Continuity of Education Work Group Recommendations
June 24, 2020
1
Continuity of Education Work Group Recommendations June 24, 2020 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Continuity of Education Work Group Recommendations June 24, 2020 1 Work Group Members Dr. Vedaraman Sriraman, Chair and Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs Dr. Gene Bourgeois, Ex-officio and Provost and Vice President for Academic
June 24, 2020
1
2
3
4
5
implemented in consultation with the chair/school director and dean.
faculty innovation efforts.
the hybrid A/B model or switch to fully remote instruction should that become necessary.
prepared to work with students who must self-quarantine, or are certified as vulnerable populations who should not come to class, etc.
6
facilitate synchronous Zoom attendance by half the class in settings using the A/B model. A list of classrooms so equipped may be found at: https://itac.txstate.edu/support/academic-classrooms/webcams.
for students who need to use Zoom or engage in online instruction on campus.
there may be limitations in computer labs from a capacity standpoint.
7
8
9
10
instructional settings, in-person meetings, shared office spaces, etc.
assistants also in laboratory or clinical settings where close contact is required, unless a mask with higher protective properties is required.
the CDC, will have the opportunity to request additional modifications. Faculty members with questions about circumstances or conditions not defined by CDC may consult with their department chairs/school directors about safeguards and options for alternative arrangements.
11
where there are significant face-to-face interactions.
personal hand sanitizer bottles, will be practiced.
COVID-19 before the start of their workday.
to-face operations.
12
certification.
transition to remote instruction should scenarios 2 or 3 unfold.
when instructors of record can no longer assume the regular load.
negatively affected by COVID-19 and its health and social consequences. Unit leadership should be knowledgeable and sensitive to recognizing and addressing the potential for these differential impacts on individuals and groups.
13
handled (such as when scenarios 2 or 3 should occasion).
academic integrity.
system tool.
14
15
attendance should be taken for participants to help with contact tracing.
by the university and not to exceed 50 percent of the room’s rated maximum occupancy where the event is being held, whichever is lower.
face coverings should be worn when physical distancing cannot be
compliance.
16
faculty are encouraged to consider the number and availability of required events as well as alternative options that should be considered for students who have received modifications for being in high health- risk categories related to COVID-19 according to university policy.
methods, keeping in mind if all events go to online delivery, the student experience could be diminished.
precautions in place.
17
necessary and critical to the mission of the university.
attendance should be taken for participants to help with contact tracing.
by the university and not to exceed 50 percent of the room’s rated maximum occupancy where the event is being held, whichever is lower.
precautions in place.
18
19
20
21
22