Computation Fluid Dynamics – ANSYS Software Key Features and Best Practices
- Dr. Wim Slagter
Lead Product Manager, ANSYS, Inc.
Courtesy of Borg Warner Turbo & Emissions Systems Courtesy of CADFEM Russia
Computation Fluid Dynamics ANSYS Software Key Features and Best - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Computation Fluid Dynamics ANSYS Software Key Features and Best Practices Courtesy of Borg Warner Turbo & Emissions Systems Dr. Wim Slagter Lead Product Manager, ANSYS, Inc. Courtesy of CADFEM Russia ANSYS, the company ANSYS
Lead Product Manager, ANSYS, Inc.
Courtesy of Borg Warner Turbo & Emissions Systems Courtesy of CADFEM Russia
and globally supports a comprehensive range of engineering simulation software
for electronics)
fatigue)
providing CFD Best Practices
Emag Acoustics Structural
CAD Import Parametric Simulation Design Exploration Meshing Post- processing
Fluid
Transient or steady-state Laminar and turbulent flows Heat transfer Buoyant flows Incompressible / compressible Multi-component flows, multi-phase Real gas modeling Filters/porous regions Reactions and combustion Moving geometry and mesh Rotating machinery Solution-based adaptive remeshing 1-way and 2-way Fluid-Structure Interaction
Courtesy of GE Energy Courtesy of BMW AG
engineers to do simulation driven product development
animating dumb CAD (geometry without parameters) models
Bi-directional CAD connections Feature-Based Modeling Direct Modeling
Setup Wizards
Geometry Meshing Problem Setup Post Processing Customized Menus
User-defined LES for highest accuracy; RANS for all other areas RANS LES
Re=395
New steady-state scheme as accurate as transient Wigley hull simulation
Free surface profiles
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Cavitation number Head rise coefficient Hofmann et al [20] CFD
Recondisation simulation Cavitating flow in a centrifugal pump can also be modeled in steady state
Tradeoff Chart Parametric CAD model Response Surface and Sensitivity Chart
Section Length Guide Curve Angle Guide Curve Radius Effective Flow Area Section Length
DOE generated with Design Points
Guide Curve Angle (Deg) Guide Curve Radius (mm) Section Length (mm) EFA (mm2) Baseline 63 41 51 1100.2 Optimized 50 30 60.5 1180.4
Baseline Design Optimized Design
Drag s sensitivity Downforc rce s sensitivity Total p pressure d drop s sensitivity Total p pressure d drop s sensitivity
Estimated downforce improvement = 41.6N Actual downforce improvement = 39.1N
in a single computation!
need to simulate the actual change!
Fluid Flow Thermal Stress
Deformation
Courtesy of Embraco
profile of external ramp
possible (each day 10 instead of 1)
Courtesy of Dyson
at inlet, external temperature, engine RPM
Fluid Flow Deformation Von Mises Stress Temperature
at inlet, external temperature, engine RPM
Fluid Flow Deformation Von Mises Stress Temperature
All samples report maximum deformation below 1.5 mm Effect of engine speed and thickness at outlet on maximum deformation