Community Forums Receiving Input from Parents, Families and Staff - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

community forums
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Community Forums Receiving Input from Parents, Families and Staff - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Community Forums Receiving Input from Parents, Families and Staff School Location: Natomas Gateways Middle School 1 Objectives for this Forum Further share with our community the potential for facilities overcrowding (as early as the 2015-


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Community Forums

Receiving Input from Parents, Families and Staff

School Location: Natomas Gateways Middle School

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Objectives for this Forum

❏ Further share with our community the potential for facilities overcrowding (as early as the 2015- 2016 school year) ❏ Examine options being considered at this school site ❏ Gather input from our parents/families/staff for

  • ptions/strategies being considered for this

school

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

How we got here

(September 2013 – present)

❏ September 25, 2013 Presentation to Board of Trustees - Short and Long Range Facilities Master Plan – Square 1 ❏ November 13, 2013, March 12, 2014, April 30, 2014, May 14, 2014, and June 11, 2014 Presentation to Board of Trustees of Facility Master plan Updates ❏ February 3, 2014, February 5, 2014, March 17, 2014, and March 19, 2014 Received Community Input regarding the 2014 Facility Master Plan ❏ June 25, 2014 Board of Trustees approval of the 2014 Facilities Master Plan ❏ August 27, 2014 Presentation to Board of Trustees: Transitioning out of the Moratorium, Part 1 ❏ September 24, 2014 Presentation to Board of Trustees: Transitioning out of the Moratorium, Part 2 ❏ November 12, 2014 Presentation to Board of Trustees: Transitioning out of the Moratorium, Part 3 ❏ December 11, 2014 Presentation to Board of Trustees: Transitioning out of the Moratorium, Part 4 ❏ November 4, 2014 Measure J - 2014 School Facilities Bond passes with 72% voter support

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Growth Projections

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Annual projected new dwelling units from residential developments

(2015 through 2024)

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Cumulative projected students generated by new residential developments

(2015 through 2024)

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Total cumulative projected students based on current growth pattern and new residential development (moderate projection)

(2015 through 2024)

Year Enrollment 00-01 6,048 01-02 6,953 02-03 7,653 03-04 8,636 04-05 9,743 05-06 10,398 06-07 10,821 07-08 11,406 08-09 12,188 09-10 12,382 10-11 12,350 11-12 12,344 12-13 12,454 13-14 13,164 14-15 13,800

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Short Term Challenge: If we do nothing, yet meet LCFF/LCAP requirements

8

2015-16 2016-17 2015-2017

Site Classrooms Short Classrooms Short Cumalitive 2 year classroom shortfall Natomas Park 2 6 8 Heron 1 1 2 Witter Ranch 2 2 4 Two Rivers 1 2 3 JE/Westlake Pebblewood 1 1

Due to anticipated continued growth with the moratorium plus anticipated growth post-moratorium and we do nothing, it is anticipated that the schools below will be short the indicated number of classrooms.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Strategies/ Options at Our School

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

No one strategy to solve potential overcrowding

With current growth, projected growth, the rate at which bond money is available, the percent of students in charters plus the moratorium - Natomas is unlike any other district on the issue

  • f growth. However, growth is not

unique to Natomas. There is not one strategy that will create a district-wide

  • solution. Our efforts are like creating a

mosaic - multiple pieces (strategies/options) have to come together to make a picture.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Building New Schools

11

❏ Thanks to Measure J passing with 72% of the voters’ support, new school construction is possible after the moratorium is lifted. ❏ New elementary school campuses are needed in the northeast and northwest regions of our district. ❏ Design development and construction may begin in 2015-16

  • r 2016-17, however occupancy needed to address
  • vercrowding will not be available until later (the average

school takes 3-3 ½ years from start to finish). As such, new school construction is not a short-term strategy/option.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Natomas Unified School District

Option by School Site

Campus Options

K-5, 6-8 Portables Boundary Shifts Enrollment Cap YRE (later) ALE

TBD

BCE

TBD

HAH

TBD

JFE

TBD

NPE

TBD

Heron K-8

TBD

TRE

TBD

WRE

TBD

NGMS

NA

NMS

NA

LGA

NA

DHS

NA

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

NATOMAS GATEWAYS MIDDLE SCHOOL

1 current strategies/options being considered: ◻ Adding a 6th grade program to NGMS

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

NATOMAS GATEWAYS MIDDLE SCHOOL: ANTICIPATED SCHOOL GROWTH

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The K-5, 6-8 model

Under consideration: Moving 6th grade students from elementary sites to middle schools starting in August 2015 (this next school year). Rationale for consideration: ▪ If anticipated growth stays as projected and with a combination of

  • ther options, the next two years of capacity issues may be resolved

by taking this action ▪ Middle schools have room Note: Future elementary schools would be designed as K-5th grades

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The K-5, 6-8 Model and Student/Parent Middle School Options

◻ Natomas Middle has a candidate International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme as one option. ◻ Natomas Gateways has a 1 to 1 technology program (every student is issued a Chromebook laptop) plus college and career pathways in Automation/Robotics (Engineering) and Health Careers. ◻ Leroy Greene Academy could add a 6th grade program. LGA is a Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) school encouraging technology utilization in our schools. LGA already has college and career pathways in Business and Art/Digital Art.

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The K-5, 6-8 model

Under consideration: Moving 6th grade students from elementary sites to middle schools starting in August 2015 (this next school year). Rationale for consideration: ▪ If anticipated growth stays as projected and with a combination of

  • ther options, the next two years of capacity issues may be resolved

by taking this action ▪ Middle schools have room Note: Future elementary schools would be designed as K-5th grades

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The K-5, 6-8 Model and Student/Parent Middle School Options

◻ One option being considered is adding a 6th grade to Leroy Greene Academy giving families 3 middle school choices: ◻ Natomas Middle, a candidate International Baccalaureate programme. ◻ Natomas Gateways with college and career pathways in Automation/Robotics (Engineering) and Health Careers. ◻ Leroy Greene Academy with its college and career pathways in Business and Art/Digital Art.

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Feedback Forms

19