Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 1
Charcoal for terra preta Michael J. Antal, Jr, Goro Uehara, Jonathan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Charcoal for terra preta Michael J. Antal, Jr, Goro Uehara, Jonathan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Charcoal for terra preta Michael J. Antal, Jr, Goro Uehara, Jonathan Deenik, and Tai McClellan Hawaii Natural Energy Institute and The College of Tropical Agriculture & Human Resources University of Hawaii at Manoa Nov 27, 2007
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 2
Modern Biomass Refineries
- Ethanol from corn grain and biocarbons
from corn stover (USA)
- Biodiesel from sunflower oil and biocar-
bons from sunflower shells and stalks (EU)
- Biodiesel from coconut oil and biocarbons
from coconut shells, fronds, etc. (Malaysia)
- Biodiesel from marine algae and biocarbons
from residual (dry) algal material (Hawaii)
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 3
Fuel Costs
$18-24/GJ Hydrogen $6-17/GJ Gas $14/GJ Ethanol $15/GJ Oil $8/GJ Charcoal Coal RENEWABLE FOSSIL
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 4
How can we use charcoal?
- Potting soil (orchids and ornamentals)
- Cooking (barbeque) fuel
- Ultra clean coal (power production)
- Activated carbon (water treatment)
- Metal reductant
- Terra preta (carbon sequestration!)
- Biocarbon fuel cell
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 5
Some questions concerning the pro- duction of biocarbons:
- 1. In theory, what limits the yield of bioC
(charcoal) from biomass?
- 2. In theory, what is the energy conversion
efficiency of biomass into bioC?
- 3. In practice, what yield and energy
conversion efficiency can be achieved?
- 4. In practice, how quickly can we convert
biomass to bioC?
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 6
Useful definitions:
- 1. ychar = mchar / mbio
- 2. 100 = % VM + % fC + % ash; where
VM = volatile matter; fC = fixed carbon
- 3. yfC = ychar × {% fC / (100 - % feed ash)}
- 4. ηchar = ychar × (HHVchar / HHVbio)
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 7
Thermochemical equilibrium predictions for the products of cellulose pyrolysis at 400 C (Ind. Eng.
- Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 3690-3699).
- C, H2O, CO2, and
CH4 are the only significant products.
- The theoretical
charcoal (i.e. C) yield is 28 wt%.
- The gas contains
significant energy (i.e. CH4).
Pressure (MPa) 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 Mass fraction (%) 10 20 30 40 50
C(s) CO2 H2O(g) CO CH4
(a)
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 8
Reaction stoichiometry for the products of cellulose pyrolysis at 400 C & 1 MPa (Ind.
- Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 3690-3699)
C6H10O5 → 3.74 C + 2.65 H2O + 1.17 CO2 + 1.08 CH4
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 9
Energy balance for cellulose pyrolysis following thermochemical equilibrium (Ind.
- Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 3690-3699)
5000 10000 15000 20000 input
- utput
Energy [kJ/kg-cellulose] cellulose specific heat carbon gas work sensible heat exotherm 5000 10000 15000 20000 input
- utput
Energy [kJ/kg-cellulose] cellulose specific heat carbon gas work sensible heat exotherm
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 10
Plot of charcoal yield from cellulose pyrolysis vs. pressure (Thermochim. Acta, 1983, 68, 165-186).
- Pressure strongly favors
formation of charcoal.
- Low gas flow rates also
favor the formation of charcoal.
- Elevated pressure and
low flow rates together double the yield of charcoal.
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 11
Flash CarbonizationTM reactor schematic (U.S. patent # 6,790,317; September 14, 2004).
PG DDV SRD PRV flare IV UDV MMV R H ATW C A HIC DS TC TC TC TC TC TC TC TC IV TC PT PT GSP WT WT H
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 12
Parity plot of Flash CarbonizationTM fixed- carbon yields from various biomass feedstocks (Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 3690-3699)
- Fixed-carbon yields
from corn cob, oak, and macshell approach the theoretical limit.
- Leucaena offers
almost 90% of the theoretical limit.
yfC - experimental (%)
20 25 30 35 40 45
yfC - theoretical limit (%)
20 25 30 35 40 45
90% 80% 100%
MS LW-A1 LW-O OW-2 OW-1 CC LW-A2
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 13
Flash CarbonizationTM demo reactor
- n the UH campus
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 14
Picture source: http://www.gerhardbechtold.com/TP/gbtp.php
Terra Preta (Amazonian Dark Earths): Highly Fertile Anthropogenic Soils
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 15
Terra Preta Soil Typical Upland Amazonian Soil
Photo source: University of Bayreuth Photo source: University of Bayreuth
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 16
Terra Preta Unamended Soil
Effect of Terra Preta on Plant Growth
Photo source: http://tinselwing.wordpress.com/tag/terra-preta/
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 17
Volcanic ash soil treated with flash carbonized macadamia nut shell charcoal 0% (w/w) 5% (w/w) 10% (w/w) 20% (w/w)
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 18
Control 20% (w/w) charcoal
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 19
Lettuce Shoot Biomass
0% 5% 10% 20%
Plant weight (grams/pot)
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
a a b c
Charcoal Rate (w/w)
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 20
Charcoal Effect in an Acid, Infertile Soil
0% 5% NPK + Lime
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 21
NPK + Lime 5% + NPK + Lime
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 22
Preliminary Conclusion:
Charcoal used in the experiment caused a negative effect on plant growth But why?
- Crop?
- Soil??
- Charcoal???
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 23
- Volatile Matter (VM) content: a measure of the
susceptibility of charcoal to further decompose and form carbon when heated
Hydrophobic Hydrophilic
22.5% VM Content 6.3% VM Content
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 24
Effect of High Volatile Matter (22.5%) Charcoal on Plant Growth
0% 10% High VM
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 25
Effect of Low Volatile Matter (6.3%) Charcoal on Plant Growth
0% 10% Low VM
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 26
Low Volatile Matter Charcoal (6.3%) versus High Volatile Matter Charcoal (22.5%)
Low Volatile Matter High Volatile Matter
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 27
Combined Effect of Low Volatile Matter Charcoal Plus Fertilizer
NPK + Lime NPK + Lime + 10% Low VM
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 28
Volatile Matter or Feedstock?
- VM content affected plant growth in macnut
shell charcoal
- Does feedstock make a difference?
- Repeat trial with corn cob charcoal
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 29
Control High VM Low VM
Effect of corn cob charcoal on soybean
29
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 30
Waller-Duncan K Ratio t-test
Control HVM LVM
Soybean Fresh Weight (g/pot)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14
a b b
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 31
Control Control Lime NPK High VM NPK Low VM NPK
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 32
Waller-Duncan K Ratio t-test
Control Lime+NPK HVM+NPK LVM+NPK
Soybean Fresh Weight (g/pot)
10 20 30 40
a b b c
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 33
Conclusions
- Volatile matter content influences a
charcoal’s effectiveness as a soil amendment
- Low volatile matter charcoals are more
effective soil amendments than high volatile matter charcoals
Nov 27, 2007 www.hnei.hawaii.edu www.ctahr.hawaii.edu 34
Future Studies
- Will the positive effects observed in
greenhouse tests carry over into field trials?
- Will the positive effects persist or diminish
with time?
- Will the negative effects of high volatile