comparing two cities method and approach Katja Leyendecker PhD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

comparing two cities
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

comparing two cities method and approach Katja Leyendecker PhD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Public perceptions of cycle space comparing two cities method and approach Katja Leyendecker PhD candidate Northumbria University Newcastle, UK Contents Global context UK context Socialisation Sensitive setting Recommended remedies X my


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Public perceptions of cycle space

comparing two cities

method and approach

Katja Leyendecker PhD candidate Northumbria University Newcastle, UK

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Contents

Global context UK context Socialisation Sensitive setting Recommended remedies X my research

2 / 18

slide-3
SLIDE 3

From the academic message boards Fiona Spotswood et al (2015)

Despite significant national and local efforts over the last decade to stimulate uptake of cycling in the UK, levels of cycling (particularly utility cycling) remain at around 2%

  • f journeys

Jan Garrard If you want to know if an urban environment supports cycling, you can forget about all the detailed ‘bikeability indexes’— just measure the proportion of cyclists who are female Source Scientific American 2009

3 / 18

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Global context

Sources: graph: Garrard, J., et al. (2012). Women and cycling. City cycling. J. Pucher and R. Buehler, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). red : UK Census 2011, blue: VEP Bremen 2025 4 / 18

slide-5
SLIDE 5

UK context

Source: Census 2011 5 / 18

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Socialisation

Women’s lives are gendered:

  • Main care-giver (still)
  • Escorting (school run), shopping, chores and errands
  • More trips
  • Trip-chaining
  • Shorter distances
  • Complex travel diaries
  • Safety / security (vs) comfort / convenience

These trips in High-cycling countries are cycled Low-cycling countries done by car

6 / 18 Lehner-Lierz, U. (1997). The role of cycling for women. The greening of urban transport. R. Tolley, Wiley and Son.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Sensitive setting

Context, context, context… global positioning

Location country / city Location descriptive factors

  • Mode share and shift potentials
  • Policies and their enactment for social change
  • Powerwebs and –landscapes and social norms

Location history/past context, trajectory

7 / 18

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Recommended remedies

Part A – contextualising the socio-ecological model

8 / 18

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Recommended remedies

Part A – contextualising the socio-ecological model

9 / 18

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Recommended remedies

Part B – acknowledging power, control and agency

10 / 18

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Recommended remedies

Part B – acknowledging power, control and agency

11 / 18

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Recommended remedies

Part C – conceptual model

12 / 18 Source: Mitra, R. (2013). "Independent mobility and mode choice for school transportation: a review and framework for future research." Transport reviews 33(1): 21-43.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

My research

13 / 18

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

slide-14
SLIDE 14

My research

14 / 18

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

slide-15
SLIDE 15

My research Phase 1 Quantify

Newcastle + Gateshead Bremen ___________________________________________________________________ Population 490,000 550,000 Density person/km 2,000 1,700

Source: Wikipedia 15 / 18

slide-16
SLIDE 16

My research Phase 1 Quantify

Source: Philippe Crist (2013). Love Cycling Go Dutch Conference, Newcastle 16 / 18

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Reading material

1. Aldred, R., et al. (2015). "Does More Cycling Mean More Diversity in Cycling?" Transport reviews: 1- 17. 2. Aldred, R. (2015). "Adults’ attitudes towards child cycling: a study of the impact of infrastructure." European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 15(2): 92 - 115. 3. Eyer, A. and A. Ferreira (2015). "Taking the tyke on a bike: mother's; and childless women's space- time geographies in Amsterdam compared." Environment and Planning A 47(3): 691-708. 4. Garrard, J., et al. (2012). Women and cycling. City cycling. J. Pucher and R. Buehler, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). 5. Goodman, A. (2013). "Walking, cycling and driving to work in the English and Welsh 2011 census: trends, socio-economic patterning and relevance to travel behaviour in general." PLoS ONE 8(8): e71790. 6. Jarvis, H. and S. Alvanides (2008). "School choice from a household resource perspective: Preliminary findings from a north of England case study." Community, Work & Family 11(4): 385- 403. 7. Hillman, M., et al. (1990). One false move: a study of children's independent mobility. London, PSI. 8. Mitra, R. (2013). "Independent mobility and mode choice for school transportation: a review and framework for future research." Transport reviews 33(1): 21-43. 9. Shaw, B., et al. (2012). Children’s independent mobility: a comparative study in England and Germany (1971-2010). London: Policy Studies Institute.

  • 10. Spotswood, F., et al. (2015). "Analysing cycling as a social practice: An empirical grounding for

behaviour change." Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 29: 22-33.

17 / 18

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Thanks for listening

Email

katja.leyendecker@northumbria.ac.uk

Blog

https://katsdekker.wordpress.com/

Twitter@katsdekker

18 / 18