Career Readiness FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS OCTOBER 24, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Measuring College and Career Readiness

STATE ASSESSMENT PRESENTATION 2015-2016

FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS OCTOBER 24, 2016

1

Franklin Township Public Schools staff and students will participate in a reflective and shared process to ensure

• wnership for learning. All students will

engage in meaningful, data-driven and individualized instruction in a caring and collaborative learning community that fosters college and career readiness and social/emotional development.

2

INSTRUCTIONAL VISION

 2016 marks the 2nd administration of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and the first opportunity to compare year-to-year results as the following slides will show.  Students took PARCC English Language Arts and Literacy Assessments (ELA/L) in grades 3 – 11.  Students took PARCC Mathematics Assessments in grades 3 – 8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II.

NEW JERSEY’S STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

3

 Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations  Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations  Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations  Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations  Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations

PARCC PERFORMANCE LEVELS

4

FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS / LITERACY

5

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS / LITERACY

COMPARISON OF FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS

SPRING 2015 AND SPRING 2016 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5)

2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Grade de 3 23% 22% 22% 22% 17% 24% 23% 23% 28% 34% 34% 3% 4% 4% Grade de 4 12% 9% 9% 17% 19% 19% 29% 28% 28% 32% 36% 36% 9% 8% 8% Grade de 5 10% 9% 9% 19% 19% 19% 31% 26% 26% 35% 40% 40% 4% 6% 6% Grade de 6 13% 7% 7% 18% 21% 26% 27% 37% 37% 6% 8% 8% Grade de 7 20% 19% 19% 22% 17% 25% 22% 22% 26% 29% 29% 7% 13% Grade de 8 20% 12% 20% 17% 24% 26% 26% 30% 35% 35% 6% 10% Grade de 9 22% 23% 23% 22% 19% 19% 21% 21% 26% 28% 28% 8% 9% 9% Grade de 10 26% 16% 20% 10% 19% 21% 26% 37% 9% 16% Grade de 11* 15% 19% 19% 20% 17% 28% 21% 30% 32% 32% 6% 11% 11%

*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test.

6

% > Level 4 FTPS % > Level 4 State 2015 2016 2015 2016 Grade e 3 31% 38% 38% 44% 48% 48% Grade e 4 41% 43% 43% 51% 54% Grade e 5 39% 46% 46% 51% 53% 53% Grade e 6 43% 46% 46% 49% 52% 52% Grade e 7 33% 41% 52% 56% 56% Grade e 8 36% 45% 45% 51% 55% 55% Grade e 9 34% 37% 39% 49% 49% Grade e 10 10 35% 52% 52% 36% 43% 43% Grade 11 11 36% 42% 42% 41% 39% 39%

7

FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 / 2016 SPRING PARCC SCHOOL VS STATE PROFICIENCY ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

% Change nge in Level vel 1 and Leve vel 2

Franklin Township Public Schools State Grade de 3 6.0% 3.4% Grade de 4 0.1% 0.6% Grade de 5 0.1% 0.9% Grade de 6 3.0% 1.9% Grade de 7 3.0% 3.3% Grade de 8 10.0% .0% 3.0% Grade de 9 2.0% 8.7% Grade de 10 19.0% .0% 7.8%

Grade 11* 1*

1.0% 1.1%

COMPARISON OF FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015-2016 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test.

• An up arrow indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a down arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year.

8

% Change nge in Level vel 4 and Leve vel 5

Franklin Township Public Schools State Grade de 3 7.0% 4.1% Grade de 4 3.0% 0% 2.4% Grade de 5 7.0% 1.7% Grade de 6 3.0% 3.5% Grade de 7 7.0% 0% 4.7% Grade de 8 9.0% 3.6% Grade de 9 2.0% 9.2% Grade de 10 17.0% 7.7%

Grade 11*

7.0% 0.9%

Count t

• f Valid

Test Scores

Not Yet Meeti eting ng (Level evel 1) 1)

Pa Partial ally Meeting ng (Level 2)

Approac achi hing ng Expect ctat ations ns (Level evel 3) Meeti eting ng Expect ctat ations ns (Level evel 4) Excee ceeding ng Expect ctat ation (Level evel 5)

District t % ≥ Level 4 2016 District t % ≥ Level 4 2015 Hispanic or Latino

1,437 21.2% 21.0% 25.1% 30.0% 5.7% 35.7% 22% 22%

Asian

670 3.3% 6.0% 15.4% 50.0% 25.4% 75.4% 69% 69%

Black or African American

1,898 18.2% 21.0% 25.1% 30.0% 5.7% 35.7% 29% 29%

White

623 7.1% 9.8% 18.3% 47.8% 17.0% 64.8% 56% 56%

Two or More Races

55 14.6% 20.0% 21.8% 36.4% 7.3% 43.7% 45% 45%

English Language Learner

198 55.0% 28.8% 11.6% 4.5% 0.0% 4.5% 4% 4%

Economically Disadvantaged

2,195 21.3% 22.8% 27.0% 25.2% 3.6% 28.8% 23% 23%

Students with Disabilities

857 39.1% 28.2% 20.6% 10.3% 1.7% 12% 10%

FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS DISTRICT - SUBGROUPS ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY (GRADES 3-11)

9

QUESTIONS TO GUIDE PARCC DATA REFLECTION

How will we use PARCC data to identify strengths and gaps that exist in our curriculum and instruction? How will we use PARCC data as a tool to address areas in need of improvement or enhancement? How can we provide additional resources and support for our educators to meet the learning needs of all our students?

10

In K-4: 4:  Infusing high quality PD and materials to address foundational reading standards, including phonics and word recognition.  Using Orton-Gillingham in special education settings as needed.  Developing and using more rigorous assessments that align to PARCC, including i-Ready Standards Mastery and local benchmarks that require students to respond to two texts simultaneously as well as to write fan-fiction rather than personal or invented narratives exclusively.

11

ELA INTERVENTIONS

In 5-8: 8:  Continued professional development in using data effectively to address NJSLS ELA standards.  Realigned curriculum in instructional support courses. In 9-12:  ELA Instructional Lab curriculum is used to individualize and target instruction.  Using Grapple protocols to analyze PARCC data, including evidence statements, practice/released items, and district common assessments.

12

ELA INTERVENTIONS

9-12 Continued:  Utilizing revisions to Learning Strategies curriculum to enable 9th graders to build confidence about and

• wnership of their learning.

 Involving teachers in opportunities to engage in Instructional Rounds to identify “problems of practice” and make adjustments in instruction as a result.

13

ELA INTERVENTIONS

FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS MATHEMATICS

14

MATHEMATICS

COMPARISON OF FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS

SPRING 2015 AND SPRING 2016 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS MATHEMATICS

Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5)

2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Grade de 3 10% 12% 20% 15% 15% 26% 23% 23% 37% 35% 35% 7% 14% Grade de 4 6% 9% 9% 23% 19% 19% 27% 27% 38% 38% 38% 5% 6% 6% Grade de 5 4% 6% 6% 28% 19% 19% 34% 27% 31% 38% 38% 4% 10% Grade de 6 9% 9% 9% 27% 26% 26% 31% 29% 29% 29% 29% 29% 3% 6% 6% Grade de 7 10% 12% 23% 25% 25% 35% 34% 34% 29% 28% 28% 3% 1% 1% Grade de 8* 19% 17% 26% 27% 30% 31% 25% 24% 1% 1% 1% Grade de 8 – Alg lgeb ebra ra I 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 4% 1% 1% 82% 79% 79% 11% 20% 20% Alg lgeb ebra ra I 21% 18% 32% 26% 26% 31% 28% 28% 14% 28% 28% 0% 0% 0% Alg lgeb ebra ra II II 29% 33% 33% 35% 22% 22% 33% 19% 19% 17% 22% 22% 3% 4% 4% Geome metr try 11% 9% 9% 27% 31% 21% 36% 36% 21% 21% 1% 3% 3%

*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.

15

% > Level 4 FTPS % > Level 4 State

2015 2016 2015 2016 Grade de 3 44% 50% 50% 45% 52% 52% Grade de 4 43% 44% 44% 40% 47% Grade de 5 35% 48% 48% 41% 47% Grade de 6 32% 35% 35% 41% 43% 43% Grade de 7 32% 29% 29% 37% 39% 39% Grade de 8 26% 25% 25% 24% 26% 26% Alg lgeb ebra ra I – Grad ade 8 93% 99% 99% 36% 41% Alg lgebra bra I 14% 27% Geome metr try 20% 25% 25% 23% 25% 25% Alg lgeb ebra ra II II 22% 24% 24% 27%

16

FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 / 2016 SPRING PARCC SCHOOL VS STATE PROFICIENCY MATHEMATICS

COMPARISON OF FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015-2016 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS MATHEMATICS

*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.

• ALG I totals for State are inclusive of all grade levels participating in test.
• An up arrow indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a down arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year.

17

% Change ge in in Leve vel 1 and Leve vel 2

Franklin Township Public Schools State Grade 3 3.0% 2.8% Grade 4 1.0% 2.5% Grade 5 7.0% .0% 2.3% Grade 6 0.0% 1.0% Grade 7 7.0% 0.9% Grade 8* 0.1% 1.3% Algebra ra I I Grade 8 2.0% 5.0% Algebra ra I I 8.0% Algebra ra II II 1.0% 0.1% Geometr try 6.0% 6.3%

% Change ge in in Leve vel 4 and Leve vel 5

Franklin Township Public Schools State Grade 3 5.0% 6.8% Grade 4 1.0% 5.9% Grade 5 13.0% .0% 6.2% Grade 6 3.0% 2.2% Grade 7 4.0% 1.9% Grade 8* 1.0% 2.1% Algebra ra I I Grade 8 6.0% 5.2% Algebra ra I I 13.0% .0% Algebra ra II II 3.0% 1.1% Geometr try 4.0% 4.6%

Count nt of Valid Test Scores es Not Yet Meeti eting ng (Level evel 1) 1) Partial ally Meeti eting ng (Level evel 2) Approac achi hing ng Expect ctat ations ns (Level evel 3) Meeti eting ng Expect ctat ations ns (Level evel 4) Excee ceeding ng Expect ctat ation (Level evel 5) Dist strict ct % ≥ Level vel 4 2016 2016 Dist strict ct % ≥ Level vel 4 2015 2015

Hispanic or Latino

1,461 16.6% 27.2% 31.8% 23.1% 1.4% 24.5% 19% 19%

Asian

637 3.5% 5.6% 16.0% 53.9% 21.0% 74.9% 71%

Black or African American

1,893 16.2% 27.8% 29.1% 24.7% 2.3% 27.0% 22% 22%

White

603 6.14% 13.1% 25.4% 45.6% 9.8% 55.4% 52% 52%

Two or More Race

56 12.5% 19.6% 23.2% 32.1% 12.5% 44.6% 51%

English Language Learner

236 31.4% 34.7% 23.3% 10.1% 0.0% 10.1% 9% 9%

Economically Disadvantaged

2,221 17.8% 28.3% 30.4% 22.0% 1.6% 23.6% 19% 19%

Students with Disabilities

848 30.4% 36.7% 21.2% 10.1% 1.5% 11.6% 9% 9%

FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2016 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS DISTRICT - SUBGROUP MATHEMATICS (GRADES 3-8, ALG 1, GEO, ALG 2)

18

K-5: 5:  Developed a math Title 1 Extended Learning curriculum.  Maximized our effectiveness with various online platforms that enable parents to support their children at home, including Think Central, Door 24, and First in Math.  Trained staff to incorporate Reciprocal Teaching strategies into daily instruction, as this allows students to talk about and “own” their learning better.

19

MATH INTERVENTIONS

6-8: 8:  Students in these grade levels have extended learning

• pportunities throughout the day.

 i-Ready implementation revisions were created for grades 6-8 with targeted training for Gr. 7 teachers. 9-12:  In Math Skills Lab 9 a Transition to Algebra program was added.  Curriculum was developed for Algebra IA and Algebra IB to address the need for foundational work needed by some of the incoming ninth graders.

20

MATH INTERVENTIONS

9-12 Continued

 Math Skills Lab 12 was further developed; it now includes a partnership with RVCC using MyFoundationLAB online supplemental program to support graduating seniors’ demonstration of college-and-career readiness in math.  Utilized revisions to Learning Strategies curriculum to enable struggling 9th graders to build confidence about and ownership of their learning.

21

6-12 MATH NEXT STEPS

RESOURCES FOR PARENTS

 Information on the new 2015-16 PARCC Student Reports: www.state.nj.us/education/assessment/parcc/scores/  Understanding the student score reports (with translations): understandthescore.org/ S a m p l e r e p o r t

22

FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS NJASK SCIENCE 4 & 8 NJBCT GRADE 11

23

SCIENCE

In In NJASK Science and NJBCT, three levels of proficiency are included: Advanced Proficient (250-300 scale score) Proficient (200-249 scale score) Partially Proficient (100-199 scale score)

24

SCIENCE

2016 NJASK SCIENCE COMPARISON – PROFICIENCY GRADE 4

9.1% 43.9% 47.0% 90.9% 10.2% 40.8% 49.0% 89.8%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient Combined - Proficient & Advanced Proficient

District State

* Total Valid Scores = 538

2016 NJASK SCIENCE COMPARISON – PROFICIENCY GRADE 8

35.7% 45.8% 18.5% 64.3% 27.1% 46.6% 26.3% 72.9%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%

Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient Combined - Proficient & Advanced Proficient

District State

* Total Valid Scores = 507

NJASK SCIENCE – GRADE 4 LONGITUDINAL(3YR)

44.0% 50.0% 47.0% 47.5% 47.2% 49.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% 55.0%

13-14 14-15 15-16

Ad Advan ance ced d Pro roficient icient

43.8% 40.4% 43.9% 45.4% 41.1% 43.4% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

13-14 14-15 15-16

Pro roficie icient nt

12.3% 9.6% 9.1% 11.5% 9.4% 10.2% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0%

13-14 14-15 15-16

Partia tially lly Prof rofici icient ent

District State

NJASK SCIENCE – GRADE 8 LONGITUDINAL(3YR)

17.4% 11.8% 18.5% 27.1% 19.3% 26.3% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%

13-14 14-15 15-16

Ad Advan ance ced d Pro roficie icient

54.5% 52.4% 45.8% 51.8% 57.7% 46.6% 44.0% 46.0% 48.0% 50.0% 52.0% 54.0% 56.0% 58.0% 60.0%

13-14 14-15 15-16

Pro roficient icient

28.0% 35.7% 35.7% 21.0% 23.0% 27.1% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%

13-14 14-15 15-16

Par artially tially Prof rofici icient ent

District State

2016 – NJASK SCIENCE – DISTRICT DEMOGRAPHICS – GRADE 4

Pa Parti tial ally y Pro rofic ficient ent Pro rofic ficient ent Ad Advanced nced Pro rofic ficient ent Combi bine ned d – Pro rofic ficient ent and d Ad Advanced nced Profi roficie ient nt St State e Combi bine ned – Pro rofic ficient ent and Ad Advanced nced Profi roficie ient nt White 7.0% 25.4% 67.6% 93.0% 95.4% Black or African American 9.7% 55.9% 34.4% 90.3% 80.0% Asian 3.0% 17.8% 79.2% 97.0% 96.6% Hispanic or Latino 13.3% 55.8% 30.9% 86.7% 82.5% Economically Disadvantaged 13.7% 55.9% 30.4% 86.3% 81.1% English Language Learners 12.1% 65.2% 22.7% 87.9% 70.0% Special Education 23.4% 50.0% 26.6% 76.6% 77.6%

2016 – NJASK SCIENCE – DISTRICT DEMOGRAPHICS – GRADE 8

Pa Parti tial ally y Pro rofic ficient ent Pro rofic ficient ent Ad Advanced nced Pro rofic ficient ent Combi bine ned d – Pro rofic ficient ent and d Ad Advanced nced Pro rofic ficient ent St State e Combi bine ned – Pro rofic ficient ent and Ad Advanced nced Pro rofic ficient ent White 14.8% 41.0% 44.3% 85.3% 83.9% Black or African American 44.6% 43.2% 12.2% 55.4% 49.9% Asian 10.1% 46.4% 43.5% 89.9% 91.0% Hispanic or Latino 42.8% 50.9% 6.3% 57.2% 57.9% Economically Disadvantaged 50.8% 41.6% 7.6% 49.2% 54.8% English Language Learners 66.7% 33.3% 0.0% 33.3% 30.8% Special Education 68.4% 30.3% 1.3% 31.6% 38.1%

2016 BIOLOGY COMPETENCY TEST - PROFICIENCY

33.2% 38.7% 28.1% 66.8% 43.3% 40.7% 16.0% 56.7%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%

Partial Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient Combined - Proficient & Advanced Proficient

District State

* Total Valid Scores = 491

NJBCT LONGITUDINAL(3YR)

13.4% 11.5% 28.1% 17.1% 13.0% 16.0% 7.0% 12.0% 17.0% 22.0% 27.0% 32.0%

13-14 14-15 15-16

Ad Advan ance ced d Pro roficie icient

45.8% 45.3% 38.7% 43.2% 44.8% 40.7% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

13-14 14-15 15-16

Pro roficient icient

40.8% 43.2% 33.2% 39.7% 42.2% 43.3% 31.0% 33.0% 35.0% 37.0% 39.0% 41.0% 43.0% 45.0% 47.0%

13-14 14-15 15-16

Partia tially lly Prof rofici icient ent

District State

2016 – NJBCT DISTRICT DEMOGRAPHIC

Pa Parti tial ally y Pro rofic ficient ent Pro rofic ficient ent Ad Advanced nced Pro rofic ficient ent Combi bine ned d – Pro rofic ficient ent and d Ad Advanced nced Pro rofic ficient ent St State e Combi bine ned – Pro rofic ficient ent and Ad Advanced nced Pro rofic ficient ent White 13.5% 32.3% 54.2% 86.5% 68.5% Black or African American 40.9% 42.9% 16.3% 59.2% 32.3% Asian 12.3% 30.8% 56.9% 87.7% 83.0% Hispanic or Latino 46.2% 41.2% 12.6% 53.8% 37.7% Economically Disadvantaged 47.3% 41.1% 11.6% 52.7% 35.6% English Language Learners 61.5% 34.6% 3.8% 38.4% 16.6% Special Education 84.4% 15.6% 0.0% 15.6% 22.1%

FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATING CLASS OF 2016

34

GRADUATION INFORMATION

FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL ADVANCED PLACEMENT COURSES OFFERED

 Language & Composition  Literature & Composition  Statistics  Calculus AB  Calculus BC  Biology  Chemistry  Environmental Science  Government & Politics  World History  Spanish  French  Music Theory  Art History  Studio Arts  Physics 1  Physics 2  Physics C  United States History II  Macroeconomics  Microeconomics

FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL ADVANCED PLACEMENT SCORES

Scho hool

• l

Tot

• tals

als 5 4 3 2 1 Tot

• tal

al Number

• f Exams

82 114 140 165 67 568 Percent

• f Total

Exams 14% 20% 25% 29% 12% 100%

* Total AP Students: 288

FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL ADVANCED PLACEMENT SCORES

16.4 13.1 16.9 6.1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Graduating Senior Class - 2016 12th Grade 11th Grade 10th Grade % of St Stude dent nt Populat ulation n Scori ring ng 3+

69% 61% 73% 72% 61% 60% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2015 2016 FHS NJ Global

38

FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL ADVANCED PLACEMENT SCORES 2 YEAR SCHOOL SCORE SUMMARY – SCORES OF 3+

FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL ADVANCED PLACEMENT SCHOLARS

AP Scho holar lar AP Scho holar lar w/ Honor

• r

AP Scholar holar w/ Dis isti tinction nction Natio ional nal AP Scho holar lar Number er of Scho holar lars 36 36 20 20 23 23 2 Ave verag rage e Score re 2.87 3.71 4.08 4.72

 AP Scholar – Students who receive 3 or higher on three or more AP exams  AP Scholar w/Honor – Students who receive an avg. score of at least 3.25

• n all exams taken and 3 or higher on four or more of these exams

 AP Scholar w/ Distinction – Students who receive an avg. score of at least 3.5 on all exams taken and scores of 3 or higher on five or more exams  National AP Scholar – Students who receive an avg. score of at least 4 on all exams taken and scores of 4 or higher on eight or more of these exams.

54% 50% 40% 38% 29% 61% 41% 44% 35% 25% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

ACT English (Benchmark Score = 18) ACT Math (Benchmark Score = 22) ACT Reading (Benchmark Score = 22) ACT Science (Benchmark Score = 23) Student Who Met All 4 ACT Benchmark Scores

FHS National

111 Students took the ACT in comparison to 418 who took the SAT 40

FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL ACT STUDENTS THAT MET BENCHMARK SCORE

SAT SCORES BY AREA

455 477 451 495 514 492 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 Critical Reading Mathematics Writing Franklin State

*New SAT test was given for 2016

FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATE

85.2 84.1 .1 87.7 10 10 20 20 30 30 40 40 50 50 60 60 70 70 80 80 90 90 100 100 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016

FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL POST-SECONDARY PLANS CLASS OF 2016

4 Yr College, 52.0% 2 Yr College, 31.0% Work / Military / Other, 17.0%

% of students ents

Measuring College and Career Readiness

STATE ASSESSMENT PRESENTATION 2015-2016

FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS OCTOBER 24, 2016

44