case study social media analytics for stance mining
play

Case Study: Social Media Analytics for Stance Mining With Examples - PDF document

<Your Name> Case Study: Social Media Analytics for Stance Mining With Examples From COVID-19 Twitter Analysis Sumeet Kumar sumeetku@andrew.cmu.edu Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems


  1. <Your Name> Case Study: Social Media Analytics for Stance Mining With Examples From COVID-19 Twitter Analysis Sumeet Kumar sumeetku@andrew.cmu.edu Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/ Let’s Define the Terms • Stance is defined as a mental or emotional position adopted with respect to a proposition, a person, an idea, etc. [1]. • Users’ Stance is categorized as: – Pro (Favor) – Con (Anti) – Neutral (or unknown) 1. https://www.thefreedictionary.com/stance 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 2 1

  2. <Your Name> How to Learn Users’ Stance (Pro/Anti)? Prior research on stance mining has appeared in two flavors 1. Language (Text) based Approach [1] 2. Network based Approach [2] 1. SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting Stance in Tweets. Mohammad et al., 2016 2. 2011, Conover, Michael, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew R. Francisco, Bruno Gonçalves, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. "Political polarization on twitter." ICWSM 133 (2011): 89-96 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 3 Prior work on Language Based Stance Learning is Mostly Supervised which Requires Labeled data. Labeling data is Expensive. Gun Gun Contr ol Tweet Target/Topic Stance (Pro/Anti) SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting Stance in Tweets. Mohammad et al., 2016 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 4 2

  3. <Your Name> Stance could also be learned from other multi-modal interactions (Networks) 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 5 Network Based Stance Learning Methods are often Semi-Supervised, so Require Less Labeled Data. However, they can’t handle isolates Right Leaning Users Left Leaning Users 2011, Conover, Michael, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew R. Francisco, Bruno Gonçalves, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. "Political polarization on twitter." ICWSM 133 (2011): 89-96 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 6 3

  4. <Your Name> In a Real (un-processed) Network, the Isolates in the Network form a Good Fraction of the Dataset Twitter Users A retweets-based Network Unprocessed gun-control conversations on after removing the isolates Twitter Collected by searching gun-control Conover et al. Political polarization on twitter." ICWSM 133 (2011): 89-96 related terms. Links are based on Retweets. 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 7 Three Main Challenges in Existing Approaches to Stance Mining 1.Most language-based stance mining models use supervised machine learning which is expensive 2.Network based semi-supervised approaches require less labeled data but cannot handle isolates 3.Topics change fast and new topics emerge which make the problem more challenging 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 8 4

  5. <Your Name> Goal of this New Methodology: Can we Combine the Strengths of Text based Methods and Networks based Methods? Network based Stance Learner Predict the Stance of All Users in a Realistic Network Text based Stance Learner 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 9 Co-Training on Social Networks: A Joint Network Label Propagation and Text Classification Approach for Stance Mining [2] Extract Data Step 2 Step 1 Input #GunControlNow: Pro #2ndAmendment: Anti Model Training Step 3 Gun-control users’ Red nodes are `Pro’ and Network. Links Green nodes are `Anti’ Users represent retweets- based interactions. 2. Sumeet Kumar, Tom Mitchell, Kathleen M. Carley, Co-Training on Social Networks, Currently under review 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 10 5

  6. <Your Name> Proposed Idea: A Three Step Process Step 3 Step 1 Seed Labeled label_propa Users New Label gation_v2.p ptx Users ‐ Text Label Propagation label_propa to Unlabeled Nodes gation_v2.p Label M ixing Co ‐ Hashtags Graph ptx label_propa Retweets Graph gation_v2.p ptx Extract Text Features Network with Text features Add new `Confident’ Node Labels N ew N ode Labels and Users Networks Text Classifiers’ Predictions of Unlabeled Nodes Updates for the Next Iteration Step 2 Derive stance of other users Label 2 to 4 hashtags from seed users #GunControlNow: Pro #2ndAmendment: Anti 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 11 Step 1: Extract users’ text features and users’ networks from data label_propa gation_v2.p ptx Users ‐ Text label_propa gation_v2.p Users ‐ Hashtags Graph ptx label_propa Users ‐ Retweets Graph gation_v2.p ptx Interactions Extracted text-data and Networks 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 12 6

  7. <Your Name> Step 1: Extract text features and users’ networks from data 1.Extract users text data 2.Extract networks Users’ Text User Tag Weight cenkuygur #IowaCau 1 cuses cenkuygur #NotMeUS 1 Users-Hashtags (Networks) User Retweet Weight spthursby cenkuygur 1 Users-Retweets (Networks) 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 13 Step 2: Label 2 to 4 popular hashtags with clear stance Steps: 1. Use hashtags that appear at the end of tweets 2. Sort hashtags by their popularity 3. Label a few popular hashtags that have clear stance e.g. #GunControlNow 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 14 7

  8. <Your Name> Step 3: A Semi-supervised Approach (Co-Training + Label Propagation) • Semi-supervised approaches of machine learning is suitable for partially labeled data • We use a co-training setting 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 15 What is Co-Training? • Co-training requires two independent New labeled views to train two example separate classifiers (weak learners) iteratively [1] • In the training process, more confident predictions are used as new training data [1] Image Source https://www.slideshare.net/butest/semisupervised-learning 1: Blum, Avrim, and Tom Mitchell. "Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co- training." Proceedings of the eleventh annual conference on Computational learning theory . ACM, 1998. 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 16 8

  9. <Your Name> What is Co-Training? Applied to Website Classification View 1 (website) View 2 (Text on the Links to the website) My advisor is Tom Mitchell and I work on….. Prof. Mitchell’s work on never ending learning … Prof. Mitchell, an expert in machine learning, mentioned … Academic / Non- Academic Webpage Classification Blum, Avrim, and Tom Mitchell. "Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training." Proceedings of the eleventh annual conference on Computational learning theory . ACM, 1998. 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 17 Co-Training could be useful if each data point has two (or more) views New labeled Unlabeled examples examples View 1 View 2 Blum, Avrim, and Tom Mitchell. "Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training." Proceedings of the eleventh annual conference on Computational learning theory . ACM, 1998. 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 18 9

  10. <Your Name> Co-Training on Social-Networks.. What could be the multiple views? New labeled Unlabeled examples examples View 1 Stance from Users’ Interaction Networks User 1 #1 #2 .... #n User 3 0 1 9 User 3 2 0 0 User 4 1 1 1 User 5 0 6 1 Users ‐ Hashtags Matrix View 2 Social Networks Data 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 19 Co-Training on Social Networks - Texts and Networks Could be Considered as Different Views View 1 – Network based Seed Labeled New Label Users Label Propagation to Unlabeled Nodes L a b e l M ix in g Network with Text features Add new `Confident’ Node Labels N e w N o d e L a b e ls View 2 – Text Classifiers’ Predictions of Unlabeled Nodes Text based Updates for the Next Iteration 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 20 10

  11. <Your Name> Co-Training on Social Networks. Texts and Networks form Different Views 1 – Network based Seed Labeled Users New Label Label Propagation to Unlabeled Nodes L a b e l M ix in g Network with Text features Add new `Confident’ Node Labels N e w N o d e L a b e ls 2 – Text based Text Classifiers’ Predictions of Unlabeled Nodes Updates for the Next Iteration Proposed Algorithm 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 21 Classifier 1: Network Classifier – A Label Propagation Model Initialize Step 1 Step 2 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 22 11

  12. <Your Name> Classifier 1: Label propagation on user-user networks has shortcomings • Many Social-Media Networks are bi-partitie i.e. users relate to other entities • Often entities on Social Media follow power law distribution • Converting user-posts network to user-user network explodes the size – For example. 100,000 users and 200 hashtags get converted to 100,000 x 100,000 size user-user network 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 23 Label Propagation Model on Bipartite Networks Stance =-1 Stance =+1 W` 43 > W` 23 • New users are labeled by propagating hashtag stance to users 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 24 12

  13. <Your Name> Label Propagation Model on Bipartite Networks With Influence Functions Stance = -1 Stance = +1 If (W` 43 - W` 23 ) > K • Influence functions are used to filter less confident predictions • In a Linear Threshold function, if a user gets higher then a certain level of influence from the influencers, the user gets influenced • New users are labeled by propagating hashtag stance to users 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 25 Classifier 1: Label Propagation Model on Bipartite Networks Better Suits our Needs • Influence functions are used to filter less confident predictions • Influence functions � ’ and � are threshold functions and used to filter out not confident hashtags and users respectively 7 June 2020 Sumeet Kumar 26 13

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend