Climate & Connectivity Conscious Systematic Conservation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Climate & Connectivity Conscious Systematic Conservation Planning: Peace Break Case Study

Jerrica Mann, MSc. Candidate Pamela Wright , Ph.D.

Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP) and Climate Change

• Growing development and adoption of SCP

(although not yet widely used in practice in NA by gov’t agencies)

• Connectivity planning limited but importance

(particularly given CC) increasingly recognized

• SCP has had limited integration of climate

change –tendency for approaches to be more static

• Wide-scale, accessible climate change data only

recently available in metrics that make sense for SCP….at same time approaches to connectivity analysis becoming more rigorous

Opportunity

• CC approaches vary from land facet (preserving the stage) to

climate velocity, biotic velocity, climate refugia and novel ecosystems

• Currently undertaking SCP for Peace Break area (Ian Curtis

with Y2Y) – using a coarse/fine filter analysis incorporating a ‘land facet’ approach

• Opportunity to develop and compare approaches for climate

conscious planning with explicit consideration of connectivity and assess the feasibility of approaches for broader adoption

Peace Break

• Critical importance for connectivity

regionally and continentally

• Unique E/W connection across

continental divide

• High value conservation targets

including caribou, grizzly, bull trout etc

• Resource values high and threat

extreme

• Current levels of protection very low

– conservation window closing rapidly

• Already working on SCP there in

partnership with Y2Y and others

Research Questions

(1) What are the probable future climate conditions for the PB? (2) What characterizes a climate resilient landscape and what elements of climate resiliency should be selected to guide conservation planning in the PB? (3) How do high priority sites for landscape level conservation in the PB differ between a static biodiversity-based approach, and a climate resiliency based approach to conservation area design?

Approach and Status

 Compile data – develop current/future footprint  Identify conservation goals (coarse/fine filter and climate change resiliency and refugia)  Determine extent to which existing reserves (existing PA’s and proposed portfolio selection) achieve conservation targets  Use Marxan ILP identify proposed portfolio of lands that achieve conservation targets at minimal cost (cost = least footprint)  Use OmniScape to quantify landscape permeability and resistance  Use Marxan ILP to generate a portfolio of additional lands using climate conscious metrics  Compare portfolio of lands selected using traditional SCP practices (but including land facet coarse filter layer) and those created using climate conscious SCP approach

Juri Peepre

Historic, Current and Future Human Footprint

y = 452.28x + 1174.1 R² = 0.7897

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 1941 1950 1956 1959 1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016

Area (Hectares) Year

Forest Harvest in the PRB Study Area between 1941 and 2016

SCP Selection Portfolio of Conservation Lands in Current Context

Building a Climate Resistance Cost Surface

Use OmniScape to identify landscape resistance due to human modification, geophysical barriers, and climate dissimilarity

Example OmniScape mapping from NCC application in the Pacific NW. (Mcrae et al 2016)

Climate Metrics

• Climate velocity is one of the most

widely used metrics for estimating exposure.

• Climate velocity tells us the

direction and rate at which

• rganisms must move to maintain

a given climate.

• It is calculated by dividing the rate
• f climate change by the rate of

spatial climate variability.

• Univariate or Multivariate
• Forward or Backward

AdaptWest Climate Velocities

Climate Metrics

Sites Species & Populations AdaptWest Climate Velocities AdaptWest Climate Velocities

Climate Metrics

• Disappearing Climates
• Novel Climates & Ecosystems
• Refugia
• Biotic Velocities vs Climate

Velocities

Next Steps

• OmniScape – resistance surfaces and develop

as a cost layer

• Revise portfolio selection
• Comparison of two approaches

Questions?