Columbia River Treaty Review Cranbrook, July 3, 2013 1 Discussion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

columbia river treaty review
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Columbia River Treaty Review Cranbrook, July 3, 2013 1 Discussion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sounding Board Columbia River Treaty Review Cranbrook, July 3, 2013 1 Discussion Paper: Benefits of Treaty Coordination 2 Objective: Highlight the existing and future benefits of the Treaty to US interests Identify risks and losses


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sounding Board Columbia River Treaty Review

Cranbrook, July 3, 2013

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Discussion Paper: Benefits of Treaty Coordination

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Objective:

  • Highlight the existing and future benefits of the Treaty to

US interests

  • Identify risks and losses if Treaty is terminated
  • Demonstrate how called Upon Flood Control is detrimental
  • Lead US stakeholders to realize that the benefits to US

exceed Canadian Entitlement

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Key elements:

Flood Control

  • Significant savings from avoided flood damage
  • Ad hoc Called Upon FC is a step backwards – increases

flood risk in US and missed refill targets

  • Disagreement on Called Upon implementation
  • Effective Use impacts of fisheries, power, water supply,

navigation, recreation

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Key elements:

Hydropower

  • Enhanced production
  • Firm reliable energy
  • Value in peak load (cold/dry), not average conditions
  • Uncertainty if Treaty terminates

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Key elements:

Ecosystems

  • Flexibility allows for changes for ecosystem values
  • Spring augmentation flows - bump up hydrograph
  • Late summer/dry – fish survival
  • Risk to US ecosystem investments if Treaty is

terminated

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Key elements:

Water Supply

  • Effective Use of US reservoirs will exacerbate competing

demands Navigation

  • Called Upon higher flows increase shipping times, docking,

channel sedimentation

  • Low flows reduce channel draft, cause grounding

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

U.S. Draft Recommendations

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Key principles

  • Share benefits - as compared to no Treaty
  • Minimum duration post 2024 – certainty and adaptability
  • Meet US domestic uses
  • Integrate Treaty and non-Treaty storage
  • Adaptation to climate change

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Ecosystem-based function

  • Shape flows for fish, reservoirs for fish and wildlife
  • Minimize impacts to aboriginal cultural resources
  • More flow aug from BC in spring and summer (less

fall/winter draft)

  • Dry year strategy
  • Long term flow aug (not annual suppl agreements)
  • Adaptable to new information, change in conditions
  • Determine interest in fish passage, joint feasibility study
  • Shared obligation for ecosystem
  • Continue to coordinate Libby Dam operations (?)

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Hydropower

  • Rebalance (!) power benefits between US and BC
  • Renegotiate transmission for return of entitlement
  • 3. Consider all factors?
  • Maintain generation during peak load

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Flood Risk Management

  • Implement Called Upon through a coordinated operation

plan

  • Establish common view of called upon (based on theirs!)
  • Interest in alternate Planned Assured Canadian Storage
  • Identify compensation to BC for Called Upon
  • Flexibility to adapt to climate change

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Water Supply

  • More water from BC in spring and summer
  • Avoid effect on Libby/VarQ

Navigation

  • Provide (maintain?) min/max flows and water levels

Recreation

  • Protect recreation resources

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Domestic Matters

  • Flood risk policy review
  • Water supply allocation (US WUP?)
  • Canadian Entitlement – who pays?
  • Post 2024 implementation plan
  • Floodplain reconnection
  • Composition of US Entity
  • Domestic advisory mechanism

14