category theory
play

Category Theory in Foundations of Computer Science Andrzej Tarlecki - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

(Universal Algebra and) Category Theory in Foundations of Computer Science Andrzej Tarlecki Institute of Informatics Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Mechanics University of Warsaw office: 4750 http://www.mimuw.edu.pl/~tarlecki


  1. (Universal Algebra and) Category Theory in Foundations of Computer Science Andrzej Tarlecki Institute of Informatics Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Mechanics University of Warsaw office: 4750 http://www.mimuw.edu.pl/~tarlecki phone: (48)(22)(55) 44475, 20443 tarlecki@mimuw.edu.pl This course: http://www.mimuw.edu.pl/~tarlecki/teaching/ct/ Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 1 -

  2. Universal algebra and category theory: basic ideas, notions and some results • Algebras, homomorphisms, equations: basic definitions and results • Categories; examples and simple categorical definitions • Limits and colimits • Functors and natural transformations • Adjunctions • Cartesian closed categories • Monads • Institutions (abstract model theory, abstract specification theory) BUT: Tell me what you want to learn! Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 2 -

  3. Literature Plenty of standard textbooks But this will be roughly based on: • D.T. Sannella, A. Tarlecki. Foundations of Algebraic Specifications and Formal Program Development . Springer, 2012. − Chap. 1: Universal algebra − Chap. 2: Simple equational specifications − Chap. 3: Category theory Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 3 -

  4. One motivation Software systems (modules, programs, databases. . . ): sets of data with operations on them • Disregarding: code, efficiency, robustness, reliability, . . . • Focusing on: CORRECTNESS Category theory Universal algebra from rough analogy A language to further abstract away from the standard notions of univer- module interface ❀ signature sal algebra, to deal with their numer- module ❀ algebra ous variants needed in foundations of module specification ❀ class of algebras computer science. Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 4 -

  5. Signatures Algebraic signature : Σ = ( S, Ω) • sort names : S • operation names, classified by arities and result sorts : Ω = � Ω w,s � w ∈ S ∗ ,s ∈ S Alternatively: Σ = ( S, Ω , arity , sort ) with sort names S , operation names Ω , and arity and result sort functions arity : Ω → S ∗ and sort : Ω → S . • f : s 1 × . . . × s n → s stands for s 1 , . . . , s n , s ∈ S and f ∈ Ω s 1 ...s n ,s Compare the two notions Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 5 -

  6. Fix a signature Σ = ( S, Ω) for a while. Algebras • Σ -algebra : A = ( | A | , � f A � f ∈ Ω ) • carrier sets: | A | = �| A | s � s ∈ S • operations : f A : | A | s 1 × . . . × | A | s n → | A | s , for f : s 1 × . . . × s n → s • the class of all Σ -algebras: Alg (Σ) Can Alg (Σ) be empty? Finite? Can A ∈ Alg (Σ) have empty carriers? Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 6 -

  7. Subalgebras • for A ∈ Alg (Σ) , a Σ -subalgebra A sub ⊆ A is given by subset | A sub | ⊆ | A | closed under the operations: − for f : s 1 × . . . × s n → s and a 1 ∈ | A sub | s 1 , . . . , a n ∈ | A sub | s n , f A sub ( a 1 , . . . , a n ) = f A ( a 1 , . . . , a n ) • for A ∈ Alg (Σ) and X ⊆ | A | , the subalgebra of A genereted by X , � A � X , is the least subalgebra of A that contains X . • A ∈ Alg (Σ) is reachable if � A � ∅ coincides with A . For any A ∈ Alg (Σ) and X ⊆ | A | , � A � X exists. Fact: Proof (idea): • generate the generated subalgebra from X by closing it under operations in A ; or • the intersection of any family of subalgebras of A is a subalgebra of A . Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 7 -

  8. Homomorphisms • for A, B ∈ Alg (Σ) , a Σ -homomorphism h : A → B is a function h : | A | → | B | that preserves the operations: − for f : s 1 × . . . × s n → s and a 1 ∈ | A | s 1 , . . . , a n ∈ | A | s n , h s ( f A ( a 1 , . . . , a n )) = f B ( h s 1 ( a 1 ) , . . . , h s n ( a n )) Given a homomorphism h : A → B and subalgebras A sub of A and B sub of B , Fact: the image of A sub under h , h ( A sub ) , is a subalgebra of B , and the coimage of B sub under h , h − 1 ( B sub ) , is a subalgebra of A . Fact: Given a homomorphism h : A → B and X ⊆ | A | , h ( � A � X ) = � B � h ( X ) . If two homomorphisms h 1 , h 2 : A → B coincide on X ⊆ | A | , then they Fact: coincide on � A � X . Identity function on the carrier of A ∈ Alg (Σ) is a homomorphism Fact: id A : A → A . Composition of homomorphisms h : A → B and g : B → C is a homomorphism h ; g : A → C . Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 8 -

  9. Isomorphisms • for A, B ∈ Alg (Σ) , a Σ -isomorphism is any Σ -homomorphism i : A → B that has an inverse , i.e., a Σ -homomorphism i − 1 : B → A such that i ; i − 1 = id A and i − 1 ; i = id B . • Σ -algebras are isomorphic if there exists an isomorphism between them. Fact: A Σ -homomorphism is a Σ -isomorphism iff it is bijective (“1-1” and “onto”). Fact: Identities are isomorphisms, and any composition of isomorphisms is an isomorphism. Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 9 -

  10. Congruences • for A ∈ Alg (Σ) , a Σ -congruence on A is an equivalence ≡ ⊆ | A | × | A | that is closed under the operations: − for f : s 1 × . . . × s n → s and a 1 , a ′ 1 ∈ | A | s 1 , . . . , a n , a ′ n ∈ | A | s n , if a 1 ≡ s 1 a ′ 1 , . . . , a n ≡ s n a ′ n then f A ( a 1 , . . . , a n ) ≡ s f A ( a ′ 1 , . . . , a ′ n ) . Fact: For any relation R ⊆ | A | × | A | on the carrier of a Σ -algebra A , there exists the least congruence on A that conatins R . For any Σ -homomorphism h : A → B , the kernel of h , K ( h ) ⊆ | A | × | A | , Fact: where a K ( h ) a ′ iff h ( a ) = h ( a ′ ) , is a Σ -congruence on A . Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 10 -

  11. Quotients • for A ∈ Alg (Σ) and Σ -congruence ≡ ⊆ | A | × | A | on A , the quotient algebra A/ ≡ is built in the natural way on the equivalence classes of ≡ : − for s ∈ S , | A/ ≡| s = { [ a ] ≡ | a ∈ | A | s } , with [ a ] ≡ = { a ′ ∈ | A | s | a ≡ a ′ } − for f : s 1 × . . . × s n → s and a 1 ∈ | A | s 1 , . . . , a n ∈ | A | s n , f A/ ≡ ([ a 1 ] ≡ , . . . , [ a n ] ≡ ) = [ f A ( a 1 , . . . , a n )] ≡ Fact: The above is well-defined; moreover, the natural map that assigns to every element its equivalence class is a Σ -homomorphisms [ ] ≡ : A → A/ ≡ . Given two Σ -congruences ≡ and ≡ ′ on A , ≡ ⊆ ≡ ′ iff there exists a Fact: Σ -homomorphism h : A/ ≡ → A/ ≡ ′ such that [ ] ≡ ; h = [ ] ≡ ′ . Fact: For any Σ -homomorphism h : A → B , A/K ( h ) is isomorphic with h ( A ) . Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 11 -

  12. Products • for A i ∈ Alg (Σ) , i ∈ I , the product of � A i � i ∈I , � i ∈I A i is built in the natural way on the Cartesian product of the carriers of A i , i ∈ I : − for s ∈ S , | � i ∈I A i | s = � i ∈I | A i | s − for f : s 1 × . . . × s n → s and a 1 ∈ | � i ∈I A i | s 1 , . . . , a n ∈ | � i ∈I A i | s n , for i ∈ I , f � i ∈I A i ( a 1 , . . . , a n )( i ) = f A i ( a 1 ( i ) , . . . , a n ( i )) For any family � A i � i ∈I of Σ -algebras, projections π i ( a ) = a ( i ) , where i ∈ I Fact: and a ∈ � i ∈I | A i | , are Σ -homomorphisms π i : � i ∈I A i → A i . Define the product of the empty family of Σ -algebras. When the projection π i is an isomorphism? Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 12 -

  13. Terms Consider an S -sorted set X of variables. • terms t ∈ | T Σ ( X ) | are built using variables X , constants and operations from Ω in the usual way: | T Σ ( X ) | is the least set such that − X ⊆ | T Σ ( X ) | − for f : s 1 × . . . × s n → s and t 1 ∈ | T Σ ( X ) | s 1 , . . . , t n ∈ | T Σ ( X ) | s n , f ( t 1 , . . . , t n ) ∈ | T Σ ( X ) | s • for any Σ -algebra A and valuation v : X → | A | , the value t A [ v ] of a term t ∈ | T Σ ( X ) | in A under v is determined inductively: − x A [ v ] = v s ( x ) , for x ∈ X s , s ∈ S − ( f ( t 1 , . . . , t n )) A [ v ] = f A (( t 1 ) A [ v ] , . . . , ( t n ) A [ v ]) , for f : s 1 × . . . × s n → s and t 1 ∈ | T Σ ( X ) | s 1 , . . . , t n ∈ | T Σ ( X ) | s n Above and in the following: assuming unambiguous “parsing” of terms! Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 13 -

  14. Term algebras Consider an S -sorted set X of variables. • The term algebra T Σ ( X ) has the set of terms as the carrier and operations defined “syntactically”: − for f : s 1 × . . . × s n → s and t 1 ∈ | T Σ ( X ) | s 1 , . . . , t n ∈ | T Σ ( X ) | s n , f T Σ ( X ) ( t 1 , . . . , t n ) = f ( t 1 , . . . , t n ) . For any S -sorted set X of variables, Σ -algebra A and valuation v : X → | A | , Fact: there is a unique Σ -homomorphism v # : T Σ ( X ) → A that extends v . Moreover, for t ∈ | T Σ ( X ) | , v # ( t ) = t A [ v ] . id X ֒ →| T Σ ( X ) | ✲ | T Σ ( X ) | T Σ ( X ) X ❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍ | v # | Set S Alg (Σ) ∃ ! v # v ❄ ❄ ❥ | A | A Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 14 -

  15. One simple consequence Fact: For any S -sorted sets X , Y and Z (of variables) and substitutions θ 1 : X → | T Σ ( Y ) | and θ 2 : Y → | T Σ ( Z ) | θ # 1 ; θ # 2 = ( θ 1 ; θ # 2 ) # ✩ id X ֒ →| T Σ ( X ) | ✲ | T Σ ( X ) | T Σ ( X ) X ❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍ Set S Alg (Σ) θ # ∃ ! θ # θ 1 1 1 ❥ ❍ ❄ ❄ id X ֒ →| T Σ ( Y ) | ∃ ! ( θ 1 ; θ # ✲ 2 ) # | T Σ ( Y ) | T Σ ( Y ) Y ❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍ θ # ∃ ! θ # θ 2 2 2 ✪ ❥ ❍ ❄ ❄ ✛ | T Σ ( Z ) | T Σ ( Z ) Andrzej Tarlecki: Category Theory, 2018 - 15 -

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend