chile pc r pp review
play

Chile PC R-PP Review Reviewers: Switzerland, U.S., Colombia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Chile PC R-PP Review Reviewers: Switzerland, U.S., Colombia Washington DC, March 19 2013 Summary This is a well conceptualized, prepared, and presented R-PP. The approach to readiness captured here appears to be appropriate to addressing the


  1. Chile PC R-PP Review Reviewers: Switzerland, U.S., Colombia Washington DC, March 19 2013

  2. Summary “This is a well conceptualized, prepared, and presented R-PP. The approach to readiness captured here appears to be appropriate to addressing the major drivers of degradation and generating economic opportunities. ( … ) The text is thorough and especially well documented. It takes care of the related policy and legislative framework of the country and the wider aim of developing Chile’s pathway towards a low carbon economy that includes as a major element the forest sector. The focus on degradation will likely provide many useful lessons for others seeking to focus on the second D in REDD+. ”

  3. Overview Component Highlight PC Review 1a Standard met Clear institutional framework 1b Standard met Good direct stakeholder mapping 1c Standard met Well developed capacity building and consultation plans 2a Standard met Good analysis of drivers of degradation 2b Standard met Clear insertion of REDD+ well into legal and sectoral frameworks. 2c Standard met Good description of land tenure systems. 2d Standard met Good description of SESA process. 3 Standard met Thorough description of methodologies and challenge of definition of degradation.

  4. Overview Component Highlight PC Review 4a Standard met Good description of process, data available, participation of stakeholders through project typologies 4b Standard met Well established links with monitoring of wood energy and forest carbon and National Biodiversity and Climate Change plan 5 Standard met Reasonable budget. Positive inclusion of private sector. 6 Standard met Preliminary logframe

  5. Recommendations • Include assessment of non-forest stakeholders. • Evaluate non-forest instruments as REDD+ strategy options • Clarify aggregation of project typology reference levels and MRV to national reference level and MRV. • Provide details on information of safeguards of governance and displacement of emissions; and further co-benefits to be measured. • Improve details of the LogFrame

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend