Community Consultation Session 12 December 2017 Tonights Agenda - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

community consultation session
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Community Consultation Session 12 December 2017 Tonights Agenda - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EDGARS CREEK BRIDGE Community Consultation Session 12 December 2017 Tonights Agenda Outline design options under investigation Feasibility study progress including; Melb Water requirements, cultural heritage, flora/fauna, DDA


slide-1
SLIDE 1

EDGARS CREEK BRIDGE

Community Consultation Session

12 December 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Tonight’s Agenda

  • Outline design options under investigation
  • Feasibility study progress including; Melb

Water requirements, cultural heritage, flora/fauna, DDA requirements, structural form, materials, aesthetics

  • Design Considerations
  • Open discussion
slide-3
SLIDE 3

transport | community | mining | industrial | food & beverage | carbon & energy

Community Consultation Session

Feasibility Study for Improved Edgars Creek Pedestrian Bridge

pitt&sherry - Proud winner of “Best Consulting Engineering Firm Revenue under $50M”

Presentation Team

Chris Morton – Senior Bridge Engineer

Date: 12 December 2017 Time: 7PM – 9PM Location: Newlands Senior Citizens Centre 49-53 Murray Road, Coburg (Cnr Connolly Avenue)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Location

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Original Bridge

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Flood Damage

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Existing Condition

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Option 1 – Replace Bridge

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Flood Immunity

Original bridge deck level

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Flood Immunity

1 in 10 year ARI flood level = 44.8m AHD Original bridge deck level

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Flood Immunity

Approach spans Original bridge deck level New bridge deck level approx. 45.5m AHD New steel beams

slide-12
SLIDE 12

10 Year ARI Contours

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Alignment Options

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Steel Beam Span

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Steel Truss Span

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Option 2 - Boardwalk

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Existing Track

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Existing Track

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Existing Track

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Existing Track

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Existing Track

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Steel / Concrete Boardwalk

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Timber Boardwalk

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Geometry

  • 3m clear width on structure
  • Height depends on flood level
  • Length depends on alignment
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Design Standards

  • AS5100 (2017) Bridge Design

– 100 year design life – 5kPa (500kg/m2) pedestrian design loading – 1.4m barrier height for cyclists – Forces due to water flow

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Design Standards

  • AS1428.1 (2009) Design for Access and Mobility

– 1 in 14 maximum ramp gradient – Ramps to be provided with handrails

  • AS2156 (2001) Walking Tracks

– Track classification – Design loads and barrier requirements – Design life 8 to 25+ years

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Materials

  • Steel (galvanised or paint coating)
  • Reinforced concrete
  • Timber (treated pine or hardwood)
  • Fibre reinforced polymer (FRP)
  • Recycled plastic
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Materials

  • Durability
  • Maintenance
  • Aesthetics
  • Slip resistance
  • Cost
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Land Ownership

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Site Geology

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Rock Formation

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Land Slip

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Native Vegetation

Destruction, lopping or removal of native vegetation requires a planning permit. Where native vegetation is permitted to be removed a native vegetation offset is required.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Cultural Heritage

7822-0851 This artefact scatter consists of a single reddish coarse grained silcrete broken flake. 7822-0852 This artefact scatter consists of a single small fine grained grey silcrete flake.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Services

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Thank you!

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Conclusion

  • Closing by council – Next Steps

– Completion of Feasibility Study – Report to Council

  • Community input can be forwarded onto Pitt

& Sherry at cmorton@pittsh.com.au or Attn: Chris Morton Pitt & Sherry PO Box 259 South Melbourne VIC 3205