Concepts Drive Change AUSA v7, 4 OCT 2018 Compete Penetrate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Compete Penetrate Dis-Integrate Exploit Re-Compete

AUSA v7, 4 OCT 2018

Concepts Drive Change

1

Compete Penetrate Dis-Integrate Exploit Re-Compete

AUSA v7, 4 OCT 2018

2

Threats Layer “Stand-off”

Combined Arms Armies employ organic long-, mid-, and short-range systems to create

• perational and tactical stand-off that requires attacking functions rather than formations

Compete Penetrate Dis-Integrate Exploit Re-Compete

AUSA v7, 4 OCT 2018

Describes three interrelated ways to achieve strategic objectives: ➢Expand the competition space on favorable terms (preferred method) If necessary: ➢Win a short conflict by denying initial enemy objectives and achieving an operational position of advantage ➢Win a protracted conflict by regaining the operational initiative and defeating enemy forces

3

Army forces, as an element of the Joint Force, conduct Multi-Domain Operations to prevail in competition; when necessary, Army forces penetrate and dis-integrate enemy anti-access and area denial systems and exploit the resultant freedom of maneuver to achieve strategic objectives (win) and force a return to competition on favorable terms.

Central Idea

Element AirLand Battle Multi-Domain Operations Operational Environment Single Pacing Threat (Soviet Union) Multiple Threats across the OE with similar

• peration approaches (near-peers)

Focus Formations (Second Echelon) Systems (Anti-Access and Area Denial Systems) Operational Context Forward postured force in prepared defense CONUS-based force executing offensive action through strategic and operational maneuver Central Idea Engage throughout the depth of the battlefield; defeat the Second Echelon Compete in all domains; when necessary, penetrate and dis-integrate enemy anti- access and area denial systems and exploit the resultant freedom of maneuver to achieve strategic objectives (win) and force a return to competition Domains Land, Air (synchronization) Land, Air, Maritime, Space, Cyber (synergy) Echelon Corps/Division and below Inter-Agency, Theater and below Phases Phased operations in armed conflict Across competition continuum Concept

AirLand Battle and Multi-Domain Operations: What is the Difference?

UNCLASSIFIED // FOUO

Multi-Domain Operations

Evolutionary Concept with Revolutionary Impacts

5 Complex, Hyper-Competition, Near-Peer gains.…

Joint Integration Convergence of Capabilities

Cross-Domain Synergy Multiple Dilemmas Innovative Teams

SPACE AIR CYBERSPACE LAND MARITIME

6

UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO

UK/US Interoperability Roadmap

Vision: UK division to operate effectively within a US Corps; UK brigade operating effectively within a US division; US BCT operating effectively within a UK division; US division

• perating effectively within UK-framework NATO Allied Rapid Reaction Corps

Events to enhance interoperability: JWA, WFX, GORT (Strat & Modernisation), ASTs, CRC-A

Timeline Focus Area

2020 2019 2018 2021 2022+

CIS/IM Intel / ISR Fusion* Digital Fires Sustainment AM&E S&T

ASCA CD (WFX 18.4) FC BISA 4.0 Release 1 UK FMN (Ex IR) US MPE (WFX / JWA) FC BISA 4.0 Release 2 DCGS-A WEB (WFX 18.4) DCGS-A IPS (WFX 19.4) Integrated Intel (TBC) UK Data Repository (IOC)

* Intel sharing continues in sp of real world ops

UK Data Repository (FOC) Automated Commodity Sharing (2023) Present CGA methodology (SCM 18) CS Standard, Log C4I & RSOM Validation (Ex TJ & JWA 19.1)

Commodity Sharing Standard RSOM CONOP Log C4I CD (WFX 18.4)

Present CGA Interop lessons exploitation presn to GORT Present CGA CRC-A CRC-A CRC-A CRC-A

7

UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO

Compete Penetrate Dis-Integrate Exploit Re-Compete

AUSA v7, 4 OCT 2018

8

Multi-Domain Operations Solution

Compete Penetrate Dis-Integrate Exploit Re-Compete

AUSA v7, 4 OCT 2018

9

Modernization Framework

Thread of Continuity

Sustain (Enduring) Delay/Reduce (Trade-off) Invest/ Accelerate (New) Divest

X

Near (now-2025) Mid (2026-2035) Far (2036-2050)

POM YEARS

(Publish Annual Mission Guidance – top down- for FFME that prioritizes and puts into action the AMS )

OE/ Pacing Threat

Russian New Generation Warfare (RNGW)

2018 2028

10 Year Plan

Experiments/Exercises

Concept

The Army needs a threat/OE based, operationally driven framework for modernization (AMS 1.5, ACP, …a single, nested narrative)

Feedback Army Mod Strategy 1.5

*

*Note: AMS 1.5 must address a comprehensive DOTMLPF-P modernization plan; the current AMS is “M” focused while CAC has sought to maintain doctrinal change commensurate with capability. Ideally, the AMS becomes an Army guidance document driving the entire enterprise across the ACOMs…potentially serving as the modernization chapter to the ACP

D O T M L P F P

Mod Strategy*

(AMS 1.0 Insufficient

• “M” focused)

April 2019

“The Army of 2028 will be ready to deploy, fight and win decisively against any adversary, anytime and anywhere, in a joint, multi-domain, high-intensity conflict, while simultaneously deterring others and maintaining its ability to conduct irregular warfare”

• SEC Mark Esper, GEN Mark Milley

NSS/NDS/ NMS