Changes to the Construction Act: Payment certaintyuncertain terms - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

changes to the construction act payment certainty
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Changes to the Construction Act: Payment certaintyuncertain terms - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Changes to the Construction Act: Payment certaintyuncertain terms Craig J Enderbury BSc DipArb MACostE FCIArb Director Hill International (UK) Ltd


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Changes to the Construction Act: Payment certainty…uncertain terms

  • Craig J Enderbury BSc DipArb MACostE FCIArb

Director – Hill International (UK) Ltd

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Objectives

To understand the amendments to Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 by virtue of the

  • by virtue of the

The Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Latham Report 1994 “Constructing the Team” identified;

  • Poor Payment Practices
  • Disputes – extensive, expensive and time

consuming

  • consuming
  • HGCRA 1996 came into force on May 1st 1998

together with the Scheme for Construction Contracts (E&W) Regulations 1998.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996

s104 Definition of Construction Contract s105 Meaning of Construction Operations s106 Residential occupiers s107 Construction Contract to be in writing s108 Right to Adjudicate s109 Entitlement to stage payments

  • s109 Entitlement to stage payments

s110 Payment notices s111 Withholding s112 Right to suspend works for non-payment s113 ‘Pay when Paid’ became ineffective

slide-5
SLIDE 5

LDEDCA Part 8 Construction Contracts The LDEDCA contains the construction provisions to amend Part 2 of the HGCRA 1996 ('the Construction Act').

  • These will seek to improve the existing legislation by

improving:

  • cash flow and
  • access to adjudication for construction companies
slide-6
SLIDE 6

SECTION 107 CONTRACTS IN

  • CONTRACTS IN

WRITING

slide-7
SLIDE 7

HGCRA Contracts in Writing provisions 107(2) Contracts are in considered to be in writing if a) whether signed or not b) exchange of communications c) evidenced in writing 107(3) Terms – by reference

  • 107(3) Terms – by reference

107(4) Terms recorded by a third person 107(5) Exchange in Adjudication/Arbitration – ‘Doctrine

  • f Election’
slide-8
SLIDE 8

HGCRA – s.107 contracts in writing problems

  • The provisions only apply to contracts evidenced

in writing.

  • Not all contracts are evidenced in writing
  • by design or by circumstance
  • Only contracts in writing can be adjudicated
  • Consequently parties prevented from using
  • Consequently parties prevented from using

adjudication to enforce payment

RJT Consulting v DM Engineering - “What has to be evidenced in writing is literally, the agreement, which means all of it, not part of it”.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

HGCRA – s.107 problems LDEDCA - solution

  • only applies to contracts

evidenced in writing

  • Not all contracts are

evidenced in writing – by design or circumstance

  • parties prevented from
  • s107 repealed in full
  • Contracts will no longer

required to be evidenced in writing – may be;

  • 1. Wholly in writing
  • 2. Part writing, part oral
  • parties prevented from

using adjudication to enforce payment

  • 2. Part writing, part oral
  • 3. Wholly oral
slide-10
SLIDE 10

LDEDCA – s.107 solution Potential issues/benefits

  • s107 repealed in full
  • Contracts will no longer

required to be evidenced in writing – may be;

  • 1. Wholly in writing
  • 2. Part writing, part oral
  • Widens scope of

adjudication to include

  • ral contracts
  • Oral agreements will rely
  • n oral evidence / witness

statements.

  • 2. Part writing, part oral
  • 3. Wholly oral

statements.

  • Potentially another

adjudication stage introduced

  • Cross examination

potentially required

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SECTION 108 ADJUDICATION

  • ADJUDICATION

PROVISIONS

slide-12
SLIDE 12

HGCRA Provisions

108(1) Right to refer disputes to Adjudication 108(2) The contract shall provide: (a) Right to refer a dispute at anytime (b) 7 day timetable for the appointment of Adjudicator (c) 28 days for Adjudicator to decide (longer if agreed) (d) 14 day extension if agreed to by referring party (e) Adjudicator to act impartially

  • (e) Adjudicator to act impartially

(f) Adjudicator to take initiative in ascertaining Facts & Law 108(3) Decision binding on the parties until Arbitration / litigation 108(4) Adjudicator not liable 108(5) Scheme is the default provision for non-compliance

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Adjudication Timetable – No change

  • Day 1
  • Before Day 7
  • Day 7
  • Days 8 – 34
  • Notice of Adjudication
  • Appointment of adjudicator
  • Referral Notice
  • Response to the Referral, Reply to

Response and any other submissions

  • Day 35

Response and any other submissions

  • Adjudicator’s decision issued
  • +14 days at consent of referring party
  • +?? days at consent of both parties
slide-14
SLIDE 14

LDEDCA Amendments to Adjudication Three changes to the HGCRA regime:

  • Section 107 repealed – contracts in writing
  • New S108(3A) – Slip rule
  • New Section 108A (1) & (2) – allocation of
  • New Section 108A (1) & (2) – allocation of

adjudicators costs

slide-15
SLIDE 15

HGCRA – s.108 problems LDEDCA - solution

  • Adjudicator clerical error in

his decision

  • Reliant on parties arguing
  • n basis of common law
  • New section 108(3A)
  • Adjudicator’s power to

correct decision

  • ‘Slip Rule’

“The contract shall include provision in writing permitting the

  • provision in writing permitting the

adjudicator to correct his decision so as to remove a clerical or typographical error arising by accident or omission.”

slide-16
SLIDE 16

HGCRA – s.108 adjudication problems Clauses that require the referring party to pay:

  • the other parties costs and/or
  • the adjudicators costs

Irrespective of the decision of the adjudicator

  • Often referred to as Tolent Clauses
slide-17
SLIDE 17

‘Tolent’ Clauses Bridgeway Construction v Tolent Construction : Notwithstanding Clause 15(a) either party may refer any dispute or difference arising under or out of the contract to Adjudication in which each party shall be responsible for their individual costs in referring or responding to the Adjudication, however, should the Sub-Contractor refer a dispute to Adjudication which is later rejected in whole or in part by the Adjudicator then the Sub-Contractor shall meet all the costs of the Adjudication including all costs sustained by the Company in responding to the claim.

  • including all costs sustained by the Company in responding to the claim.

The decision of the Adjudicator shall be binding on both parties until a final decision is reached by Arbitration or until the parties agree that the decision

  • f the Adjudicator is final regarding the dispute or difference.

Judge held – There should be no interference with the Contract. The mere fact that Bridgeway were disgruntled did not entitle Judge Mackay to say "Well these clauses are a bit unfair. Let's change them".

slide-18
SLIDE 18

However this was changed by the case of: Yuanda (UK) Co Ltd vs. WW Gear Construction Ltd “If the effect of the contract drafting is to "clearly discourage a party from exercising its right to refer disputes to adjudication", then it must be for consideration whether a provision so drafted is contrary to the requirements of HGCRA” “For these reasons, I consider that clause 9A would in practice limit

  • “For these reasons, I consider that clause 9A would in practice limit

Yuanda's freedom to refer a dispute to adjudication at any time and, in some circumstances – such as in a dispute involving a relatively small amount of money – to deprive it of a remedy altogether. I must therefore respectfully disagree with the conclusion… in the Tolent case, at least on the basis of the wording of clause 9A in this particular contract”

slide-19
SLIDE 19

HGCRA – s.108 problems LDEDCA - solution

  • Tolent clauses
  • Payment of other party’s

costs

  • Often irrespective of
  • utcome
  • New section 108A (1) & (2)
  • Intention to only allow the

Adjudicator to allocate his costs, or

  • Parties to agree cost

allocation after the notice

  • allocation after the notice
  • f adjudication issued
slide-20
SLIDE 20

LDEDCA – s.108 solution Potential issues/benefits

  • New section 108A (1) & (2)
  • Intention to only allow the

Adjudicator to allocate his costs, or

  • Parties to agree cost

allocation after the notice

  • Aim is to remove

remaining barriers to adjudication

  • LDEDCA drafting not

‘water tight’

  • Expect some cases to test
  • allocation after the notice
  • f adjudication issued
  • Expect some cases to test

the new legislation

  • Expected that Yuanda will

prevail in the end

slide-21
SLIDE 21

LDEDCA Section 108 (A) Adjudication costs: effectiveness of provision

(1) This section applies in relation to any contractual provision made between the parties to a construction contract which concerns the allocation as between those parties of costs relating to the adjudication of a dispute arising under the construction contract. (2) The contractual provision referred to in subsection (1) is ineffective unless—

  • ineffective unless—

(a) it is made in writing, is contained in the construction contract and confers power on the adjudicator to allocate his fees and expenses as between the parties, or (b) it is made in writing after the giving of notice of intention to refer the dispute to adjudication.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

LDEDCA Section 108 (A) Does it work?

“Either party may refer any dispute or difference arising under or out

  • f the contract to Adjudication in which each party shall be

responsible for their individual costs in referring or responding to the Adjudication, however, should the Sub-Contractor refer a dispute to Adjudication which is later rejected in whole or in part by the Adjudicator then the Sub-Contractor shall meet all the representation

  • Adjudicator then the Sub-Contractor shall meet all the representation

costs legal or otherwise of the Contractor in responding to the claim. The Adjudicator shall have the power to apportion his reasonable fees and expenses between the Parties at his discretion. The decision of the Adjudicator shall be binding on both parties until a final decision is reached by Arbitration or until the parties agree that the decision

  • f the Adjudicator is final regarding the dispute or difference”.
slide-23
SLIDE 23

SECTION 110 PAYMENT PROVISIONS

  • PAYMENT PROVISIONS
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Notice of intended suspension if a notice to withhold payment not given Period as stated Assessment Interval

Due Due Due Due Date Date Date Date S.110 S.110 S.110 S.110 Payment Notice Payment Notice Payment Notice Payment Notice Final Date Final Date Final Date Final Date for Payment for Payment for Payment for Payment

e.g. 30 days minimum 7 days Application Application Application Application for payment for payment for payment for payment Date by which “Notice of payment to be made” (5 days max) Employer pays

  • n or before

Right to suspend Right to suspend Right to suspend Right to suspend performance performance performance performance

(until payment made)

Performance may be suspended if payment in full has not been made

S.111 S.111 S.111 S.111 Withholding Notice Withholding Notice Withholding Notice Withholding Notice

Suspension period

HGCRA 1996: S110 Payments Overview

  • 7 days

S111(3) (Y2.3) minimum 7 days “Notice to withhold payment” given not latetrthan Employer pays Suspension period Key Time period fixed by Construction Act Time period defined in contract or by Scheme/Act in default

slide-25
SLIDE 25

HGCRA – s.S110 Payment Problems

  • 1. Payment Notice - may only be given by employer
  • 2. Sanction for failing to provide notice - none
  • 3. Absence of notice – unclear what payment is due
slide-26
SLIDE 26

HGCRA – s.110 problems LDEDCA - solution

  • 1. Payment Notice –
  • nly given by employer
  • 2. Sanction for failing to provide

notice - none

  • 3. Absence of notice – what

payment is due?

  • 1. Notice of Payment may be issued

by Payer or by a specified person

  • S110A (1a)
  • 2. If after 5 days no Notice of

Payment is issued, Payee may issue a Notice in Default stating what is due - S110B (2).

  • 3. If an application has been made
  • 3. If an application has been made

in accordance with the Contract, the application is considered the payee’s ‘Notice in Default’- S110B (4).

  • 4. The amount contained in the

Notice in Default may be considered as the amount DUE.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Notice of intended suspension if a notice to withhold payment not given Period as stated Assessment Interval

Due Due Due Due Date Date Date Date S.110 S.110 S.110 S.110 Notice Notice Notice Notice Final Date Final Date Final Date Final Date for Payment for Payment for Payment for Payment

e.g. 30 days or 30+ days ‘Payee Notice in ‘Default’ minimum 7 days Application Application Application Application for payment for payment for payment for payment Date by which “Notice of payment to be made” (5 days max) Employer pays

  • n or before

Right to suspend Right to suspend Right to suspend Right to suspend performance performance performance performance

(until payment made)

Performance may be suspended if payment in full has not been made

S.111 S.111 S.111 S.111 Notice Notice Notice Notice

Suspension period

LDEDCA 2009: S110 Payments Overview

  • 7 days

S111(3) (Y2.3) minimum 7 days “Notice of intention to pay less payment” not later than S110(B) On failure to give Notice Payee application may become ‘Payee Notice in Default’ or Payee may issue NID (5+ days) Employer pays Suspension period Importantly Loss and Expense is now recoverable for period in pursuance/consequence of suspension Key Time period fixed by Construction Act Time period defined in contract or by Scheme/Act in default

slide-28
SLIDE 28

LDEDCA – s.110 solution Potential issues/benefits

  • 1. May be issued by Payer or by a

representative - S110A (1a)

  • 2. If no Notice after 5 days Payee

may issue a Notice stating what is due - S110B (2).

  • 2. Application may be considered

the payee’s ‘Notice in Default’

  • What is due to be paid is

certain

  • Main contractors likely to be

busy at certification periods

  • 2 bites of the cherry means

that MC may allow payments to go through ‘self-cert’ process

  • the payee’s ‘Notice in Default’
  • S110B (4).
  • 3. The amount contained in the

Notice in Default may be considered as the amount DUE. to go through ‘self-cert’ process and correct using 2nd S111 notice provision

  • Still may have uncertainty until

late in the process

slide-29
SLIDE 29

SECTION 111 WITHHOLDING

  • WITHHOLDING

PAYMENT

slide-30
SLIDE 30

HGCRA – s.111 Withholding Payment problems

  • 1. Confusion as to number of Notices to be issued.
  • 2. Failing to issue a S111 notice still allows Payer to

defend to a claim via abatement defence

slide-31
SLIDE 31

HGCRA – s.111 problems LDEDCA - solution

1. Confusion as to number of Notices to be issued. 2. Abatement defence

  • 1. Clarity – requirement to pay the

‘notified sum’ in s.110A notice

  • 2. Payer may amend ‘notified sum’

via a ‘notice of intention to pay less‘ - s.111(3)

  • 3. No abatement defence as
  • bligation to pay the ‘notified
  • bligation to pay the ‘notified

sum’

slide-32
SLIDE 32

LDEDCA – s.111 solution Potential issues/benefits

  • 1. Clarity – requirement to pay

the ‘notified sum’ in s.110A notice

  • 2. Payer may amend ‘notified

sum’ via a ‘notice of intention to pay less‘ - s.111(3)

  • 3. No abatement defence as
  • 2 bites of the cherry means

that MC may allow payments to go through ‘self-cert’ process and correct using 2nd notice provision

  • Uncertainty until late into the

payment cycle

  • 3. No abatement defence as
  • bligation to pay the ‘notified

sum’ payment cycle

slide-33
SLIDE 33

SECTION 112 RIGHT TO SUSPEND

  • RIGHT TO SUSPEND

PERFORMANCE

slide-34
SLIDE 34

HGCRA – s.112 Suspension problems

  • 1. Extension of time for suspension period only
  • 2. No right to loss and/or expense
  • 3. Must suspend all obligations
slide-35
SLIDE 35

HGCRA – s.112 problems LDEDCA - solution

  • 1. Extension of time for

suspension period only

  • 2. No right to loss and/or

expense

  • 3. Must suspend all obligations

1. Right to suspend ‘any or all of’ his obligations – s112(1) 2. Right to recover ‘reasonable costs and expenses’ - s112(3A). 3. Right to claim an extension of time for any period “in

  • time for any period “in

pursuance of or in consequence

  • f“ the right to suspend

S112(4).

slide-36
SLIDE 36

SECTION 113 PAY WHEN PAID

  • PAY WHEN PAID
slide-37
SLIDE 37

HGCRA – s.113(1) ‘Pay when Paid’ problems

  • 1. The introduction of ‘Pay when Certified’ clauses.
  • 2. Sub-Contractors not privy to certification process,

therefore:

  • did not know when due, and
  • did not know when due, and
  • could not enforce payment
slide-38
SLIDE 38

HGCRA – s.113 problems LDEDCA - solution

  • 1. Pay when certified
  • 2. Not notified of certification

dates

  • s113 unchanged
  • Amendment s110(1A)
  • Payment may not be conditional
  • n:
  • Performance of obligations

under another contract, or

  • under another contract, or
  • Decision as to whether
  • bligations under another

contract have been performed

  • Does not apply to ‘management’

type contracts – s110(1C)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

SECTION 113

PAYMENT ON INSOLVENCY

  • PAYMENT ON INSOLVENCY
slide-40
SLIDE 40

HGCRA – s.113 payment on insolvency problems

  • 1. Unclear in cases of payee insolvency whether

payment is to be made in absence of s111 withholding notice Amendment confirms House of Lords decision in…

  • Amendment confirms House of Lords decision in…

Melville Dundas (in receivership) v George Wimpey UK

slide-41
SLIDE 41

HGCRA – s.113 problems LDEDCA - solution

  • 1. Payment on Payee

insolvency

  • S111(10) Payer not obliged to pay

notified sum if:

  • The Contract stipulates non-

payment in the event of Payee insolvency, and

  • Payee has become insolvent

after the prescribed period in

  • after the prescribed period in

section 111(5)(a) - date of notice of intention to pay less

slide-42
SLIDE 42

In summary Key Changes

  • 1. Adjudication costs
  • 2. Slip Rule
  • 3. Payment notices
  • 3. Payment notices
  • 4. Insolvency
slide-43
SLIDE 43

What now?

  • The new Act came into effect 1st October 2011
  • Applies only to contracts entered into after

this date – contracts before this date subject to old HGCRA

  • May lead to confusion/litigation
  • Amended suite of Contracts for JCT and NEC
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Hill International (UK) Ltd 6160 Knights Court Solihull Parkway Birmingham Business Park Birmingham B37 7WY Tel: 0121 717 5770

  • Tel: 0121 717 5770

craigenderbury@hillintl.com Craig J Enderbury BSc DipArb MACostE FCIArb Director