CH.8. PLASTICITY Continuum Mechanics Course (MMC) - ETSECCPB - UPC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ch 8 plasticity
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CH.8. PLASTICITY Continuum Mechanics Course (MMC) - ETSECCPB - UPC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CH.8. PLASTICITY Continuum Mechanics Course (MMC) - ETSECCPB - UPC Overview Introduction Previous Notions Principal Stress Space Normal and Shear Octahedral Stresses Stress Invariants Effective Stress Principal Stress


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CH.8. PLASTICITY

Continuum Mechanics Course (MMC) - ETSECCPB - UPC

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

 Introduction

 Previous Notions

 Principal Stress Space

 Normal and Shear Octahedral Stresses  Stress Invariants  Effective Stress

 Principal Stress Space

 Normal and Shear Octahedral Stress  Stress Invariants  Projection on the Octahedral Plane

 Rheological Friction Models

 Elastic Element  Frictional Element  Elastic-Frictional Model

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Overview (cont’d)

 Rheological Friction Models (cont’d)

 Frictional Model with Hardening  Elastic-Frictional Model with Hardening

 Phenomenological Behaviour

 Notion of Plastic Strain  Notion of Hardening  Bauschinger Effect  Elastoplastic Behaviour

 1D Incremental Theory of Plasticity

 Additive Decomposition of Strain  Hardening Variable  Yield Stress, Yield Function and Space of Admissible Stresses  Constitutive Equation  Elastoplastic Tangent Modulus  Uniaxial Stress-Strain Curve

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Overview (cont’d)

 3D Incremental Theory of Plasticity

 Additive Decomposition of Strain  Hardening Variable  Yield Function  Loading - Unloading Conditions and Consistency Conditions  Constitutive Equation  Elastoplastic Constitutive Tensor

 Yield Surfaces

 Von Mises Criterion  Tresca Criterion  Mohr-Coulomb Criterion  Drucker-Prager Criterion

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Ch.8. Plasticity

8.1 Introduction

slide-6
SLIDE 6

 A material with plastic behavior is characterized by:  A nonlinear stress-strain relationship.  The existence of permanent (or plastic) strain during a

loading/unloading cycle.

 Lack of unicity in the stress-strain relationship.  Plasticity is seen in most materials, after an initial elastic state.

Introduction

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

1

2

3

1

x

2

x

3

x

1

x

2

x

3

x

1

x

2

x

3

x

11

13

12

22

23

21

33

32

31

 PRINCIPAL STRESSES

 Regardless of the state of stress, it is always possible to choose a special

set of axes (principal axes of stress or principal stress directions) so that the shear stress components vanish when the stress components are referred to this system.

 The three planes perpendicular to the principle axes are the principal

planes.

 The normal stress components in the principal planes are the principal

stresses.

Previous Notions

 

1 2 3

                1   2   3

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

1

2

3

1

x

2

x

3

x

1

x

2

x

3

x

1

x

2

x

3

x

11

13

12

22

23

21

33

32

31

 PRINCIPAL STRESSES

 The Cauchy stress tensor is a symmetric 2nd order tensor so it will diagonalize

in an orthonormal basis and its eigenvalues are real numbers.

 Computing the eigenvalues and the corresponding eigenvectors :

Previous Notions

 1   2   3

 v

 

       v v v   1

 

11 12 13 12 22 23 13 23 33

det

not

=                        1 1

1 1 2 2 3 3

        

3 2 1 2 3

I I I        characteristic equation INVARIANTS

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

 STRESS INVARIANTS

 Principal stresses are invariants of the stress state.

 They are invariant w.r.t. rotation of the coordinate axes to which the

stresses are referred.

 The principal stresses are combined to form the stress invariants I :  These invariants are combined, in turn, to obtain the invariants J:

Previous Notions

 

1 1 2 3 ii

I Tr          

 

 

2 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 3

1 : 2 I I              

 

3

det I  

1 1 ii

J I   

 

 

2 2 1 2

1 1 1 2 : 2 2 2

ij ji

J I I        

 

 

3 3 1 1 2 3

1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

ij jk ki

J I I I I Tr             

REMARK

The J invariants can be expressed the unified form:

 

 

1 1,2,3

i i

J Tr i i   

REMARK

The I invariants are obtained from the characteristic equation

  • f the eigenvalue problem.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

 SPHERICAL AND DEVIATORIC PARTS OF THE STRESS TENSOR

Given the Cauchy stress tensor and its principal stresses, the following is defined:

 Mean stress  Mean pressure  A spherical or hydrostatic

state of stress:

Previous Notions

   

1 2 3

1 1 1 3 3 3

m ii

Tr             

1 2 3

1 3

m

p          

1 2 3

    

                 1

REMARK

In a hydrostatic state of stress, the stress tensor is isotropic and, thus, its components are the same in any Cartesian coordinate system. As a consequence, any direction is a principal direction and the stress state (traction vector) is the same in any plane.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

 SPHERICAL AND DEVIATORIC PARTS OF THE STRESS TENSOR

The Cauchy stress tensor can be split into:

 The spherical stress tensor:

 Also named mean hydrostatic stress tensor or volumetric stress tensor or

mean normal stress tensor.

 Is an isotropic tensor and defines a hydrostatic state of stress.  Tends to change the volume of the stressed body

 The stress deviatoric tensor:

 Is an indicator of how far from a hydrostatic state of stress the state is.  Tends to distort the volume of the stressed body

Previous Notions

sph

     

 

1 1 : 3 3

sph m ii

Tr        1 1 1 dev

m

        1

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

 STRESS INVARIANTS OF THE STRESS DEVIATORIC TENSOR

 The stress invariants of the stress deviatoric tensor:  These correspond exactly with the invariants J of the same stress

deviator tensor:

Previous Notions

1 1

J I    

2 2 1

1 2 J I    

 

2 2

1 2 : 2 I I         

3 3 1

1 3 J I   

1 2

3I I   

 

 

 

3 3

1 1 3 3 3

ij jk ki

I I Tr                    

 

1

I Tr     

2 2 1

1 : 2 I I       

 

 

 

2 2 2 3 11 22 33 12 23 13 12 33 23 11 13 22

1 det 2 3

ij jk ki

I                                        

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

 EFFECTIVE STRESS

 The effective stress or equivalent uniaxial stress is the scalar:  It is an invariant value which measures the “intensity” of a 3D stress state

in a terms of an (equivalent) 1D tensile stress state.

 It should be “consistent”: when applied to a real 1D tensile stress, should

return the intensity of this stress.

Previous Notions

' 2

3 3 3 2 2

ij ij

J           ´: ´

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Example

Calculate the value of the equivalent uniaxial stress for an uniaxial state of stress defined by:

x

x

x y z

u

u

E, G

u

            

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Example - Solution

Mean stress: Spherical and deviatoric parts

  • f the stress tensor:

1 ( 3 3

u m

Tr      

3 3 3

u m u sph m m u

                                     2 3 1 3 1 3

u u m sph m u m u

                                               

2

3 3 4 1 1 3 2 ( ) 2 2 9 9 9 2 3

ij ij u u

           

u

  

u

            

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Ch.8. Plasticity

8.2 Principal Stress Space

slide-17
SLIDE 17

 The principal stress space or Haigh–Westergaard stress space is

the space defined by a system of Cartesian axes where the three spatial axes represent the three principal stresses for a body subject to stress:

Principal Stress Space

1 2 3

    

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

 Any of the planes perpendicular to the hydrostatic stress axis is a

  • ctahedral plane.

 Its unit normal is .

Octahedral plane

1 2 3

     1 1 1 3 1            n

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

 Consider the principal stress space:

 The normal octahedral stress is defined as:

Normal and Shear Octahedral Stresses

   

1 2 3 1 2 3

1/ 3 3 , , 1/ 3 1/ 3 3 3 3

  • ct

m

OA OP                                n

1

3

  • ct

m

I    

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

 Consider the principal stress space:

 The shear or tangential octahedral

stress is defined as:

 Where the is calculated from:

Normal and Shear Octahedral Stresses

3

  • ct

AP  

 

 

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 ' 1 2 3 2

3 1 2 3

  • ct

AP OP OA J                  

AP

 

1 2 2

2 3

  • ct

J   

 

     

1/2 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1/2 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 3

1 1 3 3 1 3 3

  • ct
  • ct

                                     

Alternative forms of :

  • ct

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

 In a pure spherical stress state:  In a pure deviator stress state:

Normal and Shear Octahedral Stresses

sph m

     1

esf

    0   

2

J 

  • ct

 

  • ct

      ( ) ( )

m

Tr Tr       

A pure spherical stress state is located on the hydrostatic stress axis. A pure deviator stress state is located on the octahedral plane containing the origin of the principal stress space

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

 Any point in space is unambiguously defined by the three

invariants:

 The first stress invariant

characterizes the distance from the origin to the octahedral plane containing the point.

 The second deviator stress invariant characterizes the radius of the

cylinder containing the point and with the hydrostatic stress axis as axis.

Stress Invariants

1

I

 The third deviator stress invariant

characterizes the position of the point on the circle obtained from the intersection

  • f the octahedral plane and the
  • cylinder. It defines an angle .

2

J

3

J

 

3

J  

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

 The projection of the principal stress space on the octahedral

plane results in the division of the plane into six “sectors”:

 These are characterized by the different principal stress orders.

Projection on the Octahedral Plane

FEASIBLE WORK SPACE Election of a criterion, e.g.:

1 2 3

    

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Example

Determine the shape of the surface in the principal stress space corresponding to a function defined as,

2 1 2

, , aI bJ c a b c    

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Example - Solution

The relationship between the and invariants, and the and stresses is given by, Substituting these expressions into the yield function reads,

1

I

2

J

  • ct

  • ct

   

1 2 2 2

3 3 3 3 3 1 3 2 2

m

  • ct
  • ct
  • ct
  • ct

I Tr J             

   

2 2

3 3 3 2

  • ct
  • ct

b a c    

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Example - Solution

And dividing by c the yield function takes the form, which corresponds to an axisymmetric ellipsoid with axis the hydrostatic stress axis and semi-axis:

   

2 2

3 3 1 2 3

  • ct
  • ct

c c a b     3 , 2 c a c b

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

38

Ch.8. Plasticity

8.4 Phenomenological Behaviour

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Notion of Plastic Strain

e p

    

PLASTIC STRAIN

e

elastic limit: LINEAR ELASTIC BEHAVIOUR

e

E   

39

slide-29
SLIDE 29

 Also known as kinematic hardening.

Bauschinger Effect

f

e

e

 

41

slide-30
SLIDE 30

 Considering the phenomenological behaviour observed,

elastoplastic materials are characterized by:

 Lack of unicity in the stress-strain relationship.

 The stress value depends on the actual strain and the previous loading

history.

 A nonlinear stress-strain relationship.

 There may be certain phases in the deformation process with

incremental linearity.

 The existence of permanent (or plastic) strain during a loading /

unloading cycle.

Elastoplastic Behaviour

42

slide-31
SLIDE 31

43

Ch.8. Plasticity

8.5 1D Incremental Plasticity Theory

slide-32
SLIDE 32

 The incremental plasticity theory is a mathematical model used

to represent the evolution of the stress-strain curve in an elastoplastic material.

 Developed for 1D but it can be generalized for 3D problems.

Introduction

REMARK

This theory is developed under the hypothesis of infinitesimal strains.

44

slide-33
SLIDE 33

 Total strain can be split into an elastic (recoverable) part, ,

and an inelastic (unrecoverable) one, :

 Also,

Additive Decomposition

  • f Strain

e

E   

e p

    

e

d d E   

e p

d d d     

where where elastic modulus or Young modulus

e

p

45

slide-34
SLIDE 34

 The hardening variable, , is defined as:

Such that and .

 Note that is always positive and:

Then, for a monotonously increasing plastic strain process, both variables coincide:

Hardening Variable

 

p

d sign d    

d 

p

 

REMARK

The function is:

 

sign 

 

1

p

d d sign d           

p

d d   

p

d 

p p

p p p

d d

 

      

 

46

slide-35
SLIDE 35

 Stress value, , threshold for the material exhibiting plastic

behaviour after elastic unloading + elastic loading

 It is considered a material property.  For

is the hardening modulus

Yield Stress and Hardening Law

f

p f e

      

f

d H d    

( )

f

   

H

HARDENING LAW

47

f e

H      

( )

f

   

slide-36
SLIDE 36

 The yield function, , characterizes the state of the material:

Yield Function

   

,

f

F       

 

, F  

 

, F   

ELASTO-PLASTIC STATE ELASTIC STATE

 

 

: , F

      E R

 

 

0 :

,0

e

F

         E R

 

 

: , F

       E R

 

, F   

ELASTIC DOMAIN YIELD SURFACE INITIAL ELASTIC DOMAIN: Space of admissible stresses

48

slide-37
SLIDE 37

 Any admissible stress state must belong to the space of

admissible stresses, (postulate):

Space of Admissible Stresses

Space of admissible stresses

E

 

 

, F

  

          E E E R

   

,

f

F        ( ), ( )

f f 

          E

REMARK

49

slide-38
SLIDE 38

 The following situations are defined:

 ELASTIC REGIME  ELASTOPLASTIC REGIME – UNLOADING  ELASTOPLASTIC REGIME – PLASTIC LOADING

Constitutive Equation

 E

 

, dF

     E

 

, dF

     E d E d    d E d   

ep

d E d   

Elastoplastic tangent modulus

REMARK

The situation is not possible because, by definition, on the yield surface .

( , ) dF

     E

 

, F   

50

slide-39
SLIDE 39

 Consider the elastoplastic regime in plastic loading,  Since the hardening variable is defined as:

Elastoplastic Tangent Modulus

 

p

d sign d    

HARDENING LAW

f

d H d     1

p

d d H

      E for

 E

     

, ,

f

F dF           

 

 

( )

,

f

sign

H

dF d d

       

 

        

 

1 d sign d H     

51

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Elastoplastic Tangent Modulus

1 1 1 1 ( ) 1 1 1

e p e p

ep

E

d d E d d H d d d d E H EH d d d E H E H                            strain strain Additive strain decomposition : Elastic Plastic

ep

EH E E H    

ELASTOPLASTIC TANGENT MODULUS

ep

d E d   

52

slide-41
SLIDE 41

 Following the constitutive equation defined

Uniaxial Stress-Strain Curve

ELASTIC REGIME ELASTOPLASTIC REGIME

d E d   

ep

d E d   

REMARK

Plastic strain is generated only during the plastic loading process.

53

slide-42
SLIDE 42

 The value of the hardening modulus, , determines the following

situations:

Role of the Hardening Modulus

H

ep

EH E E H    

Linear elasticity Perfect plasticity Plasticity with strain hardening H  Plasticity with strain softening H 

55

slide-43
SLIDE 43

 In real materials, the stress-strain curve shows a combination of

the three types of hardening modulus.

Plasticity in Real Materials

H  H  H 

56

slide-44
SLIDE 44

57

Ch.8. Plasticity

8.6 3D Incremental Theory

slide-45
SLIDE 45

 The 1D incremental plasticity theory can be generalized to a

multiaxial stress state in 3D. The same concepts are used:

 Additive decomposition of strain  Hardening variable  Yield function

Plus, additional ones are added:

 Loading - unloading conditions  Consistency conditions

Introduction

58

slide-46
SLIDE 46

 Total strain can be split into an elastic (recoverable) part, ,

and an inelastic (unrecoverable) one, :

 Also,

Additive Decomposition

  • f Strain

1 : e

 

 C

e p

    

1 : e

d d  

 C

e p

d d d     

where where

e

p

constitutive elastic (constant) tensor

59

1

e p e

D E              

slide-47
SLIDE 47

 The hardening variable, , is a scalar:

Where is known as the plastic multiplier.

 The flow rule is defined as:

Where is the plastic potential function

Hardening Variable

d  

 

,

p

f    

 

,

p

G d        

 

0,   

 

, G  

with

60

 

1

p

d D d sign       

slide-48
SLIDE 48

 The yield function, , is a scalar defined as:

Yield Function

     

,

f

F        

 

, F  

 

, F   

ELASTOPLASTIC STATE ELASTIC STATE

 

 

: , F

     E

 

 

0 :

,0 F

    E

 

 

: , F

      E

 

, F   

ELASTIC DOMAIN YIELD SURFACE INITIAL ELASTIC DOMAIN:

  

   E E E

Space of admissible stresses Equivalent uniaxial stress Yield stress

61

   

1 ,

f

D F        

slide-49
SLIDE 49

 Loading/unloading conditions (also known as Karush-Kuhn-

Tucker conditions):

 Consistency conditions:

Loading-Unloading Conditions and Consistency Condition

   

; , ; , F F         

   

For , , F dF        

     

, 0; 0; , 0; 0; , 0; 0;

p p p

G F dF d G d F dF G d F dF                                              

ELASTIC LOADING/UNLOADING ELASTOPLASTIC NEUTRAL LOADING IMPOSSIBLE

62

ELASTOPLASTIC LOADING

slide-50
SLIDE 50

 The following situations are defined:

 ELASTIC REGIME  ELASTOPLASTIC REGIME – ELASTIC UNLOADING  ELASTOPLASTIC REGIME – PLASTIC LOADING

Constitutive Equation

 E

 

, dF

     E

 

, dF

     E : d d    C : d d    C :

ep

d d    C

ELASTOPLASTIC CONSTITUTIVE TENSOR

 

( 0 and , 0) F dF     ( 0) F 

 

( 0 and , 0) F dF    

63 04/12/2015 MMC - ETSECCPB - UPC

slide-51
SLIDE 51

 The elastoplastic constitutive tensor is written as:

Elastoplastic Constitutive Tensor

 

: : : :

ep

G F F G H              C C C C C C C C C     

 

, , , , , , , 1,2,3

ijpq rskl pq rs ep ijkl ijkl pqrs pq rs

G F i j k l p q r s F G H                 C C C C C

REMARK

When the plastic potential function and the yield function coincide, it is said that there is associated flow:

   

, , G F     

64

slide-52
SLIDE 52

65

Ch.8. Plasticity

8.7 Failure Criteria: Yield Surfaces

slide-53
SLIDE 53

 The initial yield surface, , is the external boundary of the initial

elastic domain for the virgin material

 The state of stress inside the yield surface is elastic for the virgin material.  When in a deformation process, the stress state reaches the yield surface, the

virgin material looses elasticity for the first time: this is considered as a failure criterion for design. Subsequent stages in the deformation process are not considered.

Introduction

E

E

66 04/12/2015 MMC - ETSECCPB - UPC

slide-54
SLIDE 54

 The yield surface is usually expressed in terms of the following

invariants to make it independent of the reference system (in the principal stress space):

 Where:  The elastoplastic behavior will be isotropic.

Yield (Failure) Criteria

   

1 2 3

, ,

e

F I J J 

 

        

 F  

1 1 2 3 ii

I Tr          

2 2 1

1 2 J I    

 

2 2

1 2 : 2 I I         

3 3 1

1 3 J I   

1 2

3I I   

 

 

 

3 3

1 1 3 3 3

ij jk ki

I I Tr                    

with

1 2 3

    

REMARK

Due to the adopted principal stress criteria, the definition of yield surface only affects the first sector

  • f the principal stress space.

67

slide-55
SLIDE 55

 The yield surface is defined as:

 Where is the effective stress.

(often termed the Von-Mises stress)

 The shear octahedral stress is, by definition, .

Thus, the effective stress is rewritten:

 And the yield surface is given by:

Von Mises Criterion

 

( )

e

F      

 

2

3J    

 

1 2 2

2 3

  • ct

J   

 

1 2 2

3 2

  • ct

J   

 

3 3 3 2 2

  • ct
  • ct

      3 ( ) 2

  • ct

e

F      

REMARK

The Von Mises criterion depends solely on the second deviator stress invariant.

68

 

e

F        

slide-56
SLIDE 56

 The octahedral stresses characterizes the radius of the cylinder

containing the point and with the hydrostatic stress axis as axis.

Von Mises Criterion

2 2 3 3 3

  • ct

e

  • ct

e

      

REMARK

The Von Mises Criterion is adequate for metals, where hydrostatic stress states have an elastic behavior and failure is typically due to deviatoric stress components.

   

2 e

F J      F

69

3 ( ) 2

  • ct

e

F      

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Example

Consider a beam under a composed flexure state such that for a beam section the stress state takes the form, Obtain the expression for Von Mises criterion.

x

x

 

x xy xy

              

70

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Example - Solution

The mean stress is: The deviator part of the stress tensor is: The second deviator stress invariant is given by,  

1 3 3

x m

Tr     

2 3 1 esf 3 1 3 x m xy x xy xy m xy x m x

                                           

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1 1 4 1 1 1 : 2 2 9 9 9 3

x x x xy xy x xy

J                          

71

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Example - Solution

The uniaxial effective stress is: Finally, the Von Mises yield surface is given by the expression: (Criterion in design codes for metal beams)

 

2 2 2

3 3

x xy

J        

2

( ) 3

e

F J      

2 2

3

x xy e

co

        

(comparison stress)

72

slide-60
SLIDE 60

 Also known as the maximum shear stress criterion, it establishes

that the elastic domain ends when:

 It can be written univocally in terms of invariants and :

Tresca Criterion

1 3 max

2 2

e

      

   

1 3 e

F        

   

1 3 2 3

( ) ,

e e

F J J             F

2

J

3

J

Plane parallel to axis

2

73

 

e

F       

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Tresca Criterion

REMARK

The Tresca yield surface is appropriate for metals, which have an elastic behavior under hydrostatic stress states and basically have the same traction/compression behavior.

   

2 3

,

e

F J J        F

74

   

1 3 e

F        

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Von Mises and Tresca Criteria

75

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Example

Obtain the expression of the Tresca criterion for an uniaxial state of stress defined by:

x

x

x y z

u

u

E, G

u

            

76

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Example - Solution

Consider: The Tresca criterion is expressed as:

u

 

 

1 3

( )

e u e u e

u

F

              

1 3 u

    

u

 

 

1 3

( )

e u e u e u

F

               

1 3 u

     ( )

e

F      

u e

  

Note that it coincides with the Von Mises criterion for an uniaxial state of stress.

77

u

            

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Example

Consider a beam under a composed flexure state such that for a beam section the stress state takes the form, Obtain the expression for Tresca yield surface.

x

x

 

x xy xy

              

78

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Example - Solution

The principal stresses are: Taking the definition of the Tresca yield surface,

2 2 2 2 1 3

1 1 1 1 , 2 4 2 4

x x xy x x xy

             

   

1 3 e

F        

2 2 2 2 1 3

1 1 1 1 2 4 2 4

e x x xy x x xy

                                

2 2

4

x xy e

co

       

s (comparison stress)

79

slide-67
SLIDE 67

 It is a generalization of the Tresca criterion, by including the

influence of the first stress invariant.

 In the Mohr circle’s plane, the Mohr-Coulomb yield function takes

the form,

Mohr-Coulomb Criterion

tan c     

internal friction angle cohesion

REMARK

The yield line cuts the normal stress axis at a positive value, limiting the materials tensile strength.

80

slide-68
SLIDE 68

 Consider the stress state for which the yield point is reached:

Mohr-Coulomb Criterion

1 3

cos sin 2

A A

R R          

   

1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3

tg cos sin tg 2 2 2 sin 2 cos

A A

c c c                                       

     

1 3 1 3 sin

2 cos F c             

REMARK

For and , the Tresca criterion is recovered.

/2

e

c    

81

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Mohr-Coulomb Criterion

REMARK

The Mohr-Coulomb yield surface is appropriate for frictional cohesive materials, such as concrete, soils or rocks which have considerably different tensile and compressive values for the uniaxial elastic limit.

   

1 2 3

, , F I J J      F

82

slide-70
SLIDE 70

 It is a generalization of the Von Mises criterion, by including the

influence of the first stress invariant.

 The yield surface is given by the expression:

 Where:

 It can be rewritten as:

Drucker-Prager Criterion

   

1/2 2

3

m

F J            

1 2 3 1

2sin 6 cos ; ; 3 3 3 3 sin 3 3 sin

m

I c                  

     

1/2 1 2 1 2

3 3 , 2

  • ct
  • ct

F I J I J                

REMARK

For and , the Von Mises criterion is recovered.

/2

e

c    

83

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Drucker-Prager Criterion

REMARK

The Drucker-Prager yield surface, like the Mohr-Coulomb one, is appropriate for frictional cohesive materials, such as concrete, soils or rocks which have considerably different tensile and compressive values for the uniaxial elastic limit.

   

1 2

, F I J   F

84

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Mohr-Coulomb and Drucker-Prager Criteria

85

slide-73
SLIDE 73

86

Ch.8. Plasticity

Summary

slide-74
SLIDE 74

1

2

3

1

x

2

x

3

x

1

x

2

x

3

x

1

x

2

x

3

x

11

13

12

22

23

21

33

32

31

 The principal stress directions correspond to the set of axes that make

the shear stress components vanish when the stress components are referred to this system.

 The normal stress components in the

principal planes are the principal stresses.

 Mean stress:  Mean pressure:  A spherical or hydrostatic state of stress:

Summary

 

1 2 3

              

 1   2   3

   

1 2 3

1 1 1 3 3 3

m ii

Tr           

m

p   

1 2 3

    

   1

87

slide-75
SLIDE 75

 The Cauchy stress tensor can be split into:  Stress invariants:

Summary (cont’d)

sph

     

:

sph m

   1 dev

m

        1

spherical stress tensor: stress deviator tensor:

 

1 1 2 3 ii

I Tr          

 

 

2 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 3

1 : 2 I I              

 

3

det I  

1 1 ii

J I   

 

 

2 2 1 2

1 1 1 2 : 2 2 2

ij ji

J I I        

 

 

3 3 1 1 2 3

1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3

ij jk ki

J I I I I Tr             

 

1

I Tr     

2 2 1

1 : 2 I I       

 

 

 

3

1 det 3

ij jk ki

I           

1 1

J I    

2 2 1

1 2 J I    

 

2 2

1 2 : 2 I I         

3 3 1

1 3 J I   

1 2

3I I   

 

 

 

3 3

1 1 3 3 3

ij jk ki

I I Tr                    

88

slide-76
SLIDE 76

 Effective stress:  Principal stress space or

Haigh–Westergaard stress space:

 Normal octahedral stress:  Shear octahedral stress:

Summary (cont’d)

' 2

3 3 3 2 2

ij ij

J           ´: ´

1 2 3

    

 

1 1, 1, ,1 3

T

 n

1

3

  • ct

m

I    

 

1 2 2

2 3

  • ct

J   

89

slide-77
SLIDE 77

 Any point in space is unambiguously defined by the three invariants:

Summary (cont’d)

The projection of the principal stress space on the octahedral plane results in the division of the plane into six spaces: FEASIBLE WORK SPACE

90

slide-78
SLIDE 78

 Phenomenological behaviour:

 Plastic strain  Hardening  Bauschinger Effect

 Elastoplastic materials are

characterized by:

 Lack of unicity in the stress-strain relationship.  A nonlinear stress-strain relationship.  The existence of permanent (or plastic) strain during a loading / unloading

cycle.

Summary (cont’d)

Perfectly Plastic Material

94

slide-79
SLIDE 79

 1D Incremental Theory:

 Additive decomposition of strain:  Hardening variable:  Yield stress, :  Yield function:

Summary (cont’d)

e p

    

e

E   

where

 

p

d sign d    

such that and d 

p

 

f

f

d H d    

f e

H       HARDENING LAW hardening parameter

   

,

f

F       

 

, F    ELASTOPLASTIC STATE ELASTIC STATE

 

, F   

95

slide-80
SLIDE 80

 1D Incremental Theory (cont’d):

 Space of admissible stresses  Constitutive Equation:  ELASTIC REGIME:  ELASTOPLASTIC REGIME: – UNLOADING  ELASTOPLASTIC REGIME: – PLASTIC LOADING

Summary (cont’d)

Space of admissible stresses

 

 

, F

  

          E E E R

 E d E d   

 

; , dF

     E d E d   

 

, F   

 

, F   

 

, F   

 

; , dF

     E

ep

d E d    Elastoplastic tangent modulus

ep

EH E E H    

96

slide-81
SLIDE 81

 1D Incremental Theory (cont’d):

 Uniaxial Stress-Strain Curve

Summary (cont’d)

ELASTIC REGIME ELASTOPLASTIC REGIME

d E d   

ep

d E d   

97

slide-82
SLIDE 82

 1D Incremental Theory (cont’d):

 Role of the hardening parameter

Summary (cont’d)

Plasticity with strain hardening Lineal elasticity Perfect plasticity Perfect plasticity Plasticity with strain softening

98

slide-83
SLIDE 83

 3D Incremental Theory: generalization of the 1D incremental theory.

The same concepts are used:

 Additive decomposition of strain:  Hardening variable:  Yield function:

Summary (cont’d)

1 : e

 

 C

e p

    

where

d  

 

0,    with

 

,

p

G d        

FLOW RULE: plastic potential function plastic multiplier

     

,

f

F        

 

, F    ELASTOPLASTIC STATE ELASTIC STATE

 

, F   



equivalent uniaxial stress

99

slide-84
SLIDE 84

 3D Incremental Theory (cont’d):

Plus, additional ones are added:

 Loading - unloading conditions (Kuhn-Tucker conditions):  Consistency conditions:

If , then

Summary (cont’d)

   

, , F F         

F F      

 

, F   

 

, F    

0; 0; 0; 0;

p

F dF F dF F dF            

LOADING PLASTIC LOADING impossible

100

slide-85
SLIDE 85

 3D Incremental Theory (cont’d):

 Constitutive Equation:  ELASTIC REGIME:  ELASTOPLASTIC REGIME: – UNLOADING  ELASTOPLASTIC REGIME: – PLASTIC LOADING

Summary (cont’d)

 E

 

; , dF

     E

 

, F   

 

; , dF

     E Elastoplastic constitutive tangent tensor

 

, F   

 

, F   

: d d    C : d d    C :

ep

d d    C

 

: : : :

ep

G F F G H              C C C C C C C C C     

101

slide-86
SLIDE 86

 The yield surface is the external boundary of the elastic domain.

Summary (cont’d)

   

1 2 3

, , F I J J     F

 

1 1 2 3 ii

I Tr          

2 2 1

1 2 J I    

 

2 2

1 2 : 2 I I         

3 3 1

1 3 J I   

1 2

3I I   

 

 

 

3 3

1 1 3 3 3

ij jk ki

I I Tr                    

with

1 2 3

    

102

slide-87
SLIDE 87

 Yield criteria:

 Von Mises Criterion  Tresca Criterion

Summary (cont’d)

 

2

3

e

F J      

3 2

e

  • ct

      

1 3 e

F        

 

2 3

( ) , F J J     F    

2

F J   F

103

slide-88
SLIDE 88

 Yield criteria:

 Mohr-Coulomb Criterion  Drucker-Prager Criterion

Summary (cont’d)

     

1 3 1 3 sin

2 cos F c             

internal friction angle cohesion

   

1 2 3

, , F I J J     F

   

1/2 2

3

m

F J            

1 2 3 1

2sin 6 cos ; ; 3 3 3 3 sin 3 3 sin

m

I c                  

   

1 2

, F I J   F

3 cotan c 

104