Collingswood Public Schools Athletic Complex The three Rs T he - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

collingswood public schools
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Collingswood Public Schools Athletic Complex The three Rs T he - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Collingswood Public Schools Athletic Complex The three Rs T he Collingswood High School Athletic Stadium grandstands, in their current condition, are not safe. What we KNOW The grass fields both in and around the stadium are overused.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Collingswood Public Schools

Athletic Complex The three R’s

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What we KNOW

The Collingswood High School Athletic

Stadium grandstands, in their current condition, are not safe. The grass fields both in and around the stadium are overused. With excessive use, the fields become unsafe. School, Borough, and Independent/Travel programs require more field space than is available.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What we KNOW

The Collingswood High School Athletic Stadium grandstands, in their current condition, are not safe. Concrete is spalling in many places. Cracks are evident. In some areas, cantilever walkway is

  • nly about 1.5” thick and continues to

decay. Risk of injury from falling or failing concrete is real. The greater the number of people in the grandstands, the greater the risk. Doing nothing is not an option.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Options

slide-5
SLIDE 5

OPTION 1: REINFORCE ~$250,000

Install heavy duty debris netting to the underside

  • f the structure from end to end approximately

360’ x 15’ with four stairs towers at approximately 15’x 15’. Remove all crumbling, cracked & sprawling concrete as identified on individual columns and beams throughout the structure. Specification is to clean reinforcing bar, apply epoxy and masonry cover. Install Bracing to two identified concrete block

  • walls. One at the south side of the structure and

the other in the second stair tower from the South side. Address the cantilevered walk portion by placing shoring posts and horizontal beams to support the walk.

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

OPTION 1: REINFORCE Pros and Cons

PROS:

  • Least expensive option
  • Reinforcement can occur

relatively quickly and would cause minimal interference to events CONS:

  • 12-18 month lifespan (temporary)
  • What happens in a year?

○ Repair; or ○ Referendum

  • Much of cost will be wasted once

permanent solution identified

slide-8
SLIDE 8

OPTION 2: REPAIR ~$1.4 million

Identify all areas of crumbling, cracked & sprawling concrete shall be cleaned, epoxy repair and concrete covered. All expansion joints shall be cleaned of old caulk, repair sprawling concrete at the joint and install new silicone caulk. Address all ADA requirements, walk path, seating, railings, and ramp.

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

OPTION 2: REPAIR ~$1.4 million

PROS:

  • 7-10 year lifespan
  • Reasonable cost for a longer-term

solution CONS:

  • Putting $1.4 million into an 80+

year old structure that will continue to decay

  • The structure has outlived its

useful life in terms of need (we do not need 4,000 seats), but we do need the space those 4,000 seats consume.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

OPTION 3: REFERENDUM $ ??

The Board may decide to go for referendum again, seeking community input and approval to reconstruct the athletic complex and address the 18-21 y/o space. This provides a longer-term solution. Prior to going to referendum again, Board may want to consider additional upgrades to facilities for safety and accessibility.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

OPTION 3: REFERENDUM $ ??

PROS:

  • If properly planned, can address

all of the long-term athletic needs

  • f the high school, middle school,

borough recreation, and travel programs.

  • Can address other needs:

○ 18-21 y/o vocational program ○ Security Concerns ○ Accessibility Concerns CONS:

  • When? If?
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Committee Recommendation

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Demolish Remove Replace

  • Immediately fence off area (safety)

and apply for emergent condition (demo already approved)

  • Now: Prepare bid documents
  • May: Approve out to Bid
  • June: Award Bid
  • Late July - October 1: Demolish and

Remove Grandstands/Utilities

  • Install smaller fixed bleachers
  • Secure portable toilets
  • Secure storage containers
  • Concrete path from entrance to

field, add ADA area

  • Lighting: Existing + Add’l LED
  • Sound: Existing
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Demolish Remove Replace $517,000 + soft costs + $13,000/yr

  • Temp Fencing: $1,000
  • Prepare bid documents:10-12%
  • Approve out to Bid: $0
  • Award Bid: $0
  • Demolish and Remove

Grandstands/Utilities: $400,000

  • Install bleachers: $100,000 +/-
  • Portable toilets: $7,000/yr
  • Storage containers (5): $6,000/yr
  • Stone: $6,000 (optional)
  • Concrete path: $10,000 (optional)
  • Lighting: Purchase add’l for poles
  • Sound: Existing
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Demolish Remove Replace

PROS:

  • Fastest solution to secure the area and

maintain safety

  • Solution can be as permanent as is

needed

  • Recapture additional field space
  • If another referendum is ever

considered, these steps would already be completed (minimum waste) CONS:

  • Not an ideal stadium space; some

temp/rented structures

  • When demolishing an 85-year old

structure, you do not know what you’ll find (hazards)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Summary

Fence off area immediately Demolish, Remove, Replace Relatively little waste Flexibility (rent vs. purchase) Immediately safe and secure Some immediate disruption, but not long term; can continue to use parts of field space Buys community time to decide Remember: When demolishing an 85-year

  • ld structure, you do not know what you’ll

find (hazards)