Controlling quantum state and its coherence
Tanumoy Pramanik S N Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences
- D. Mondal, T. Pramanik, and A. K. Pati, arXiv: 1508.03770
Controlling quantum state and its coherence Tanumoy Pramanik S - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Controlling quantum state and its coherence Tanumoy Pramanik S N Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences D. Mondal, T. Pramanik, and A. K. Pati, arXiv: 1508.03770 Motivation X | i = k i | i i i State Superposition
Tanumoy Pramanik S N Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences
|ψi = X
i
ki |ii
State Superposition coherence
Controlling State Controlling coherence
Quantum correlations Uncertainty relations Quantum coherence
Steering of quantum state Steering of quantum coherence Example: Pure state and mixed state
ρAB
It is the weakest form of non-local correlation
i
i ⌦ ρB i
State tomography
ρAB
It is the strongest form of non-local correlation
It violates any Bell-CHSH inequality
P(aA, bB) A B a b
ρAB Steerable, if Alice can control the state of Bob’s system
Entanglement Steering Bell-nonlocal
Coarse grained form : Heisenberg uncertainty relation (HUR) and entropic form of uncertainty relation (EUR). Fine-grained form : Fine-grained uncertainty relation (FUR).
Here, uncertainty is measured by standard deviation which is coarse grained measure of uncertainty.
∆A ∆B
2
∆A = sX
a
a2 pa − X
a
(a pa)2
W . Heisenberg, Z. Phys. 43, 172 (1927); E. H. Kennard, Z. Phys. 44, 326 (1927).
Here, uncertainty is measured by Shannon entropy.
H (A) + H (B) ≥ log 1 c
H (A) = − X
a
pa log pa and the complementarity, 1/c, is defined as c = max
a,b |ha|bi|2
Here, uncertainty is measured by probability of a particular measurement outcome or a combination of measurement outcomes, i.e., fine-graining of all possible outcomes.
0 ⌘ | "i 1 ⌘ | #i σz σx σy
P(σi) = 1 3
PSuccess =
3
X
i=1
P(σi) P(bσi = 0) ≤ PSuccess = max
ρB
PSuccess
0 ⌘ | "i 1 ⌘ | #i σz σx σy
P(σi) = 1 3
ρCertain = 1 2(I + 1 √ 3 (σx + σy + σz))
P(0σx) + P(0σy) + P(0σz) ≤ 3 2 + 3 2 √ 3
Zero Coherence: All off-diagonal terms are zero.
ρB(i, j|i 6= j) = 0 ρB(i, j|i 6= j) = 0
Cl1(ρB) = X
i,j,i6=j
|ρB(i, j)|
B) − S(ρB)
ρD
B : diagonal matrix formed with diagonal element
ρB
CS
B(ρB) = −1
2 Tr [√ρB, B]2
: is calculated by writing the state in basis .
Cl1
x (ρ) + Cl1 y (ρ) + Cl1 z (ρ) ≤
√ 6 CE
x (ρ) + CE y (ρ) + CE z (ρ) ≤ 2.23
σk
ρC
max = 1
2 ✓ I + 1 √ 3 (σx + σy + σz) ◆
CE (l1)
k
(ρ)
: is measured in basis .
σk
ρC
max = 1
2 ✓ I + 1 √ 3 (σx + σy + σz) ◆ CS
x (ρ) + CS y (ρ) + CS z (ρ) ≤ 2
CS
k (ρ)
EPR paradox Entanglement is used to put question about incompleteness of quantum physics by Einstein, podolsky and Rosen. Steering Schrodinger re-expressed EPR paradox as the power to control of one system by distantly located system.
Steerability : Alice’s control on the state of Bob’s system, i.e., Bob can know his system with higher precision than allowed by uncertainty principle. ρAB R = σz S = σx
R = σz S = σx
|ΨiAB = | " #iAB | # "iAB 2
Alice’ s measurement outcome State of Bob’ s system
Bob’ s Uncertainty of system B is zero when Alice communicates her results
Steerability : Absence of local hidden state (LHS) model for Bob’s system.
P(aA, bB) 6= X
λ
P(λ) P(aA|λ) PQ(bB|λ) ρAB 6= X
λ
P(λ) ρA
λ ⌦ ρB λ, Q
LHS model Local : Alice prepares system B in a state quantumly uncorrelated with other systems possessed by Alice. Hidden : Bob has no information about the state of B.
λ
λ ⊗ ρB λ, Q
When Alice and Bob share steerable state, Alice can reduce Bob’s uncertainty about his system by controlling its state.
It should violate some local uncertainty relation satisfied by
P(bB|aA) P(bB)
P(aA, bB) = X
λ
P(λ)P(aA|λ) PQ(bB|λ)
qmin X
i
pi ≤ X
i
pi qi ≤ qmax X
i
pi
P(bσx) + P(bσy) + P(bσz) ≤ 3 2 + 3 2 √ 3
P(bσx|aA1) + P(bσy|aA2) + P(bσz|aA3) ≤ 3 2 + 3 2 √ 3
ρP = pα |00i + p 1 α |11i
All pure entangled states are maximally steerable
P(bσx|aA1) + P(bσy|aA2) + P(bσz|aA3) = 3
ρW = p ρS + (1 − p) I 4
ρS = |01i |10i p 2
ρW = p ρS + (1 − p) I 4
p > 1 3 p > 1 2 p > 1 √ 3 p > 1 √ 2
: The state is entangled. : The state is steerable with infinite measurement settings. : The state is steerable with three measurement settings. : The state is Bell nonlocal and steerable with two settings.
σi
σi
Steerable, if it violates coherence complementarity relation
CE
x (ηB|Πa
y (z)) + CE
y (ηB|Πa
z (x)) + CE
z (ηB|Πa
x (y)) > 2.23
Cl1
x (ηB|Πa
y (z)) + Cl1
y (ηB|Πa
z (x)) + Cl1
z (ηB|Πa
x (y)) >
√ 6 CS
x (ηB|Πa
y (z)) + CS
y (ηB|Πa
z (x)) + CS
z (ηB|Πa
x (y)) > 2
ρP = pα |00i + p 1 α |11i
All pure entangled states are maximally steerable
Cx(ηB|Πa
y (z)) + Cy(ηB|Πa z (x)) + Cz(ηB|Πa x (y)) = 3
ρW = p ρS + (1 − p) I 4
: Steerable under l1-norm. : Steerable under relative entropy coherence : Steerable under skew information
p > 0.82 p > 0.91 p > 0.94
State Steerability : p > 0.58
Steering is a kind of non-local correlation where
Fine-grained steering criterion overcomes the limitations of coarse grained form of steering criteria. Coherence complementary relation : No single quantum state is fully coherence under all non- commuting basis. With three measurement settings, Werner state is steerable (state property) for p > 0.58. With three measurement settings, Werner state is steerable (coherence property) for p > 0.82.