CCLHO-CHEAC Chronic Disease Prevention Leadership Project Survey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CCLHO-CHEAC Chronic Disease Prevention Leadership Project Survey

Preliminary Results October 10, 2012

Survey Highlights

• 42 responses from city and county health

departments

• Response rate: 70%
• Focus areas
• Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB)
• Safe Routes to School (SRTS)

2

Goal: Improve healthy nutrition for all Californians by reducing consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.

3

Activities to reduce SSB consumption

4

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Implementation of sales ban, size limitation, sales tax or pricing policies Working with corner stores/retailers Assessment of community perceptions Media campaign Healthy vending machine and/or procurement policies within LHD Provision of consumption data Healthy vending machine and/or procurement policies outside LHD Provider education School wellness/nutrition policies strengthened Community education Rethink Your Drink campaign Have/Developing activity Interested Not Planning

5

Partners working to reduce SSB consumption

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%

No partners Local youth Local Coalition/Collaborative Senior/Disabled Housing and Centers Funders Retail outlets Local Foundations Local Universities/Colleges Faith-based organizations Subcontracting agencies/organizations UC Cooperative Extension Parent groups Resident Leaders Food banks Sports and recreation programs Local Government (elected) officials Grassroots/Community-based organizations Hospitals, healthcare providers and local medical associations Workplaces Other organizations that serve youth

Percent of LHDs reporting

6

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%

Network for a Healthy California Community Transformation Grant (CTG) Local jurisdiction funding State Nutrition Assistance Programs Kaiser Foundation Hospitals /Kaiser Community Benefit Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) The California Endowment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) First 5 Other private foundation funds Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Department of Education (DOE) Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Project REACH No funding

Percent of LHDs reporting

Reported funding sources - SSB

Reported Barriers – SSB Activities

7

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%

Beverage contracts Lack of enforcement LHD media limitations Time intensive to build partnerships/efforts Lack of readiness to start efforts Awarness of the issues around SSB Social norms strong Lack of agency leadership County vending policies/monopoly Lack of staff Industry lobbyists Political Climate Lack of funding

Percent of LHDs reporting

Goal: Increase daily physical activity

• pportunities for all Californians through

promotion of safe routes to school and expanded efforts to create walkable communities and active transport.

8

Activities related to SRTS

9

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Healthy Urban Design Task Force that incorporate SRTS Complete Streets Task Force that incorporates SRTS Provider education Participation in SRTS campaigns (Local Jurisdictions/Districts) Incorporation of SRTS-related support language in County /City General Plan Conducting mapping assessments Participation in SRTS campaigns (County/Unincorporated areas) School-based policies that promote SRTS - infrastructure changes Provision of data Partnership with other sectors advocating for expansion of SRTS concept Community education Have/Developing activity Interested Not Planning

10

Partners working to implement SRTS programs and policies

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%

Air Quality Management District Faith-based organizations No partners Local coalitions Sports and recreation programs Workplaces Local Foundations Local Universities/Colleges Subcontracting agencies/organizations Other organizations that serve youth Resident Leaders Local Government (elected) officials Public Works Planning agencies Grassroots/Community-based organizations Parent groups Transportation agencies School districts

11

Reported funding sources - SRTS

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0%

No funding Unsure Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Project REACH Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Gas tax money Local Congestion Management funding Partnerships with funded entities The California Endowment Other private foundation funds Department of Education (DOE) Kaiser Foundation Hospitals /Kaiser Community Benefit Network for a Healthy California Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Office of Traffic Safety Cal Trans Grants Local jurisdiction funding Community Transformation Grant (CTG)

Percent of LHDs reporting

Reported Barriers – SRTS Activities

12

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% Liability concerns Turnover of champions Lack of agency leadership Behavior change issues Citywide school assignments not conducive to walking/biking Physical activity not a priority Lack of effective partnerhsips LHD not previously involved Safety concerns Lack of staff Political Climate Lack of funding

Percent of LHDs reporting

Collaborative Efforts

• 79% of LHDs participate on coalitions that

include SSB consumption reduction efforts

• 64% of LHDs participate in SRTS coalitions
• 69% of LHDs participate in coalitions to expand

SRTS efforts or built environment changes

13

Survey Summary

• Statewide inventory of programs and policies

related to SSB and SRTS

• Coalition participation
• Opportunities for partnership & sharing best

practices

14

Next Steps

• Examine need/opportunity for synergy
• Determine how best to address funding and

political barriers

• Elevate these issues
• Going beyond Rethink Your Drink education to

focus on environmental approaches

• Explore ways to chip away at “political

resistance”

15

Survey Design and Analysis Questions

Please contact Danyte S. Mockus, PhD, MPH Epidemiologist, Epidemiology and Program Evaluation Branch County of Riverside Department of Public Health 951.358.5063 Email: dmockus@rivcocha.org

16

17

18

64% 26% 10%

Yes No Unsure

LHD Coalition Participation

69% 24% 7%

Yes No Unsure

LHD participation in a coalition focused

• n expansion of SRTS or other efforts to

promote physical activity through changes in the built environment LHD participation in SRTS coalition

LHD SSB Coalition Participation

19

79% 19% 2%

Yes No Unsure