cea in policies and plans uk case studies
play

CEA in Policies and Plans: UK Case Studies Dr Lourdes M Cooper p - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CEA in Policies and Plans: UK Case Studies Dr Lourdes M Cooper p Senior Environmental Consultant, Hyder Consulting Legislative Requirements for Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment European Strategic


  1. CEA in Policies and Plans: UK Case Studies Dr Lourdes M Cooper p Senior Environmental Consultant, Hyder Consulting

  2. Legislative Requirements for Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment • European Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive (2001/42/EC) ( ) ( ) • Environmental Assessment of Plans and Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations (2004) • Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act (2004)

  3. SA and SEA SA and SEA • SA and SEA are distinct processes • SEA focuses on environmental issues • SA considers social, economic and environmental issues • SA objectives-led approach • Combined SA/SEA process

  4. SA Process Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stage A: Scoping Identify other PPPs and key receptors; Document current status for each key receptor Stage B: • Test plan objectives against SA objectives, Develop and refine Develop and refine highlight cumulative effects highlight cumulative effects options and assess • Assess cumulative effects of options; • Predict and assess cumulative effects of the effects plan policies and proposals on key receptors receptors Stage C: Prepare SA Report cumulative effects in transparent and Report p accessible way and explain accessible way and explain Stage D: Consulting and Use consultation process to help predict and Decision-making g assess cumulative effects Monitor cumulative effects using indicators Stage E: Monitoring and Implementation Implementation

  5. SA Practice Case Study: Seven Sisters Neighbourhood Plan SA Neighbourhood Plan SA • Promote regeneration and guide future development – spatial framework development – spatial framework • Cumulative effects of proposals against SA Objectives g j • Overall positive impacts: provide new green spaces, improve access, promote sustainable modes of promote sustainable modes of transport (cycling and walking) • Negative impacts on employment and Negative impacts on employment and businesses in some areas and use of environmental resources

  6. Appraisal Matrix: Cumulative Effects of Proposals Specific location proposals Cumulativ SASA Objectives e Impact St C C Br G Apex Er Pa Sir Arena, Vale Ne A he ul un ou House mi ig Fra Crusad Rd w nn nn st st ve ve sw sw rle rle & & ne ne nt nt der der er & er & Empl Empl Ri Ri ’s nu rt ick y Stone Pa on ick Omega oym ve ts R Pa Pl bridge rk Pa Me ent r Pa oa rk ac Road rk ss Area rk d e er 1 1 T To reduce crime, disorder and fear of crime d i di d d f f i + + + + + 0 + + + + 0 + + 2 To improve levels of educational attainment for all age 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 groups and all sectors of society. 3 To improve physical and mental health for all and reduce y + + + + + + 0 + + + + 0 0 + health inequalities. + 4 To provide greater choice, quality and diversity of housing + 0 + 0 + + + 0 + + 0 0 + across all tenures to meet the needs of residents. 5 5 To protect and enhance community spirit and cohesion To protect and enhance community spirit and cohesion. 0 + 0 + + + + 0 0 0 0 0 +

  7. Case Study: Development Brief Silverstone Circuit Masterplan SA • Sit Site covers over 300 ha. 300 h • Development brief to provide guidance on development of site • 24 Policies • Potential cumulative effects of proposed development: – Positive impact on social and economic SA Objectives – Negative impact on air quality, noise, fuel use, waste generation, energy consumption and biodiversity consumption and biodiversity but policies to reduce impacts.

  8. Findings Findings • SA approach – integrated appraisal where social, environmental and economic dimensions of i t l d i di i f sustainability are considered • SA is an objectives led approach – Plan objectives, options and policies/proposals assessed against SA g objectives • Pragmatic, can be done by planners, easily P i b d b l il understood by stakeholders and decision makers • Needs to assess cumulative effects on key receptors more fully

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend