challenges of performance testing an environmentally
play

Challenges of performance testing an environmentally referenced - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Challenges of performance testing an environmentally referenced sensor David McKnight October 2018 Guidance Marine History Completed the legal 1991 2005 2013 2014 2017 separation of the Automation and Marine businesses with the Guidance


  1. Challenges of performance testing an environmentally referenced sensor David McKnight October 2018

  2. Guidance Marine History Completed the legal 1991 2005 2013 2014 2017 separation of the Automation and Marine businesses with the Guidance group Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  3. Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  4. Local Position Reference Sensor – User experience • We are familiar with the use of local position reference sensors. • Typical user interface shown Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  5. Local Position Reference Sensors – What am I tracking • In order to start tracking a DPO will • Select one or more targets after identifying the targets are the correct ones. • Click on “Start tracking” • They will then be tracking either a prism or a radar responder. Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  6. Targetless Position Reference Sensors - Introduction • Recently launched targetless sensor – SceneScan. • Scans the scene with a 2D laser scanner • Matches the current observation against previous to determine the sensor motion between observations. Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  7. Targetless Position Reference Sensors - Why • Avoids the problems with targets. • Delays moving targets to an appropriate position • Delays cleaning targets which are dirty • Delays due to power issues with radar target • Difficulties placing targets optimally • No more target hand-overs • Breaks the dependency a vessel has on an asset Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  8. Targetless Position Reference Sensors – What am I tracking • A targeted sensor has an easy answer to “What am I tracking” • The target! • A targetless sensor allows tracking by looking at how the environment changes over time to deduce what the motion of the vessel is within that scene. • Simultaneous Localisation And Mapping - SLAM Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  9. Targetless Position Reference Sensors – What is a scene reference point? • On a targeted sensor there are targets which are tracked. • We must send a position of something to the DP system. • We have called this the Scene Reference Point • It is a virtual target. • When we start tracking we assign one at the weighted middle of the point cloud • From the DP system point of view the exact position doesn’t matter. • The DPO does have the option to change this. Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  10. SceneScan – On-land testing • With a PRS utilizing a target static testing is easy to conceptualise. • Place target in a suitable area. • Measure distance to sensor whilst everything is static. • SceneScan requires an asset-like target to produce realistic performance figures. Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  11. SceneScan – On-land testing • With a PRS utilizing a target static testing is easy to conceptualise. • Place target in a suitable area. • Measure distance to sensor whilst everything is static. • SceneScan requires an asset-like target to produce realistic performance figures. • Dry-dock! Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  12. SceneScan – On-land testing results Structure type Range to structure Position noise on pre-production algorithm TLP 75m 0.028m radial 0.057m tangential TLP 25m 0.006m radial 0.010m tangential Jackup 90m 0.031m radial 0.076m tangential Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  13. Targetless sensors at sea – characterizing position. • Having characterized performance in a static setting we should look at how to characterize performance at sea. • Visualization and measurement of tracking performance. • Comparison to known sensors. Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  14. Targetless sensors at sea – Visualization of position holding • Tracking may be visualized in a diversity of ways. • A simple 2D plot will show a position which combines: • Noise from the sensor • Wave motion • Box holding performance of the DP system. • Driven movement. Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  15. Targetless sensors at sea – Visualization of position holding • Tracking may be visualized in a diversity of ways. • By increasing the scope of the 2D plot to include the map and scan data we can add context. Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  16. Targetless sensors at sea – Visualization of position holding • Multiple 2D plots, showing different components of position can be shown. • X, Y, Heading • Range, Bearing, Heading Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  17. Targetless sensors at sea – Visualization of position holding • Multiple 2D plots, showing different components of position can be shown. • X, Y, Heading • Range, Bearing, Heading • This has the advantage of showing tracks being formed. • Slow movements are separated out, though noise and wave motion are still merged. Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  18. Targetless sensors at sea – Visualization of position holding • Ideally separating the different components of motion would allow us to evaluate noise performance. • Utilising signal processing methods we can filter by frequency. • We take wave motion to occur on timescales of 5 seconds or longer 2 nd order Butterworth high-pass filter with a • cut-off of 0.2Hz used Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  19. Targetless sensors at sea – Visualization of position holding Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  20. Targetless sensors at sea – comparison between sensors • From Shell Mars platform testing – comparing SceneScan, CyScan and RadaScan data • Different timescales shown. Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  21. Targetless sensor - TLP and accommodation vessel Results against a TLP at 110m Position noise – radial Position noise – tangential DP position holding performance 0.088m 0.084 degree (0.161m distance referenced) SceneScan position noise 0.013m 0.009 degree (0.017m distance referenced) Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  22. Targetless sensor - drillship Results against a drilllship at 60m Position noise – radial Position noise – tangential DP position holding performance 0.088m 0.104 degree (0.109m distance referenced) SceneScan position noise 0.028m 0.019 degree (0.020m distance referenced) Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

  23. Targetless sensor - conclusion • We have shown the basis of testing a targetless sensor in isolation on land. • We have show testing methods at sea. • We have shown results from all of these against a variety of assets. • Performance is similar or better than targeted systems. Tel: +44 116 229 2600 Web: www.guidance.eu.com

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend