challenges in pre operative
play

Challenges in Pre-Operative I have no disclosures Evaluation Geoff - PDF document

Challenges in Pre-Operative I have no disclosures Evaluation Geoff Stetson, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine, UCSF Hospitalist, San Francisco VA Medical Center Special Thanks Roadmap Heather Nye, MD, PhD Overview of pre-op


  1. Challenges in Pre-Operative I have no disclosures Evaluation Geoff Stetson, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine, UCSF Hospitalist, San Francisco VA Medical Center Special Thanks Roadmap  Heather Nye, MD, PhD  Overview of pre-op evaluation  Case 1 – 10 Minutes • Professor of Medicine UCSF • Cardiac risk-stratification in pre-operative evaluation • Director of Co-Management Service and Veterans Integrated Preoperative Clinic at San Francisco VA Medical Center • High-risk medications  Henry Crevensten, MD  Case 2 – 10 Minutes • Associate Professor of Medicine UCSF • Pulmonary risk-stratification in pre-operative evaluation • Director of Quality Improvement at San Francisco VA Medical • OSA considerations Center  Case 3 – 5 Minutes • An approach to geriatric pre-operative evaluation 3 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 4 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation

  2. Learning Objectives Goals of Pre-Op Evaluation  Evaluate risk of a procedure to a particular patient  Understand the risks and benefits of pre-operative evaluation  Appropriately risk-stratify a patient from a cardiac standpoint • Allows for informed decision-making  Explain how to modify use of certain high-risk medications in the  Optimize medical conditions perioperative period  Describe PPCs and their role in perioperative care  Minimize unnecessary testing  Appropriately risk-stratify a patient from a pulmonary standpoint  Minimize complications  Understand the role of OSA in the perioperative period  Develop a holistic framework for approaching the pre-operative evaluation of a geriatric patient 5 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 6 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation Prevalence and Costs Risks of Unnecessary PreOp Testing  ~30 million people/yr undergo surgery in US, most ambulatory 1 Delay Cost  ~18% of cataract surgery patients had preoperative consultation 2 Harm  ~ 50% of preoperative consultants recommended an unnecessary test 3 Worse Patient and System Outcomes  Preoperative testing costs ~$18 Billion annually in the U.S. 4 1. Onuoha OC, Arkoosh VA, Fleishre LA. JAMA Int Med. 2014; 174(8):1391-1395 2. Thilen S, Treggiari M, Lange J et al. JAMA Int Med. 2014; 173(3):380-388 3. Kachalia A, Berg A, Fagerlin A, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162(2):100-108 4. Kumar A, Srivastava U. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Apr;27(2):174-9 7 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 8 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation

  3. Question 1 Case 1 10 Minutes Risk Clearance Stratification 9 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 10 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation General Approach Source of Guiding Principles Pulmonary Cardiac Risk Update H&P Risk Assessment Assessment Optimize Substance Medication Medical Co- Abuse and History Morbidities EtOH Screen 11 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 12 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation

  4. ACC/AHA Flowchart ACC/AHA Flowchart CAD = Coronary Artery Disease, ACS = Acute Coronary Syndrome, GDMT = Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy, MACE = Major Adverse Cardiac Events 13 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 14 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation Risk Calculators RCRI  Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI)  Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI)  American College of Surgeons (ACS) National • 6 Predictors of MACE (MI, V.fib, Cardiac Arrest, Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Complete Heart Block, Pulm Edema) • 0-1 predictors = low risk • 2+ predictors = high risk • One center; thoracic, vascular, ortho over- represented • Retrospectively validated numerous times Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1999;100:1043-9. 15 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 16 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation

  5. RCRI ACS NSQIP Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI)  21 predictors, created in 2011 1. CAD (MI, + stress, use NTG, CP c/w angina, Q-waves)  525 US hospitals, > 1 million operations Score % of MACE 2. CHF  Calculates risk of: MACE, death, PNA, VTE, AKI, 0 0.4% return to OR, unplanned intubation, discharge to 3. CVA/TIA 1 0.9% rehab/nursing home, surgical infection, UTI 2 6.6% 4. DM (requiring insulin) 3+ 11% 5. CKD (Cr > 2.0 mg/dL)  Limitations: Not validated outside NSQIP, unclear 6. High Risk Surgery (suprainguinal vascular, what to do with all the predictive information intraperitoneal, intrathoracic) 17 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 18 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation ACS NSQIP – Inputs Did anyone use a calculator? Which one? How did our patient do? 19 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 20 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation

  6. RCRI ACS NSQIP – Results Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) 1. CAD (MI, + stress, use NTG, CP c/w angina, Q-waves) Score % of MACE 2. CHF 0 0.4% 3. CVA/TIA 1 0.9% 2 6.6% 4. DM (requiring insulin) 3+ 11% 5. CKD (Cr > 2.0 mg/dL) 6. High Risk Surgery (suprainguinal vascular, intraperitoneal, intrathoracic) 21 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 22 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation ACC/AHA Flowchart Functional Capacity  1 MET (metabolic equivalent) = basal O2 consumption of a 70 kg 40-year-old man  >10 METs  Excellent  7-10 METs  Good  4-6 METs  Moderate • Climbing 2 flights of stairs, walking up a hill, walking on level ground at 4 mph, heavy work around the house  <4 METs  Poor • Golfing with golf cart, playing a musical instrument, slow ballroom dancing, walking at 2-3 miles per hour METs = Metabolic Equivalents; CPG = Clinical Practice Guidelines; GDMT = Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy 23 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 24 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation

  7. Functional Capacity ACC/AHA Flowchart  Making Beds – 3-5  Broomball – 6.3  Ironing – 2  Cricket – 6.1  Archery – 4.3  Equestrianism (not horseback riding) – 7  Doubles Badminton – 3-4  Ringette – 12.6  Bocce – 2-3  Tobogganing – 7 METs = Metabolic Equivalents; CPG = Clinical Practice Guidelines; GDMT = Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy 25 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 26 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation Medications  Diabetes Medications  Betablockers  ACEI/ARB Now, what about those meds?  Statins  Anticoagulation  Aspirin 27 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 28 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation

  8. Diabetes Meds β Blockers  Assuming patient is NPO at MN…  In NON-CARDIAC surgery, β blockers:  Stop oral meds (including metformin*) • Reduce cardiac events perioperatively  Dose reduce long-acting insulin ~25% • Higher risk of death and stroke  Stop prandial insulin  CONTINUE β blockers for other indications  Start sliding-scale insulin  DO NOT start β blocker solely for surgery (consider RCRI 3+) 29 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 30 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation ACEI/ARB Statins  Continuation associated with hypotension, not  Continue statins if patient already taking one worse CV outcomes  Consider starting statin if patient to undergo  Many hold ACEI/ARB 2/2 concern for vascular procedure perioperative AKI  ACC/AHA: “Continuation of ACEIs or ARBs perioperatively is reasonable.”  Recommend: if patient on ACEI/ARB for CHF or difficult to control HTN, continue 31 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 32 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation

  9. Anticoagulation Aspirin  Aspirin for primary/secondary prevention (excluding prior PCI): • No decrease in death or non-fatal MI • Increased Hemorrhage  Stop ASA 5-10 days before procedure, restart 7- 10 days later  In patients with previous PCI and intervention, should continue ASA if possible Devereaux PJ et al for the POISE-2 Investigators. Aspirin in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2014 Mar 31; [e-pub ahead of print]. Graham MM et al. Aspirin in patients with previous percutaneous coronary intervention undergoing noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med 2017 Nov 14; [e-pub]. 33 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 34 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation Medications How about that ?  Diabetes Medications – Reduce Glargine by 25% Patient Procedure Characteristics Perform EKG? + SSI Characteristics  Betablockers – Continue Low Risk Low Risk NO  ACEI/ARB – Controversial…+/- Low Risk Int. or High Risk NO High Risk Low Risk NO  Statins – Continue High Risk Int. or High Risk YES  Anticoagulation – Hold, restart when surgeons deem safe, usually POD 1-3 • Low risk patients – asymptomatic, <10% 10-year risk of CAD  Aspirin – Hold • High risk patients – coronary artery, peripheral artery, or cerebrovascular disease, structural heart disease, or arrhythmia • Optimal timing of EKG is unknown, consensus 1-3 months 35 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation 36 Challenges in Pre-Operative Evaluation

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend