commmunity advisory group meeting 1
play

COMMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP MEETING #1 June 23, 2010 INTRODUCTIONS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

COMMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP MEETING #1 June 23, 2010 INTRODUCTIONS Illinois Department of Transportation Clark Dietz, Inc. Huff & Huff, Inc. Planning Communities, LLC. Community Advisory Group (CAG) members MEETING OUTLINE


  1. COMMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP MEETING #1 June 23, 2010

  2. INTRODUCTIONS  Illinois Department of Transportation  Clark Dietz, Inc.  Huff & Huff, Inc.  Planning Communities, LLC.  Community Advisory Group (CAG) members

  3. MEETING OUTLINE  Agenda Review the public involvement process Discuss the initial findings Define the transportation problem Establish the next steps in the process  CAG Notebooks Meeting materials Reference materials

  4. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS  Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) review  Ground rules  Role of the Community Advisory Group (CAG)  Meeting timetable

  5. WHAT IS CONTEXT SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS? Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) is an interdisciplinary approach that seeks effective, multimodal transportation solutions by working with stakeholders to develop a cost- effective transportation facility which will fit into and reflect the project’s surroundings – its “context” . An IDOT CSS project:  Considers project’s context  Fosters communication and collaboration  Environmentally sensitive  Exercises design flexibility

  6. WHY USE CONTEXT SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS?  Open and transparent process  Find solutions to transportation and community issues  Add lasting value to community, environment and transportation system  Create working relationships

  7. THE CSS PROCESS Identify Context Define and Evaluation Define Preferred Evaluate Criteria Problem Alternative Alternatives Identify Stakeholders Considerations Stakeholder Considerations / Community Assets Environmental Considerations / Compatibility with the Environment Engineering Considerations / Transportation Needs

  8. IDENTIFYING CONTEXT VISIBLE Economics Safety & Environment REGIONAL Health Mobility Aesthetics Social & Right-of-Way Cultural Constraints INVISIBLE LOCAL Land Use

  9. IDENTIFYING CONTEXT

  10. REGIONAL CONTEXT I-55 at Weber Rd

  11. LOCAL CONTEXT Rodeo Dr./119 th St Colleges Windham Pkwy. Residential Parks/Open lands Normantown Rd. Warehouse and Distribution Farmland Businesses Civic Romeo Rd./135 th St

  12. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT PLAN (SIP)  Inventory of stakeholders  Responsibilities of participants  Description of opportunities for stakeholder participation  Schedule of public involvement activities Will be available on the study website

  13. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS  Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) review  Ground rules  Role of the Community Advisory Group (CAG)  Meeting timetable

  14. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS  Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) review  Ground rules  Role of the Community Advisory Group (CAG)  Meeting timetable

  15. THE COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP Assists with: Defining context  Establishing purpose and need  Developing alternatives Community  Advisory Group Could consist of: (CAG) Community leaders  Interested stakeholders  Responsibilities include: Interest General Groups Public Providing input  Local Businesses Attending meetings  Collaborating with the Project Study Group 

  16. TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPS Assists with: Evaluation of alternatives  Specific issues  Technical Could consist of parties interested in: Advisory Group Transportation & engineering  (TAG) Environment & land Use  Responsibilities include: Provide input  Attend TAG meetings  Collaborate with the Project Study  Group

  17. PROJECT STUDY GROUP Clark Dietz, Inc. & Sub-Consultants

  18. PROJECT STUDY GROUP Community Advisory Group (CAG) Project Study Group (PSG) Clark Dietz, Inc. & Sub-Consultants Technical Advisory Group (TAG)

  19. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS  Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) review  Ground rules  Role of the Community Advisory Group (CAG)  Meeting timetable

  20. MEETING TIMETABLE

  21. INITIAL FINDINGS  Regional growth  Future growth  Traffic  Crashes  Context Survey results

  22. PROBLEM STATEMENT WORKSHOP What are the transportation problems at the I-55 at Weber Road interchange?

  23. CONSIDERATIONS Economics VISIBLE Safety & Health Environment INVISIBLE Mobility Aesthetics Social & Right-of-Way Cultural Constraints Land Use LOCAL REGIONAL

  24. THANK YOU! Community Advisory Group Meeting #2 August 2010

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend