characterization of murine hepatocarcinogenesis induced
play

Characterization of Murine Hepatocarcinogenesis Induced by the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Characterization of Murine Hepatocarcinogenesis Induced by the Hepatocarcinogenesis Induced by the Nitrification Inhibitor Nitrapyrin: Mode of Action, Human Relevance Mode of Action, Human Relevance Framework, and Risk Assessment Implications


  1. Characterization of Murine Hepatocarcinogenesis Induced by the Hepatocarcinogenesis Induced by the Nitrification Inhibitor Nitrapyrin: Mode of Action, Human Relevance Mode of Action, Human Relevance Framework, and Risk Assessment Implications RASS Webinar February 10, 2016 February 10, 2016 Kerry Hastings D Phil Kerry Hastings, D.Phil Risk Assessor Dow AgroSciences Risk Assessor, Dow AgroSciences Jessica LaRocca, PhD Toxicologist, Dow AgroSciences Matthew LeBaron, PhD Toxicologist, Dow Chemical 1 |

  2. Agenda • Background/overview • Liver MoA evaluation Liver MoA evaluation • Application of the HRF • Risk assessment overview • Risk assessment overview 2 |

  3. Nitrapyrin • (2-chloro-6-trichloromethyl pyridine) • Registered in the US since 1974 Registered in the US since 1974 • Nitrification inhibitor • Nitrogen stabilizer • Nitrogen stabilizer Cl N Cl Cl Cl Cl 3 |

  4. Nitrate Loss Ammonium Nitrite Nitrate Nit Nitrosomonas Nit Nitrobacter b t NH 4 NO 2 NO 3 bacteria bacteria (+) positive (-) soil negative ( ) (-) negative g charge h charge h charge Nitrogen loss Nitrogen loss through denitrification Nitrogen loss through nitrate leaching through nitrate leaching 4 |

  5. Nitrapyrin Stabilizes Nitrogen Ammonium Nitrite X X X X X X X X Nitrate Nitrosomonas Nitrobacter NH 4 NO 2 NO 3 bacteria bacteria 3 (+) positive charge (-) soil negative charge (-) negative charge STABILIZED NITROGEN Readily Available 5 |

  6. Liver Tumors 250 No adverse 200 effects • 250 mkd: ↑ adenomas and adenomas/carcinomas in ♂ and ♀ g/day) Systemic toxicity 150 ↑ absolute and relative liver weights in ♂ and ♀ ↑ absolute and relative liver weights in ♂ and ♀ ose (mg/kg • 125 mkd: ↑ adenomas and adenomas/carcinomas in ♀ Tumors 100 ↑ absolute and relative liver weights in ♂ and ♀ Do 50 • 125/250 mkd: ↓ bw at 12 and 24 months in ♂ and ♀ • 250 mkd: ↓ bwg at 12 mo (29.6%), 24 mo (26.9%) in ♂ 0 0 Rat Mouse Mouse (1989) (1990) (1997) 6 |

  7. What is the MoA for nitrapyrin-mediated mouse liver tumors and is it relevant to humans? 7 |

  8. Approach: • Question 1: Can we assimilate/generate data to define an MoA for nitrapyrin- data to define an MoA for nitrapyrin mediated mouse liver tumors? • Question 2: Can we exclude other MoAs? • Question 3: Is the MoA relevant to humans? • Question 3: Is the MoA relevant to humans? 8 |

  9. Question 1: MoA • Assessed potential MoAs by evaluating Assessed potential MoAs by evaluating previous toxicity data • Generated additional MoA data to rule in or rule out nuclear receptor activation p  Key events (NR activation, proliferation)  Recovery after removal of treatment Recovery after removal of treatment 9 |

  10. Nitrapyrin Liver MoA Study 0, 75, 250, 400 mg/kg/day 0 mg/kg/day nitrapyrin (recovery) nitrapyrin Days of exposure 4 7 14 14 plus 21 day recovery Endpoints: • Gene expression of biomarkers of NR activation (AhR, CAR, PXR, PPAR- α ) • Protein and enzyme activity • Liver weight and histopathology • Hepatocellular proliferation (via BrdU osmotic pumps) • Assess recovery after treatment cessation Assess recovery after treatment cessation 10 |

  11. Key Event #1: NR Activation 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 7 5 0 7 5 0 7 5 0 7 5 0 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 Cyp1a1 Cyp2b10 Cyp3a11 Cyp4a10 AhR CAR PXR PPAR - 11 |

  12. Key Event #1: CAR Activation ( Cyp2b10 ) trol over con d change p2b10 fold Cyp mg/kg/day nitrapyrin 12 | N=6-9 mice/timepoint/dose

  13. Key Event #1: Liver Weight Increases rol over contr ncrease o Percent In P N=6 9 mice/timepoint/dose N=6-9 mice/timepoint/dose mg/kg/day nitrapyrin Similar responses for liver hypertrophy 13 |

  14. Cyp2b10 and Expected PROD Activity 7-Pentoxy-Resorufin O-Deethylation (PROD) activity (Cyp2b10-dependent) Activation downstream PB genes/pathways Cyp2b10 C b2b10 Cyb2b10 CAR Cyp2b10 14 |

  15. Key Event #1: CYP Enzyme Induction 7-Pentoxy-Resorufin O-Deethylation (PROD) activity (Cyp2b10-dependent) ontrol e Over Co d Change Fold mg/kg/day nitrapyrin Cyp2b10 Western Blot Cyp2b10 Western Blot ← Cyp2b10 N=6 mice/timepoint/dose 15 |

  16. Suicide Inhibition • Inhibition of cytochrome activity (irreversible) • Phenobarbital (PB)-induced liver microsomes used to investigate the role for suicide inhibition Inhibitor Binds irreversibly, removes active enzyme from system Enzyme Enzyme 16 |

  17. Suicide Inhibition • Inhibition of cytochrome activity (irreversible) Cl Activation downstream N Cl Cl genes/pathways Cl Cyp2b10 C b2b10 Cyb2b10 CAR NR I hibi Inhibitor Cl N Cl Cl Cl Cl Cyp2b10 17 |

  18. CYP Enzyme Induction/Suicide Inhibition Cl C N Cl PB Cl Cl Cyp2b10 Cyp2b10 Cyp2b10 Cyp2b10 enzymatic inhibition similar to what was seen in vivo 18 |

  19. Key Event #2: Increased Hepatocellular Proliferation 4.3 Cells Per 1,000 Fold increases ive Cells P 4.9 4 9 2 3.5 rdU Positi 2.4 Br N=6-9 mice/timepoint/dose mg/kg/day nitrapyrin 19 |

  20. Summary Key Events #1 and 2 • Nitrapyrin exposure in mice causes:  Key Event #1 – CAR activation ─ Cyp2b10 gene and protein expression ─ Liver weight increases ─ Liver hypertrophy ─ Suicide inhibition of PROD  Key Event #2 – Hepatocellular proliferation ─ BrdU Labeling Index 20 |

  21. Question 1: Conclusion Can we assimilate/generate data to define an g MoA for nitrapyrin-mediated mouse liver tumors? tumors? YES Key events #1 (CAR) and #2 (Proliferation) y ( ) ( ) 21 |

  22. Question 2 • Can we exclude other MoAs? • Is CAR necessary for nitrapyrin mediated • Is CAR necessary for nitrapyrin-mediated liver effects (proliferation)? • Addressed this question with a CAR-KO q mouse study 22 |

  23. CAR-KO Mouse Study Design 0, 250 mkd nitrapyrin Endpoints: • Cyp2b10 C 2b10 WT CAR-KO • Liver weight increases, g histopathology • Hepatocellular Hepatocellular proliferation Days of Exposure 4 4 23 |

  24. Gene expression in WT and CAR-KO Livers rol over contr change o Fold mg/kg/day nitrapyrin (mouse strain) N=6 mice/strain/dose 24 |

  25. Relative liver weight increases ease rcent Incr Per mg/kg/day nitrapyrin (mouse strain) g g y py ( ) 25 |

  26. Histopathologic changes in WT and CAR-KO Mice Vacuolization; Very slight V li ti Hypertrophy; Very slight or slight H t h V li ht V li ht li ht 6/6 6/6 6/6 5/6 ected ected Percent Affe Percent Affe P P 0/6 0/6 0/6 0/6 mg/kg/day nitrapyrin (mouse strain) mg/kg/day nitrapyrin (mouse strain) Increased number of mitotic figures Increased number of mitotic figures 5/6 Affected Percent A 1/6 0/6 0/6 0/6 mg/kg/day nitrapyrin (mouse strain) 26 |

  27. Hepatocellular Proliferation in WT and CAR-KO Mice ol ver contro change ov Fold c mg/kg/day nitrapyrin (mouse strain) N=6 mice/strain/dose Nitrapyrin-induced proliferation requires CAR activation 27 |

  28. Alternative MoAs Alternative MoAs were evaluated for plausibility and coherence by Bradford Hill Criteria: • DNA Reactivity •Not plausible •No coherence • AhR, PXR, PPAR α Activation •Not plausible •No coherence • Cytotoxicity (1 Wk – 12 Mo) •Plausible •No coherence: based on magnitude of effect, entirety of data • Increased Apoptosis •Not plausible •No coherence • Estrogens, Statins, Metals, Infectious •Not plausible •No coherence 28 |

  29. Temporality Key Event 1 Key Event 2 Apical Endpoints: Apical Endpoints: Causal: CAR Increased Key Events Activation Hepatocellular Hepatocellular After Recovery (Cyp2b10 Tumors and Proliferation Dose (mkd) ( ) Transcript & p Altered Foci Protein) 14 Days Plus 21 4-14 Days 4-14 Days 2 Yrs Days Recovery - 5 Dose - 25 - - - - 75 +,+ # - 125 + + - + 250 - - 250 CAR KO + Indicates effect present, - indicates effect absent at indicated duration of treatment. Blank cell = No data. # Data only from 1-year interim sacrifice 29 |

  30. Question 2: Conclusion Can we exclude other MoAs? YES CAR is necessary for nitrapyrin-induced hepatocellular proliferation hepatocellular proliferation 30 |

  31. Question 3: Relevance to Humans? • CAR activation has been shown to be not relevant to humans: Key Events Evidence in Rodents Evidence in Humans Activation of CAR Yes Yes CYP Enzyme Yes; unclear if critical Yes; different enzymes #1 Induction step or indicator of induced compared to Associated Liver activity secondary to rodents Hypertrophy CAR activation No evidence of increased Hepatocellular cell proliferation in the #2 Yes Proliferation human liver (limited in vitro and in vivo data). vitro and in vivo data) Selective Clonal Yes No; none reported Expansion (Foci) Apical Endpoints Apical Endpoints O Occurrence of f No; based on Hepatocellular Yes epidemiological data Tumors 31 |

  32. Relevance to Humans for Nitrapyrin? • Wanted to generate nitrapyrin-specific data • How?  Mouse vs. human hepatocyte proliferation study 32 |

  33. Study Design • Mouse hepatocytes treated Mouse hepatocytes treated with 0, 1, 3, 10 µM nitrapyrin • Human hepatocytes treated p y with 0, 3, 10, 30, 100 µM nitrapyrin • Positive control EGF • DNA synthesis analyzed via EdU t i i EdU staining (fluorescent (fl t alternative to BrdU) 33 |

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend