central valley program improvement act section 3408 h
play

Central Valley Program Improvement Act Section 3408 (h) Land - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Central Valley Program Improvement Act Section 3408 (h) Land Retirement Program U.S. Dept. of the Interior CVPIA Land Retirement An Interagency Team Robert H. May USBR Program Manager Robert H. May USBR Program Manager Stephen Lee, USBR


  1. Central Valley Program Improvement Act Section 3408 (h) Land Retirement Program U.S. Dept. of the Interior

  2. CVPIA Land Retirement An Interagency Team Robert H. May USBR Program Manager Robert H. May USBR Program Manager Stephen Lee, USBR Hydrologist Stephen Lee, USBR Hydrologist Bea Olsen, FWS Wildlife Biologist Bea Olsen, FWS Wildlife Biologist Steve Laymon, BLM Site Coordinator Steve Laymon, BLM Site Coordinator

  3. Land Land Retirement Retirement Program Program Goals Goals � Reduce agricultural drainage � Reduce agricultural drainage � Restore upland wildlife habitat � Restore upland wildlife habitat � Acquire CVP water when feasible � Acquire CVP water when feasible

  4. Lands are retired from irrigated agricultural Lands are retired from irrigated agricultural Lands are retired from irrigated agricultural Lands are retired from irrigated agricultural production as one means to reduce drainage production as one means to reduce drainage production as one means to reduce drainage production as one means to reduce drainage Retired lands are those taken out of Retired lands are those taken out of problems. problems. problems. problems. Can these lands be restored to safe upland Can these lands be restored to safe upland Can these lands be restored to safe upland Can these lands be restored to safe upland irrigated agricultural production as one irrigated agricultural production as one w ildlife habitats? w ildlife habitats? w ildlife habitats? w ildlife habitats? means to reduce drainage problems. means to reduce drainage problems.

  5. Five Year Land Retirement Demonstration Project Demonstration Project clearly shows that retiring land from irrigated agriculture results in numerous physical and biological benefits .

  6. Acquisitions Accomplished for the CVPIA Land Retirement Demonstration Project Tranquillity Site = 2090 acres Atwell Island Site = 6200 acres

  7. The shallow water table for all wells monitored showed an average declining trend of 1.2 feet/year. Groundwater monitoring confirmed conceptual & numerical models predicting a declining shallow water-table in response to land retirement.

  8. Declining Shallow Groundwater Trend Traquillity Site Hydrographs: Land Retirement Demonstration Project Wells 15A1, 16M1 Tranquillity Site Hydrographs: Wells15M1, 16A1 Date May-00 May-01 May-02 May-03 May-04 Aug-99 Nov-99 Aug-00 Nov-00 Aug-01 Nov-01 Aug-02 Nov-02 Aug-03 Nov-03 Aug-04 Feb-00 Feb-01 Feb-02 Feb-03 Feb-04 Depth to Groundwater from Land Surface (ft) 0 -2 Well 15M1 -4 -6 Well 16A1 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18

  9. Depth to Shallow Groundwater Number of acres within 7 feet of land surface October 2001 October 2001 October 1999 October 1999 34 acres 34 acres 600 acres 600 acres

  10. Groundwater Quality Groundwater Quality � Dominant ions are Sodium Sulfate. � Highly saline shallow groundwater ranges of 11,000 – 76,000 uS/cm. � High Se Concentrations 5 – 5300 ug/l, mean 2100 ug/l. (EPA surface water criteria 5 ug/l). � High Salinity and trace element concentrations in shallow groundwater results of evaporation from shallow water-table.

  11. Soil selenium moderately elevated, but w/in range of western clay & silty-clay soils. � Tranquillity Clay Predominant soil type � Slow permeability � High shrink-swell potential � Selenium in top foot decreased over 5 yrs � Soluble Se increase in substrata due to oxidation associated with declining water-table

  12. Comparison of Mean Baseline Selenium Concentrations in Soil 4.5 4 4 Mean Se Conc. (mg/kg) 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.05 1.5 1 0.5 0.34 0.14 0.12 0.5 0 Atwell Island Tranquillity Lillis/Lethent Threshold Joaquin Soil Series Western Soil Series Valley Toxicity Typical Soils San Site

  13. Fi gur e S-1 Salinity (EC5) Trends in Top Foot of Soil Salinity (EC5) Trends in Top Foot of Soil Westl ands Land Reti r ement Demonstr ati on Ar ea EC5 T r ends i n T op Foot of Soi l f r om 1999 to 2004 9 � 1999 8 � 2002 7 � 2004 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 10B1 10D1 10K3 10L3 10M3 10N3 15F3 15C3 15D3 15E3 15J1 15K3 15L3 15M3 15N3 15O1 16A3 16B3 16G3 16H3 16I3 16J3 16O3 16P3 Sa mpl i ng Si t e Loc a t i ons Soil Sampling Site � No evidence of upward movement of water or salt into surface soils. � Over 50% of salts leached from the 0-1 ft zone (most leaching from 0-8 in.).

  14. Surface Ponding � No surface water ponding due to extensive network of dessication cracks in clay soils � Soils cracked to depth of 3-5 ft. Cracks not swell shut during study � Depth to moisture did not exceed 12” during 1999-2004 � Depth to moisture averaged 25” March 2005 � No groundwater recharge from rainfall � Site vegetation mostly shallow rooted annual grasses

  15. Habitat Restoration Study Monitoring Results Show Biota Selenium Levels � Are within performance standards, � Slightly above those expected from area with non-seleniferous soils � An order of magnitude lower than those found at Kesterson NWR � Atwell Island levels are lower than those at Tranquillity � Slight decline in levels on non-irrigated sites

  16. Se Levels in Deer Mouse ( Peromyscus maniculatus) n= 10 10 11 16 17 Se concentration (mg/kg) A = range of geometric means of Se concentrations in deer mouse bodies collected at Kesterson NWR 1988 -1992. B = background Se level in small mammal bodies from non-seleniferous Soils in western US p =0.01

  17. Selenium Concentration Levels Selenium Concentration Levels � All Selenium levels measured are below levels of EPA � All Selenium levels measured are below levels of EPA & USFWS concern for terrestrial biota. & USFWS concern for terrestrial biota. � Selenium concentrations in all biota did not change � Selenium concentrations in all biota did not change significantly over the 5– –year study period except for a year study period except for a significantly over the 5 slight decline on lands where irrigation was removed.. . slight decline on lands where irrigation was removed.

  18. Pygmy Blue Butterfly Increased wildlife diversity & abundance on retired agricultural lands. Gopher Snake Short Eared Owls

  19. Restoration Results Restoration Results Non- -native species dominate. native species dominate. Non Relatively few non- -imprinted imprinted Relatively few non natives become established. natives become established. Successful establishment of of Successful establishment Tranquillity perennials but with low perennials but with low diversity. diversity. Atwell Island At Tranquillity 8 native species were observed in the restored areas.

  20. Restoration Restoration Challenges to Challenges to Native Vegetation Native Vegetation Establishment Establishment Typical 5-hook Bassia at Atwell Island � Large amount of weed seed � Large amount of weed seed in seed bank & adjacent fields in seed bank & adjacent fields � Low amounts of native seed � Low amounts of native seed in seed bank in seed bank � Low rainfall years & � Low rainfall years & changed hydrology changed hydrology In 2005 7’Black Mustard � Effects of soil types & � Effects of soil types & at Tranquillity recent agricultural activities recent agricultural activities

  21. Establish 9 acres of Native Plant Nursery because existing upland habitats are greatly limited. � Amplify seed stock. � Determine species for restoration strategies. � Investigate efficient cultivation. � Assess species’ ability for mechanized production & harvest � 98 species planted from over 100 sites

  22. Seed Augmentation by USDA – NRCS Plant Material Center Lockeford, CA

  23. Why Restoration of Why Restoration of Native Vegetation? Native Vegetation? � Self sustaining � Self sustaining � Low water requirement � Low water requirement � Low maintenance cost � Low maintenance cost once established once established � Provides wildlife habitat � Provides wildlife habitat

  24. Restoration of retired lands can assist the recovery of local species and enhance existing upland wildlife habitat by providing structure & composition. Two year hedgerow with nesting Loggerhead Shrikes & other resident & migratory species

  25. Knowing listed species life requirements helps in planning restoration work Existing native upland Four-year old hedgerow habitat. creates similar low density shrubland.

  26. Some Restoration Lessons Learned Drip irrigation is too labor intensive. Perennial shrubs grow in hedgerows on either side of a furrow created wide enough to plant both sides with range land drill. Furrow irrigated twice in year of planting only.

  27. Habitat Demonstration Management Units for Wildlife Benefits Hedgerow trapping tumbleweeds Increased numbers of agricultural beneficial insects.

  28. Utilize TSC Expertise In Growth-form & Herbicide Trials like this Late Season Species Trial. For Testing Planting Techniques of Strips of Natives in Retired Alfalfa Fields.

  29. Other Restoration Trials & Lessons Recreating topography Best use of fire Seeding Rates & Methods

  30. Water Management on site Water Management on site and for other CVPIA purposes and for other CVPIA purposes

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend