COACHE Faculty Survey: A Presentation to the Senate Committee on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

coache faculty survey
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

COACHE Faculty Survey: A Presentation to the Senate Committee on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

COACHE Faculty Survey: A Presentation to the Senate Committee on Benefits and Welfare 29 June 2017 Laurie J. Kirsch Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs, Development, and Diversity Amanda Brodish Senior Data Analyst Why Survey the Faculty?


slide-1
SLIDE 1

COACHE Faculty Survey:

A Presentation to the Senate Committee on Benefits and Welfare

29 June 2017

Laurie J. Kirsch Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs, Development, and Diversity Amanda Brodish Senior Data Analyst

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why Survey the Faculty?

  • Aligns with the Plan for Pitt
  • Support efforts to recruit, develop, and retain

a diverse and excellent faculty

  • Baseline data about faculty satisfaction and

faculty perceptions of Pitt as a workplace

  • Roadmap for implementing informed changes
slide-3
SLIDE 3

The COACHE Survey

  • Collaborative Of Academic Careers in

Higher Education

  • Harvard Graduate School of Education
  • Consortium of over 250 institutions
  • Survey of faculty satisfaction
  • Resources to promote change
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Survey Themes

  • Nature of Work (Research, Teaching, Service)
  • Resources & Benefits
  • Tenure & Promotion
  • Collaboration & Mentoring
  • Leadership & Governance
  • Department Culture
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Methodology

  • Full-time faculty eligible to participate
  • Survey open from Feb 10 to April 17, 2016
  • Pitt response rate was 45% (similar to 47%

response rate of other institutions)

  • 507 tenured faculty
  • 192 tenure stream faculty
  • 608 non-tenure stream faculty
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Comparisons

  • Cohort: 88 research universities that were

surveyed in the past 3 years

  • Peers: 5 universities of our choosing from

cohort

  • 1. Indiana University
  • 2. Purdue University
  • 3. University of

Minnesota

  • 4. University of North

Carolina

  • 5. University of Virginia
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Results

  • General satisfaction
  • Key benchmarks

– Each benchmark assessed with multiple Qs – Pitt mean relative to peers

  • Deep dive on questions related to HR

topics and benefits

  • Faculty in their own words
slide-8
SLIDE 8

General Satisfaction

74%

Said if they had to do it again, they would select Pitt

  • Cohort Avg.: 66%
  • Peers Avg.: 70%

94 %

Would recommend or strongly recommend department as a place to work

  • Cohort Avg.: 92%
  • Peers Avg.: 94%

74%

Satisfied with department as a place to work

  • Cohort Avg.: 71%
  • Peers Avg.: 72%

75%

Satisfied with Pitt as a place to work

  • Cohort Avg.: 63%
  • Peers Avg.: 70%
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Satisfaction with

Health Benefits 86%  Retirement Benefits 83% 

Family Medical/ Parental Leave

64% 

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Pitt Compared to Cohort

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Pitt Compared to Cohort

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Pitt Compared to Cohort

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Pitt Compared to Peers

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Pitt Compared to Peers

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Pitt Compared to Peers

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Benefits-Related Benchmarks

3.46 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

Personal and Family Policies

4.04 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

Health and Retirement Benefits

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Personal and Family Policies Questions

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Tuition waivers, remission, or exchange Stop-the-clock policies Flexible workload/ modified duties Family medical/ parental leave Right balance between prof/ personal life Inst supports family/ career compatibility Parking benefits Spousal/ partner hiring program Childcare Eldercare Housing benefits Not available (Very) Dissatisfied Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied (Very) Satisfied

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Personal and Family Policies Questions

2% 3% 14% 19% 31% 48% 10% 14% 12% 12% 31% 30% 41% 31% 36% 14% 19% 16% 18% 21% 24% 10% 25% 19% 33% 27% 39% 23% 74% 67% 64% 63% 59% 45% 39% 22% 17% 15% 10%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Tuition waivers, remission, or exchange Stop-the-clock policies Flexible workload/ modified duties Family medical/ parental leave Right balance between prof/ personal life Inst supports family/ career compatibility Parking benefits Spousal/ partner hiring program Childcare Eldercare Housing benefits Not available (Very) Dissatisfied Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied (Very) Satisfied

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Health & Retirement Benefits Questions

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Health benefits for yourself Health benefits for family Retirement benefits Phased retirement options

Not available (Very) Dissatisfied Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied (Very) Satisfied

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Health & Retirement Benefits Questions

3% 4% 6% 4% 14% 9% 11% 13% 28% 86% 84% 83% 55% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Health benefits for yourself Health benefits for family Retirement benefits Phased retirement options

Not available (Very) Dissatisfied Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied (Very) Satisfied

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Effect Size

  • Emphasizes size of an effect
  • Not a test of statistical significance
  • Not affected by sample size

d =

M1 – M2 SD Effect Size d Small 0.10 Medium 0.30 Large 0.50

Within Pitt Variation

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Within Pitt Variation Personal and Family Policies Questions

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Within Pitt Variation Personal and Family Policies Questions

Tenured m ore satisfied than TS

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Within Pitt Variation Personal and Family Policies Questions

Tenured m ore satisfied than TS

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Within Pitt Variation Personal and Family Policies Questions

Tenured m ore satisfied than TS NTS m ore satisfied than Tenured Full m ore satisfied than Associate Asian m ore satisfied than White White m ore satisfied than URM Women m ore satisfied than Men

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Within Pitt Variation Health & Retirement Benefits Questions

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Within Pitt Variation Health & Retirement Benefits Questions

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Within Pitt Variation Health & Retirement Benefits Questions

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Within Pitt Variation Health & Retirement Benefits Questions

NTS m ore satisfied than Tenured White m ore satisfied than Asian

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Personal/Family Policies & Benefits: Suggestions for Improvement

“Better accommodations for spousal hires”

“Free, high-quality childcare for all employees. And meaningful paid parental leave”

“Parking for all” “More clarity on maternity leave and better childcare for young women”

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Summary of Results

  • Pitt faculty are quite satisfied with Pitt

compared to peers

  • Pitt faculty are especially satisfied with

benefits and personal/ family policies compared to peers

  • Some Pitt variation by tenure status, rank,

gender, and race/ ethnicity

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Dissemination of COACHE Results

  • Communication to all faculty announcing

results

  • Presentations to senior leadership
  • Presentations to standing committees and ad

hoc groups

  • Meetings with all deans and campus

presidents

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Dissemination of COACHE Results

  • Developed website

– http:/ / pitt.edu/ coache – Results, infographics and “good practices” – Updated content

  • Resources to inform discussions and to

strengthen work environment for faculty across the University of Pittsburgh

slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Office of the Provost Website

  • Ongoing effort to improve communications
  • Visit www.provost.pitt.edu/ faculty

– Reorganized and revised content related to:

  • Recruiting, Retaining, & Recognizing Faculty
  • Career Development & Resources for Faculty
  • Faculty Guidelines & Processes
  • University Policies, Procedures, & Resources
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Office of the Provost Website

  • Sample content on programs & resources:

– Dual-Career Hiring Program – Educational Benefits – Faculty Medical and Family Leave – Transition to Retirement – FAQs

… and more!

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Office of the Provost Website

  • Information on committees & initiatives

– Revised content from PACWC, including:

  • Caregiving Across the Lifespan
  • Health and Wellness

– New IDEAL-N content (NSF Advance grant)

  • Recruiting & Retaining a Diverse and Excellent Faculty
  • Writing Groups for Faculty (pilot program in 2017-18)
  • Fam ily Friendly Program s for Pitt Faculty
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Family Friendly Programs for Pitt Faculty

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Thank you!