commutators paraproducts and bmo in non homogeneous
play

Commutators, paraproducts and BMO in non-homogeneous martingale - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Outline Commutators, paraproducts and BMO in non-homogeneous martingale harmonic analysis Sergei Treil Department of Mathematics Brown University August 22, 2012 Abel Symposium Oslo, Norway 1 Outline Main objects 1 Martingale difference


  1. Outline Commutators, paraproducts and BMO in non-homogeneous martingale harmonic analysis Sergei Treil Department of Mathematics Brown University August 22, 2012 Abel Symposium Oslo, Norway 1

  2. Outline Main objects 1 Martingale difference decomposition Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO Bounds on paraproducts and commutators 2 Paraproducts Extended paraproducts and commutators Basis properties of martingale difference spaces From dyadic to classical 3 Random dyadic lattices Averaging of dyadic shifts H 1 vs. dyadic H 1 2

  3. Main objects Martingale difference decomposition Bounds on paraproducts and commutators Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO From dyadic to classical Haar system: For an interval I let h I be the Haar function h I := | I | − 1 / 2 ( 1 I + − 1 I − ) , where I ± are the right and left halves of I respectively. 3

  4. Main objects Martingale difference decomposition Bounds on paraproducts and commutators Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO From dyadic to classical Haar system: For an interval I let h I be the Haar function h I := | I | − 1 / 2 ( 1 I + − 1 I − ) , where I ± are the right and left halves of I respectively. Dyadic lattice D := { 2 k ( j + [0 , 1)) : j, k ∈ Z } 3

  5. Main objects Martingale difference decomposition Bounds on paraproducts and commutators Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO From dyadic to classical Haar system: For an interval I let h I be the Haar function h I := | I | − 1 / 2 ( 1 I + − 1 I − ) , where I ± are the right and left halves of I respectively. Dyadic lattice D := { 2 k ( j + [0 , 1)) : j, k ∈ Z } { h I } I ∈D is and orthonormal basis in L 2 ( R ) 3

  6. Main objects Martingale difference decomposition Bounds on paraproducts and commutators Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO From dyadic to classical Haar system: For an interval I let h I be the Haar function h I := | I | − 1 / 2 ( 1 I + − 1 I − ) , where I ± are the right and left halves of I respectively. Dyadic lattice D := { 2 k ( j + [0 , 1)) : j, k ∈ Z } { h I } I ∈D is and orthonormal basis in L 2 ( R ) It is also an unconditional basis in L p ( R ) , 1 < p < ∞ : � f = � f, h I � h I I ∈D and the series converges unconditionally. 3

  7. Main objects Martingale difference decomposition Bounds on paraproducts and commutators Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO From dyadic to classical Martingale difference decomposition: � � ˆ | I | − 1 E I F := fdx 1 I I � ∆ I := − E I + E J J ∈ child( I ) � So f = ∆ I f ; I ∈D Note that on R we have ∆ I f = � f, h I � h I ; Advantage of MDD notation: the same notation in R n , where there are 2 n − 1 Haar functions for each cube. Can use arbitrary measure. 4

  8. Main objects Martingale difference decomposition Bounds on paraproducts and commutators Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO From dyadic to classical Martingale transforms and martingale multipliers R N , Radon measure µ : E Q = E µ Q , ∆ Q = ∆ µ Q are with respect to µ . Q := ∆ Q L p — martingale difference space; D Q = D p Martingale multiplier T α , α = { α Q } Q ∈D , � T α f := α Q ∆ Q f. Q ∈D Martingale transform T is a diagonal operator in the basis { D Q : Q ∈ D} : � Tf = T Q (∆ Q f ) , T Q : D Q → D Q . Q ∈D For doubling µ , T is bounded in L p , 1 < p < ∞ iff T Q are uniformly bounded: not true in general case for p � = 2 . 5

  9. Main objects Martingale difference decomposition Bounds on paraproducts and commutators Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO From dyadic to classical Paraproducts Let b locally integrable. Let M b be the multiplication operator, M b f = bf . Decompose M b in the basis { D Q : Q ∈ D} (recall D Q = ∆ Q L 2 ), � Tf = ∆ Q M b ∆ R f Q,R ∈D � � � . . . = π b f + Λ b f + π ∗ = . . . + . . . + b f Q � R Q = R R � Q π b f = � Q ∈D (∆ Q b )( E Q f ) — paraproduct Λ b is a martingale transform, commutes with all martingale multipliers. � � b f = � Q ∈D E Q ( b ∆ Q f ) = � π ∗ Q ∈D E Q (∆ Q b )(∆ Q f ) 6

  10. Main objects Martingale difference decomposition Bounds on paraproducts and commutators Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO From dyadic to classical Paraproducts: another point of view Decompose � bf = (∆ Q b )(∆ R f ) Q,R ∈D � � � b f + π ( ∗ ) . . . = π b f + Λ 0 = . . . + . . . + b f Q � R R � Q Q = R b f = � Λ 0 R ∈D ( E R b )(∆ R f ) — martingale multiplier, commutes with all martingale transforms. b f = � π ( ∗ ) Q ∈D (∆ Q b )(∆ Q f ) � � b f = � (recall that π ∗ Q ∈D E Q (∆ Q b )(∆ Q f ) ). b = π ( ∗ ) For classical Haar system (Lebesgue measure) on R , π ∗ b (because h 2 I ≡ Const on I ). 7

  11. Main objects Martingale difference decomposition Bounds on paraproducts and commutators Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO From dyadic to classical Paraproducts and commutators M b = π b + π ∗ b + Λ b , where Λ b is a martingale transform, and so commutes with all martingale multipliers. Therefore, if π b is bounded, then [ M b , T ] := M b T − TM b is bounded for any martingale multiplier T = T α M b = π b + π ( ∗ ) + Λ 0 b where Λ 0 b is a martingale multiplier, and so b commutes with all martingale transforms. Therefore, if π b and π ( ∗ ) are bounded, then [ M b , T ] := M b T − TM b b is bounded for any martingale transform T = diag { T Q : Q ∈ D} . In fact, if π ( ∗ ) is bounded, then π b is bounded b � � b = � π ( ∗ ) − π ∗ b = Λ b − Λ 0 Q ∈D ∆ Q (∆ Q b )(∆ Q f ) — one can split b this term between π b and π ∗ b . 8

  12. Main objects Martingale difference decomposition Bounds on paraproducts and commutators Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO From dyadic to classical Paraproducts and Calder´ on–Zygmund operators For CZO paraproducts catch some hidden oscillation ( T (1) theorem). If Q ∩ R = ∅ then � T ∆ Q f, ∆ R g � is easy to estimate using only smoothness of the kernel. If R ⊂ Q one needs to estimate � T 1 Q ′ , ∆ R g � ; here Q ′ is the child of Q , Q ′ ⊃ R . if T 1 = 0 this is equivalent the estimating � T 1 R N \ Q ′ , ∆ R g � , which can be done standard way If T 1 � = 0 one needs to replace T by T − π b , b = T 1 Condition b ∈ BMO implies that π b is bounded Case Q ⊂ R is treated symmetrically. Condition T ∗ 1 ∈ BMO is used. 9

  13. Main objects Martingale difference decomposition Bounds on paraproducts and commutators Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO From dyadic to classical Let child( Q ) = child 1 ( Q ) denote the children of Q , and let child n ( Q ) be the grandchildren of order n . Definition (Dyadic (Haar) shift) with parameters m and n is an operator T = � Q ∈D A I , where A I : ⊕ R ∈ child m ( Q ) D R → ⊕ R ∈ child n ( Q ) D R where A I can be represented as an integral operator with kernel a Q ( x, y ) , � a Q � ∞ ≤ | Q | − 1 . Complexity of T is r = max { m, n } . Dyadic shift is not a martingale transform. But T can be decomposed T = T 1 + T 2 + . . . + T r , T k = � � Q ∈D : ℓ ( Q )=2 k + rj A Q ; j ∈ Z Each T k can be treated as a martingale transform if one goes r steps at a time. 10

  14. Main objects Martingale difference decomposition Bounds on paraproducts and commutators Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO From dyadic to classical Definition (Dyadic (Haar) shift) with parameters m and n is an operator T = � Q ∈D A I , where A I : ⊕ R ∈ child m ( Q ) D R → ⊕ R ∈ child n ( Q ) D R where A I can be represented as an integral operator with kernel a Q ( x, y ) , � a Q � ∞ ≤ | Q | − 1 . Complexity of T is r = max { m, n } . Bound � a Q � ∞ ≤ | Q | − 1 means simply that after “renormalization” bilinear form of the operator A Q is bounded on L 1 × L 1 . 11

  15. Main objects Martingale difference decomposition Bounds on paraproducts and commutators Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO From dyadic to classical Square function and Hardy space H 1 d �� Q ∈D | ∆ Q f ( x ) | 2 � 1 / 2 Square function: Sf ( x ) = . 12

  16. Main objects Martingale difference decomposition Bounds on paraproducts and commutators Martingale transforms, paraproducts and dyadic shifts Square function, H 1 and BMO From dyadic to classical Square function and Hardy space H 1 d �� Q ∈D | ∆ Q f ( x ) | 2 � 1 / 2 Square function: Sf ( x ) = . Linearized (vector) square function ( � Sf ( x ) ∈ ℓ 2 ): � Sf ( x ) = { ∆ Q ( x ) : Q ∋ x, ℓ ( Q ) = 2 − k } k ∈ Z . | Sf ( x ) | = � � Sf ( x ) � ℓ 2 . 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend