Comments on the Stability of SUSY Theories Jean-Fran cois Fortin - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

comments on the stability of susy theories
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Comments on the Stability of SUSY Theories Jean-Fran cois Fortin - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions Comments on the Stability of SUSY Theories Jean-Fran cois Fortin Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA May 10-12, 2010


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions

Comments on the Stability of SUSY Theories

Jean-Fran¸ cois Fortin

Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA

May 10-12, 2010 Phenomenology 2010 Symposium based on arXiv:0906.3714 [hep-th] (Tom Banks, JFF), work in progress (JFF)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions

Outline

1

Preliminaries SUSY Breaking vs R-symmetry Breaking Faith of the False Vacuum without Gravity

2

Faith of the False Vacuum Faith of the False Vacuum with Gravity

3

Implications for SUSY Theories Temperature and Entropy of dS Space Stable dS space with N < ∞

4

Conclusions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions

SUSY Breaking vs R-symmetry Breaking

Spontaneous SUSY breaking in stable states → Exact R-symmetry

Nelson, Seiberg

  • Unbroken exact R-symmetry ⇒ Massless gauginos not

compatible with experimental constraints

  • Spontaneously broken exact R-symmetry ⇒ Massless R-axion

not compatible with experimental constraints

⇒ Need explicit R-symmetry breaking

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions

SUSY Breaking vs R-symmetry Breaking

Spontaneous SUSY breaking in metastable states → Approximate R-symmetry

Intriligator, Seiberg, Shih

  • Approximate R-symmetry ⇒ SUSY states far in field space,

metastability

  • Unbroken approximate R-symmetry ⇒ Massive gauginos from

explicit R-symmetry breaking

  • Spontaneously broken approximate R-symmetry ⇒ Massive

R-axion from explicit R-symmetry breaking

Metastable SUSY breaking more generic than stable SUSY breaking ⇒ Metastable SUSY breaking with tunneling probability Γ/V compatible with experimental constraints

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions

Faith of the False Vacuum without Gravity

Tunneling probability Γ/V = Ae−[SE (φ)−SE (φF )]

Coleman

  • Euclidean action for the instanton solution SE(φ)
  • Vanishing background Euclidean action SE(φF) = 0
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions

Faith of the False Vacuum without Gravity

Tunneling probability Γ/V = Ae−[SE (φ)−SE (φF )]

Coleman

  • Euclidean action for the instanton solution SE(φ)
  • Vanishing background Euclidean action SE(φF) = 0
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions

Faith of the False Vacuum with Gravity

Tunneling probability Γ/V = Ae−[SE (φ)−SE (φF )]

Coleman, De Luccia

  • Background Euclidean action SM

E (φF) = 0 and SdS E (φF) < 0

  • Actual “decay” of metastable Minkowski space to AdS space

⇒ Gravitational collapse (Big Crunch)

  • Stability of seemingly metastable Minkowski space in thin-wall

approximation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions

Faith of the False Vacuum with Gravity

Space of potentials partitioned in the VF → 0 limit

  • ǫ ≈ |∆φ|

MP

  • Aguirre, Banks, Johnson & Bousso, Freivogel, Lippert
  • Below the Great Divide (ǫ < ǫc ∼ O(1))
  • Non-compact instanton
  • Instanton action scales like and comparable to background

action ⇒ No “extra” decay suppression

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions

Faith of the False Vacuum with Gravity

Space of potentials partitioned in the VF → 0 limit

  • ǫ ≈ |∆φ|

MP

  • Aguirre, Banks, Johnson & Bousso, Freivogel, Lippert
  • Above the Great Divide (ǫ > ǫc ∼ O(1))
  • Compact instanton
  • Instanton action negligible compared to background action ⇒

“Extra” decay suppression of order O(eSdS

E (φF ))

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions

Temperature and Entropy of dS Space

dS temperature TdS =

1 2πRdS and entropy SdS = π(RdSMP)2

Gibbons, Hawking

SdS

E (φF) = −SdS thus Γ/V = Ae−[SE (φ)+SdS]

Below the Great Divide

  • Γ/V = Ae−[SE (φ)+SdS]

ΛdS→0

− − − − → finite > 0

  • Actual “decay” of metastable dS space to AdS space ⇒

Gravitational collapse (Big Crunch)

  • No entropic explanation of decay

Above the Great Divide

  • Γ/V = Ae−[SE (φ)+SdS]

ΛdS→0

− − − − → Ae−SdS ≈ 0

  • Decay seen as a Poincar´

e recurrence instead of an instability

  • Entropic explanation of decay
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions

Stable dS space with N < ∞

Quantum theory of stable dS space ⇒ Finite number of quantum states N < ∞ (Assumption)

Banks, Fischler

⇒ Theory above the Great Divide

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions

Stable dS space with N < ∞ (Assumption)

Consequences for models with SUSY breaking in MP → ∞ limit (e.g. gauge and gravity mediation)

  • Metastable SUSY breaking with SUSY vacua ⇒ AdS space

theories with ΛAdS ≈ −F 2/M2

P

  • |∆φ| ≪ MP ⇒ Theory below the Great Divide

⇒ Spontaneous SUSY breaking in stable states !

  • Generic with (spontaneously broken) exact R-symmetry
  • PNGB R-axion with ma ≈ (F 3/M2

P)1/4 > 10 MeV

Bagger, Poppitz, Randall

  • Gauge mediation ⇒

√ F 105 GeV

  • Gravity mediation ⇒ Cosmologically safe R-axion with

ma ≈ 107 GeV

  • Non-generic superpotential ⇒ Cosmological SUSY breaking

Banks

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions

Stable dS space with N < ∞ (Assumption)

Consequences for models with SUSY breaking in MP → ∞ limit (e.g. gauge and gravity mediation)

  • Metastable SUSY breaking with SUSY vacua ⇒ AdS space

theories with ΛAdS ≈ −F 2/M2

P

  • |∆φ| ≪ MP ⇒ Theory below the Great Divide

⇒ Spontaneous SUSY breaking in stable states !

  • Generic with (spontaneously broken) exact R-symmetry
  • PNGB R-axion with ma ≈ (F 3/M2

P)1/4 > 10 MeV

Bagger, Poppitz, Randall

  • Gauge mediation ⇒

√ F 105 GeV

  • Gravity mediation ⇒ Cosmologically safe R-axion with

ma ≈ 107 GeV

  • Non-generic superpotential ⇒ Cosmological SUSY breaking

Banks

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Preliminaries Faith of the False Vacuum Implications for SUSY Theories Conclusions

Conclusions

MP → ∞ limit

  • SUSY breaking and R-symmetry breaking ⇒ Spontaneous

SUSY breaking in metastable states

  • Massive gauginos
  • Massive R-axion

MP < ∞

  • Stable dS space with N < ∞ (Assumption) ⇒ Spontaneous

SUSY breaking in stable states

  • Generic with exact R-symmetry
  • Non-generic superpotential