 2020, at least 17% of terrestrial and inland water, and 10% of coastal and marine areas – Qualitative - conserved through effectively managed systems of protected areas
– 8/12 countries had already reached the goal of protecting at least 17% of their terrestrial areas
Quantitative element: Aichi Target 11 evaluation
Country Land area (km²) Number of protected areas (PAs) Land protected areas (km²) Land protected areas percentage Brazil 8.515.767 1.966 1.460.918 17,2% Argentina 2.791.810 436 215.150 7,7% Bolivia 1.098.581 130 221.913 20,2% Colombia 1.141.748 633 141.851 12,4% Costa Rica 51.100 168 13.286 26,0% El Salvador 21.041 72 5.260 25,0% Ecuador 256.370 50 50.150 19,6% Honduras 112.492 91 31.086 27,6% Mexico 1.964.375 176 206.681 10,5% Paraguay 406.752 91 83.378 20,5% Peru 1.294.364 152 239.391 18,5% Venezuela* 1.075.987 400 390.458 36,3% Total 18.730.387 4.365 3.059.523 16,3%
Source: World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA), National Reports to CDB and data of SAI
– The international commitment requires that, besides its creation, the protected areas should be efficiently managed – To evaluate these aspects, EFS used Indimapa
– 19% of the Latin American PAs evaluated are in the green level, indicative of a high degree of implementation and management – Almost 30% are at the low management level
Implementation Level of 313 federal PAs
G Management plan 1,03 H Human resources 1,49 $ Financial resources 1,09 E Physical structures 2,29 T Territorial consolidation 1,65 F Environmental inspection 1,66 P Research 1,65 B Biodiversity monitoring 0,94 C Managing council 1,70 M Community management 1,36 U Public use 0,87 L Articulation in the PA 0,93 Indicators
– 47% (526 PAs ) do not have MP
– 53% (165 federal PAs) do not have MP
– 44% (492 PAs) do not carry out the activity
– 50% (156 federal PAs) do not carry out the activity
biodiversity conservation can’t be measured.
* continuous and systematic activity
– 13% (145 PAs) do not have a single person in charge of their management
– 3% (9 federal PAs) do not have a person in charge
– 52% (580 PAs) have not completed the territorial consolidation process
– 47% (146 federal PAs) have problems in completing the process of territorial consolidation
*property rights
Aichi Target 11
Quantitative element: 8/12 countries reached the terrestrial target; Qualitative element: 19% at a high level of implementation and management;
Protected Areas are created but not effectively implemented
Insufficient articulation among players to the achievement of the goals of protected areas Conditions incompatible with the needs of protected areas Few utilization of economic, social and environmental potential of protected areas
essential resources (management plan, human and financial resources, physical structures, among others) to the effective implementation and adequate management of these territories.
PAs that consider the technical, legal, social and environmental issues involved in this process
and non-governmental in order to enhance environmental governance
Portuguese, English and Spanish
secexambiental@tcu.gov.br hugoca@tcu.gov.br +55 (61) 3316-5066
benefit, feasibility):
– Management plans – Territorial consolidation
– 29 in 2013 – 36 in 2014
TCE-RR
Visita à APA Baixo Rio Branco - RR