Consultation Meetings March 2012 Agenda Introduction and welcome - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Consultation Meetings

March 2012

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Flood Mitigation Measures to be implemented for the Oshakati / Ongwediva Area

Agenda

• Introduction and welcome (10)
• The EIA process (20)
• Project overview (30)
• Technical Clarification (10)
• Issues Identified (10)
• Consultation (40)
• Wrap up (11:30)

Project Scope

Proposed Flood Mitigation Measures to be implemented for the Oshakati / Ongwediva Area consisting of:

• Cleaning and deepening of the Okatana River

in Oshakati

• Construction of a dyke system to the north

and west of the town of Oshakati

Locality Map

Introduction

The Proponent Team

Name Organisation Role

Martin Shikongo MRLGHRD Project Manager Joshua Kaitungwa PMS Consultant Gunter Leicher Knight Piesold Consultant Ronnie van Looveren BAR Consultant Jan Wynants BAR Consultant Martha Amupolo BAR Consultant

Introduction

The EIA Team

Name Organisation Role

Norman van Zyl Enviro Dynamics Impact Assessment Stephanie van Zyl Enviro Dynamics Impact Assessment Ernst Simon Urban Dynamics Socio-economic Chris Muir WCE Hydrology Carla Saayman Enviro Dynamics Public consultation

EIA Process

• Environmental Management Act, 2007 ( 7 of 2007)
• The Regulations now promulgated.
• Therefore we will use this as the framework for

this project.

• There are other regulations and Acts that integrates

into the EIA process.

• Water Management Act
• Forestry Act

EIA combines public values and technical facts

EIA

Technical Environmental Analysis Public Consultation

Facts Values

Decision

EIA Process

Scoping

Key issues Scope of EIA Environmental Assessment Specialists Analyse Impacts Mitigation Measures

Appeal ? Decision Environmental Management Plan Implementation

YOUR ROLE

SCOPING DATA GATHERING ASSESSMENT REPORTING CONSULTATION FEEDBACK

Interaction with the client and its technical team

Roles at this meeting

• Proponent:

Provide project information, including aspects which interact with the environment.

• EIA consultants:

Explain EIA process, facilitate

• pen and sincere discussions,

accurately record input.

• Audience:

Understanding project, provide input to be investigated.

House Rules

• Allow for clarification after project overview
• Allow for comment after discussing issues

identified

• Speak through the chair of the meeting
• State name clearly before asking questions
• Speak slowly and clearly
• Respect other views on the project

Project overview

Technical Team BAR KNIGHT PIESOLD

Clarification questions

Clarify the project overview Speak through the chair of the meeting State name clearly before asking questions

Issues identified so far

• Benefits of the project
• The benefit of the reduction in flooding in Oshakati

which has a huge negative impact on people and their livelihoods as well as on the ability of the Town Council to provide services to its constituents.

• The benefit of being able to lay dry large areas, which

are currently subjected to flooding, allows for the much more logical and cost effective development of the Urban Area of Oshakati.

Issues identified so far

• Land use and people
• The footprint of the dyke and the channel next to it will

result in the need to relocate homesteads and fields which are in the way.

• The land use of the affected area is mostly subsistence
• agriculture. Loss of land means loss of livelihood of the

affected households.

• The dyke could potentially cause, through a backwater

effect, flooding of homesteads and fields located to the north and west of the dyke and channel.

• Fruit bearing trees and other usefull vegetation may be

lost to accommodate the footprint of the dyke and channels.

Issues identified so far

• Effects on the river system
• The water in the Oshanas may have a high silt load. This

could result in the channels silting up and thereby increase flooding upstream and to the west of the dyke.

• The ephemeral river system through the town may be a

pollution hazard if not maintained.

• The natural abilities of the river system to cleanse itself

is removed if normal flow of water is reduced or interrupted

• The concrete lining will affect the ecosystem functioning

in the area.

Issues identified so far

• Effects on the downstream river system
• Depending on the extent of diversion of water, it may

cause some areas to dry up and may influence the availability of surface and groundwater in certain areas which may bring about changes to the local ecology and the plant and animals community so supported.

• If the water retention reservoir is constructed, it will

reduce the downstream flow, which may affect the Etosha ecosystem and the tourism it attracts.

Consultation

• State name clearly before commenting
• Cards- write down issues
• Be specific on your issue
• One issue per card
• Beware of generalization

Consultation

• Free and open discussion on:
• What worries you about the project
• What do you find positive about the

project

• Any other comments or issues

Wrap Up

• Did you sign the Attendance Register?
• Comments to reach us by

Contact: Carla Saayman carla@envirod.com Tel: (061) 223 336 Fax: (061) 307437