comments on the stability of susy theories
play

Comments on the Stability of SUSY Theories Jean-Fran cois Fortin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions Comments on the Stability of SUSY Theories Jean-Fran cois Fortin Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA May 10-12, 2010


  1. Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions Comments on the Stability of SUSY Theories Jean-Fran¸ cois Fortin Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA May 10-12, 2010 Phenomenology 2010 Symposium based on arXiv:0906.3714 [hep-th] (Tom Banks, JFF), work in progress (JFF)

  2. Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions Outline Preliminaries 1 SUSY Breaking vs R -symmetry Breaking Faith of the False Vacuum without Gravity Faith of the False Vacuum 2 Faith of the False Vacuum with Gravity Implications for SUSY Theories 3 Temperature and Entropy of dS Space Stable dS space with N < ∞ Conclusions 4

  3. Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions SUSY Breaking vs R -symmetry Breaking Spontaneous SUSY breaking in stable states → Exact R -symmetry Nelson, Seiberg - Unbroken exact R -symmetry ⇒ Massless gauginos not compatible with experimental constraints - Spontaneously broken exact R -symmetry ⇒ Massless R -axion not compatible with experimental constraints ⇒ Need explicit R -symmetry breaking

  4. Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions SUSY Breaking vs R -symmetry Breaking Spontaneous SUSY breaking in metastable states → Approximate R -symmetry Intriligator, Seiberg, Shih - Approximate R -symmetry ⇒ SUSY states far in field space, metastability - Unbroken approximate R -symmetry ⇒ Massive gauginos from explicit R -symmetry breaking - Spontaneously broken approximate R -symmetry ⇒ Massive R -axion from explicit R -symmetry breaking Metastable SUSY breaking more generic than stable SUSY breaking ⇒ Metastable SUSY breaking with tunneling probability Γ / V compatible with experimental constraints

  5. Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions Faith of the False Vacuum without Gravity Tunneling probability Γ / V = Ae − [ S E ( φ ) − S E ( φ F )] Coleman - Euclidean action for the instanton solution S E ( φ ) - Vanishing background Euclidean action S E ( φ F ) = 0

  6. Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions Faith of the False Vacuum without Gravity Tunneling probability Γ / V = Ae − [ S E ( φ ) − S E ( φ F )] Coleman - Euclidean action for the instanton solution S E ( φ ) - Vanishing background Euclidean action S E ( φ F ) = 0

  7. Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions Faith of the False Vacuum with Gravity Tunneling probability Γ / V = Ae − [ S E ( φ ) − S E ( φ F )] Coleman, De Luccia - Background Euclidean action S M E ( φ F ) = 0 and S dS E ( φ F ) < 0 - Actual “decay” of metastable Minkowski space to AdS space ⇒ Gravitational collapse (Big Crunch) - Stability of seemingly metastable Minkowski space in thin-wall approximation

  8. Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions Faith of the False Vacuum with Gravity � � ǫ ≈ | ∆ φ | Space of potentials partitioned in the V F → 0 limit M P Aguirre, Banks, Johnson & Bousso, Freivogel, Lippert - Below the Great Divide ( ǫ < ǫ c ∼ O (1)) - Non-compact instanton - Instanton action scales like and comparable to background action ⇒ No “extra” decay suppression

  9. Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions Faith of the False Vacuum with Gravity � � ǫ ≈ | ∆ φ | Space of potentials partitioned in the V F → 0 limit M P Aguirre, Banks, Johnson & Bousso, Freivogel, Lippert - Above the Great Divide ( ǫ > ǫ c ∼ O (1)) - Compact instanton - Instanton action negligible compared to background action ⇒ “Extra” decay suppression of order O ( e S dS E ( φ F ) )

  10. Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions Temperature and Entropy of dS Space 1 2 π R dS and entropy S dS = π ( R dS M P ) 2 dS temperature T dS = Gibbons, Hawking E ( φ F ) = −S dS thus Γ / V = Ae − [ S E ( φ )+ S dS ] S dS Below the Great Divide Λ dS → 0 - Γ / V = Ae − [ S E ( φ )+ S dS ] − − − − → finite > 0 - Actual “decay” of metastable dS space to AdS space ⇒ Gravitational collapse (Big Crunch) - No entropic explanation of decay Above the Great Divide Λ dS → 0 → Ae −S dS ≈ 0 - Γ / V = Ae − [ S E ( φ )+ S dS ] − − − − - Decay seen as a Poincar´ e recurrence instead of an instability - Entropic explanation of decay

  11. Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions Stable dS space with N < ∞ Quantum theory of stable dS space ⇒ Finite number of quantum states N < ∞ (Assumption) Banks, Fischler ⇒ Theory above the Great Divide

  12. Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions Stable dS space with N < ∞ (Assumption) Consequences for models with SUSY breaking in M P → ∞ limit (e.g. gauge and gravity mediation) - Metastable SUSY breaking with SUSY vacua ⇒ AdS space theories with Λ AdS ≈ − F 2 / M 2 P - | ∆ φ | ≪ M P ⇒ Theory below the Great Divide ⇒ Spontaneous SUSY breaking in stable states ! - Generic with (spontaneously broken) exact R -symmetry P ) 1 / 4 > 10 MeV - PNGB R -axion with m a ≈ ( F 3 / M 2 Bagger, Poppitz, Randall √ F � 10 5 GeV - Gauge mediation ⇒ - Gravity mediation ⇒ Cosmologically safe R -axion with m a ≈ 10 7 GeV - Non-generic superpotential ⇒ Cosmological SUSY breaking Banks

  13. Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions Stable dS space with N < ∞ (Assumption) Consequences for models with SUSY breaking in M P → ∞ limit (e.g. gauge and gravity mediation) - Metastable SUSY breaking with SUSY vacua ⇒ AdS space theories with Λ AdS ≈ − F 2 / M 2 P - | ∆ φ | ≪ M P ⇒ Theory below the Great Divide ⇒ Spontaneous SUSY breaking in stable states ! - Generic with (spontaneously broken) exact R -symmetry P ) 1 / 4 > 10 MeV - PNGB R -axion with m a ≈ ( F 3 / M 2 Bagger, Poppitz, Randall √ F � 10 5 GeV - Gauge mediation ⇒ - Gravity mediation ⇒ Cosmologically safe R -axion with m a ≈ 10 7 GeV - Non-generic superpotential ⇒ Cosmological SUSY breaking Banks

  14. Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions Conclusions M P → ∞ limit - SUSY breaking and R -symmetry breaking ⇒ Spontaneous SUSY breaking in metastable states - Massive gauginos - Massive R -axion M P < ∞ - Stable dS space with N < ∞ (Assumption) ⇒ Spontaneous SUSY breaking in stable states - Generic with exact R -symmetry - Non-generic superpotential

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend