Complete Streets Project Community Meeting #2 February 11, 2016 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

complete streets project
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Complete Streets Project Community Meeting #2 February 11, 2016 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

King Street Complete Streets Project Community Meeting #2 February 11, 2016 Project Overview King Street resurfacing this summer Complete Streets policy Community Meeting #1 in November 2015 Tonight: Present options and get


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Community Meeting #2 February 11, 2016

King Street Complete Streets Project

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Project Overview

  • King Street resurfacing this summer
  • Complete Streets policy
  • Community Meeting #1 in November 2015
  • Tonight: Present options and get feedback
  • Provide facilities for people who walk, bike,

ride transit or drive cars

  • Improve the safety and convenience for all

street users

  • Implement City Council adopted plans and

policies

3

Project Goals

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project Limits: Radford St. to Janney’s Ln.

4

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Summary - What we heard

5

What We Heard

Difficult to cross King Street Pedestrian safety concerns near school Vehicle speeds along King Street are high Street crossings are long Not enough time to cross at lights Unsafe for people who bike Difficult to access bus stops Improvements needed at intersections Need to change character of the roadway

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Proposed Options

  • 1. Complete Street Maintenance
  • 2. Pedestrian and Accessibility

Intersection Enhancements

  • 3. Complete Street Corridor

Improvements *Tradeoffs and Balances!!!

6

slide-6
SLIDE 6

King Street Existing Conditions

7

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Option 1: Complete Street Maintenance

  • Improve curb ramps
  • Install crosswalks along side streets
  • Provide ADA compliant bus stops

8

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Option 1: Considerations

  • No major change to roadway
  • Minimal pedestrian improvements
  • No bicycle or vehicular improvements

9

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Option 2: Pedestrian & Accessibility Intersection Enhancements

  • Remove westbound travel lane and install left

turn lanes

  • Provide pedestrian & streetscape improvements

at intersections

  • Improve pedestrian crossings at bus stops

10

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Option 2: Considerations

  • Westbound travel time along corridor increases

by 13s in AM peak (11s in PM peak)

  • Change character of roadway at intersections
  • No improvements for people who bike

11

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Option 2 Corridor Concept

12 Existing Option 2

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Typical Intersection – Option 2

13

slide-13
SLIDE 13

14

Option 3: Complete Street Corridor Improvements – Radford Street to Chinquapin Drive (Section 1)

  • Remove westbound travel lane
  • Provide westbound bike lane (to Kenwood Avenue)

and east bound shared lane in front of school

  • Provide left turn lane into school at Kenwood Avenue
  • Provide left and right turn lane at Chinquapin Drive
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Project Limits: Radford St. to Janney’s Ln.

15 Section 1 Section 2

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Option 3: Complete Street Corridor Improvements – Chinquapin Drive to Janneys Lane (Section 2)

  • Remove one travel lane in each direction and provide

left turn lanes

  • Provide pedestrian & streetscape improvements at

intersections

  • Improve pedestrian crossings at bus stops
  • Install buffered bike lanes

16

slide-16
SLIDE 16

17

Option 3: Considerations

  • Eastbound travel time increases by 7s in the AM peak (3s in PM peak)
  • Westbound travel time increases by 13s in AM peak (11s in PM peak)
  • Provides separation between vehicles and sidewalk
  • Provides designated space on street for all users for most of corridor
  • Changes character of the corridor
  • Provides major pedestrian improvements at Kenwood Avenue for

increased safety at school

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Option 3 Corridor Concept: Section 2

18 Existing Complete Street Option

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Typical Section 2 Intersection – Option 3

19

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Option 3 Corridor Concept: Section 1

20

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Option 3 Corridor Concept: Section 1

21

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Typical Intersection improvements

  • With option 2 & 3, “typical”

improvements can be made to the following intersection:

  • Albany, Quincy and

Tuckahoe

  • Improvements Include

22

  • Planted

pedestrian refuge island

  • High visibility

crosswalk

  • Left turn lane

Stevenson Avenue, Alexandria

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Lane Reduction Options 2 & 3

  • Potential improvements with
  • ptions 2 & 3
  • Change to overall character of

roadway

  • Pedestrian refuge islands and new

crosswalks at intersections with bus stops (6)

  • Major pedestrian improvements

at:

  • Kenwood Avenue
  • Scroggins Road
  • Melrose Street
  • Left turn bays/

center turn lane

  • Reduced speeds

with speed indicator signs 23

slide-23
SLIDE 23

24

What could it look like?

BEFORE AFTER SAMPLE

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Major Intersection Improvements

  • Kenwood

Avenue

  • Scroggins

Road

  • Melrose

Street

25

*No bicycle or pedestrian crashes reported

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Kenwood Avenue Concept

26

  • Remove left turn from King to

Kenwood

  • Provide pedestrian refuge islands
  • n King and Kenwood
  • Change lane designation on

Kenwood

  • Provide LPI for pedestrians at

intersection

  • Relocate bus stop to far side of

intersection

slide-26
SLIDE 26

27

  • Provide pedestrian refuge

island on King

  • Provide RFP (Rapid Flashing

Beacon) for crossing of King

  • Relocate bus stop to far side
  • f intersection
  • Provide ADA curb ramps and

bus stops

  • Provide left turn lanes

Melrose Street Concept

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Scroggins Road Concept

28

  • Provide pedestrian refuge

island on King Street

  • Provide SB left turn lane
  • Extend curb on Scroggins Rd.

to normalize intersection

  • Provide temporary materials

to realign right turn onto Scroggins Rd. and remove slip lane

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Option Matrix

What We Heard

Complete Street Maintenance Pedestrian & Accessibility Intersection Enhancements Complete Street Corridor Improvements

Difficult to cross King Street Pedestrian safety concerns near school Vehicle speeds along King Street are high Street crossings are long Not enough time to cross at lights Unsafe for people who bike Difficult to access bus stops Improvements needed at intersections Need to change character of the roadway

29

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • 1. Do you live on King Street or an adjacent side street?

(choose one)

  • 1. Yes
  • 2. No

Yes No

45% 55%

Polling Question

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • 2. Other than your place of residence, what is

your main destination on King Street?

(choose 1)

  • 1. School/Daycare
  • 2. Place of Worship
  • 3. Recreation Center/Park
  • 4. Work
  • 5. Social
  • 6. No destinations

(I use King Street to travel elsewhere)

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

11% 11% 68% 5% 0% 5%

Polling Question

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • 3. What are your top priorities for a Complete King Street?

(choose 3) 1. Improve pedestrian safety near TC Williams 2. Reduce vehicular speeding 3. Provide safer crossings for pedestrians 4. Provide more accessible transit stops 5. Provide a safe and accessible bicycle facility 6. Provide greater separation between vehicles and pedestrian 7. Maintain comparable travel times for drivers

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 13% 13% 27% 6% 21% 13% 6%

Polling Question

slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • 4. What intersection safety improvements

are most important to you?

(choose all that apply)

1. Safer & shorter street crossings 2. Planted pedestrian islands 3. Left turn only lanes 4. Slower speeds of turning vehicles 5. None—not in favor of any improvements

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

40% 19% 2% 17% 21%

Polling Question

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • 5. What intersections are in need
  • f the most improvement?

(choose 3)

  • 1. Janney’s Lane
  • 2. Melrose Street
  • 3. Albany Avenue
  • 4. Tuckahoe Lane
  • 5. Scroggins Road
  • 6. Quincy Street
  • 7. Chinquapin Drive
  • 8. Kenwood Avenue
  • 9. Radford Street

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

12% 14% 0% 6% 2% 24% 16% 0% 27%

Polling Question

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Option 1

Complete Street Maintenance

Option 2

Pedestrian & Accessibility Intersection Enhancements

Option 3

Complete Street Corridor Improvements

slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • 6. What option do you prefer?

(choose 1)

  • 1. Option 1: Complete Street

Maintenance

  • 2. Option 2: Pedestrian

Accessibility Intersection Enhancements

  • 3. Option 3: Complete Streets

Corridor Improvements

  • 4. Other: (I will submit a

comment form)

1. 2. 3. 4.

10% 5% 70% 15%

Polling Question

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Hillary.Orr@AlexandriaVA.gov

40

Next Steps

  • Alex Engage – Community

Feedback on options

  • Public Meeting #3 – Proposed

Design

  • Traffic and Parking Board – Public

Hearing