CMAS Results Academy District 20 Stakeholder Meetings Learning - - PDF document

11/5/2019 1

CMAS Results

Academy District 20 ‐ Stakeholder Meetings Learning Services Fall 2019 Jolynn Patterson – Director of Assessment

About the Assessments

• Colorado Measures of Academic Success (CMAS)
• April of 2019
• CMAS Assessed Areas 2019
• 3rd‐8th Grade ELA and Math
• 5th, 8th and 11th Grade Science
• 4th and 7th Grade Social Studies (sampled schools)
• 9th and 10th Grade PSAT
• 11th Grade SAT

1 2

11/5/2019 2

CMAS 2019 Testing Format

• Grades 3‐8 (ELA)

Computer Based Testing (CBT)

(except TCA, AVMS, NSCA)

• Grades 3‐8 (Math)

Computer Based Testing

(except TCA, AVMS, DCCMS, MRMS, NSCA)

• PSAT/SAT Grades 9‐11

Paper Based Testing

(CBT not an available)

CMAS Scoring

Performance: Meets and Exceeds Percentile Scores Accountability: Scale Scores (Average Scale Score)

and

3 4

11/5/2019 3

CMAS 2019 Social Studies Results

Sampled Schools in 2019: DCC MS, DVES, EXES, FRES, JK8, MRMS, NSCA, PHES, RCES, TCA CP, TCA Performance Levels SS and SC Exceeded Met Approached Partially Met

2016 2017 2018 2019 STATE 2019 Grade 4 651 673 669 658 617 Grade 7 635 655 631 644 590 Grade 11 NA NA NA NA NA (Note: does not count toward Accountability) Achievement/Performance Level Social Studies: Mean Scale Score

CMAS 2019 Science Results

Accountability Exceeds Meets Approaching Does Not Meet

2016 2017 2018 2019 STATE 2019 Grade 5

642 647 645 652 600

Grade 8

630 629 645 644 580

Grade 11

657 643 654 638 576

Achievement/Acountability Rating Science: Mean Scale Score

5 6

11/5/2019 4

2019 CMAS Highlights Science

– Elementary science scores increased slightly. – Middle school (grade 8) remained stable. – High school (grade 11) science scores decreased and dropped their accountability rating from exceeds to meets.

CMAS 2019 ELA Achievement Results

Accountability Exceeds Meets Approaching Does Not Meet

2016 2017 2018 2019 STATE 2019 Grade 3

748 753 752 753 740

Grade 4

754 753 759 748 735

Grade 5

751 755 756 760 747

Grade 6

747 751 753 752 743

Grade 7

751 757 759 761 745

Grade 8

752 750 755 762 745

Grade 9

495 495 457

Grade 10

516.8 518 519 476

Grade 11

554.7 554 547 505

ELA: Mean Scale Score

7 8

11/5/2019 5

CMAS 2019 ELA Growth Results

Accountability Exceeds Meets Approaching Does Not Meet

2016 2017 2018 2019 STATE Grade 4 54 52 53 54 50 Grade 5 49 52 51 56 50 Grade 6 49 50 51 48.5 50 Grade 7 55 57 56 60 50 Grade 8 52 42 50 56 50 Grade 9 67 NA NA Grade 10 64 53 50 Grade 11 54 56 54 49 ELA/EBRW: Median Growth Percentile Growth/Accountability Rating

2019 CMAS Highlights ELA

– Grade 4 dropped from exceeds to meets. (achievement) – Grade 6 dropped to approaching. (growth) – Grade 8 up from meets to exceeds. (achievement) – Growth scores remained stable in 6 grade levels. (growth)

9 10

11/5/2019 6

CMAS 2019 Math Achievement Results

Accountability Exceeds Meets Approaching Does Not Meet

2016 2017 2018 2019 STATE 2019 Grade 3

754 757 752 753 740

Grade 4

748 749 751 758 745

Grade 5

747 748 750 751 738

Grade 6

747 748 744 742 732

Grade 7

747 748 745 746 735

Grade 8

726 731 750 754 736

Grade 9

478 481 448

Grade 10

502.1 497 490 462

Grade 11

537 540 534 496

MATH: Mean Scale Score

CMAS 2019 Math Growth Results

Accountability Exceeds Meets Approaching Does Not Meet

2016 2017 2018 2019 STATE Grade 4 55 49 58 57 50 Grade 5 45 49 48 49 50 Grade 6 53 56 50 45 50 Grade 7 40 44 49 53 50 Grade 8 48 51 53 54 50 Grade 9 55 55 51 Grade 10 56 53 52 Grade 11 54 51 52 51 MATH: Median Growth Percentile Growth/Accountability Rating

11 12

11/5/2019 7

2019 CMAS Highlights Math

– Grade 6 dropped to approaching. (growth) – Grade 7 moved up to meets. (growth) – Grade 4 moved up to exceeds. (achievement) – Grade 10 dropped to meets. (achievement) – All other grades remained stable.

CMAS 2019 PSAT/SAT Results

Accountability Exceeds Meets Approaching Does Not Meet 2016 2017 2018 2019 STATE 2019 2016 2017 2018 2019 STATE 2019 Grade 9 55 55 51 Grade 9 67 NA NA Grade 10 56 53 52 Grade 10 64 53 50 Grade 11 54 51 52 51 Grade 11 54 56 54 49 Growth/Accountability Rating Growth/Accountability Rating MATH: Median Growth Percentile ELA/EBRW: Median Growth Percentile 2016 2017 2018 2019 STATE 2019 2016 2017 2018 2019 STATE 2019 Grade 9

478 481 448 Grade 9 495 495 457 Grade 10 502.1 497 490 462 Grade 10 516.8 518 519 476 Grade 11 537 540 534 496 Grade 11 554.7 554 547 505 MATH: Mean Scale Score ELA: Mean Scale Score

13 14

11/5/2019 8

CMAS 2019 PSAT/SAT Results

2017 2018 2019 STATE 2019 PSAT Grade 9 973 977 906 PSAT Grade 10 1020 1015 1009 938 SAT Grade 11 1092 1095 1081 1001 PSAT/SAT Total Score NOTE: Not included in Accountability Ratings.

2019 CMAS Highlights PSAT/SAT

– Overall SAT/PSAT scores decreased slightly in D20 and the state of Colorado. – PSAT/SAT growth and achievement scores exceeded the state in all grade level assessments.

15 16

11/5/2019 9

2019 Performance Frameworks

Purpose of the DPF/SPF

The District Performance Framework and the School Performance Framework serve to:

• 1. hold districts and schools accountable for

performance on the same, single set of indicators and measures; and

• 2. inform a differentiated approach to state support

based on performance and need, by specifically identifying the lowest performing schools and districts.

17 18

11/5/2019 10

Key Performance Indicators:

• 1. Academic Achievement

– District /School Mean Scale Score

• 2. Academic Growth

– Median Growth Percentile

• 3. Post-Secondary & Workforce Readiness

– Graduation Rate and Disaggregated Graduation Rate (Best of 4,5,6, or 7 year) – Dropout Rate (grades 7-12 as of EOY 2018) – Matriculation Rate (entered 2 or 4 year CTE program following gradation) – CO SAT EBRW (ELA) – CO SAT Math

District Accreditation Categories: Plan Types

Distinction 74 -100% Accredited 56 - 73.9% Improvement 44 – 55.9 Priority Improvement 34 - 43.9% Turnaround 0.0 – 33.9% Insufficient Data: No reportable achievement or growth data.

19 20

11/5/2019 11

School Plan Categories

Performance 53 -100% Improvement 42 - 52.9% Priority Improvement 34 - 41.9% Turnaround 0.0 – 33.9% Insufficient Data: No reportable achievement or growth data.

Scoring Guide for DPF/SPF

21 22

11/5/2019 12

Possible Points by Indicator

Indicator Elem/Middle High/District Achievement 40% 30% Growth 60% 40% Postsecondary NA 30%

ASD20 2019 Preliminary DPF

Each district receives a District Performance Framework (DPF) with a Plan Assignment. Academy 20:

• Accredited with Distinction
• 78%

23 24

11/5/2019 13

ASD20 Preliminary SPF

Each school receives a School Performance Framework (SPF) with a Plan Assignment.

2019 DPF/SPF: Changes

• Growth for grade 9 ELA was not provided.

25 26

11/5/2019 14

2018 DPF: Academic Achievement

Exceeds (Levels and Content)

– Elementary ELA (Grades3-5) – Middle School ELA (grades 6-8) – Middle School Math (grades 6-8) – Middle School Science (grade 8) – High School PSAT/EBRW (grades 9 and 10)

2018 DPF: Academic Growth

Exceeds English Language Proficiency (ELP) Data

Elementary: 65 MGP English Language Proficiency (ELP) Exceeds Middle School: 82 MGP English Language Proficiency (ELP) 68.9 On Track to Proficiency Exceeds High School: 75 MGP English Language Proficiency (ELP) 69.1 % On Track to Proficiency Exceeds

27 28

11/5/2019 15

2018 DPF: Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness

Exceeds (Levels and Content)

– Dropout .4% All Students – Dropout .0% English Learners – Dropout .4% Minority Students – Graduation 96.2% All Students – Graduation 95.3% Minority Students

Connection to Learning Services

 The Unified Improvement Plan is required by the State of Colorado and is designed to improve student learning through a cycle of continuous

• improvement. Learning Services with the support of district develops the District

Unified Improvement Plan in order to support areas of need across the district.  Looking Ahead:

– Continued data analysis through the use of Tableau and the development of data analysis protocols. – Identification of areas of strength and areas for growth in all content areas focused on targeted subgroups. – Collaboration and planning with teachers, administrators and the Learning Services team through the Support to Schools – Instructional Leadership Team model.

29 30

11/5/2019 16

Looking Ahead

– Learning Services team will support schools through the Unified Improvement Plan process and the development of their Instructional Leadership Plans.

Thank you!

31 32