Case Study: y: View-Ma Master er Site, e, Bea eavert erton, Or - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

case study y view ma master er site e bea eavert erton or
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Case Study: y: View-Ma Master er Site, e, Bea eavert erton, Or - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Case Study: y: View-Ma Master er Site, e, Bea eavert erton, Or Oregon Henning Larsen, RG Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 1 View-Master Site, Beaverton Oregon Site Site Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Case Study: y: View-Ma Master er Site, e, Bea eavert erton, Or Oregon

Henning Larsen, RG

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

View-Master Site, Beaverton Oregon

Site

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 2

Site

slide-3
SLIDE 3

View-Master Campus Circa 1960s

  • TCE released via waste disposal, drain fields, vapor degreaser
  • 1,200-1,500 ug/L TCE - Industrial Supply Well
  • Up to 25,000 Workers Exposed; 1,000 for >5yrs
  • Epi Study identified increased incidence of cancer

TCE Releases at the View-Master Site

Water Tower Demolition Factory Work

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

28,000 21,000 9,000 65,000 2,800

2/ND/6 7/3/16 86/524/50 62/215/100 1/6/9 TCE Source Areas TCE (ug/L) Facility Boundary TCE/cis-DCE/Total Cyanide (ug/L)

28,000 86/524/50

View-Master Site, Beaverton Oregon

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 5

Regional Structural Geology

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 6

A Tualatin Mtns A’

800 ft

Portland Basin

380 ft 275 ft

Fanno Creek

160 ft Anticline 600 ft

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 7

East-West Cross-Section

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Columbia River Basalt Flows Identified at the Site

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Palouse Canyon, the Sentinel Bluffs flows of the Grand Ronde Formation are seen on the bottom, covered by the Ginkgo Flow of the Wanapum Basalt.

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 9

Columbia River Basalts in their Native Habitat

slide-10
SLIDE 10

U U U D D D

Block “B” Block “c” Block “E” Block “D”

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA - September 2019 10

Hydrogeologic Blocks of Columbia River Basalt Group: View-Master Site

C’ C D’

D

E’ E

Discharge of saline groundwater

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 11

Willamette Silt CRB Flow Top

East-West Site Cross-Section

TCE Plume

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 12

Willamette Silt CRB Flow Top

North-South Cross-Section

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 13

Northwest-Southeast Cross-Section

Willamette Silt CRB Flow Top

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 14

Basalt Well Spinner Logs Distribution of Flow in CRB Sheet Flow Basalts

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 15

1.5 ft drawdown contour within Block E

No Response In Block C

No Response in Block D

Extraction Well

4 ft drawdown

Estimated 120 gpm groundwater inflow based on average gain of Fanno Creek

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 16

High lateral and Vertical conductivity and hydraulic connection within Blocks

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 17

130 ft vertical separation between DMW-2A and DMW-2C

Strong Vertical Hydraulic Connection

  • Head similarities
  • Deep contaminant

migration

slide-18
SLIDE 18

NS 6,740/190 29/66 ND/ND 4/81 4,070/NA

TCE Plumes in CRBG-A

Highest concentration of last four events: 29/66 - TCE (ug/L)/ Total Cyanide (ug/L),

Estimated Capture Zone - 2001 FS Extraction Wells Average Flow – Initial/Current (gpm)

376/63 ND/8 ND ND 4,510 3,100 ND 12,000 1,280 1,540 6.5

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 18 10/5 5/0 100/54 90/62 5/0

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 21

Deeper Aquifer TCE Concentrations Block E

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Fractured Rock Training - Seattle, WA -September 2019 22

Interflow zones have high lateral conductivity and transmissivity, but offset by faults can disconnect zones in adjacent blocks Faults Act as Flow Barriers

  • No hydraulic response across inferred faults
  • Steep seasonal gradients

Faults Convey Water

  • Deep groundwater discharge to wetland and Fanno Creek
  • Discharge of contaminated groundwater to Koll Center Wetlands

Flow Within Blocks – Interflow zones are highly conductive within fault blocks and are inter- connected vertically (water tank) Pump and Treat Alone has limited success in remediating groundwater in this geologic setting

Conclusions