CO 2 Capture using Nanoparticle-based Ionic Materials (NIMs) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ah-Hyung Alissa Park

Earth and Environmental Engineering & Chemical Engineering Lenfest Center for Sustainable Energy Columbia University Sustainable Fuels from CO2, H2O and Carbon-Free Energy May 4th, 2010

CO2 Capture using Nanoparticle-based Ionic Materials (NIMs)

Projected Global Energy Demand & Supply

The world energy demand is projected to increase by over 40% in the next two decades Fossil Fuels will remain the dominant source

Coal-fired Power Plants

Our Research Goals

Use domestic energy sources to achieve energy independence with environmental sustainability Use carbon neutral energy sources such as biomass & MSW Integrate carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies into the energy conversion systems

CCS

Gasoline Diesel Fossil Nuclear Solar Biomass Wind , Hydro Jet Fuel Heat Electricity Ethanol Methanol DME Hydrogen Chemicals Geo Municipal Solid Wastes Gasoline Diesel Jet Fuel Heat Electricity Ethanol DME Hydrogen Chemicals Municipal Solid Wastes Wind , Hydro Geo Biomass Nuclear Solar Fossil Carbon Gas Refining Synthesis

CO2

Gasification-Based Energy Production System Concepts

Sulfur r By By-Pro Product Fly A y Ash By By-Pro Product Slag ag By By-Pro Product

Steigel and Ramezan, 2006

Petroleum-based vs. Synthetic Liquid Fuels

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Crude Oil Price ($/Barrel) US$ of the day (Nominal) 2003 US$ (Real)

Crude oil prices once again at 1973 levels

Steynberg, (2006)

$81.81 (04/28/10)

Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Options

• Necessary Characteristics
• Capacity and price
• Environmentally benign fate
• Stability

Separation Transportation Sequestration CO2 Removal

Carbon Capture Schemes

Source: NETL, 2008

• From

concentrated sources vs. diffuse sources

• Integrated

Carbon Capture Technologies

• Most widely employed

CO2 capture method is using

(Goff et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004)

• Concerns with Amine Scrubbing Technology

1.High parasitic energy penalty 2.High cost - capital and operating 3.Corrosion & degradation (due to SO2, O2, particulate, etc) 4.High vapor pressure leads to fugitive emissions

Typical Amine Scrubbing Process

Carbon Capture

10

Carbon Capture Schemes

Source: NETL, 2008

• From

concentrated sources vs. diffuse sources

• Integrated

Carbon Capture Technologies

What is NIMS? Nanoparticle Ionic Materials

A Nanoscale Analogue to Ionic Liquids Nanoparticle Ionic Corona + =

NIMS advantages

• Zero Vapor Pressure
• >600 counter ions affiliated with a single nanoparticle

(unlike ionic liquids where each ion is the source of a single bearing CO2 capture site)

• Ionic coronas forming the Canopy are forced to distort their natural

conformations to fill in the space between the cores.

• Such Entropic Frustration can be relieved by addition of solute

(e.g. CO2), enhancing the overall solvation.

Synthesis of NIMs

C H3 O O O C H3 NH2 CH3

x y

:

Molecular Weight (Mw): 600 ~ 2000

OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH

Average 5-12 chains/nm2

Polymer Silica NIMS + →

=

7 nm(dia.) Silica average surface area: 345 m2/g 12nm(dia.) Silica average surface area: 220 m2/g 22 nm(dia.) Silica average surface area: 140 m2/g

(Ref.:Sigma-aldrich)

Estimation of Corona Density

Average diameter 7 nm

Average 7.8 chains/nm2

Average diameter 12 nm Average diameter 22 nm

Average 5 chains/nm2 Average 12 chains/nm2

Corona Density = f [Hydroxyl ions of Silica]

Corona fraction

HSQC Spectra (Polyetheramine)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

H9 H6 H8 H7 H1 C6 C9 C8 C1 C7

Jeffamine M-600 (Mw. 600) *Up (Red): CH or CH3 *Down (Blue): CH2

Jeffamine M-600 in DMSO-d6

H8‒C8 H7‒C7 H7‒C7 H9‒C9

NIMS (7 nm SiO2 with Jeffamine M-600) in DMSO-d6

C1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

NIMS (Mw. 600, 7 nm)

Ionic Bond H6, H9 H1 C6, C9

SO3 O3S SO3 SO3 SO3 SO3 O3S O3S

̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶

HSQC Spectra (NIMS)

H6‒C6/H9‒C9 H7‒C7 H8‒C8 The peaks were deshielded (1H shifted to higher ppm region) due to the approach of oxygen atoms in sulfonate group by the formation of Ionic Bonds

*Up (Red): CH or CH3 *Down (Blue): CH2 ** Electronegativity O: 3.44 N: 3.04

TGA: Improved Thermal Stability TEM: Mono-dispersed, Non-agglomerated nanoparticles ATR-IR: Counter Ions Grafted on Surface of Nanoparticles

7 nm core 12 nm core 22 nm core

CO2 capture by NIMS:

Characterization of Different Core Size NIMs

Water bath

Scheme of experimental setup

19

P T Holder for thin layer samples

(at equilibrium and low pressure)

sample

Effects of T and P on CO2 Capture by NIMs

• >95% of capacity in 20 min
• Equilibrium in 50 min

(35℃, PCO2=0.31 MPa)

• Negligible effect of core Size
• Pressure ↑CO2 absorption ↑
• Temperature↑ CO2 absorption↓

(35℃, PCO2 = 0.07-0.34 MPa)

(25℃-65 ℃, PCO2=0.31 MPa)

(35℃, PCO2=0.31MPa)

Regeneration of NIMs

• Regenerated under vacuum for 20 min
• A multi-cycle test:

Regenerated NIMS shows SAME CO2 capacity as a fresh sample

Vacuum

(25℃, PCO2=0.31MPa)

CO2 Capture Mechanism of NIMs

• 1. Molecular Interaction btw. functional groups and CO2

e.g., Lewis interaction btw. anion and CO2, other chemisorption (i.e. ‒NH2)

• 2. Molecular Structure

e.g., Free volume for physisorption of CO2  Attenuated Total Refraction (ATR) FTIR and NMR Experiment  Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and 2D NMR Experiment  Volume vs Temperature measurement, ATR IR

NMR and ATR FTIR Spectra of NIMS with CO2

200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20

Chemically absorbed CO2 ppm Physically absorbed CO2 13C NMR result of NIMS with CO2

(@ 25 ℃ and 5 bar)

CO2

3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500

Wavenumber (cm

• 1)

Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) IR results of NIMS with CO2 (@ 25 ℃ and 10 bar)

ATR FTIR Measurement

3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500

Wavenumber (cm

• 1)

2400 2380 2360 2340 2320 2300 2280 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25

Absorbance Wavenumber (cm

• 1)

1300 1200 1100 1000 900 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Absorbance Wavenumber (cm

• 1)

680 670 660 650 640 630 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12

Absorbance Wavenumber (cm

• 1)

Lewis Acid-Base Interaction

SiO2

Vapor CO2 NIMS + CO2

<ν2 Bending Mode Region>

<Curve Fit Spectrum of ν2 Bending Mode Region>

NIMS + CO2: Eliminating Degeneracy of CO2 Bending Mode

Time (Minute)

200 400 600 800 1000

P/Po, %

70 80 90 100 #1 (16 hr,0.05g) #2 (16 hr,0.05g) #3 (16 hr,0.05g) #4 (16 hr,0.05g) #5 (16 hr,0.05g) #6 (16 hr,0.05g) #7 (16 hr,0.05g) #8 (16 hr,0.05g) #2 (8 hr,0.1g) [BMIM]PF6 (12 hr,0.1g) [BMIM]BF4 (8 hr,0.1g) TSIL (16 hr,0.05g) 30% MEA (16 hr,0.05g) 30 % MEA (0.05g) NIMS #2 (0.1g) NIMS #2 (0.05g) TSIL (0.05g) [BMIM]PF6 (0.05g) [BMIM]BF4 (0.05g)

Comparison of CO2 Capture by NIMS & other media

• NIMS#2 made with

Diamine polymer

• 0.05 g of NIMS at 300K

and 2 atm

• TSIL: [HNH2MPL] NTF

NIMS#2 is a NIMS made with diamine polymer

Viscosicty = f [size of core, MW of polymer, ratio of core to polymer]

CO2 Capture by NIMS#2: Effect of Temperature

(NIMS #2, 0.05 g of NIMS, 2 atm)

Time (Minute)

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

P/Po %

80 85 90 95 100 300K 305K 310K 315K 320K 330K 340K 350K 360K

Temperature Absorption 27oC 87oC

• Higher temperature

reduces viscosity while physisorption decreases.

• Up to 57oC, initial

reaction rates remain similar.

• Potential to operate

at high temperature.

57oC

Future directions

• Development of Multifunctional smart particles (e.g. capture

carbon and sulfur at the same time)

• Integrated systems (e.g. chemical looping technologies,

ZECA, and enhanced WGS using mineral carbonation)

• Process intensification and flexibility (production of heat,

electricity, chemicals and fuels (e.g. hydrogen and liquid fuels) in any combination

Acknowledgement

The NIMs part of this project is supported by Award No. KUS-C1-018-02, made by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) as a part of the Global Research Partnership Center led by Cornell University.

Thank you