Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule Beverley M. Sheafer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

challenges to cost loading a project schedule
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule Beverley M. Sheafer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2004 AACE International Annual Meeting Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule Beverley M. Sheafer Assistant Professor Construction Management Program California State University, Sacramento Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2004 AACE International Annual Meeting

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Beverley M. Sheafer Assistant Professor Construction Management Program California State University, Sacramento

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 2

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

WELCOME Ladies and Gentlemen

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 3

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

The Question Is it possible to adequately "cost- load" a project schedule to reflect the true costs of the project?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 4

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

The Assumptions

Applicable to all contract types

lump sum unit price GMP

Important to all parties involved Includes all components of cost

resources overhead profit

Incorporated into schedule

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 5

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

The Discussion

Contract requirements Parties involved Cost definitions Schedule development Approaches

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 6

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Pareto’s Rule

(Vilfredo Pareto, Italian economist, 1848-1923 )

“80 percent of the outcome of any project is determined by 20 percent of its included elements”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 7

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Contract requirements

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 8

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Contract requirements

Purpose

To establish goals for project To allow measurement of project progress To allow forecasting of end result

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 9

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Contract requirements

It is typical for a project contract to have

a requirement that the project baseline schedule be cost-loaded.

The project schedule is usually the basis

for progress payment applications.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 10

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Contract requirements

Sample 1 – Schedule (see note 1)

The Project Schedule shall be cost loaded.

Precedence scheduling format shall be used in accordance with accepted practice and the scheduling references described in Section 5.2, insofar as they pertain to precedence format and cost-loading.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 11

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Contract requirements

Sample 2 - Payment (see note 2)

Payment shall be based on actual progress

achieved against the cost loaded Project Schedule.

Each invoice shall (a) document the

progress of the Work by activity number, (b) set forth the amount then due associated with such progress in accordance with the approved Project Schedule, …

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 12

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Parties involved

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 13

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Parties involved

Each party has the intent to fulfill the

contract requirements

Each party may have a different concept

as to what “cost-loaded” infers.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 14

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Parties involved

Owner Designer (not typically involved) Construction Manager General Contractor / Sub-Contractors

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 15

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Parties involved

Owner

Wants to stay within budget

Construction Manager

Wants to monitor costs

General Contractor / Sub-Contractors

Wants control over how “costs” are entered

slide-16
SLIDE 16

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 16

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Cost definitions

slide-17
SLIDE 17

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 17

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Cost definitions

Project Budgeted Cost

Establishes the baseline project cost

Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS)

Provides the framework by which cost

information is gathered and reported

Includes all elements in the budget that

have been given a dollar amount

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 18

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Cost definitions

Sample 3 (see note 3)

Level 8: Cost Code - The cost code of the

Project will be defined by the Contractor. However, the cost code needs to follow the guidelines of WBS herein.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 19

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Schedule development

slide-20
SLIDE 20

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 20

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Schedule development

Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

Establishing activities for the Scope of Work

Activity development

Should all activities be cost-loaded?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 21

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Schedule development

Sample 4 (see note 4)

The WBS provides a hierarchical structure

to segregate Project elements to facilitate the collection and analysis of Project Data and to serve as a mechanism for payment and scheduling for Project design, procurement and construction.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 22

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Schedule development

Sample 4 continued

The WBS for the Double Track Corridor

Improvement Program consists of eight levels of detail, which are: 1) Full Funded Grant Agreement (FFGA), 2) TRI-RAIL Phases, 3) Category, 4) Location, 5) Subcategory, 6) Work Element, 7) Work Detail, and 8) Cost Code.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 23

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Approaches

slide-24
SLIDE 24

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 24

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Approaches

Purpose

To provide framework by which information

is gathered and stored on a project

slide-25
SLIDE 25

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 25

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Approaches

Accounting structures

Schedule of Values

In conjunction with Bid Estimate

Assembly loading

To analyze cost and efficiency of different

  • perations (assembly)

Resource loading

To manage labor, material, equipment and o&p

slide-26
SLIDE 26

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 26

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

The Conclusion

slide-27
SLIDE 27

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 27

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

The Conclusion

Schedules can be adequately cost-

loaded.

Contract should stipulate cost-loading

structure.

Multiple coding and accounting

structures should be used.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 28

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Pareto’s Rule Applied to Construction A project control system needs to identify the major cost elements of the project early and develop a system of controls to monitor and manage these elements.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 29

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Questions ?

slide-30
SLIDE 30

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 30

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Notes

1. Taken from Book II: Contractual Terms and Conditions, Section 5 – Project Schedule Requirements, Subsection 5.5 of Agreement No. 01-839 between Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority and The Washington Group International for TRI- RAIL Double Track Improvement Program New River Bridge Project. 2. Taken from Book II: Contractual Terms and Conditions, Section 10 – Payment, Subsection 10.4 of Agreement No. 01- 839 between Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority and The Washington Group International for TRI-RAIL Double Track Improvement Program New River Bridge Project.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 31

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Notes

3. Taken from Book III: Project Provisions, Section 8 – Work Breakdown Structure, Subsection 8.3 of Agreement No. 01- 839 between Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority and The Washington Group International for TRI-RAIL Double Track Improvement Program New River Bridge Project. 4. Taken from Book III: Project Provisions, Section 8 – Work Breakdown Structure, Subsections 8.1 and 8.2 of Agreement

  • No. 01-839 between Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority and

The Washington Group International for TRI-RAIL Double Track Improvement Program New River Bridge Project.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 32

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

References

Managing the Construction Process

by F.E. Gould, PE, AIC

Construction Project Planning and Scheduling

by C. Patrick, PE, CSIT

Construction Planning and Scheduling

by J.W. Hinze, PhD

TRI-RAIL Double Track Improvement Program

New River Bridge Project Agreement No. 01-839

slide-33
SLIDE 33

2004 AACEI Annual Meeting Sheafer / page 33

Challenges to Cost-Loading a Project Schedule

Contact information

Beverley M. Sheafer Assistant Professor Construction Management Program California State University, Sacramento 6000 J Street Sacramento CA 95819-6029 Phone – 916.278.5349 Email – sheaferb@ecs.csus.edu