COMMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP MEETING #1 June 23, 2010 INTRODUCTIONS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

commmunity advisory group meeting 1
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

COMMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP MEETING #1 June 23, 2010 INTRODUCTIONS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

COMMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP MEETING #1 June 23, 2010 INTRODUCTIONS Illinois Department of Transportation Clark Dietz, Inc. Huff & Huff, Inc. Planning Communities, LLC. Community Advisory Group (CAG) members MEETING OUTLINE


slide-1
SLIDE 1

COMMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP MEETING #1

June 23, 2010

slide-2
SLIDE 2

INTRODUCTIONS

 Illinois Department of Transportation  Clark Dietz, Inc.  Huff & Huff, Inc.  Planning Communities, LLC.  Community Advisory Group (CAG) members

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MEETING OUTLINE

 Agenda

Review the public involvement process Discuss the initial findings Define the transportation problem Establish the next steps in the process

 CAG Notebooks

Meeting materials Reference materials

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS

 Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) review  Ground rules  Role of the Community

Advisory Group (CAG)

 Meeting timetable

slide-5
SLIDE 5

WHAT IS CONTEXT SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS?

Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) is an interdisciplinary approach that seeks effective, multimodal transportation solutions by working with stakeholders to develop a cost- effective transportation facility which will fit into and reflect the project’s surroundings – its “context”. An IDOT CSS project:

 Considers project’s context  Fosters communication and collaboration  Environmentally sensitive  Exercises design flexibility

slide-6
SLIDE 6

WHY USE CONTEXT SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS?

 Open and transparent process  Find solutions to transportation

and community issues

 Add lasting value to community,

environment and transportation system

 Create working relationships

slide-7
SLIDE 7

THE CSS PROCESS

Identify Context Define Problem Evaluation Criteria Define and Evaluate Alternatives Identify Stakeholders

Considerations

Stakeholder Considerations / Community Assets Environmental Considerations / Compatibility with the Environment Engineering Considerations / Transportation Needs

Preferred Alternative

slide-8
SLIDE 8

IDENTIFYING CONTEXT

Economics Environment Aesthetics Right-of-Way Constraints Land Use Social & Cultural Mobility Safety & Health

VISIBLE LOCAL INVISIBLE REGIONAL

slide-9
SLIDE 9

IDENTIFYING CONTEXT

slide-10
SLIDE 10

REGIONAL CONTEXT

I-55 at Weber Rd

slide-11
SLIDE 11

LOCAL CONTEXT

Rodeo Dr./119th St Normantown Rd. Windham Pkwy. Romeo Rd./135th St

Warehouse and Distribution Businesses Farmland Residential Parks/Open lands Civic Colleges

slide-12
SLIDE 12

STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT PLAN (SIP)

 Inventory of stakeholders  Responsibilities of participants  Description of opportunities for

stakeholder participation

 Schedule of public involvement

activities

Will be available on the study website

slide-13
SLIDE 13

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS

 Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) review  Ground rules  Role of the Community

Advisory Group (CAG)

 Meeting timetable

slide-14
SLIDE 14

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS

 Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) review  Ground rules  Role of the Community

Advisory Group (CAG)

 Meeting timetable

slide-15
SLIDE 15

THE COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP

General Public

Responsibilities include:

Providing input

Attending meetings

Collaborating with the Project Study Group Could consist of:

Community leaders

Interested stakeholders Assists with:

Defining context

Establishing purpose and need

Developing alternatives Community Advisory Group (CAG)

Interest Groups Local Businesses

slide-16
SLIDE 16

TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPS

Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Could consist of parties interested in:

Transportation & engineering

Environment & land Use Responsibilities include:

Provide input

Attend TAG meetings

Collaborate with the Project Study Group Assists with:

Evaluation of alternatives

Specific issues

slide-17
SLIDE 17

PROJECT STUDY GROUP

Clark Dietz, Inc. & Sub-Consultants

slide-18
SLIDE 18

PROJECT STUDY GROUP

Project Study Group (PSG) Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Community Advisory Group (CAG)

Clark Dietz, Inc. & Sub-Consultants

slide-19
SLIDE 19

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS

 Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) review  Ground rules  Role of the Community

Advisory Group (CAG)

 Meeting timetable

slide-20
SLIDE 20

MEETING TIMETABLE

slide-21
SLIDE 21

INITIAL FINDINGS

 Regional growth  Future growth  Traffic  Crashes  Context Survey results

slide-22
SLIDE 22

What are the transportation problems at the I-55 at Weber Road interchange?

PROBLEM STATEMENT WORKSHOP

slide-23
SLIDE 23

CONSIDERATIONS

Economics Environment Aesthetics Right-of-Way Constraints Land Use Social & Cultural Mobility Safety & Health

VISIBLE LOCAL INVISIBLE REGIONAL

slide-24
SLIDE 24

THANK YOU!

Community Advisory Group Meeting #2 August 2010