Controllability and stability of difference equations and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

controllability and stability of difference equations and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Controllability and stability of difference equations and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Applications A conference in the honor of Jean-Michel Coron for his 60 th birthday Paris June 20 th , 2016


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications

Guilherme Mazanti

Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Applications

A conference in the honor of Jean-Michel Coron for his 60th birthday

Paris – June 20th, 2016 CMAP, École Polytechnique Team GECO, Inria Saclay France

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Outline

1

Introduction Linear difference equations Motivation: hyperbolic PDEs Motivation: previous results

2

Stability analysis and applications Stability analysis Technique of the proof Applications

3

Relative controllability Definition Explicit formula Relative controllability criterion

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Linear difference equations

1 Stability analysis of the difference equation

Σstab : x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Aj(t)x(t − Λj), t ≥ 0.

2 Relative controllability of the difference equation

Σcontr : x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Ajx(t − Λj) + Bu(t), t ≥ 0.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Linear difference equations

1 Stability analysis of the difference equation

Σstab : x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Aj(t)x(t − Λj), t ≥ 0.

2 Relative controllability of the difference equation

Σcontr : x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Ajx(t − Λj) + Bu(t), t ≥ 0. Λ1, . . . , ΛN: (rationally independent) positive delays (Λmin = minj Λj, Λmax = maxj Λj). x(t) ∈ Cd, u(t) ∈ Cm.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Linear difference equations

1 Stability analysis of the difference equation

Σstab : x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Aj(t)x(t − Λj), t ≥ 0.

2 Relative controllability of the difference equation

Σcontr : x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Ajx(t − Λj) + Bu(t), t ≥ 0. Λ1, . . . , ΛN: (rationally independent) positive delays (Λmin = minj Λj, Λmax = maxj Λj). x(t) ∈ Cd, u(t) ∈ Cm. Motivation: Applications to some hyperbolic PDEs. Generalization of previous results.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Motivation: hyperbolic PDEs

Hyperbolic PDEs → difference equations: [Cooke, Krumme, 1968],

[Slemrod, 1971], [Greenberg, Li, 1984], [Coron, Bastin, d’Andréa Novel, 2008], [Fridman, Mondié, Saldivar, 2010], [Gugat, Sigalotti, 2010]...

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Motivation: hyperbolic PDEs

Hyperbolic PDEs → difference equations: [Cooke, Krumme, 1968],

[Slemrod, 1971], [Greenberg, Li, 1984], [Coron, Bastin, d’Andréa Novel, 2008], [Fridman, Mondié, Saldivar, 2010], [Gugat, Sigalotti, 2010]...             

∂tui(t, ξ) + ∂ξui(t, ξ) + αi(t, ξ)ui(t, ξ) = 0, t ∈ R+, ξ ∈ [0, Λi], i ∈ 1, N, ui(t, 0) =

N

  • j=1

mij(t)uj(t, Λj), t ∈ R+, i ∈ 1, N.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Motivation: hyperbolic PDEs

Hyperbolic PDEs → difference equations: [Cooke, Krumme, 1968],

[Slemrod, 1971], [Greenberg, Li, 1984], [Coron, Bastin, d’Andréa Novel, 2008], [Fridman, Mondié, Saldivar, 2010], [Gugat, Sigalotti, 2010]...             

∂tui(t, ξ) + ∂ξui(t, ξ) + αi(t, ξ)ui(t, ξ) = 0, t ∈ R+, ξ ∈ [0, Λi], i ∈ 1, N, ui(t, 0) =

N

  • j=1

mij(t)uj(t, Λj), t ∈ R+, i ∈ 1, N. Method of characteristics: for t ≥ Λmax,

ui(t, 0) =

N

  • j=1

mij(t)uj(t, Λj) =

N

  • j=1

mij(t)e−

Λj αj(t−s,Λj−s)dsuj(t − Λj, 0).

Set x(t) = (ui(t, 0))i∈1,N. Then x satisfies a difference equation.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Motivation: hyperbolic PDEs

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Motivation: hyperbolic PDEs

Λ1 Λ2 Λ3 ΛN Edges: E Vertices: V ∂2

ttui(t, ξ) = ∂2 ξξui(t, ξ)

ui(t, q) = uj(t, q), ∀q ∈ V, ∀i, j ∈ Eq + conditions on vertices.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Motivation: hyperbolic PDEs

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Motivation: hyperbolic PDEs

D’Alembert decomposition on travelling waves:

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Motivation: hyperbolic PDEs

D’Alembert decomposition on travelling waves: System of 2N transport equations. Can be reduced to a system of difference equations.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Motivation: previous stability results (cf. [Cruz, Hale, 1970], [Henry, 1974], [Michiels et al., 2009])

Σaut

stab :

x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Ajx(t − Λj), t ≥ 0. Stability for rationally independent Λ1, . . . , ΛN characterized by ρHS(A) = max

(θ1,...,θN)∈[0,2π]N ρ

N

j=1 Ajeiθj

  • .

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Motivation: previous stability results (cf. [Cruz, Hale, 1970], [Henry, 1974], [Michiels et al., 2009])

Σaut

stab :

x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Ajx(t − Λj), t ≥ 0. Stability for rationally independent Λ1, . . . , ΛN characterized by ρHS(A) = max

(θ1,...,θN)∈[0,2π]N ρ

N

j=1 Ajeiθj

  • .

Theorem (Hale, 1975; Silkowski, 1976)

The following are equivalent: ρHS(A) < 1; Σaut

stab is exponentially stable for some Λ ∈ (0, +∞)N with

rationally independent components; Σaut

stab is exponentially stable for every Λ ∈ (0, +∞)N.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Motivation: previous controllability results

Σcontr : x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Ajx(t − Λj) + Bu(t), t ≥ 0. Stabilization by linear feedbacks u(t) = N

j=1 Kjx(t − Λj):

[Hale, Verduyn Lunel, 2002 and 2003].

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Motivation: previous controllability results

Σcontr : x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Ajx(t − Λj) + Bu(t), t ≥ 0. Stabilization by linear feedbacks u(t) = N

j=1 Kjx(t − Λj):

[Hale, Verduyn Lunel, 2002 and 2003]. Spectral and approximate controllability in Lp([−Λmax, 0], Cd): [Salamon, 1984].

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Motivation: previous controllability results

Σcontr : x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Ajx(t − Λj) + Bu(t), t ≥ 0. Stabilization by linear feedbacks u(t) = N

j=1 Kjx(t − Λj):

[Hale, Verduyn Lunel, 2002 and 2003]. Spectral and approximate controllability in Lp([−Λmax, 0], Cd): [Salamon, 1984]. Relative controllability in time T > 0: for any initial condition x0 : [−Λmax, 0] → Cd and final target state x1 ∈ Cd, find u : [0, T] → Cm such that the solution x with initial condition x0 and control u satisfies x(T) = x1.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Introduction

Motivation: previous controllability results

Σcontr : x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Ajx(t − Λj) + Bu(t), t ≥ 0. Stabilization by linear feedbacks u(t) = N

j=1 Kjx(t − Λj):

[Hale, Verduyn Lunel, 2002 and 2003]. Spectral and approximate controllability in Lp([−Λmax, 0], Cd): [Salamon, 1984]. Relative controllability in time T > 0: for any initial condition x0 : [−Λmax, 0] → Cd and final target state x1 ∈ Cd, find u : [0, T] → Cm such that the solution x with initial condition x0 and control u satisfies x(T) = x1. Case of two integer delays: [Diblík, Khusainov, Růžičková, 2008], [Pospíšil, Diblík, Fečkan, 2015].

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Stability analysis

Σstab : x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Aj(t)x(t − Λj), t ≥ 0. Xδ

p = Lp([−Λmax, 0], Cd), p ∈ [1, +∞].

Exponential stability of Σstab uniformly with respect to a given set A of functions A : R → Md(C)N.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Stability analysis

Σstab : x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Aj(t)x(t − Λj), t ≥ 0. Xδ

p = Lp([−Λmax, 0], Cd), p ∈ [1, +∞].

Exponential stability of Σstab uniformly with respect to a given set A of functions A : R → Md(C)N. In this talk, to simplify, A = L∞(R, B) for some bounded B ⊂ Md(C)N (more general A: see [Chitour, M., Sigalotti, 2015]). RI: set of all Λ = (Λ1, . . . , ΛN) ∈ (0, +∞)N with rationally independent components.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Stability analysis

Let µ(B) = lim sup

|n|1→+∞ n∈NN

sup

Br∈B for r∈Ln(Λ)

  • v∈Vn

|n|1

k=1 B Λv1+...+Λvk−1 vk

  • 1

Λ·n ,

where Ln(Λ) = {Λ · k | k ∈ NN, Λ · k < Λ · n} and Vn is the set of all permutations of (1, . . . , 1

  • n1 times

, 2, . . . , 2

  • n2 times

, . . . , N, . . . , N

  • nN times

).

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Stability analysis

Let µ(B) = lim sup

|n|1→+∞ n∈NN

sup

Br∈B for r∈Ln(Λ)

  • v∈Vn

|n|1

k=1 B Λv1+...+Λvk−1 vk

  • 1

Λ·n ,

where Ln(Λ) = {Λ · k | k ∈ NN, Λ · k < Λ · n} and Vn is the set of all permutations of (1, . . . , 1

  • n1 times

, 2, . . . , 2

  • n2 times

, . . . , N, . . . , N

  • nN times

).

Theorem (Chitour, M., Sigalotti)

The following statements are equivalent: µ(B) < 1; Σstab is uniformly exponentially stable in Xδ

p for some

p ∈ [1, +∞] and Λ ∈ RI; Σstab is uniformly exponentially stable in Xδ

p for every

p ∈ [1, +∞] and Λ ∈ (0, +∞)N.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Stability analysis

Let µ(B) = lim sup

|n|1→+∞ n∈NN

sup

Br∈B for r∈Ln(Λ)

  • v∈Vn

|n|1

k=1 B Λv1+...+Λvk−1 vk

  • 1

Λ·n ,

where Ln(Λ) = {Λ · k | k ∈ NN, Λ · k < Λ · n} and Vn is the set of all permutations of (1, . . . , 1

  • n1 times

, 2, . . . , 2

  • n2 times

, . . . , N, . . . , N

  • nN times

).

Theorem (Chitour, M., Sigalotti)

The following statements are equivalent: µ(B) < 1; Σstab is uniformly exponentially stable in Xδ

p for some

p ∈ [1, +∞] and Λ ∈ RI; Σstab is uniformly exponentially stable in Xδ

p for every

p ∈ [1, +∞] and Λ ∈ (0, +∞)N.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Technique of the proof

To simplify, consider Σaut

stab :

x(t) = N

j=1 Ajx(t − Λj).

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Technique of the proof

To simplify, consider Σaut

stab :

x(t) = N

j=1 Ajx(t − Λj).

Lemma (Explicit solution)

Let x0 : [−Λmax, 0) → Cd. The solution x : [−Λmax, +∞) → Cd of Σaut

stab

is, for t ≥ 0, x(t) =

  • n∈NN

t<Λ·n≤t+Λmax

  • j∈1,N

Λ·n−Λj≤t

Ξn−ejAjx0(t − Λ · n), where the matrices Ξn are defined recursively for n ∈ NN by Ξn =

N

  • k=1

nk≥1

AkΞn−ek, Ξ0 = Idd .

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Technique of the proof

To simplify, consider Σaut

stab :

x(t) = N

j=1 Ajx(t − Λj).

Lemma (Explicit solution)

Let x0 : [−Λmax, 0) → Cd. The solution x : [−Λmax, +∞) → Cd of Σaut

stab

is, for t ≥ 0, x(t) =

  • n∈NN

t<Λ·n≤t+Λmax

  • j∈1,N

Λ·n−Λj≤t

Ξn−ejAjx0(t − Λ · n), where the matrices Ξn are defined recursively for n ∈ NN by Ξn =

N

  • k=1

nk≥1

AkΞn−ek, Ξ0 = Idd .

Can be easily adapted to time-dependent matrices. Exponential stability can be analyzed through Ξ. Rational independence: all Λ · n are different.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Applications

Using the previous transformations of hyperbolic PDEs into difference equations: under arbitrary switching, exponential stability for some Λ ∈ RI and p ∈ [1, +∞] ⇐ ⇒ exponential stability for all Λ ∈ (0, +∞)N and p ∈ [1, +∞].

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Applications

Using the previous transformations of hyperbolic PDEs into difference equations: under arbitrary switching, exponential stability for some Λ ∈ RI and p ∈ [1, +∞] ⇐ ⇒ exponential stability for all Λ ∈ (0, +∞)N and p ∈ [1, +∞]. Example: wave propagation on networks.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Applications

Using the previous transformations of hyperbolic PDEs into difference equations: under arbitrary switching, exponential stability for some Λ ∈ RI and p ∈ [1, +∞] ⇐ ⇒ exponential stability for all Λ ∈ (0, +∞)N and p ∈ [1, +∞]. Example: wave propagation on networks.

Λ1 Λ2 Λ3 ΛN Edges: E Vertices: V ∂2

ttui(t, ξ) = ∂2 ξξui(t, ξ),

ui(t, q) = uj(t, q), ∀q ∈ V, ∀i, j ∈ Eq,

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Applications

Using the previous transformations of hyperbolic PDEs into difference equations: under arbitrary switching, exponential stability for some Λ ∈ RI and p ∈ [1, +∞] ⇐ ⇒ exponential stability for all Λ ∈ (0, +∞)N and p ∈ [1, +∞]. Example: wave propagation on networks.

Λ1 Λ2 Λ3 ΛN Edges: E Vertices: V Interior vertices: Vint ∂2

ttui(t, ξ) = ∂2 ξξui(t, ξ),

ui(t, q) = uj(t, q), ∀q ∈ V, ∀i, j ∈ Eq,

  • i∈Eq ∂nui(t, q) = 0,

∀q ∈ Vint,

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Applications

Using the previous transformations of hyperbolic PDEs into difference equations: under arbitrary switching, exponential stability for some Λ ∈ RI and p ∈ [1, +∞] ⇐ ⇒ exponential stability for all Λ ∈ (0, +∞)N and p ∈ [1, +∞]. Example: wave propagation on networks.

Λ1 Λ2 Λ3 ΛN Edges: E Vertices: V Interior vertices: Vint Damped vertices: Vd ∂2

ttui(t, ξ) = ∂2 ξξui(t, ξ),

ui(t, q) = uj(t, q), ∀q ∈ V, ∀i, j ∈ Eq,

  • i∈Eq ∂nui(t, q) = 0,

∀q ∈ Vint, ∂tui(t, q) = −ηq(t)∂nui(t, q), ∀q ∈ Vd,

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Applications

Using the previous transformations of hyperbolic PDEs into difference equations: under arbitrary switching, exponential stability for some Λ ∈ RI and p ∈ [1, +∞] ⇐ ⇒ exponential stability for all Λ ∈ (0, +∞)N and p ∈ [1, +∞]. Example: wave propagation on networks.

Λ1 Λ2 Λ3 ΛN Edges: E Vertices: V V = Vint ∪ Vd ∪ Vu Interior vertices: Vint Damped vertices: Vd Undamped vertices: Vu ∂2

ttui(t, ξ) = ∂2 ξξui(t, ξ),

ui(t, q) = uj(t, q), ∀q ∈ V, ∀i, j ∈ Eq,

  • i∈Eq ∂nui(t, q) = 0,

∀q ∈ Vint, ∂tui(t, q) = −ηq(t)∂nui(t, q), ∀q ∈ Vd, ui(t, q) = 0, ∀q ∈ Vu.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Applications

We assume (ηq)q∈Vd ∈ L∞(R, D) for some bounded D ⊂ RVd

+ .

Theorem

The previous system is uniformly exponentially stable in W 1,p × Lp for some p if and only if the network is a tree, Vu contains only

  • ne point, and D ⊂ (0, +∞)d.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Applications

We assume (ηq)q∈Vd ∈ L∞(R, D) for some bounded D ⊂ RVd

+ .

Theorem

The previous system is uniformly exponentially stable in W 1,p × Lp for some p if and only if the network is a tree, Vu contains only

  • ne point, and D ⊂ (0, +∞)d.

⇐ =: classical methods based on an energy estimate and an

  • bservability inequality (see, e.g., [Dáger, Zuazua, 2006]).

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Applications

= ⇒: (only for the case Λ ∈ RI) Exponential stability for Λ ∈ RI ⇐ ⇒ exponential stability for every L.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Applications

= ⇒: (only for the case Λ ∈ RI) Exponential stability for Λ ∈ RI ⇐ ⇒ exponential stability for every L. Take L = (1, 1, . . . , 1).

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Applications

= ⇒: (only for the case Λ ∈ RI) Exponential stability for Λ ∈ RI ⇐ ⇒ exponential stability for every L. Take L = (1, 1, . . . , 1). If the graph is not a tree, or if Vu contains two or more points, or if D has a point with one coordinate zero: Two vertices in Vu.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Applications

= ⇒: (only for the case Λ ∈ RI) Exponential stability for Λ ∈ RI ⇐ ⇒ exponential stability for every L. Take L = (1, 1, . . . , 1). If the graph is not a tree, or if Vu contains two or more points, or if D has a point with one coordinate zero: j1 j2 jn Two vertices in Vu. (j1, j2, . . . , jn): path

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Applications

= ⇒: (only for the case Λ ∈ RI) Exponential stability for Λ ∈ RI ⇐ ⇒ exponential stability for every L. Take L = (1, 1, . . . , 1). If the graph is not a tree, or if Vu contains two or more points, or if D has a point with one coordinate zero: j1 j2 jn Two vertices in Vu. (j1, j2, . . . , jn): path uji(t, x) = ± sin(2πt) sin(2πx): periodic solution

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Stability analysis and applications

Applications

= ⇒: (only for the case Λ ∈ RI) Exponential stability for Λ ∈ RI ⇐ ⇒ exponential stability for every L. Take L = (1, 1, . . . , 1). If the graph is not a tree, or if Vu contains two or more points, or if D has a point with one coordinate zero: j1 j2 jn Two vertices in Vu. (j1, j2, . . . , jn): path uji(t, x) = ± sin(2πt) sin(2πx): periodic solution Not exponentially stable for L, then not exponentially stable for Λ either.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Relative controllability

Definition

Σcontr : x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Ajx(t − Λj) + Bu(t), t ≥ 0. For every initial condition x0 : [−Λmax, 0) → Cd and control u : [0, T] → Cm, Σcontr admits a unique solution x : [−Λmax, T] → Cd (no regularity assumptions!).

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Relative controllability

Definition

Σcontr : x(t) =

N

  • j=1

Ajx(t − Λj) + Bu(t), t ≥ 0. For every initial condition x0 : [−Λmax, 0) → Cd and control u : [0, T] → Cm, Σcontr admits a unique solution x : [−Λmax, T] → Cd (no regularity assumptions!).

Definition

We say that Σcontr is relatively controllable in time T > 0 if, for every x0 : [−Λmax, 0) → Cd and x1 ∈ Cd, there exists u : [0, T] → Cm such that the unique solution x of Σcontr with initial condition x0 and control u satisfies x(T) = x1.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Relative controllability

Explicit formula

Similarly to the stability analysis, we use an explicit formula for the solutions in order to characterize relative controllability.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Relative controllability

Explicit formula

Similarly to the stability analysis, we use an explicit formula for the solutions in order to characterize relative controllability.

Lemma (Explicit solution)

Let u : [0, T] → Cm. The solution x : [−Λmax, T] → Cd of Σcontr with zero initial condition and control u is, for t ∈ [0, T], x(t) =

  • n∈NN

Λ·n≤t

ΞnBu(t − Λ · n), where the matrices Ξn are defined as before.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Relative controllability

Explicit formula

Similarly to the stability analysis, we use an explicit formula for the solutions in order to characterize relative controllability.

Lemma (Explicit solution)

Let u : [0, T] → Cm. The solution x : [−Λmax, T] → Cd of Σcontr with zero initial condition and control u is, for t ∈ [0, T], x(t) =

  • n∈NN

Λ·n≤t

ΞnBu(t − Λ · n), where the matrices Ξn are defined as before. By linearity, solution with initial condition x0 and control u is the sum of this formula with the previous one. Rational independence: all Λ · n are different.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Relative controllability

Relative controllability criterion

Theorem (M.)

The following statements are equivalent: Σcontr is relatively controllable in time T; Span

  • ΞnBw | n ∈ NN, Λ · n ≤ T, w ∈ Cm

= Cd;

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Relative controllability

Relative controllability criterion

Theorem (M.)

The following statements are equivalent: Σcontr is relatively controllable in time T; Span

  • ΞnBw | n ∈ NN, Λ · n ≤ T, w ∈ Cm

= Cd; ∃ε0 > 0 such that, for every ε ∈ (0, ε0), x0 : [−Λmax, 0) → Cd, and x1 : [0, ε] → Cd, there exists u : [0, T + ε] → Cm such that the solution x of Σcontr with initial condition x0 and control u satisfies x(T + ·)|[0,ε] = x1;

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Relative controllability

Relative controllability criterion

Theorem (M.)

The following statements are equivalent: Σcontr is relatively controllable in time T; Span

  • ΞnBw | n ∈ NN, Λ · n ≤ T, w ∈ Cm

= Cd; ∃ε0 > 0 such that, for every ε ∈ (0, ε0), x0 : [−Λmax, 0) → Cd, and x1 : [0, ε] → Cd, there exists u : [0, T + ε] → Cm such that the solution x of Σcontr with initial condition x0 and control u satisfies x(T + ·)|[0,ε] = x1; ∃ε0 > 0 such that, for every p ∈ [1, +∞], ε ∈ (0, ε0), x0 ∈ Lp((−Λmax, 0), Cd), and x1 ∈ Lp((0, ε), Cd), there exists u ∈ Lp((0, T + ε), Cm) such that the solution x of Σcontr with initial condition x0 and control u satisfies x ∈ Lp((−Λmax, T + ε), Cd) and x(T + ·)|[0,ε] = x1.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Relative controllability

Relative controllability criterion

Can also be generalized to other spaces (e.g., Ck).

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Relative controllability

Relative controllability criterion

Can also be generalized to other spaces (e.g., Ck). Generalizes Kalman criterion: for x(t) = Ax(t − 1) + Bu(t),

  • ne has

Span

  • ΞnBw | n ∈ NN, Λ · n ≤ T, w ∈ Cm

= Ran

  • B

AB A2B · · · A⌊T⌋B

  • .

Theorem (M.)

If Σcontr is relatively controllable in some time T > 0, then it is also relatively controllable in time T = (d − 1)Λmax.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Relative controllability

Relative controllability criterion

Can also be generalized to other spaces (e.g., Ck). Generalizes Kalman criterion: for x(t) = Ax(t − 1) + Bu(t),

  • ne has

Span

  • ΞnBw | n ∈ NN, Λ · n ≤ T, w ∈ Cm

= Ran

  • B

AB A2B · · · A⌊T⌋B

  • .

Theorem (M.)

If Σcontr is relatively controllable in some time T > 0, then it is also relatively controllable in time T = (d − 1)Λmax. Σcontr is relatively controllable in some time T > 0 if and only if Span

  • ΞnBej | n ∈ NN, |n|1 ≤ d − 1, j ∈ 1, m
  • = Cd.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Relative controllability

Relative controllability criterion

The previous results can be modified to treat also the rationally dependent case. Ongoing work: use the explicit formula to study exact and approximate controllability in L2. Future work: applications to PDEs.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability

Relative controllability

Relative controllability criterion

The previous results can be modified to treat also the rationally dependent case. Ongoing work: use the explicit formula to study exact and approximate controllability in L2. Future work: applications to PDEs. References:

1 Y. Chitour, G. Mazanti, and M. Sigalotti. Stability of

non-autonomous difference equations with applications to transport and wave propagation on networks. Netw. Heterog. Media, to appear.

2 G. Mazanti. Relative controllability of linear difference

  • equations. Preprint arXiv: 1604.08663, 2016.

Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Introduction Stability analysis and applications Relative controllability Controllability and stability of difference equations and applications Guilherme Mazanti