Chile PC R-PP Review Reviewers: Switzerland, U.S., Colombia - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Chile PC R-PP Review Reviewers: Switzerland, U.S., Colombia - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Chile PC R-PP Review Reviewers: Switzerland, U.S., Colombia Washington DC, March 19 2013 Summary This is a well conceptualized, prepared, and presented R-PP. The approach to readiness captured here appears to be appropriate to addressing the
Summary
“This is a well conceptualized, prepared, and presented R-PP. The approach to readiness captured here appears to be appropriate to addressing the major drivers of degradation and generating economic opportunities. (…) The text is thorough and especially well documented. It takes care of the related policy and legislative framework of the country and the wider aim of developing Chile’s pathway towards a low carbon economy that includes as a major element the forest sector. The focus on degradation will likely provide many useful lessons for others seeking to focus on the second D in REDD+.”
Overview
Component Highlight PC Review 1a Clear institutional framework Standard met 1b Good direct stakeholder mapping Standard met 1c Well developed capacity building and consultation plans Standard met 2a Good analysis
- f
drivers
- f
degradation Standard met 2b Clear insertion of REDD+ well into legal and sectoral frameworks. Standard met 2c Good description of land tenure systems. Standard met 2d Good description
- f
SESA process. Standard met 3 Thorough description
- f
methodologies and challenge of definition of degradation. Standard met
Overview
Component Highlight PC Review 4a Good description of process, data available, participation
- f
stakeholders through project typologies Standard met 4b Well established links with monitoring of wood energy and forest carbon and National Biodiversity and Climate Change plan Standard met 5 Reasonable budget. Positive inclusion of private sector. Standard met 6 Preliminary logframe Standard met
Recommendations
- Include assessment of non-forest stakeholders.
- Evaluate non-forest instruments as REDD+ strategy
- ptions
- Clarify aggregation of project typology reference
levels and MRV to national reference level and MRV.
- Provide details on information of safeguards of
governance and displacement of emissions; and further co-benefits to be measured.
- Improve details of the LogFrame