computational personalization data science methods for
play

Computational Personalization: Data science methods for - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Computational Personalization: Data science methods for personalized health Maurits Kaptein Providing the right treatment to the right patient, at the right dose at the right time Outline: Defining personalized healthcare


  1. Computational Personalization: Data science methods for personalized health Maurits Kaptein

  2. “Providing the right treatment to the right patient, at the right dose at the right time”

  3. Outline: ◮ Defining personalized healthcare ◮ Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) ◮ A computational approach to personalization

  4. Defining personalized healthcare

  5. { patient , time , treatment , dose } f − → outcome .

  6. f outcome ← − { patient , time , treatment , dose } f ← − { patient , time , treatment , dose } r f r ← − { x , a } = f ( x , a ; θ ) , r The reward, r , is a function of the context, x , (the characteristics of the patient), and the actions, a , (the treatment).

  7. arg max f ( x , a ) a

  8. T � arg max f ( x t , a t ) , a t t =1 We choose the treatments such that we maximize the reward over all treatments.

  9. 0.6 0.4 S u r v i v a l 0.2 1.0 0.0 0.8 20 0.6 Dose 40 0.4 Weight 0.2 60 0.0 80 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 S Survival Survival u r v Weight = 20 Weight = 60 i v a l 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.2 20 0.6 Dose 40 0.4 Weight 0.2 0.1 0.1 60 80 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Dose Dose

  10. Why is this difficult?

  11. ◮ High dimensional learning from noisy data

  12. ◮ High dimensional learning from noisy data ◮ Learning causal relationships

  13. ◮ High dimensional learning from noisy data ◮ Learning causal relationships ◮ Balancing learning and earning

  14. The Randomized Controlled Trial

  15. ◮ Advantages: 1. Transparent and understandable 2. Causal effects through randomization 3. Practically appealing

  16. ◮ Advantages: 1. Transparent and understandable 2. Causal effects through randomization 3. Practically appealing ◮ Disadvantages: 1. Examines a very small number of options 2. Poor balancing of earning and learning 3. Inability to (re-)use data after trial

  17. A computational approach

  18. Disadvantages: 1. Loss of transparency: black-box

  19. Disadvantages: 1. Loss of transparency: black-box 2. Practical challenges: no deterministic choices

  20. Disadvantages: 1. Loss of transparency: black-box 2. Practical challenges: no deterministic choices 3. Causal effects not guaranteed: need additional analysis

  21. Disadvantages: 1. Loss of transparency: black-box 2. Practical challenges: no deterministic choices 3. Causal effects not guaranteed: need additional analysis 4. Computationally challenging

  22. Why would we want this?

  23. Policy RCT Computational Personalization 30 Regret 20 10 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Interactions

  24. 800 600 Regret 400 200 Policy RCT (.754) Computational Personalization (1.0) 0 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Interactions

  25. 10 Policy RCT Computational Personalization 8 Estimator error 6 4 2 0 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Interactions

  26. Conclusion

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend