computer implemented
play

computer-implemented invention patents in Europe 2020 Improving - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Improving your grant rate of computer-implemented invention patents in Europe 2020 Improving your grant rate of computer-implemented invention patents in Europe Howard Sands and Phil Merchant 9 September 2020 Overview Introduction - whats


  1. Improving your grant rate of computer-implemented invention patents in Europe 2020

  2. Improving your grant rate of computer-implemented invention patents in Europe Howard Sands and Phil Merchant 9 September 2020 Overview Introduction - what’s it all about?  Statistics on filing and grant – success is possible  The EPO approach - how it works and what you can do  Worked examples  Tips and Pointers – how to make the system work for you 

  3. Improving your grant rate of computer-implemented invention patents in Europe Howard Sands and Phil Merchant 9 September 2020 Introduction - What’s it all about? United Kingdom Section 1 Patents Act 1977: (1) A patent may be granted only for an invention in respect of Europe which the following conditions are satisfied, that is to say - Article 52 EPC: (a) the invention is new; “(1) European patents shall be granted for any inventions, (b) it involves an inventive step; in all fields of technology, provided that they are new, (c) it is capable of industrial application; involve an inventive step and are susceptible of industrial (d) the grant of a patent for it is not excluded by subsections (2) application ” and (3) or section 4A below;and references in this Act to a patentable invention shall be construed accordingly. (2) The following in particular shall not be regarded as (2) It is hereby declared that the following (among other things) inventions within the meaning of paragraph 1: (a) are not inventions for the purposes of this Act, that is to say, discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical anything which consists of - methods; (b) aesthetic creations; (c) schemes, rules and (a) a discovery, scientific theory or mathematical method; methods for performing mental acts, playing games or (b) a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work or any other doing business, and programs for computers; (d) aesthetic creation whatsoever; presentations of information. (c) a scheme, rule or method for performing a mental act, playing (3) Paragraph 2 shall exclude the patentability of the a game or doing business, or a program for a computer; subject-matter or activities referred to therein only to the (d) the presentation of information; but the foregoing provision extent to which a European patent application or European shall prevent anything from being treated as an invention for patent relates to such subject-matter or activities as such. the purposes of this Act only to the extent that a patent or application for a patent relates to that thing as such.

  4. Improving your grant rate of computer-implemented invention patents in Europe Howard Sands and Phil Merchant 9 September 2020 Statistics on filing and grant - Success is possible G06Q: DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE,  COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR G06Q - EP filings G06Q - EP grants EPO launches “Early 4000 1200 certainty from Search” 3500 1000 3000 800 2500 600 2000 1500 400 1000 200 500 0 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

  5. Improving your grant rate of computer-implemented invention patents in Europe Howard Sands and Phil Merchant 9 September 2020 Statistics on filing and grant - a softening approach? G06Q - percentage of total G06Q grants - Percentage of TOTAL EP [1] filings total FILED GRANTED 0.025 0.8 0.7 200,000 0.02 0.6 0.5 150,000 0.015 0.4 0.3 100,000 0.01 0.2 0.1 50,000 0.005 0 0 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 [1] Data from EPO 2019 Patent Statistics - https://www.epo.org/about-us/annual-reports-statistics/statistics.html

  6. The EPO approach How it works and what you can do

  7. Improving your grant rate of computer-implemented invention patents in Europe Howard Sands and Phil Merchant 9 September 2020 The EPO interpretation of the statute Article 52 EPC Article 52 EPC Article 52 EPC Invention - EPO Guidelines G-II-2: (1) European patents shall be granted for any inventions, in (1) European patents shall be granted for any inventions, in (1) European patents shall be granted for any inventions, in “[T]he subject-matter of the claim is to be considered as a all fields of technology, provided that they are new, involve all fields of technology, provided that they are new, involve all fields of technology, provided that they are new, involve whole, in order to decide whether the claimed subject- an inventive step and are susceptible of industrial an inventive step and are susceptible of industrial an inventive step and are susceptible of industrial matter has a technical character. If it does not, there is no application. application. application. invention within the meaning of Art. 52(1). ” (2) The following in particular shall not be regarded as (2) The following in particular shall not be regarded as (2) The following in particular shall not be regarded as Inventive Step (Obviousness) – Guidelines G-VII- 5; “problem and inventions within the meaning of paragraph 1: (a) inventions within the meaning of paragraph 1: (a) inventions within the meaning of paragraph 1: (a) solution” approach: discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical (i) Determine the closest prior art; methods; (b) aesthetic creations; (c) schemes, rules and methods; (b) aesthetic creations; (c) schemes, rules and methods; (b) aesthetic creations; (c) schemes, rules and (ii) Identify the “distinguishing features” with respect to that methods for performing mental acts, playing games or methods for performing mental acts, playing games or methods for performing mental acts, playing games or closest prior art, identify the “technical effect” they provide and doing business, and programs for computers; (d) doing business, and programs for computers; (d) doing business, and programs for computers; (d) therefore the “technical problem” that they solve. presentations of information. presentations of information. presentations of information. (iii) Considering whether the claimed invention, starting from the closest prior art and seeking to solve the objective technical (3) Paragraph 2 shall exclude the patentability of the (3) Paragraph 2 shall exclude the patentability of the (3) Paragraph 2 shall exclude the patentability of the problem, would be obvious to the skilled person.) subject-matter or activities referred to therein only to the subject-matter or activities referred to therein only to the subject-matter or activities referred to therein only to the extent to which a European patent application or European extent to which a European patent application or European extent to which a European patent application or European patent relates to such subject-matter or activities as such. patent relates to such subject-matter or activities as such. patent relates to such subject-matter or activities as such.

  8. Improving your grant rate of computer-implemented invention patents in Europe Howard Sands and Phil Merchant 9 September 2020 A test for technical character (in two stages) No features have technical character Excluded - Step 1: Is the claim directed toward excluded subject-matter as such? Article 52(2) EPC If yes, claim is not patentable under Article 52(2) EPC. If no, go to Step 2. Step 2: Apply a (refined) inventive step analysis Step 2a: Identify features that contribute toward the technical A mixture of technical character and non-technical features Such features features include: - Subset of features taken a: Features of the claim that are per se “technical” (e.g. into account for obviousness processor). b : Features of the claim are per se “non - technical” (e.g. mathematical method step), but in the context of the invention interact with the technical features to provide a technical effect. Step 2b: Conduct an inventive step analysis taking into account those All features h ave distinguishing features that contribute toward technical character . technical character All features taken into account EPO Guidelines sections G – II – 2 (step 1) and G – VII – 5.4 (steps 2a and 2b)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend