Comparative Effectiveness Research Impact on Quality and Access - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

comparative effectiveness research impact on quality and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Comparative Effectiveness Research Impact on Quality and Access - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Comparative Effectiveness Research Impact on Quality and Access John Santa MD MPH Director, Health Ratings Center Consumers Union March 21, 2011 Disclosures General internist, most recent practice at the VA in 2008. Employed by


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Comparative Effectiveness Research Impact on Quality and Access

John Santa MD MPH Director, Health Ratings Center Consumers Union March 21, 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

  • General internist, most recent practice at the VA

in 2008.

  • Employed by Consumers Union, publisher of:

– Consumer Reports – Consumer Reports – ConsumerReportsHealth.org

  • 20 million readers a month, older, affluent, well

educated, not diverse. Trying to diversify.

  • Independent of industry
  • Non profit, non partisan
slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 12. Consumer

Reports employee

R A T E R T

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 4

Health Alerts via Text

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Comparative Effectiveness

  • Current context
  • Key consumer principles
  • Early successes
  • Important events on horizon
  • Comments about cancer
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Systems are perfectly designed to get the results they achieve.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Current CE Playing Field Not Level

  • Industry dominates information to

consumers

  • Pharma most prominent but all sectors effective
  • Billions in direct to consumer
  • Billions in direct to consumer
  • Words regulated but visuals, tone and context may

be more important

  • Billions in physician marketing
  • Detailing, sampling, financial relationships
  • Billions in a biased research enterprise
  • Methodology, positive finding bias, ghostwriters
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Recent Examples

  • ProPublica analysis and release of physician

financial relationship info

  • Fugh Berman analysis of estrogen literature
  • Rothman—Health Advocacy Organizations and
  • Rothman—Health Advocacy Organizations and

the Pharmaceutical Industry

  • Avandia studies
  • St Jude Medical and US DOJ agreement

– DOJ alleges kickbacks to physicians for post marketing trials and registries

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Key Consumer Principles

  • Consumers should be involved “from the

start….at the top”….for appropriate CE tasks including research.

  • Careful selection…..of consumers and
  • Careful selection…..of consumers and

researchers

  • Training, orientation, support, feedback is

needed…..for both consumers and researchers.

  • Independence is crucial……for consumers and

for researchers.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Consumers Are Interested in Comparisons

  • Multiple successful health information

releases—hospitals, drugs, treatments

  • Strong readership scores for all health

articles—competes well with other content articles—competes well with other content

  • Strong media interest
  • Surveys show consumers use

comparative data in decision making

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Successes

  • Academic detailing---Avorn and others
  • ClinicalTrials.gov
  • Drug Effectiveness Review Project

– BestBuyDrugs

  • Hospital infections---Pronovost and others
  • Surgical Checklist---Gawande and others
  • Decision Guides---FIMDM and others
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Heart/Vascular Prevention Test Ratings Men, 45-54, Asymptomatic

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Cardiovascular Screening Tests in Healthy 40-60 year olds

  • 11% had a MD conversation about FU if

test abnormal

  • 9% discussed accuracy of test
  • 4% knew about potential complications
  • 1% discussed with MD whether test saved

lives

2010 Survey of Consumer Reports Subscribers

slide-16
SLIDE 16

On the Horizon

  • Medicare physician performance data
  • National reporting system for hospital

infections

  • Patient Centered Outcome Research
  • Patient Centered Outcome Research

Institute

  • Required reporting on physician financial

relationships with industry

  • Insurance Exchanges
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Important Activities

  • IOM reports on CER, Systematic Reviews,

Trustworthy Clinical Guidelines

  • AHRQ’s efforts to engage consumers—

past, present and future past, present and future

  • NIH’s efforts to engage consumers

– www.gem-beta.org/Public/EHRInitiative.aspx?cat=4

  • PCORI—how will consumers be engaged?
  • Delivery system reform
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Cancer CE Opportunities

  • If you want to say yes, you must be willing

to say no.

  • Context of comparisons
  • Poor delivery of what we know works
  • Poor delivery of what we know works
  • Overuse of what we know does not work
  • Prevention, diagnostic testing, “elective”

treatments good starters.

  • “Free the data” and use it for comparisons

for all---community cancer centers

slide-19
SLIDE 19

CONSUMER REPORTS

MARCH 2011

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Zeno’s Paradox

“To get there, you first have to make it

  • halfway. Then you have to make it

halfway from there. And then halfway halfway from there. And then halfway

  • again. You will never arrive, but

always getting closer.”

slide-21
SLIDE 21

“When you’re through learning, you’re through.”

John Wooden

Former UCLA basketball coach

slide-22
SLIDE 22

John Santa MD MPH Consumer Reports Health Director, Health Ratings Center santjo@consumer.org 914-378-2455