Commission Briefing Managing Fatigue 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

commission briefing managing fatigue 10 cfr part 26
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Commission Briefing Managing Fatigue 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Commission Briefing Managing Fatigue 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I Tony Pietrangelo Nuclear Energy Institute February 8, 2011 Industry Actions October 1, 2009- Industry implements rule June 2010- NEI surveys industry for any rule


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Commission Briefing Managing Fatigue 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I

Tony Pietrangelo Nuclear Energy Institute February 8, 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Industry Actions

  • October 1, 2009- Industry implements rule
  • June 2010- NEI surveys industry for any rule

implementation issues

  • September 3, 2010- NEI submits petition for

rulemaking to address unintended consequences

  • September 23, 2010- NEI submits request for

enforcement discretion

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Problem Statement

  • The complexity and rigidity of the fatigue rule

has resulted in unintended consequences that have impacted safety beneficial practices, adversely impacted quality of life, and created conflicts with bargaining unit agreements

  • The complexity and rigidity result in large part

from the minimum day off provisions of the rule

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Justification for Change

  • Long-standing safety-beneficial practices have

been adversely impacted

– Shift leader meetings – Just in time training – Time in LCOs has been extended – Licensed Operator off-shift functions curtailed – First line supervisor admin time increased

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Justification for Change

  • Quality of life adversely impacted

– Schedule uncertainty – Forced overtime – Inability to trade shifts – Family impacts – Increased frustration, anger and stress

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Justification for Change

  • Bargaining unit agreements adversely

impacted

– >1000 grievances filed – Overtime equalization – Forced overtime – Reciprocity for contractor work hours – Paid rest time

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Proposed Interim Approach

  • Agreement with NRC staff on 54 hours/week

average for all covered workers over a rolling period not to exceed 6 weeks

  • Work week average applicable to all covered

workers

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Benefits of Interim Approach

  • More flexibility in scheduling due to no MDO

would allow reinstatement of safety beneficial practices

  • Complexity of 8/10/12 hr shifts eliminated
  • Same limits for all work groups
  • Workers able to track their own hours

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Authorization to Proceed

  • Clear industry preference for enforcement

discretion

– Timely restoration of safety-beneficial practices – Minimizes administrative burden on the staff – Facilitates industry transition to interim approach

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Going Forward

  • Industry recommends Commission SRM to

authorize interim approach

  • Industry will monitor and trend

implementation of interim approach

  • Industry will continue dialog with NRC staff on

implementation

  • Industry looks forward to timely consideration
  • f petitions for rulemaking

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Acronyms

  • MDO – Minimum Days Off
  • SRM – Staff Requirements Memorandum
  • LCO – Limiting Conditions of Operation

11