Community Based Organisations (CBOs): Can DAY-NRLM Do It? - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Livelihood Promotion Through Community Based Organisations (CBOs): Can DAY-NRLM Do It?

H.S.Shylendra IRMA

Independent Assessment of Design, Strategies, and Impacts of DAY-NRLM

IRMA, 2017

Introduction

• Poverty Reduction is the primary focus of

SDG 1 and 2

• Poverty being multidimensional challenge

requires a more holistic approach

• The past approaches have given mixed, if nor

dismal results. Poverty challenge continues especially in rural areas

• Newer strategies and interventions are being

being explored given the past experience

• DAY-NRLM is one the new flagship

programmes towards poverty alleviation

DAY-NRLM

• In existence since 2011, NRLM has adopted

multidimensional approach for poverty alleviation.

• 1. Livelihood approach: Combine diverse interventions like

wage employment and self-employment to address extreme and other types of poverty

• 2. Promote and nurture sustainable community based
• rganisations (CBOs) to universally cover the poor and to

unleash their innate abilities for poverty alleviation

• 3. Provide dedicate professional support and linkages to these

CBOs for livelihood promotion effort.

• Mission statement:

“To reduce poverty by enabling the poor households to access gainful self-employment and skilled wage employment opportunities, resulting in appreciable improvement in their livelihoods on a sustainable basis, through building strong grassroots institutions of the poor.” (GOI nd p.6).

• Guiding principle of DAY-NRLM:

“Social mobilization and building strong institutions

• f the poor is critical for unleashing the innate

capabilities of the poor.” (ibid, p.6).

CBOs and Livelihood

• NRLM visualizes promoting and nurturing

various institutions of the poor comprising self-help groups (SHGs) their federations and

• ther livelihood collectives.
• These CBOs being refered as ‘Institutions of

the poor’ are envisaged to emerge as universal catalytic agents of poverty reduction.

CLFs VOs SHGs

Figure 1: Typical Structure of SHG Federation under DAY-NRLM

• ‘Platforms for collective action based on self-help

and mutual co-operation’.

• Building linkages with variety of other support

and resource agencies, these institutions would strive towards providing a wide range of services, augmenting in the process capital, skills, employment, productive assets and infrastructure which can help overcome the multiple deprivations and risks faced by the poor.

Collectives and Livelihood

• Can collectives of the poor with all their constraint

work towards livelihood promotion ?

• CBOs of NRLM aims at including all types of poor (9

crore)especially women and would like to address both livelihood protection and promotion needs,besides social issues of women

• Experience of working with various types of

collectives and community based organizations to address rural poverty and livelihood issues has at best been mixed in the country.

• Excessive state control and regulation, elite capture,

and absence of linkages have hindered the role of CBOs in the past

Requiem for Good Livelihood Collectives

• Role clarity
• Go beyond microfinance
• Livelihood Centric (promoting and pursuing

livelihoods like Amul cooperatives)

• Good governance and professional support
• Well integrated in terms of functions and

linkages

• Right legal form

What are CBOs?

• CBOs

Are peoples’ collectives which may be formal or informal and working at primary or higher levels

• n democratic and decentralization basis to

address relevant social and economic needs of their members who exercise full or significant control and ownership over these organizations.

Objectives, Approach, and Methods

• To analyse the policy and approaches of DAY-

NRLM in promoting and nurturing SHGs, their federations and other collectives

• To examine the structure and working of CBOs
• Role in promotion of livelihood
• Way forward towards promoting livelihood

Methodology

• The Study covered 8 states with varying

progress in NRLM implementation

• Interaction with diverse stakeholders at

various levels

• Multiple methods including survey of 4472

households survey

Details 2017 1 No. of districts covered 530 2 % of total district 81.62 3 No. of blocks covered 3519 4 % to total blocks 53.26 5 Households mobilized 3,86,18,623 6 % of target HHs 43.00 7 Estimated % of total rural households 21.55 9 Estimated % of rural BPL households 83.87 1 Total CBOs:

• 1. Self-Help Groups(SHGs):
• 2. Village Orgnisations(VOs):
• 3. Cluster Level Federations(CLFs):
• 4. Producer Organizations:

32,52,372 1,81,105 15,665 11,297

Table 1: Outreach & CBO Formation under DAY-NRLM

Social Category % of Households % of Predominant SHGs* 1 Scheduled Castes(SC) 22.10 18.95 2 Scheduled Tribes(ST) 13.33 12.03 3 Minorities 8.35 6.14 4 Differently enabled persons 1.21 1.33 5 Others 55.01 61.15 6 Elderly

• 0.40

Total (Actual) 100.0 (38618623) 100.0 (3252372)

Table 2: Social Composition of DAY-NRLM SHGs 2017

CLFs VOs SHGs

Figure 1: Typical Structure of SHG Federation under DAY-NRLM

Details Total 1 Average Size of SHGs 11.02 2 % of SHGs reporting member withdrawal 37% 3 % of SHGs with Regular Meetings 86.68 4 % of SHGs with regular savings 91.58 5 Per member Savings Rs. 2293 6 % of SHGs with internal lending 96.47 7 % of SHGs with reg repayment in int lending 88.04 8 % of SHGs federated into VO 83.97 9 % of SHGs received training in SHG Mgment 82.61 9 % of SHGs received training in livelihood 45.11 10 % of SHGs/ members having membership in producer group/organization 20.65 Table 2: Working of SHGs

Details Total 1 No. of VOs surveyed 339 2 Average number of SHGs 10.95 3 % of ST/SC members on the governing body 78.98 4 Average membership fee per SHG (Rs.) 476 5 % of SHGs saving with VO 63.72 6 Average savings per SHG(Rs) 141 Table 3: VOs- Results from VO Survey

Services Total 1 Savings 70.52 2 Credit 87.31 3 Insurance 36.19 4 SHG-Bank Linkage Facilitation 64.18 5 SHG formation 82.84 6 Training for SHGs 73.88 7 Audit 45.15 8 Social issues taken up 69.03 9 Legal Counseling 24.25 10 Convergences attempted 26.12 116 Livelihood Promotion 45.90 12 FPOs formed 9.70 13 Input Supply 4.10 14 Supply of Consumer items 5.97 Table 4: Services/Activities of VOs (% to total)

Particulars 2013-14 2015-16 1 Total SHGs linked (ALL) (Lakh) 74.30 79.03 2 DAY-NRLM SHGs linked (Lakh) 22.62 34.57 3 % of DAY-NRLM SHGs (2/1) 30.45 43.74 4 Savings per SHG(Rs.) 10953 18065 5 No. of SHGs extended loan (Lakh) 2.26 8.16 6 % of SHGs extended loan 9.99 23.60 7 Loan disbursed per SHG (Rs.) 154009 205708 8 SHGs with outstanding loan(lakh) 13.07 21.91 9 % SHGs with outstanding loan 57.78 63.38 10 Loan outstanding per SHG (Rs) 77869 121452 11 Average loan per member 14001 18700

Table 5: DAY-NRLM* and SHG Bank Linkage

Particualars Treatment Control 1. Productive Livestock 5.41 3.08 * 2. Non-Livestock 1.51 1.870 *** 3. Per capita Income 1422 1167 4.

• No. of Enterprises in Village

25.20 14.14 *** 5. % participating in MGNREGA 8.8 15.6 *** 6.

• No. of days worked

31.42 31.78 7. Per capita consum exp 1054 1180 *** 8. Per capita savings 2066 2438 9.

• No. of loans

0.44 0.17 *** 10.

• No. of formal loans

0.41 0.08 *** 11. Average loan received 7584 5143 12.

• No. of members migrating

0.08 0.05 **

Table 6: Impact of NRLM

Details*

• I. Problems Faced by SHG Members

Inadequate loan 18.57 Loan not available 18.25 No support for livelihood 17.13 No timely loan/delay 15.10 No training given 13.39 No savings withdrawal 10.03 Higher interest on Loan 9.87 Internal Conflict 4.86 No proper book keeping 3.04 Leaders dominate 1.81

Table7: Problems in SHGs and Support Needed for Livelihoods

Details*

• II. Support Needed for Improving

Household Livelihoods Credit Subsidy 50.21 Credit 49.20 Training in income generation 40.45 Employment/Job; 32.34 Technology (Machines/equipment) 29.24 Other Subsidy 20.01 Marketing of your produce 13.98 Productive Assets 13.98

Table8: Support Needed for Livelihoods

CBOs of NRLM & Livelihood: Conclusion

• The CBOs of NRLM emerging in a fairly widespread way as

platforms for socio-economic change for poor and women

• Nascent and faced with many challenges in their goal of livelihood

generation; long way to go

• Institutional issues like capacity, autonomy, legality, role clarity yet

to be addressed fully.

• Though diverse activities being pursued but depth is weak;

livelihood focus /activities very limited and sporadic

• Largely microfinance focused; impact so far is largely what

microfinance can do or enable (more of livelihood protection than promotion) The required professional support for LH promotion and linkages is found to be very weak;

• The required professional support for LH promotion and linkages is

found to be very weak;

Way forward

• Institutional issues like legality and integration needs to resolved while

federating

• Role clarity about CBOs in different tiers in the structure: MF or

Livelihood or both ?

• Need for professional support for large scale livelihood generation
• Ensure inclusion for PoP as CBO can give protection ( social security

and wage employment)

• Ensure access to resources and productive assets to the CBOs under the

mission both for capacity building and livelihood promotion

• Banks must do well to link with SHGs; no better option (though second

best)

Thanks