Case Study: Str e amlining I/ I Re pair s in Be r lin Char te - - PDF document

case study str e amlining i i re pair s in be r lin char
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Case Study: Str e amlining I/ I Re pair s in Be r lin Char te - - PDF document

4/19/2013 Case Study: Str e amlining I/ I Re pair s in Be r lin Char te r T ownship Pr e se nte d by: Ric h Gr ant, PE Age nda Disc ussion of the pr oble ms & the SAW I/ I E S = Asse t Manage me nt valuation


slide-1
SLIDE 1

4/19/2013 1

Case Study: Str e amlining I/ I Re pair s in Be r lin Char te r T

  • wnship

Pr e se nte d by: Ric h Gr ant, PE

Age nda

  • Disc ussion of the pr
  • ble ms & “the SAW”
  • I/ I E

valuation & SSE S = Asse t Manage me nt

  • Gr
  • undtr

uthing of Re sults

  • Ove r

all Re sult - $$ Savings for the T wp

  • L

e ssons L e ar ne d / Ke y Re c omme ndations

  • Que stions
slide-2
SLIDE 2

4/19/2013 2

Ke y Points

  • Colle c tion Syste m I/ I = Ve r

y E xpe nsive

  • Mass F

low Monitor ing: Save s Mone y

  • What we did that’s ne w
  • vs. tr

aditional data c olle c tion

  • $$OldWay (flow me te r

ing many e ve nts, BigCCT V) …Ne w way

  • Highly T

ar ge te d Constr uc tion save s mone y

T he Pr

  • ble ms – At a Glanc e
  • Colle c tion Syste m Asse ts: wate r

fille d

  • Ne w pe r

mit limits: De c e mbe r

2007

  • Pr

ior to De c . 2007, ammonia was r e por t only

  • Ne w limits we r

e har d to c onsiste ntly ac hie ve

  • May-Se pt – 1.4 mg/ L
  • Oc t-Nov – 5.1 mg/ L
slide-3
SLIDE 3

4/19/2013 3

Imme diate NPDE S Pe r mit Re qs

NPDES Permit Issued December 2007 New Ammonia Nitrogen Limit

‐WWTP not designed for NH3 treatment ‐Exceedences occurred immediately w permit ‐Capacity of this asset immediately impacted Clean cold water interferes with NH3 treatment

Upc oming NPDE S Pe r mit Re qs

MDEQ draft; revised September 20, 2012 Part 1.A.X(a number). Operation, Maintenance & Replacement/Asset Management The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities (i.e. sewer system, treatment works, as defined in Part 41 of Act 451, 1994 as amended, and control systems) which are installed or used by the permittee to operate the treatment works and sewer system and achieve and maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit (also see Part II.D.3 of this permit). The requirements of an asset management program listed below contain goals of effective performance, adequate funding, and adequate operator staffing and training. Asset management is a planning process that ensures gaining optimum value for each asset and providing the financial resources to rehabilitate and replace them when necessary; and typically includes five core elements which identify: the current state of the asset, the desired level of service (e.g., per the permit, or for the customer), the most critical asset(s) to sustain performance, the best life cycle cost, and the long term funding strategy to sustain service and performance. The permittee shall comply with the following Operation, Maintenance and Replacement (OM&R)/Asset Management program requirements (the permittee can choose to include the Operation and Maintenance Manual required under Part II.C.14 of this permit as part of this program):

  • a. Maintenance Staff. The permittee shall provide an adequate staff to carry out the operation, maintenance, repair, and testing functions required to ensure

compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. The level of staffing needed shall be determined taking into account the work involved in operating the sewer system and treatment works, planning for and conducting maintenance, and complying with this permit.

  • b. Collection System Map. Within __ months of the effective date of the permit, the permittee shall complete a map of the sewer collection system it owns and
  • perates. The map shall be of sufficient detail and at a scale to allow easy interpretation. The collection system information shown on the map shall be based on

current conditions and shall be kept up to date and available for review by the Department. Such map(s) shall include, but not be limited to the following: 1) All sanitary sewer lines and related manholes; 2) All combined sewer lines, related manholes, catch basins and CSO regulators; 3) All known or suspected connections between the sanitary sewer or combined sewer and storm drain systems; 4) All outfalls, including the treatment plant outfall(s), combined sewer treatment facility outfalls (RTBs), untreated CSOs, and any known SSOs; 5) All pump stations and force mains; 6) The wastewater treatment facility(ies), including all treatment process; 7) All surface waters (labeled); 8) Other major appurtenances such as invested siphons and air release valves; 9) A numbering system which uniquely identifies manholes, catch basins, overflow points, regulators and outfalls; 10) The scale and a north arrow; and 11) The pipe diameter, date of installation, type of material, distance between manholes, and the direction of flow. 12) The manhole interior material, GPS coordinates (optional), rim elevation, and invert elevations.

  • c. Inventory and assessment of fixed assets. Within __ months of the effective date of this permit, the permittee shall complete an inventory and assessment of
  • perations‐related fixed assets. Fixed assets are assets that are normally stationary, for example pumps, blowers, and buildings. The inventory and assessment

shall be based on current conditions and shall be kept up‐to‐date and available for review by the Department. The inventory shall include the following information:

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4/19/2013 4

T he Pr

  • ble ms – At a Glanc e
  • High F

lows of Cle an Wate rRe c e ive d at WWT

F

  • E

ve r y spr ing

  • Dur

ing he avy r ain e ve nts

  • Both infiltr

ation and inflow suspe c te d

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 1/1/2007 7/20/2007 2/5/2008 8/23/2008 3/11/2009 9/27/2009 4/15/2010 11/1/2010 Precipitation, inches Flow, MGD Date

Berlin Township WWTF Influent Flows and Precipitation 2007 ‐ 2010

precipitation Influent Flows Dry Sewage, est

5.144 mgd

Infiltration Inflow

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4/19/2013 5

T he Pr

  • ble ms – At a Glanc e
  • High flows r

e sulte d in:

  • Ope r

ational c halle nge s at the WWT P

  • T

SS % r e moval violation (F e b/ Mar / Apr 2009)

  • E

fflue nt ammonia violations (spr ing 2009)

  • Ope r

ations staff stor ing e xc e ss wate r in the c olle c tion syste m to pr e ve nt pe r mit violations

  • Sanitar

y Se we r Ove r flow (Mar c h 2009)

I/ I E valuation – Analytic al Re vie w

  • SRF

Guide line s: “dr y se wage ” is 70 gpc d

  • T
  • wnship has 3,600 se we r

c ustome r s, or appr

  • x. 4,200 e quivale nt pe ople
  • Dr

y se wage should be ar

  • und 0.29 mgd
  • Annual avg. flow was 0.66 mgd (2007-2010)
  • 0.84 mgd avg Mar

/ Apr / May = 201 gpc d, highe r than 120 gpc d thus “e xc e ssive ” infiltr ation/ inflow

  • 1.5 to 2.0 mgd was not unusual
slide-6
SLIDE 6

4/19/2013 6

Se we r Syste m E valuation Sur ve y

‐ 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 3.500 3/7/2011 3/21/2011 4/4/2011 4/18/2011 5/2/2011 5/16/2011 Wastewater Flow (MGD)

Total Wastewater Flow: St Charles Plus Lilly Patch Lift Stations

St Charles Lilly Patch WWTP Influent

  • Analytic al r

e vie w indic ate d both infiltr ation and inflow … but ove r flows we r e at L illy Patc h

  • Pur

pose of SSE S: ide ntify spe c ific sour c e s of infiltr ation & inflow

SSE S Se tup / Appr

  • ac h
  • Re lative ly lar

ge c olle c tion syste m for the numbe r

  • f se we r

use r s (22.5 mile s)

  • Many smalle r

se we r s fe e ding two main tr unk se we r s into the WWT P

  • Ne e de d: c ost e ffe c tive way to do SSE

S

slide-7
SLIDE 7

4/19/2013 7

SSE S Se tup / Appr

  • ac h
  • T

he “old way” of c olle c ting SSE S Data

  • “He y, ya

wanna be

  • n my

stor m te am?

SSE S Se tup / Appr

  • ac h
  • “Mass F

low Monitor ing”

  • Ine xpe nsive – r

e ntal was $4/ day pe r “F lostic k”

  • E

asy installation – no c onfine d spac e e ntr y

  • Many data c olle c tions loc ations

I mage c o urtesy o f F lo Cis Co rp.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

4/19/2013 8

SSE S Se tup / Appr

  • ac h
  • Install the “mass monitor

” se nsor s in ke y manhole s in the syste m

  • Data Colle c te d
  • Waste wate r

te mpe r atur e

  • Wate r

de pth

  • Re lative ve loc ity (“wiggle -waggle ”)
  • Ne ar

c ontinuous data c olle c tion

  • Data c olle c te d e ve r

y 5 minute s at e ac h of 38 loc ations for 9 we e ks We st Distr ic t – divide d into 13 subdistr ic ts

slide-9
SLIDE 9

4/19/2013 9

SSE S Se tup / Appr

  • ac h
  • E

ast Distr ic t - divide d into 3 subdistr ic ts

SSE S Re sults

  • “Mass monitor

ing” allowe d us to pinpoint whic h subdistr ic ts we r e c ontr ibuting I/ I

  • Knowing se we r

diame te r , slope , and de pth of wate r allowe d us to e stimate flow r ate s

  • Pump station flows we r

e e stimate d using pump r un time to he lp c alibr ate flow r ate e stimate

slide-10
SLIDE 10

4/19/2013 10

E xample Inflow Re sult

Water Temp Depth Rainfall

  • F

loStic k #26, inflow indic ate d by inc r e asing de pth c or r e spond to de c r e ase d te mpe r atur e

E xample Infiltr ation Re sult

  • F

loStic k #12, de pths r e main high for a while afte r r ain e ve nt and te mpe r atur e s ar e r e lative ly stable

Rainfall Water Temp Depth

slide-11
SLIDE 11

4/19/2013 11

  • Most of the flow is c oming fr
  • m the

We st Distr ic t

  • Confir

me d that the E ast Distr ic t pr e viously line d, only c ontr ibute d minimal inflow, not muc h infiltr ation

SSE S – Summar y of Re sults SSE S – Summar y of Re sults

  • Confir

me d sur c har ging of the main tr unk se we r dur ing lar ge r r ain e ve nts as ope r ator use s c olle c tion syste m for stor age to ke e p WWT P in c omplianc e

  • SSO in manhole in E

ast Distr ic t was due to a “hydr aulic r

  • adbloc k”
  • Pr

ior itize d ke y se gme nts for impr

  • ve me nts
slide-12
SLIDE 12

4/19/2013 12

Total Wet Weather Total Inflow can be Infiltration/Inflow Inflow Removed Total Infiltration can be Infiltration Removed Remainder Prioritized - North Swan Creek Area – segment to be lined/rehab’d as part of SRF Project

slide-13
SLIDE 13

4/19/2013 13

Gr

  • und-tr

uth the Mass Monitor ing

Wikipe dia:

  • Ground truth a term used in remote sensing;

refers to information collected on location.

  • Verifies image data to real features and

materials on the ground

Gr

  • und-tr

uth the Mass Monitor ing

  • Syste m-wide smoke

te sting

  • T

e le vising of ke y se we r se gme nts

~5mi/ 22.5mi

  • Confir

me d r e sults of SSE S

slide-14
SLIDE 14

4/19/2013 14

Gr

  • und-tr

uth the Mass Monitor ing

  • Smoke T

e sting

Gr

  • und-tr

uth the Mass Monitor ing

slide-15
SLIDE 15

4/19/2013 15

Gr

  • und-tr

uth the Mass Monitor ing

  • Smoke T

e sting

  • Se we r

T e le vising

Gr

  • undtr

uthing of Mass Monitor ing

slide-16
SLIDE 16

4/19/2013 16

  • Se we r

T e le vising

Gr

  • undtr

uthing of Mass Monitor ing

Ove r all Re sult

  • Pr

ior itize d Re habilitation

  • T
  • wnship did not have to line e ntir

e le ngths of lar ge diame te r tr unk se we r s

  • Ke y manhole s
  • E

xpe c te d $2.25M r e duc tion in Pr

  • je c t

Se we r Re hab Compone nt

  • Cost fr
  • m $3.75M => $1.5M
slide-17
SLIDE 17

4/19/2013 17

Ove r all Re sult

  • Unde r

c onstr uc tion 2012-13

  • $150K Mass F

low Monitor ing/ Analysis $160K CCT V, Smoke T e sts, Inspe c t’ns ~$2M c onstr uc tion sc ope r e duc tion

  • Post-c onstr

uc tion validation planne d to me asur e amount of I/ I r e move d & c onfir m it me t T

  • wnship’s goals of 40%

r e moval

So …What’s Ne w?

  • Mass Monitor

ing … for c ost r e duc tions, impr

  • ve d data, BIG data e ve r

y stor m

  • Confine d spac e e ntr

y? nope

  • T

ar ge te d CCT V wor k

  • Asse ss the whole syste m with SAW$
  • Re ady for

NPDE S pe r mit

Asse t Manage me nt r e q’s

slide-18
SLIDE 18

4/19/2013 18

Que stions?

Richard Grant P.E. Fleis & VandenBrink Engineering 800.494.5202